Pertrochanteric femur fracture at the proximal end of a retrograde intramedullary nail—a case report

Peri-implant fractures proximal to a long retrograde femoral nail – A case series

Low energy peri-trochanteric fractures may happen in the presence of a retrograde nail in the femur. The management of these peri-implant fractures are very rarely reported. This is a series of seven cases from a level one trauma centre in Hong Kong. All fractures arose from low energy falls and were either inter-trochanteric or subtrochanteric. Removal of previous implants to allow cephalo-medullary fixation of the new fracture could be considered, but this is often difficult, time-consuming, and may inflict damage to the articular cartilage. Furthermore, this is not an option if the distal fracture is not yet well healed. Six of the seven fractures presented here were treated operatively with an extra-medullary device fixed to the proximal shaft with cerclage cables. The choice of fixation implants were based on the fracture type and available space above the proximal end of the retrograde nail. All seven fractures healed with no implant failure and major complications. There were no thirty-day and one-year mortality. A treatment algorithm is proposed for the management of these uncommon but difficult cases.

Subtrochanteric fractures after retrograde femoral nailing

Secondary fractures around femoral nails placed for the management of hip fractures are well known. We report, two cases of a fracture of the femur at the interlocking screw site in the subtrochanteric area after retrograde femoral nailing of a femoral shaft fracture. Only a few reports in the existing literature have described these fractures. Two young men after sustaining a fall presented to us with pain, swelling and deformity in the upper thigh region. On enquiring, examining and radiographing them, peri-implant fractures of subtrochanteric nature through the distal interlocking screws were revealed in both patients who also had histories of previous falls for which retrograde intramedullary nailing was performed for their respective femora. Both patients were managed with similar surgical routines including removal of the existing hardware, open reduction and ace cephallomedullary antegrade nailing. The second case did show evidence of delayed healing and was additionally stabilized with cerclage wires. Both patients had uneventful postoperative outcomes and union was evident at the end of 6 mo postoperatively with a good range of motion at the hip and knee. Our report suggests that though seldom reported, peri-implant fractures around the subtrochanteric region can occur and pose a challenge to the treating orthopaedic surgeon. We suggest these be managed, after initial stabilization and resuscitation, by implant removal, open reduction and interlocking intramedullary antegrade nailing. Good results and progression to union can be expected in these patients by adhering to basic principles of osteosynthesis.