Resuscitation volume in paediatric non-haemorrhagic blunt trauma

Changes in transfusion and fluid therapy practices in severely injured children: an analysis of 5118 children from the TraumaRegister DGU®

Purpose

Trauma is the leading cause of death in children. In adults, blood transfusion and fluid resuscitation protocols changed resulting in a decrease of morbidity and mortality over the past 2 decades. Here, transfusion and fluid resuscitation practices were analysed in severe injured children in Germany.

Methods

Severely injured children (maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3) admitted to a certified trauma-centre (TraumaZentrum DGU®) between 2002 and 2017 and registered at the TraumaRegister DGU® were included and assessed regarding blood transfusion rates and fluid therapy.

Results

5,118 children (aged 1–15 years) with a mean ISS 22 were analysed. Blood transfusion rates administered until ICU admission decreased from 18% (2002–2005) to 7% (2014–2017). Children who are transfused are increasingly seriously injured. ISS has increased for transfused children aged 1–15 years (2002–2005: mean 27.7–34.4 in 2014–2017). ISS in non-transfused children has decreased in children aged 1–15 years (2002–2005: mean 19.6 to mean 17.6 in 2014–2017). Mean prehospital fluid administration decreased from 980 to 549 ml without affecting hemodynamic instability.

Conclusion

Blood transfusion rates and amount of fluid resuscitation decreased in severe injured children over a 16-year period in Germany. Restrictive blood transfusion and fluid management has become common practice in severe injured children. A prehospital restrictive fluid management strategy in severely injured children is not associated with a worsened hemodynamic state, abnormal coagulation or base excess but leads to higher hemoglobin levels.

Aggressive Crystalloid Resuscitation Outcomes in Low-Severity Pediatric Trauma

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause of death among children. Studies have found that insufficient intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in pediatric trauma. While large-volume resuscitation represents a potential solution, overly aggressive fluid management may complicate hospitalizations and recovery. Through this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of aggressive fluid resuscitation on outcomes in pediatric trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review utilizing our level I trauma center registry for pediatric patients aged <16 y admitted from 2014 to 2017. Patients transferred from our center within 24 h and those who arrived from outside hospitals were excluded. Patients who received blood product transfusions were excluded. Included patients were divided into two crystalloid groups: <60 mL/kg/24 h and ≥60 mL/kg/24 h. Outcome measures included ICU length-of-stay, length-of-hospitalization, complications, and mortality rate.

RESULTS

Study sample included 320 patients (<60 mL/kg/24 h = 219; ≥60 mL/kg/24 h = 101). The ≥60 mL/kg/24 h group was younger (9.95 versus 5.27, P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences in GCS on arrival, injury severity score, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Revised Trauma Scores, traumatic brain injury, and operative intervention between groups. Outcome measures showed there was no significant difference in 30-day readmission rate, complications, or mortality. Large-volume crystalloid resuscitation was associated with longer mean ICU length-of-stay (1.5 d versus 0.8 d, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-institution retrospective database analysis, large-volume crystalloid resuscitation (≥60 mL/kg) was associated with a significant increase in ICU length-of-stay without survival benefit. More research in the form of randomized trials will help determine the optimal rate for fluid resuscitation in pediatric trauma patients while weighing potential critical care complications.

Anesthetic considerations for extracranial injuries in patients with associated brain trauma

Patients with severe traumatic brain injury often presents with extracranial injuries, which may contribute to fatal outcome. Anesthetic management of such polytrauma patients is extremely challenging that includes prioritizing the organ system to be dealt first, reducing on-going injury, and preventing secondary injuries. Neuroprotective and neurorescue measures should be instituted simultaneously during extracranial surgeries. Selection of anesthetic drugs that minimally interferes with cerebral dynamics, maintenance of hemodynamics and cerebral perfusion pressure, optimal utilization of multimodal monitoring techniques, and aggressive rehabilitation approach are the key factors for improving overall patient outcome.

Prevalence and mortality of abdominal compartment syndrome in severely injured patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in severely injured patients is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Many efforts have been made to improve outcome of patients with ACS. A treatment algorithm for ACS patients was introduced on January 1, 2005 by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and mortality rate of ACS among severely injured patients before and after January 1, 2005 using a systematic literature review.

METHOD

Databases of Embase, Medline (OvidSP), Web of Science, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PubMed publisher, and Google Scholar were searched for terms related to severely injured patients and ACS. Original studies reporting ACS in trauma patients were considered eligible. Data on study design, population, definitions, prevalence, and mortality rates were extracted. Pooled prevalence and mortality of ACS among severely injured patients were calculated for both time periods using inversed variance weighting assuming a random effects model. Tests for heterogeneity were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 80 publications were included. Prevalence of studies that finished enrolling patients before January 1, 2005 ranged from 0.5% to 36.4% and 0.0% to 28.0% in studies after that date. For severely injured patients admitted to the ICU, this range was 0.5% to 1.3% before 2005 and 0% in one publication in the second time period. For patients with visceral injuries, ACS prevalence ranged 1.0% to 20.0%; one study in the second time period reported 11.1%. The prevalence among severely injured patients who underwent trauma laparotomy ranged from 0.9% to 36.4% in the first time period. Two studies after January 1, 2005 reported ACS prevalence of 2.3% and 13.2%, respectively. The mortality rate in both time periods ranged between 0.0% and 100.0%.

CONCLUSION

The overall prevalence of ACS ranged from 0.0% to 36.4%. Future studies are needed to measure the effect of improved trauma care and effectiveness of the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Consensus Statements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review/meta-analysis, level III.

The role of serious concomitant injuries in the treatment and outcome of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

The study objective was to describe the epidemiology of serious concomitant injuries and their effects on outcome in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of all severely injured (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥ 12) pediatric patients (<18 years) admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit, between 2000 and 2011, after experiencing an sTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤ 8 and head Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] ≥ 4) were included. Two groups were compared based on the presence of serious concomitant injuries (maximum AIS score ≥ 3). Multivariate logistic regression was undertaken to determine variable associations with mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 180 patients with sTBI, 113 (63%) sustained serious concomitant injuries. Chest was the most commonly injured extracranial body region (84%), with lung being the most often injured. Patients with serious concomitant injuries had increased age, weight, and injury severity (p < 0.001) and were more likely injured in a motor vehicle collision (91% vs. 48%, p < 0.001). Those with serious concomitant injuries had worse sTBI, based on lower presedation GCS (p = 0.031), higher frequency of fixed pupils (p = 0.006), and increased imaging abnormalities (SAH and DAI, p ≤ 0.01). Non-neurosurgical operations and blood transfusions were more frequent in the serious concomitant injury group (p < 0.01). The differences in mortality for the two groups failed to reach statistical significant (p = 0.053), but patients with serious concomitant injuries had higher rates of infection and acute central diabetes insipidus, fewer ventilator-free days, and greater length of stays (p < 0.05). Multivariate analyses revealed fixed pupillary response (odd ratio [OR], 63.58; p < 0.001), presedation motor GCS (OR, 0.23; p = 0.001), blood transfusion (OR, 5.80; p = 0.008), and hypotension (OR, 4.82; p = 0.025) were associated with mortality, but serious concomitant injuries was not (p = 0.283).

CONCLUSION

Head injury is the most important prognostic factor in mortality for sTBI pediatric patients, but the presence of serious concomitant injuries does contribute to greater morbidity, including longer stays, more infections, fewer ventilator-free days, and a higher level of care required on discharge from hospital.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiologic study, level III.