Medical education in India: Problems and solutions

Delay in seeking medical help in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in India: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease with varied articular and extra-articular manifestations. In developing countries such as India patients with RA often delay seeking medical advice which may impact prognosis and disease burden.

AIM

To explore perceptions and experiences of patients living in India in seeking medical help for their RA symptoms.

METHODS

Clinician-diagnosed RA participants from different socioeconomic backgrounds were interviewed using a semi-structured topic guide. Participants were purposively selected and interviewed following an iterative approach. All interviews were recorded and transcribed by an independent company and analyzed using a thematic framework. Findings were reported in accordance with consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty participants (13 male, 7 female) with median age 40 years (35.7-46.5) were recruited. Three overarching themes demonstrating participants' experiences and reasons for delay in seeking medical help were identified. (1) "Symptoms perspectives and delay in participants' journey" narrated participants' experiences of having RA symptoms, how these were perceived, rationalized and led to delay. (2) "Participants' experience of the healthcare system" illustrated delay in referral, reaching diagnosis and treatment initiation highlighting their experiences with the health system. (3) "Recommendations for improving care" where participants made recommendations for reducing the delay at local and national levels.

CONCLUSION

This is the first qualitative study which explored perceptions and experiences of RA patients in India resulting in delay. Improved provision of rheumatology care, effective referral system and greater involvement of government at local and national levels are needed to improve the delay in seeking medical help for Indian patients.

Two Indias: The structure of primary health care markets in rural Indian villages with implications for policy

We visited 1519 villages across 19 Indian states in 2009 to (a) count all health care providers and (b) elicit their quality as measured through tests of medical knowledge. We document three main findings. First, 75% of villages have at least one health care provider and 64% of care is sought in villages with 3 or more providers. Most providers are in the private sector (86%) and, within the private sector, the majority are ‘informal providers' without any formal medical training. Our estimates suggest that such informal providers account for 68% of the total provider population in rural India. Second, there is considerable variation in quality across states and formal qualifications are a poor predictor of quality. For instance, the medical knowledge of informal providers in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka is higher than that of fully trained doctors in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. Surprisingly, the share of informal providers does not decline with socioeconomic status. Instead, their quality, along with the quality of doctors in the private and public sector, increases sharply. Third, India is divided into two nations not just by quality of health care providers, but also by costs: Better performing states provide higher quality at lower per-visit costs, suggesting that they are on a different production possibility frontier. These patterns are consistent with significant variation across states in the availability and quality of medical education. Our results highlight the complex structure of health care markets, the large share of private informal providers, and the substantial variation in the quality and cost of care across and within markets in rural India. Measuring and accounting for this complexity is essential for health care policy in India.

•

In 2010, the average Indian village had 3.2 primary healthcare providers.

•

Of these, 86% were in the private sector and 68% had no formal medical training.

•

In richer states, the share of informal providers did not decrease—quality improved.

•

In high-performing states, quality was higher and per-patient costs were lower.

•

The density and variation of health market cost and quality has policy implications.