Toward zero mortality in acute epidural hematoma: A review in 268 cases problems and challenges in the developing country

Practical pearls for management of cranial injury in the developing world

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with approximately 69 million individuals affected globally each year, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where neurosurgical resources are limited. The neurocognitive consequences of TBI range from life-threatening conditions to more subtle impairments such as cognitive deficits, impulsivity, and behavioral changes, significantly impacting patients' reintegration into society. LMICs bear about 70% of the global trauma burden, with causes of TBI differing from high-income countries (HICs). The lack of equitable neurosurgical care in LMICs exacerbates these challenges. Improving TBI care in LMICs requires targeted resource allocation, neurotrauma registries, increased education, and multidisciplinary approaches within trauma centers. Reports from successful neurotrauma initiatives in low-resource settings provide valuable insights into safe, adaptable strategies for managing TBI when "gold standard" protocols are unfeasible. This review discusses common TBI scenarios in LMICs, highlighting key epidemiological factors, diagnostic challenges, and surgical techniques applicable to resource-limited settings. Specific cases, including epidural hematoma, subdural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and cerebrospinal fluid leaks, are explored to provide actionable insights for improving neurosurgical outcomes in LMICs.

Clinical Outcome of Patients Diagnosed Traumatic Intracranial Epidural Hematoma With Severe Brain Injury (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8) Who Undergo Surgery: A Report From the Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in surgically treated patients with severe brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤8) diagnosed with traumatic epidural hematoma (EDH).

METHODS

From January 2018 to June 2021, 1,122 patients with an initial GCS score ≤8 were retrospectively enrolled in the Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System. Clinical data of 79 surgically treated patients with EDH were compared between the unfavorable (scores of 1-4 on the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended [GOSE]) and favorable (score of 5-8 on the GOSE) outcome groups.

RESULTS

The overall mortality rate was 13.9%, and 60.8% of the patients had good outcomes at six months post-trauma. In the univariate analysis, increasing age (p=0.010), lower initial GCS score (p=0.001), higher Rotterdam computed tomography (CT) score (p=0.012), craniotomy rather than craniectomy (p=0.032), larger EDH volume (p=0.007), and loss of pupillary reactivity (unilateral unreactive pupil, p=0.026; bilateral unreactive pupils, p<0.001), were significantly correlated with unfavorable outcomes. Of these factors, increasing age (p=0.011) and bilateral unreactive pupils (p=0.002) were the most significant risk factors in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The interval from admission to the brain CT scan was not correlated with the outcome; however, it was significantly longer in the unfavorable outcome group.

CONCLUSION

Despite severe brain injury, more than half of the patients with EDH had favorable outcomes after surgical treatment. Our findings suggest that prompt diagnosis and surgical treatment should be considered for such cases.

Emergency Craniotomy and Burr-Hole Trephination in a Low-Resource Setting: Capacity Building at a Regional Hospital in Cambodia

To evaluate the teaching effect of a trauma training program in emergency cranial neurosurgery in Cambodia on surgical outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). We analyzed the data of TBI patients who received emergency burr-hole trephination or craniotomy from a prospective, descriptive cohort study at the Military Region 5 Hospital between January 2015 and December 2016. TBI patients who underwent emergency cranial neurosurgery were primarily young men, with acute epidural hematoma (EDH) and acute subdural hematoma (SDH) as the most common diagnoses and with long transfer delay. The incidence of favorable outcomes three months after chronic intracranial hematoma, acute SDH, acute EDH, and acute intracerebral hematoma were 96.28%, 89.2%, 93%, and 97.1%, respectively. Severe traumatic brain injury was associated with long-term unfavorable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale of 1–3) (OR = 23.9, 95% CI: 3.1–184.4). Surgical outcomes at 3 months appeared acceptable. This program in emergency cranial neurosurgery was successful in the study hospital, as evidenced by the fact that the relevant surgical capacity of the regional hospital increased from zero to an acceptable level.

Influence of Decompressive Craniectomy Post Evacuation of Epidural Hematoma in Comatose Patients

BACKGROUND

Epidural hematoma causing brain herniation is a major cause of mortality and morbidity after severe traumatic brain injury, even if surgical treatment is performed quickly. Decompression may be effective in decreasing intracranial pressure, but its effect on outcomes remains unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of deeply comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score 3-5) who underwent surgical treatment during a 12-year period, either via osteoplastic craniotomy (OC) or decompressive craniectomy, was carried out. Patient groups were compared on the basis of demographics, admission clinical state, head computed tomography imaging characteristics, and discharge outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were examined. The first group of 31 patients (52%) needed decompression during primary surgery. The second group of 29 patients (48%) underwent OC with evacuation of epidural hematoma without decompression. Both patient groups were similar according to age (40.9 ± 13 vs. 40.6 ± 12.5 years), Glasgow Coma Scale score before surgery (4 [3-5] vs. 4 [3-5]), hematoma thickness (based on computed tomography) (3.44 ± 1 vs. 3.36 ± 1.62 cm), and midline shift (1.42 ± 0.83 vs. 1.36 ± 0.9 cm). Mortality was more evident in the decompression group (45.2% vs. 13.8%; P = 0.008), and the Glasgow Outcome Score was also lower, 2.26 ± 1.5 versus 3.45 ± 1.5 (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Decompressive craniectomy following the evacuation of an acute epidural hematoma in deeply comatose patients demonstrated inferior outcomes in comparison with OC. Brain injury in the decompressive craniectomy patient group was more severe (concomitant subdural hematoma, early brain ischemia, and early brain herniation), which may have influenced the outcome. Further prospective studies are needed.

Duret Hemorrhage after Extradural Hematoma Evacuation–A Rare Entity

Traumatic brainstem injury can be classified as primary or secondary. Secondary brainstem hemorrhage that evolves from raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and transtentorial herniation is referred to as Duret hemorrhage. We report a 25-year-old male who underwent emergency craniotomy, with evacuation of acute epidural hematoma, and postoperatively developed fatal Duret hemorrhage. Duret hemorrhage after acute epidural hematoma (EDH) evacuation is a very rare complication and the outcome is grave in most of the cases.

Risk Factors and Prognostic Value of Swirl Sign in Traumatic Acute Epidural Hematoma

Objective: Acute epidural hematoma (AEDH) is one of the deadliest lesions in patients after traumatic brain injury. AEDH with swirl sign progresses rapidly and requires timely surgical treatment. This study aims to investigate the risk factors for the occurrence of AEDH with swirl sign and its prognostic value.

Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on 131 AEDH patients, who were divided into swirl sign group and non-swirl sign group based on the brain computed tomographic (CT) scan. Patient information, including gender, age, hypertension, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission, time from injury to CT scan, pupillary light reactivity on admission, midline shift, location of hematoma, hematoma volume on admission, oral anticoagulation, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 3 months were collected. Univariate analysis was used to determine the risk factors for the occurrence of swirl sign. The factors with P < 0.05 were recruited into the multivariate logistic regression analysis and predictive receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve model.

Results: Univariate analysis demonstrated that the GCS score on admission (P = 0.007), pupillary light reactivity (P = 0.003), location of hematoma (P < 0.0001), and GOS score at 3 months (P = 0.007) were risk factors for the occurrence of swirl sign. Multivariate logistic regression model revealed that the location of hematoma (OR = 0.121; 95% CI: 0.019–0.786; P = 0.027) was an independent risk factor for swirl sign, and the occurrence of swirl sign was a significant predictor of unfavorable neurological outcomes (OR = 0.100; 95% CI: 0.016–0.630; P = 0.014). ROC curves demonstrated that the GCS score on admission (AUC = 0.655; 95% CI: 0.506–0.804), pupillary light reactivity (AUC = 0.625; 95% CI: 0.474–0.777) and location of hematoma (AUC = 0.788; 95% CI: 0.682–0.893) can predict the occurrence of swirl sign, respectively. Remarkably, the combination of these three factors (AUC = 0.829; 95% CI: 0.753–0.906) provided a greater power to predict the swirl sign.

Conclusion: GCS score on admission, pupillary light reactivity, and location of hematoma are risk factors for the occurrence of swirl sign, respectively. The combination of these three factors might be used to predict whether there is swirl sign in AEDH after traumatic brain injury. Furthermore, swirl sign can be used as an effective predictor of poor prognosis in patients.