The effects of a displaced dorsal rim fracture on outcomes after volar plate fixation of a distal radius fracture

Size and fixation options of dorsoulnar fragments in distal radius fractures

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the influence of size and fixation options of dorsoulnar fragments on the clinical outcomes of distal radius fractures (DRFs).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was performed on 94 patients with DFR accompanied by dorsoulnar fragments, spanning the period from October 2018 to November 2022. Mean follow-up was 15.5 (range, 12-20) months. Patients were divided into small- (<5 %, n = 28), middle- (5-15 %, n = 50), and large- (>15 %, n = 16) sized groups according to articular involvement of dorsoulnar fragments determined by three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) modeling. Subdivision also took place for the presence of postoperative fragment displacement (>2 mm) and fixation methods including volar locking plate (VLP), VLP combined with dorsal hollow compression screw (VDS), and VLP combined with dorsal low-profile mini plate (VDP). The radiographic parameters (volar tilt, radial inclination, and radial height) and functional outcome measures of wrist range of motion, wrist function (DASH, PRWE), and wrist pain (VAS) were evaluated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Fracture healing was observed in all patients at final follow-up. No instances of dorsoulnar fragment displacement were observed in patients undergoing VDS and VDP treatment and the incidence of the dorsoulnar fragment displacement was 35 % (n = 8) in small-sized group, 21 % (n = 7) in middle-sized group, and 7 % (n = 1) in large-sized group when patients were treated with VLP. In small-sized group, no significant differences were found between patients with and without dorsoulnar fragment displacement in dorsiflexion restriction (10.6 ± 2.8°, 9.1 ± 2.3°, P = 0.159), pronosupination restriction (9.6 ± 2.1°, 8.6 ± 1.7°, P = 0.188), DASH (11.5 ± 4.1, 10.7 ± 3.2, P = 0.562), PRWE (11.9 ± 4.2, 10.6 ± 3.6, P = 0.425), and VAS (1.1 ± 1.1, 0.9 ± 1.0, P = 0.528). In middle-sized combined with large-sized group, the functional outcome measures of dorsiflexion restriction (12.5 ± 3.7°, 9.8 ± 2.9°, P = 0.022), DASH (14.6 ± 5.2, 11.4 ± 3.7, P = 0.030), and PRWE (15.0 ± 4.5, 11.3 ± 3.9, P = 0.016) were superior in patients without dorsoulnar fragment displacement. In patients treated with VLPs, no significant differences were found in dorsiflexion restriction (9.8 ± 2.5°, 10.8 ± 3.5°, 9.4 ± 2.5°, P = 0.299), pronosupination restriction (9.2 ± 1.9°, 10.1 ± 2.8°, 8.9 ± 1.5°, P = 0.200), DASH (11.1 ± 3.5, 12.9 ± 4.3, 11.1 ± 3.6, P = 0.162), PRWE (11.1 ± 3.9, 12.8 ± 4.2, 10.8 ± 3.9, P = 0.188), and VAS (1.0 ± 1.0, 1.4 ± 1.1, 0.9 ± 0.9, P = 0.151) between small-sized, middle-sized, and large-sized groups. In middle-sized group, no significant differences were found in dorsiflexion restriction (10.8 ± 3.5°, 9.4 ± 2.2°, 9.4 ± 2.4°, P = 0.316); pronosupination restriction (10.1 ± 2.8°, 8.8 ± 1.9°, 9.0 ± 2.5°, P = 0.314), DASH (12.9 ± 4.3, 10.3 ± 3.7, 10.5 ± 3.7, P = 0.133), PRWE (12.8 ± 4.2, 10.4 ± 3.8, 10.6 ± 4.1, P = 0.199), and VAS (1.4 ± 1.1, 0.8 ± 0.7, 1.0 ± 1.1, P = 0.201) between subgroups of VLP, VDS, and VDP. No significant differences were found in radiographic parameters between all groups compared.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that the strict reduction and fixation of a dorsoulnar fragment might be not essential when its articular involvement was less than 5 %. The volar locking plate (VLP) fixation was commonly effective in treating distal radius fractures accompanied by a dorsoulnar fragment involving over 15 % of the articular surface. Additionally, the use of an additional dorsal hollow compression screw or a dorsal low-profile mini plate can get good wrist function in the early-term follow-up when the dorsoulnar fragment involve 5-15 % of the articular surface.

Combined approach versus single Henry approach for fixation of die-punch distal radius fractures: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common orthopaedic-related traumas. DRF patients with die-punch fractures have a higher risk of loss of reduction, poorer functional outcomes, and increased risk of complications even after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). According to the three-column theory, the lunate fossa is an important part of the intermediate column for load bearing. When the distal radius fracture involves the lunate fossa, adequate anatomical reduction can have an important impact on the prognosis of wrist function. Herein, we used the combined volar and dorsal approach, and the dorsal approach was used to assist in bone grafting or dorsal plate fixation in reducing fractures. We compare the combined approach versus the Henry approach for the fixation of die-punch distal radius fractures.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who were admitted for surgery for die-punch fractures from January 2016 to June 2021. The patients were followed-up after surgery to measure and evaluate their Gartland-Werley wrist score, wrist range of motion (ROM), and follow-up imaging data.

RESULTS

There were 21 patients in the volar locking plate (VLP) group and 10 patients in the combined approach group. The majority of fractures in the VLP and combined approach groups were AO B and C fractures, respectively. The cause of injury and AO fracture classification showed significant differences between the two groups, and there was no difference in age or sex between the two groups. There was no significant difference in ROM between the two groups, but the VLP group presented a better Gartland-Werley score and volar tilt angle, and the combined group presented better maintenance in radial height and articular congruity.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction through the combined palmar and dorsal approach supplemented by bone grafting or dorsal plate fixation is an effective method for the treatment of die-punch distal radius fractures, which provides a new option for the treatment of die-punch fractures.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation by Volar Locking Plates and the "Poking Reduction" Technique in Distal Radius Fractures with Displaced Dorsal Ulnar Fragments: A Retrospective Study

Objective

To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of distal radius fractures (DRFs) with displaced dorsal ulnar fragments treated with volar locking plate (VLP) and the “poking reduction” technique.

Methods

Between January 2014 and January 2019, 78 unilateral DRFs with displaced dorsal ulnar fragment (AO type C3) treated with VLP were conducted. According to the reduction technique of the dorsal ulnar fragment, the patients were divided into the conventional reduction (CRG) group (33 patients, 14 males and 19 females, mean age 57.2 ± 12.1 years old) and the “poking reduction” (PRG) group (45 patients, 11 males and 34 females, mean age 60.1 ± 12.4 years old). According to the AO classification, there were 21 cases of C3.1 and 12 of C3.2 in the CPG group, 27 cases of C3.1 and 18 of C3.2 in the PRG group. Clinical and radiographic data were extracted from the electronic medical record system. These data were reviewed for clinical outcomes (range of motion, grip strength), radiological outcomes (volar tilt, radial inclination, radial height, step of articular surface), and postoperative complications. The final functional recovery was evaluated by the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score.

Results

The mean duration of follow‐up was 27 months (range from 12 to 56). The average operation time and intraoperative blood loss did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05). Postoperative CT examination showed that the step of articular surface in CPG group (0.8 ± 0.3 mm) was larger than that in PRG group (0.5 ± 0.2 mm) (p < 0.001). The DASH score did not significantly differ between groups (26.1 ± 4.6 in CRG and 24.7 ± 4.0 in PRG, p > 0.05) at 3 months postoperatively. At 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, the DASH score was better in PRG group (11.8 ± 2.5 and 10.4 ± 2.0) than in CRG group (13.6 ± 2.7 and 12.2 ± 2.5) (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, respectively). At 12 months postoperatively, wrist range of motion did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in radiological parameters between the two groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of complications was higher in the CRG group (7/33) than in the PRG group (2/45) (p = 0.009).

Conclusion

The “poking reduction” technique is a wise option for reduction of dorsal ulnar fragment in DRFs. This innovative technique could restore smoothness of the radiocarpal joint effectively, and the dorsal ulnar fragment could be fixed effectively combined with the volar plate.

Effect of the Articular Surface Incongruency on Surgical Outcome of the Distal Radius Fracture

Purpose

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the joint fragment that mostly affects the outcome of the distal radius fracture surgically treated with a volar locking plate (VLP).

Methods

The outcomes of 69 patients with the distal radius fractures were evaluated at their final follow-up. The articular surface was divided into six specific fragments, and computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate the degree of mismatch of each fragments. A plain radiograph was also obtained for evaluation of the distal radius alignment. Clinical outcomes were measured by using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS). Univariate analyses were performed, with subsequent multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 14.8 (range, 12 to 52) months. The group with a worse DASH score showed significantly greater mismatch in the volar and dorsal lunate facets, as well as the central depression of the distal radius (p = 0.042, 0.031, and 0.023, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between the DASH score and degree of mismatch of the dorsal lunate facet and central depression of the distal radius (p = 0.040 and 0.011, respectively). Groups with worse MMWS showed significantly greater mismatch in the dorsal lunate facet (p = 0.025). There was a significant negative correlation between MMWS and abnormal ulnar variance and mismatch of the dorsal lunate facet and central depression of the distal radius (p = 0.041, 0.004, and 0.018, respectively). The result of multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a mismatch of the dorsal lunate facet is a significant predictor for a worse MMWS (odds ratio = 3.072, p = 0.043).

Conclusions

Articular surface mismatch of the dorsal lunate facet appears to mostly affect the surgical outcomes of the distal radius fractures using VLP. In cases where the dorsal lunate facet is heavily involved, surgeons should be cautious about its reduction and fixation.

Combined Approach for Intra-articular Distal Radius Fracture: A Case Series and Literature Review

Background

The purpose of this study was to classify the possible indications for a combined approach to distal radius fractures (DRFs) by investigating surgical outcomes of patients treated according to our treatment algorithm.

Methods

A combined approach was performed in 32 patients. Patients who were thought to need a combined approach were classified into three types according to the combined injuries associated with loss of volar cortical buttresses in DRFs. The classifications included the following: type 1, free intra-articular fragments; type 2, distally migrated dorsal fragments located beyond the wrist joint; and type 3, centrally impacted articular fragments and displaced dorsal fragments, not reduced by indirect methods.

Results

Seven patients had type 1 fractures treated with volar plates and excision of the intra-articular fragments. Fourteen patients had type 2 fractures: 12 were treated with volar plates and excision of dorsal fragments, and 2 with relatively large unstable dorsal fragments were treated with combined volar and dorsal plates. The remaining 11 patients had type 3 fractures treated with combined volar and dorsal plates. At the latest follow-up, the radiographs revealed an average of 16.9° of radial inclination, an average of 4.2° of volar tilt, and an average of 7.5 mm of radial height. According to the Garland and Werley scores, the functional results were excellent for 3 patients, good for 25, and fair for 4.

Conclusions

The classification system indicated when an additional dorsal approach was needed in unstable DRFs, and it may establish useful guidelines for appropriate surgical decision-making.

Lasso loop technique using bioabsorbable thread to treat intra-articular distal radius fracture

This article introduces our lasso loop technique (LLT) using a bioabsorbable thread for the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures with displaced dorsal bone fragment containing articular surface (DBF). We also examined whether the articular gap is sufficiently reduced and maintained by the LLT, along with the results of other radiological and clinical evaluations. We retrospectively reviewed 19 patients who underwent LLT for intra-articular distal radius fracture with a displaced DBF. Patient radiographic images and medical records were used to investigate radiological characteristics, symptoms, physical findings, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Sagittal-view computed tomography showed that the mean preoperative articular gap was 2.6 mm, but the gap was reduced by LLT, and the gap immediately postoperatively was <1.0 mm in all patients. No re-displacement of the DBF was evident from immediately postoperatively to 6 months postoperatively. Postoperatively, no losses of correction in palmar tilt, radial inclination, or ulnar variance were seen in the evaluation of plain radiographs, and satisfactory joint range of motion, grip strength, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score were obtained. No significant complications due to LLT were observed. LLT appears to offer a simple and effective procedure to reduce displaced DBF with little risk of complications. LLT may become a useful option in the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures with displaced DBF.

Nuances of Radiographic Assessment of Distal Radius Fractures to Avoid Missed Fragments

Distal radius fractures, like many articular and periarticular fractures, can make it difficult to determine the true number, location, and orientation of fracture fragments. This article should help the reader work through imaging interpretation starting from the initial, often displaced radiographs to postreduction imaging and determination if further 3-dimensional imaging is necessary.

Size and stabilization of the dorsoulnar fragment in AO C3-type distal radius fractures

INTRODUCTION

Volar locking plate (VLP) fixation has become the gold-standard treatment for distal radius fractures (DRFs). Especially, internal fixation of the volar lunate facet fragment is essential for the treatment of AO C3-type DRFs. On the other hand, the necessity of the fixation of the dorsal lunate facet fragment (dorsoulnar fragment) remains unclear. The purpose of the present study was to measure three-dimensionally the size of the dorsoulnar fragments in AO C3-type DRFs using computed tomography (CT) images in detail, and to reveal relationships of the size and stabilization of the dorsoulnar fragment with postoperative fracture displacement after VLP fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the 101 consecutive Japanese patients who underwent surgical treatment for AO C3-type distal radius fractures. If patient had dorsoulnar fragment, the three-dimensional size of this fragment and the occupying ratio to the radiocarpal joint (RCJ) and the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) were anatomically evaluated using the preoperative CT images. In addition, we investigated the relationship of the size and stabilization of the dorsoulnar fragment with fracture displacement after VLP fixation. We statistically compared the size parameters and occupying ratio of the dorsoulnar fragment between the displaced group and the stable groups using a two-tailed t-test. We also statistically compared the numbers of screws inserted into the dorsoulnar fragments between the displaced and stable groups using a chi-square test.

RESULTS

The mean dorsoulnar fragment size was 9.4 mm × 7.9 mm × 11.0 mm and the occupying ratio to the DRUJ and RCJ was 50% and 10%, respectively. The number of patients treated with volar locking plate fixation was 77, of which 12 patients had postoperative displacements. Although the size of the dorsoulnar fragment was not associated with postoperative displacement, stabilization following screw insertion into the dorsoulnar fragment was significantly associated with displacement.

CONCLUSION

Stabilization of the dorsoulnar fragment with at least one screw of the volar locking plate was necessary to prevent postoperative fracture displacement regardless of dorsoulnar fragment size in AO C3-type distal radius fractures.

Dorsal Lunate Facet Fracture Reduction Using a Bone Reduction Forceps

Background  The dorsal lunate facet fragment represents part of a complex articular injury of the distal radius and is challenging to reduce through a standard volar approach. We propose reduction through a standard volar approach and intraoperative dorsal lunate facet reduction using a bone forceps. To evaluate the postoperative reduction, we used computed tomography (CT) scan. Methods  We retrospectively included 60 patients with a median follow-up of 44 weeks. Fracture reduction was evaluated using pre- and direct postoperative CT scans of the wrist, measuring the articular gap and step of the sigmoid notch. The range of motion was evaluated clinically by the treating physician. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements and to compare wrist range of motion. Results  When comparing the injured with the uninjured wrist, there was a significant difference in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination. In 87% of the patients, there was complete radiographic reduction of the fracture. Conclusion  This study shows that dorsal ulnar lunate facet fracture fragments in distal radius fractures can be reduced through a standard volar approach with the help of an intraoperative bone reduction forceps. Using wrist CT, we showed that 87% of the patients with a dorsal ulnar lunate facet fragment had a postoperative articular step or gap of <1 mm. Level of Evidence : This is a level IV, therapeutic study.

Comparison of Locking and Frag-Loc Screws for Fixation of Die-Punch Fragments

Background  The Frag-Loc (FL) compression screw system was designed to stabilize dorsally displaced intra-articular dorsoulnar (die-punch) fragments in distal radius fractures. Purpose  Comparison of the biomechanical properties of fixation of the die-punch fragment (stiffness, ultimate strength, and displacement ratio of the fragment), using the FL and traditional locking screw (LS), and using simulated distal radial fractures in cadaveric specimens under axial compressive loading. Both screws were used with a volar locking plate (VLP). Materials and Methods  Eight matched pairs of formalin-fixed cadaveric specimens of the radius were used to simulate distal radius fractures with die-punch fragments. The die-punch fragment was fixed using VLP with either FL group or LS group. Biomechanical properties for the two fixation systems were evaluated under axial compression loading, applied at a constant rate of 0.5 mm/min until failure. Load data were recorded and the ultimate strength and change in the gap between the die-punch and proximal fragments measured, with the displacement ratio calculated by dividing the value of the gap before loading by the gap after loading. Failure was defined as 10 mm or more of fragment displacement, or screw failure. Results  There were no differences in ultimate strength ( p  = 0.47) or stiffness ( p  = 0.061) between the two fragment fixation systems. However, the displacement ratio was lower for the FL than for the LS system ( p  = 0.049). Conclusion  Compared with LS, the FL system lowers the displacement of die-punch fragments under compressive loading. Clinical Relevance  The FL system is effective for the treatment of distal radius fractures with die-punch fragments.

A Sandwich Method Using Kapandji Intrafocal Pinning to Facilitate Palmar Plating of Displaced Distal Radius Fractures

The use of palmar plating in the treatment of dorsally displaced distal radius fracture is very common, and can result in a good functional outcome. We present an easy "sandwich method" to reduce the fracture and to facilitate osteosynthesis. Firstly, the dorsal Kapandji intrafocal wire was applied to achieve the reduction of the dorsally displaced fracture and provide a volar-directed force. Then the intra-articular fractures were reduced or the metaphyseal defect is stuffed with bone graft if necessary. Finally, the anatomical plate is used to buttress and push back the distal fragment to complete the osteosynthesis. The postoperative radiographic parameters, comparing with the contralateral noninjured side, could achieve similar radial height, radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance without significant difference.

Surgical Strategy and Techniques for Low-Profile Dorsal Plating in Treating Dorsally Displaced Unstable Distal Radius Fractures

Background The low-profile dorsal locking plating (DLP) technique is useful for treating dorsally comminuted intra-articular distal radius fractures; however, due to the complications associated with DLP, the technique is not widely used. Methods A retrospective review of 24 consecutive cases treated with DLP were done. Results All cases were classified into two types by surgical strategy according to the fracture pattern. In type 1, there is a volar fracture line distal to the watershed line in the dorsally displaced fragment, and this type is treated by H-framed DLP. In type 2, the displaced dorsal die-punch fragment is associated with a minimally displaced styloid shearing fracture or a transverse volar fracture line. We found that the die-punch fragment was reduced by the buttress effect of small l-shaped DLP after stabilization of the styloid shearing for the volar segment by cannulated screws from radial styloid processes. At 6 months after surgery, outcomes were good or excellent based on the modified Mayo wrist scores with no serious complications except one case. The mean range of motion of each type was as follows: the palmar flexion was 50, 65 degrees, dorsiflexion was 70, 75 degrees, supination was 85, 85 degrees, and pronation was 80, 80 degrees; in type 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusion DLP is a useful technique for the treatment of selected cases of dorsally displaced, comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal radius with careful soft tissue coverage.

New Technique for Dorsal Fragment Reduction in Distal Radius Fractures by Using Volar Bone Fenestration

Introduction:

For intra-articular distal radius fractures (AO Classification, type B2) with a displaced dorsal fragment, there remains much discussion on the fixation method for the dorsal fragment. To reduce the displaced dorsal fragment, we developed a new technique consisting of fenestration of the volar bone cortex, reduction using an intramedullary procedure, and fixation using a volar plate. This avoids necessity of dorsal approach.

Technical Note:

We performed this surgical technique in 2 patients and achieved a good reduced position without much injury to the bone cortex at the site of volar plate placement. This surgical technique allows reduction of the dorsal fragment using an intramedullary procedure by only a volar approach, and, therefore, does not affect the dorsal soft tissue (extensor tendon). For intra-articular distal radius fractures, complete reduction of the articular surface is extremely difficult, and, in patients with a remaining gap on the articular surface, a variable angle locking screw system may be useful. In the 2 patients, the angle of the locking screw was adjusted to catch the displaced dorsal fragment, and adequate reduction and fixation could be achieved.

Conclusion:

This technique using fenestration of the volar bone cortex allows reduction and fixation of the displaced dorsal fragment in distal radius fractures and thus avoids the necessity of a dorsal approach.

Management of Complex Distal Radius Fractures: Review of Treatment Principles and Select Surgical Techniques

Most distal radius fractures are the result of low-energy mechanisms that can be successfully treated either non-operatively or with a variety of operative techniques if indicated. Complex distal radius fractures occur most commonly in high-energy injuries with extensive comminution or bone loss and associated soft tissue or vascular injuries. These high-energy fractures can present many challenges in reconstructing the distal radius. Effective restoration of the bony architecture requires a thorough knowledge of distal radius anatomy, understanding of the goals of treatment, versatility in surgical approaches, and familiarity with multiple fixation options.

The Effect of Displaced Dorsal Rim Fragment in a Distal Radius Fracture

Background In intra-articular fracture of distal radius, the intra-articular fragments can be divided into some specific fragments. In particular, the poor outcomes have been well documented for reduction loss of the volar lunate facet, but the effect of a displaced dorsal rim fracture has rarely been addressed. Materials and Methods The records of 26 patients with dorsal rim fragment displaced by more than 2 mm after volar locking plate (VLP) fixation for a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture (DRF) treated from March 2006 to March 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical assessments including grip strengths, wrist range of motions, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were performed at 12 months postoperatively. Widths of the distal ends of dorsal rims were determined by preoperative computed tomography (CT). Dorsal rim fragment displacements were measured in immediate postoperative plain lateral radiographs. Radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance were measured on immediate postoperative wrist radiographs. Arthritic changes of radiocarpal joints were graded using radiographs obtained at 12 months postoperatively. Description of Technique DRFs were fixed using a VLP in the usual manner. Although DRF displacement was noticed after plate fixation, no further procedure was performed. The sizes of articular portions of dorsal rim fragments were measured arthroscopically in 5 of the 26 patients at the time of plate fixation. Results At 12 months postoperatively, mean grip strength, wrist flexion arc, and mean wrist extension arc were 86 ± 13, 87 ± 11, and 91 ± 10%, respectively, of contralateral sides. Mean forearm supination and pronation were 96 ± 8 and 99 ± 5%, respectively, of contralateral sides. Mean DASH score was 11 ± 10 points. Preoperatively, mean width of the distal end of dorsal rim fragments and mean displacements of dorsal rim fragments were 2.0 ± 0.6 and 3.0 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. Mean width of the articular portions of dorsal rim fragment by arthroscopic examination was 1.0 ± 0.4 mm. Mean radial inclination was 21 ± 4.8 degrees, mean volar angulation was 4.8 ± 3.9 degrees, and mean ulnar variance was 0.6 ± 1.8 mm at immediate postoperatively. Two patients showed grade I arthritic changes at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions The articular portions of dorsal rim fragments measured arthroscopically were smaller than determined by CT. Furthermore, the study shows that displaced dorsal rim fragments in dorsally displaced DRFs treated by VLP do not adversely affect wrist clinical outcomes.

The effects of the Frag-Loc(®) compression screw on distal radius fracture with a displaced dorsoulnar fragment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the Frag-Loc(®) compression screw with palmar plate fixation on distal radius fractures that include a displaced dorsoulnar fragment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective comparative study enrolled 48 patients who had an unstable distal radius fracture and a dorsoulnar fragment that was more than 2 mm displaced and that had involvement of more than one-quarter of the articular surface. Twenty-six of the 48 patients were treated with a palmar locking plate without a Frag-Loc(®) compression screw (group 1) and the other 22 patients were treated with palmar locking plate with a Frag-Loc(®) compression screw to fix the dorsoulnar fragment (group 2). First, we reviewed all pre-surgical computerized tomographic (CT) scans. Second, we used the gap distance between the dorsoulnar and palmar fragment as seen on post-surgical axial and sagittal CT scans to determine outcome. The gap distance was measured at the point of maximum distance perpendicular to the plane of the main fracture line. Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score; the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score; wrist active range of motion; and grip strength.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome between the two groups. However, there were statistically significant differences in post-surgical gap distance. The mean post-surgical gap distances for group 1 were 1.3 mm (range 0.2-3.8 mm) on axial CT scans and 1.4 mm (range 0.5-2.4 mm) on sagittal CT scans, while the mean post-surgical gap distances for group 2 were 0.7 mm (range 0.7-1.6 mm) and 0.7 mm (range 0.3-1.1 mm).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the Frag-Loc(®) compression screw can reduce the gap distance between the dorsoulnar fragment and the distal radius, according to evaluation of post-surgical axial and sagittal CT scans. This result suggests that the Frag-Loc(®) compression screw is an effective and simple treatment option to immobilize a dorsoulnar fragment associated with distal radius fracture.

Avoiding and treating perioperative complications of distal radius fractures

Numerous methods of treatment are available for the management of distal radius fractures, with modern trends favoring volar fixed-angle distal radius plates. Whatever the method of fixation, recognition, management, and prevention of the known associated complications are essential to achieve a good outcome. This article reviews the common preventable complications that are associated with operative treatment of distal radius fractures, including tendon injuries, inadequate reduction, subsidence or collapse, intra-articular placement of pegs or screws, nerve injuries, complex regional pain syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome, and compartment syndrome.