Risk factors associated with CSF leakage and complications after retrosigmoid surgery

Skull Base Repair following Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review (Part 2: The Translabyrinthine Approach)

Objectives  Despite advances in skull base reconstruction techniques, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks remain a relatively common complication after translabyrinthine (TL) vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize the repair techniques and materials used in TL VS surgery to prevent CSF leaks. Design  A systematic review of studies published since 2000 reporting techniques to prevent CSF leaks during adult TL VS surgery was conducted. A narrative synthesis of primary repair protocols was produced, and a taxonomy was established. Additionally, the advantages, disadvantages, and associated CSF leak rates of different repair protocols were extracted. Results  All 43 studies were case series, and 39 were retrospective. Repair strategies included heterogeneous combinations of autografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials. A taxonomy was produced, classifying repairs into seven distinct stages, including approaches to the dura, middle ear cleft, air cells, TL bony defect, extra-cranial soft tissue, postoperative dressings, and CSF diversion. The median postoperative incidence of CSF leaks was 6% (interquartile range: 0-10%). Conclusions  This systematic review reveals substantial inter-institutional heterogeneity in intraoperative strategies to prevent CSF leaks following TL VS surgery. However, comparing these techniques is challenging due to the multiple predictive factors for CSF leaks and their inconsistent reporting. We propose a taxonomy of seven stages to classify operative techniques and materials aimed at preventing CSF leaks. We recommend that future evaluations should adopt a prospective approach encompassing data collection strategies that considers all operative stages described by our taxonomy.

Skull Base Repair following Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review (Part 1: The Retrosigmoid Approach)

Objective  Despite advances in skull-base reconstruction techniques, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks remain a common complication following retrosigmoid (RS) vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. We aimed to review and classify the available strategies used to prevent CSF leaks following RS VS surgery. Methods  A systematic review, including studies of adults undergoing RS VS surgery since 2000, was conducted. Repair protocols were synthesized into a narrative summary, and a taxonomic classification of techniques and materials was produced. Additionally, the advantages, disadvantages, and associated CSF leak rates of different repair protocols were described. Results  All 42 studies were case series, of which 34 were retrospective, and eight were prospective. Repair strategies included heterogeneous combinations of autografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials. A repair taxonomy was produced considering seven distinct stages to CSF leak prevention, including intraoperative approaches to the dura, internal auditory canal (IAC), air cells, RS bony defect, extracranial soft tissue, postoperative dressings, and CSF diversion. Notably, there was significant heterogeneity among institutions, particularly in the dural and IAC stages. The median postoperative incidence of CSF leaks was 6.3% (IQR: 1.3-8.44%). Conclusions  The intraoperative strategies used to prevent CSF leaks during RS VS surgery vary between and within institutions. As a result of this heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting of CSF leak predictive factors, a meaningful comparative analysis of repair protocols was not feasible. Instead, we propose the development of a prospective multicenter observational evaluation designed to accurately capture a comprehensive dataset of potential CSF risk factors, including all stages of the operative repair protocol.

Functional outcomes after retrosigmoid approach to the cerebellopontine angle: Observations from a single-center experience of over 13 years

Introduction

Accessing the posterior base of the skull is complex because of the vital neurovascular structures in the area. However, the retrosigmoid approach (RSA) offers a solution to this challenge.

Research question

To analyze surgical outcome of RSA.

Material and methods

This study involved a retrospective review of patient charts from a single center, focusing on the surgical procedure and outcomes following the operation.

Results

The study included 517 patients suffering from conditions like vestibular schwannomas (VS), metastatic cancers, and trigeminal neuralgia. The most frequent symptoms reported were balance disorders (42.7%), hearing loss (36.5%), walking difficulties (21.2%), headaches (18.9%), facial pain (17.1%), issues with trigeminal nerve function (14.1%), cerebellar dysfunction (13.5%), and facial nerve paralysis (10.2%). The rate of complications stood at 21.1%, with 11.3% of patients needing revision surgery. The median score on the Clavien-Dindo scale was 2, and the rate of mortality related to surgery was 1.0%. Permanent symptom improvement was seen in 72.1% of cases. Temporary new deficits occurred in 43.2% of patients, with facial nerve paralysis being the most common (14.1%). No significant correlation was found between the size of the craniotomy and the extent of tumor resection (p = 0.155), except in the case of VS (p = 0.041). Larger craniotomy sizes were associated with higher rates of complications (p = 0.016), especially CSF leaks (p = 0.006). Complications significantly affected the likelihood and number of new deficits (p < 0.001 for both), particularly postoperative bleeding (p = 0.019, p = 0.001), CSF leaks (p = 0.026, p = 0.039), and hydrocephalus (p = 0.050, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

The potential for complications related to the surgical approach cannot be overlooked. The size of the tumor should not dictate larger surgical approaches due to the associated increase in postoperative complications; a tailored approach that considers the precise tumor location and pathology is crucial for optimizing postoperative outcomes.

Risk Factors and Management of Incisional Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage After Craniotomy: A Retrospective International Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Incisional cerebrospinal fluid (iCSF) leakage is a serious complication after intradural cranial surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and risk factors of iCSF leakage after craniotomy. Secondarily, the complications after iCSF leakage and the success rate of iCSF leakage treatment was studied.

METHODS

All patients who underwent an intradural cranial surgery from 2017 to 2018 at 5 neurosurgical centers were retrospectively included. Data were retrieved from medical records with 2 months of follow-up. First, univariate regression analyses were performed. Subsequently, identified risk factors were evaluated in a multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total 2310 consecutive patients were included. Total iCSF leakage rate was 7.1% (n = 165). Younger age, male, higher body mass index, smoking, infratentorial surgery, and use of a dural substitute were associated with increased iCSF leakage risk, and use of a sealant reduced that risk. The odds for developing a wound infection and/or meningitis were 15 times higher in patients with iCSF leakage compared with patients without leakage. Initial conservative iCSF leakage treatment failed in 48% of patients. In 80% of cases, external cerebrospinal fluid drainage ceased the iCSF leakage. A total of 32% of patients with iCSF leakage required wound revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

iCSF leakage risk increases by younger age, higher body mass index, smoking, infratentorial craniotomy, and dural substitute use, whereas sealant use reduced the risk for iCSF leakage. The leak increases the risk of postoperative infections. When iCSF leakage occurs, immediate external cerebrospinal fluid drainage or wound revision should be considered.

Keyhole retrosigmoid approach without watertight dural closure - Evaluation of a minimalistic approach

BACKGROUND

The retrosigmoid craniotomy is a versatile surgical approach to the cerebellopontine angle though cerebrospinal fluid leak remains a concern, with a reported prevalence of 0-22 %. A host of closure materials and strategies have been proposed to achieve a watertight dural closure to varying degrees of success. We review our series of keyhole retrosigmoid craniotomies and describe our simple, standardized method of closure without watertight dural closure.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all retrosigmoid craniotomies performed by the senior author was completed. Closure was achieved by placing an oversized piece of gelatin in the subdural space. The dura is grossly approximated. An oversized sheet of collagen matrix is placed as an overlay followed by gelatin sponge in the craniectomy defect held in place with titanium mesh. The superficial layers are approximated. The skin is closed with a running sub-cuticular suture followed by skin glue. Patient demographics, cerebrospinal fluid leak risk factors, and surgical outcomes were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were included. There was one case (0.9 %) of CSF leak, which resolved with placement of a lumbar drain for 5 days. The patient had one defined risk factor (morbid obesity, BMI 41.0 kg/m²).

CONCLUSIONS

Obtaining a watertight dural layer closure has been the generally accepted strategy in preventing CSF leaks in a traditional retrosigmoid approach. In keyhole retrosigmoid approaches it may not be necessary by utilizing a simple gelfoam bolstered collagen matrix onlay technique potentially improving outcome measures including operative time.

Rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak and pseudomeningocele formation after posterior fossa craniotomy versus craniectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a major concern after posterior fossa surgery with significant clinical implications. It has been postulated that replacing the bone flap, performing a craniotomy, would reinforce the surgical closure and decrease rates of CSF leak. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the rate of CSF leak after posterior fossa craniotomies versus craniectomies.

Methods

Three databases were searched for English studies comparing the primary outcome, rate of CSF leak, after adult posterior fossa craniotomies versus craniectomies. Secondary outcomes included the rate of postoperative pseudomeningocele formation, CSF leak and pseudomeningocele formation, CSF diversion, revision surgery, and infection. Pooled estimates and relative risks for dichotomous outcomes were calculated using Review Manager 5.4, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 1250 patients (635 craniotomies and 615 craniectomies), from nine studies, were included in the final analysis. Even though rates of CSF leak favored craniotomies, the difference did not reach statistical significance in our pooled analysis (Risk Ratio: 0.71, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.45-1.14, p-value = 0.15, Heterogeneity I-squared = 0%). On the other hand, comparing the rates of pseudomeningocele formation and CSF leak, as a combined outcome, or pseudomeningocele formation only showed a significant difference favoring craniotomies. The quality of evidence in this meta-analysis was graded as having a high risk of bias based on the risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of exposure criteria.

Conclusion

Based on evidence with high risk of bias, rates of postoperative CSF leak and pseudomeningocele formation favored posterior fossa craniotomies over craniectomies. Further research with more robust methodology is required to validate these findings.

The incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage after elective cranial surgery: a systematic review

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a major complication after elective neurosurgical procedures. The aim of this systematic literature review is to summarize the incidence rates of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage for neurosurgical procedures, classified by surgical approach. The Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies reporting the outcome of patients undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures. The number of patients, surgical approach, and indication for surgery were recorded for each study. Outcomes related to CSF leakage such as clinical manifestation and treatment were reported as well. One hundred and thirteen studies were included, reporting 94,695 cases. Overall, CSF leaks were present in 3.8% of cases. Skull base surgery had the highest rate of CSF leakage with 6.2%. CSF leakage occurred in 5.9% of anterior skull base procedures, 6.4% of middle fossa, and 5.2% of transpetrosal surgeries. 5.8% of reported infratentorial procedures were complicated by CSF leakage versus 2.9% of supratentorial surgeries. CSF leakage remains a common serious adverse event after cranial surgery. There exists a need for standardized procedures to reduce the incidence of postoperative CSF leakage, as this serious adverse event may lead to increased health care costs.