Functional outcome of nerve transfers for traumatic global brachial plexus avulsion

Imaging of Cervical Spine Trauma: Update of Techniques and Clinical Relevance

Imaging of cervical spine trauma most commonly begins with computed tomography (CT) for initial osseous and basic soft tissue evaluation, followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for complementary evaluation of the neural structures (i.e., spinal cord, nerves) and soft tissues (i.e., ligaments). Although CT and conventional MRI sequences have been the mainstay of trauma imaging for decades, there have been significant advances in CT processing, imaging sequences and techniques made possible by hardware and software development, and artificial intelligence. These advancements may provide advantages in increasing sensitivity for detection of pathology as well as in decreasing imaging and interpretation time. Unquestionably, the most important role of imaging is to provide information to help direct patient care, including diagnosis, next steps in treatment plan, and prognosis. As such, there has been a growing body of research investigating the clinical relevance of imaging findings to clinical outcomes in the setting of spinal cord injury. This article will focus on these recent advances in imaging of cervical spinal trauma.

Comparison of Fibrin Glue With Conventional Suturing in Peripheral Nerve Repairs: A Study of Sensory and Motor Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Nerve injuries have traditionally been repaired with sutures, and this method is considered the gold standard technique in the management of nerve injuries. However, fibrin glue has recently become a promising tool for repairing nerve injuries and has advantages including ease of usability, atraumatic application technique, and decreased co-optation time of the nerves. This study aims to clinically evaluate the efficacy of nerve repair with fibrin glue compared with the usual suture technique in terms of sensory and motor outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients were included in the study; 50 patients underwent primary nerve repair, and 30 patients underwent Oberlin's repair. These subsets were randomly divided into two groups in which the nerves were repaired with microsutures in one group and fibrin glue in the other group.

RESULTS

In the comparison of fibrin glue with microsutures, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the 2-point discrimination (2PD) test, Semmes-Weinstein test, motor function, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores. However, the co-optation times were significantly shorter with fibrin glue than with microsutures.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, nerve repair with fibrin glue is as effective as microsutures in terms of sensory and motor recovery and has added advantages of ease of usability and shorter repair times. Therefore, fibrin glue may be an effective alternative to sutures in nerve repair.

Surgical management and outcomes of traumatic global brachial plexus injury: A concise review and our center approach

Global brachial plexus injury (GBPI) mainly affects adults and causes severe life-changing consequences that lead to the deterioration of patients' quality of life. Several surgical approaches have been described and reported in the literature to improve patients' functional ability. A literature review is done on PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase using specific keywords to retrieve relevant articles assessing different surgical approaches for GBPI management. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and eligible articles were included in the review. The literature survey revealed that various surgical options had been used to manage GBPI patients. In this concise review, we discuss and compare the different surgical approaches related to GBPI and its outcome in terms of restoring elbow flexion and extension, shoulder abduction, and wrist and hand function. The primary surgical intervention relies mainly on transferring single or multiple nerves with/without nerve grafts to restore the function of the targeted muscle. Different techniques using a variety of nerve donors and recipients are compared to assess the functional outcomes of each option. Moreover, further options are addressed for delayed GBPI injuries or failed nerve transfer procedures, as in free functional muscle transfer techniques. In addition, information about brachial plexus injury cases faced in our center is presented along with our center's approach to diagnosing and managing partial and GBPI cases.

Transhumeral amputation in brachial plexus lesion patients: A multicenter case series

BACKGROUND

A flail limb can be the result of a traumatic complete brachial plexus lesion. Some patients prefer retaining the flail limb, however some patients feel that a flail limb negatively affects daily life. In these circumstances an elective amputation is sometimes elected, however long-term follow-up, with respect to satisfaction and function is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of this rare and life changing operation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

8 patients with a transhumeral amputation performed in 2 specialized medical centers were included. Postoperatively, the functional- and psychological outcome and the quality of life were evaluated with standardized patient reported outcome measures (PROMs; DASH, SIP-68, EQ-5D-5L and HADS).

RESULTS

After a median of 9.4 (range 7.5 - 12.8) years follow-up, 7 patients (88%) stated that they would undergo the operation again and were satisfied with the results. At latest follow-up the median DASH score was 37.3 (range 8.3-61.7), the median SIP-68 score was 6.5 (range 0-43) and the median HADS score was 3.0 (range 0-14) for anxiety and 3.0 (range 1-19) for depression. In the EQ-5D-5L patients had most difficulties in self-care, usual activities and pain/discomfort. The median overall health status was 69 (range 20-95).

DISCUSSION

With the right indication a transhumeral amputation is a reasonable option for traumatic complete brachial plexus lesion with satisfying long-term results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, multicenter case series.

Predictors of functional outcome after peripheral nerve injury and compression

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION

Upper-extremity peripheral nerve injuries can impact long-term pain, work performance, and disability, yet there are few studies evaluating treatment outcomes for a large sample of patients with varying peripheral nerve pathology.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study was to identify outcomes of care and predictors of disability and health status in adults with peripheral nerve injuries.

METHODS

We explored medical records from 364 patients treated by a plastic surgeon over a three-year period. Descriptive and inferential statistics compared the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Short-Form 8, and routine intake data between baseline and discharge, diagnosis, and intervention group. Multivariate linear regression models predicted disability, work disability, and physical and mental health at discharge.

RESULTS

We found significant improvements in disability, work disability, pain, depression, and stress. Health status changed minimally. Disability decreased most in patients who were working and who had symptoms fewer than six months. Outcomes were not statistically different between surgical and nonsurgical patients. Disability was the highest in patients with brachial plexus injuries. Multivariate models predicted 35 to 55% of the variance in the outcome measures. Factors that were highly predictive of functional outcomes included work status, household management, pain, depression, stress, and difficulty sleeping.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with peripheral nerve injuries experience improved pain and disability whether treated surgically or nonsurgically. Maintaining engagement in meaningful home and work roles may improve outcomes. Helping patients manage pain remains important, along with combatting stress, depression, and sleep deprivation.

Bionic Upper Limb Reconstruction: A Valuable Alternative in Global Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injuries-A Case Series

Global brachial plexopathies including multiple nerve root avulsions may result in complete upper limb paralysis despite surgical treatment. Bionic reconstruction, which includes the elective amputation of the functionless hand and its replacement with a mechatronic device, has been described for the transradial level. Here, we present for the first time that patients with global brachial plexus avulsion injuries and lack of biological shoulder and elbow function benefit from above-elbow amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation. Between 2012 and 2017, forty-five patients with global brachial plexus injuries approached our centre, of which nineteen (42.2%) were treated with bionic reconstruction. While fourteen patients were amputated at the transradial level, the entire upper limb was replaced with a prosthetic arm in a total of five patients. Global upper extremity function before and after bionic arm substitution was assessed using two objective hand function tests, the action research arm test (ARAT), and the Southampton hand assessment procedure (SHAP). Other outcome measures included the DASH questionnaire, VAS to assess deafferentation pain and the SF-36 health survey to evaluate changes in quality of life. Using a hybrid prosthetic arm mean ARAT scores improved from 0.6 ± 1.3 to 11.0 ± 6.7 (p = 0.042) and mean SHAP scores increased from 4.0 ± 3.7 to 13.8 ± 9.2 (p = 0.058). After prosthetic arm replacement mean DASH scores improved from 52.5 ± 9.4 to 31.2 ± 9.8 (p = 0.003). Deafferentation pain decreased from mean VAS 8.5 ± 1.0 to 6.7 ± 2.1 (p = 0.055), while the physical and mental component summary scale as part of the SF-36 health survey improved from 32.9 ± 6.4 to 40.4 ± 9.4 (p = 0.058) and 43.6 ± 8.9 to 57.3 ± 5.5 (p = 0.021), respectively. Bionic reconstruction can restore simple but robust arm and hand function in longstanding brachial plexus patients with lack of treatment alternatives.

Minimum Ten-Year Outcomes of Partial Ulnar Nerve Transfer for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Patients with Upper Brachial Plexus Injury

Background: Partial ulnar nerve transfer to the biceps motor branch of the musculocutaneous nerve (Oberlin's transfer) is a successful approach to restore elbow flexion in patients with upper brachial plexus injury (BPI). However, there is no report on more than 10 years subjective and objective outcomes. The purpose of this study was to clarify the long-term outcomes of Oberlin's transfer based on the objective evaluation of elbow flexion strength and subjective functional evaluation of patients. Methods: Six patients with BPI who underwent Oberlin's transfer were reviewed retrospectively by their medical records. The mean age at surgery was 29.5 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 13 years. The objective functional outcomes were evaluated by biceps muscle strength using the Medical Research Council (MRC) grade at preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up. The patient-derived subjective functional outcomes were evaluated using the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire at final follow-up. Results: All patients had MRC grade 0 (M0) or 1 (M1) elbow flexion strength before operation. Four patients gained M4 postoperatively and maintained or increased muscle strength at the final follow-up. One patient gained M3 postoperatively and at the final follow-up. Although one patient achieved M4 postoperatively, the strength was reduced to M2 due to additional disorder. The mean score of QuickDASH was 36.5 (range, 7-71). Patients were divided into two groups; three patients had lower scores and the other three patients had higher scores of QuickDASH. Conclusions: Oberlin's transfer is effective in the restoration of elbow flexion and can maintain the strength for more than 10 years. Patients with upper BPI with restored elbow flexion strength and no complicated nerve disorders have over ten-year subjective satisfaction.

Outcome of contralateral C7 transfers to different recipient nerves after global brachial plexus avulsion

INTRODUCTION

Contralateral cervical seventh nerve root (CC7) transfer has been widely applied for treatment of traumatic brachial plexus injury. The purpose of the study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with global brachial plexus avulsion (GBPA) after CC7 transfer and compare the recoveries of median nerve as the only recipient nerve and one of the multiple recipient nerves.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 51 patients treated with CC7 transfers after GBPA was carried out. The British Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system and range of joint motion (ROM) were used for motor and sensory assessment.

RESULTS

The effective rates of FCR were 57.7%, 45.5%, and 36.4% in CC7 transfer to median nerve (CC7-Md), CC7 transfer to median nerve and biceps branch (CC7-Md+Bic) and CC7 transfer to median nerve and triceps branch (CC7-Md+Tric) groups, respectively. There were no statistical differences no matter in FCR or FDS among groups. The effective rate in biceps had no significant difference with that in triceps. The effective sensory recovery rate was 65.4%, 54.5%, and 36.4% in CC7-Md, CC7-Md+Bic, and CC7-Md+Tric groups. There were no statistical differences in the sensory effective recovery rate among groups. All the ROMs were improved significantly after surgery. The improvement of ROM of elbow flexion after surgery in CC7-Md+Bic group was significantly larger than that of elbow extension after surgery in CC7-Md+Tric group (p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

The CC7 transfer contributed to the functional improvement of the hand and wrist for the patients with global brachial plexus avulsion. The whole CC7 could be used to repair more than one recipient nerve (including median nerve) without affecting the recovery of median nerve. When CC7 was used to repair two nerves, biceps branch might be preferred to choose as one recipient nerve rather than triceps branch.

Comparative study of phrenic and partial ulnar nerve transfers for elbow flexion after upper brachial plexus avulsion: A retrospective clinical analysis

The widely used nerve transfer sources for elbow flexion in patients with upper brachial plexus avulsion (UBPA) include partial ulnar nerve, phrenic nerve, and intercostal nerves. A retrospective review of 21 patients treated with phrenic and partial ulnar nerve transfers for elbow flexion after UBPA was carried out. In the phrenic nerve transfer group, the phrenic nerve was transferred to the anterolateral bundle of the anterior division of the upper trunk; in the partial ulnar nerve transfer group, one fascicle of the ulnar nerve was transferred to the biceps branch. The British Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system, angle of elbow flexion, electromyography (EMG), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scoring were used to evaluate the recovery of elbow flexion at least 3 years postoperatively. The efficiency of motor function in phrenic nerve transfer group was 82%, whereas it was 80% in partial ulnar nerve transfer group. The outstanding rates of angle of elbow flexion were 64% and 70% in phrenic and partial ulnar nerve transfer groups, respectively. The DASH scores after surgery were significantly lower than those before surgery in the two groups. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the changes of DASH scores before and after surgery. Both of phrenic and partial ulnar nerve transfers had good prognosis for elbow flexion in patients with UBPA.

Magnetic resonance imaging for detecting root avulsions in traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries: protocol for a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND

Adult brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are becoming more common. The reconstruction and prognosis of pre-ganglionic injuries (root avulsions) are different to other types of BPI injury. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being used to identify root avulsions, but the evidence from studies of its diagnostic accuracy are conflicting. Therefore, a systematic review is needed to address uncertainty about the accuracy of MRI and to guide future research.

METHODS

We will conduct a systematic search of electronic databases alongside reference tracking. We will include studies of adults with traumatic BPI which report the accuracy of preoperative MRI (index test) against surgical exploration of the roots of the brachial plexus (reference standard) for detecting either of the two target conditions (any root avulsion or any pseudomeningocoele as a surrogate marker of root avulsion). We will exclude case reports, articles considering bilateral injuries and studies where the number of true positives, false positives, false negatives and true negatives cannot be derived. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using a tailored version of the QUADAS-2 tool. Where possible, a bivariate model will be used for meta-analysis to obtain summary sensitivities and specificities for both target conditions. We will investigate heterogeneity in the performance of MRI according to field strength and the risk of bias if data permits.

DISCUSSION

This review will summarise the current diagnostic accuracy of MRI for adult BPI, identify shortcomings and gaps in the literature and so help to guide future research.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42016049702 .

Restoration of active pick-up function in patients with total brachial plexus avulsion injuries

We designed multiple nerve transfers in one surgery to restore active pick-up function in patients with total brachial plexus avulsion injuries. Forty patients with total brachial plexus avulsion injuries first underwent multiple nerve transfers. These included transfer of the accessory nerve onto the suprascapular nerve to recover shoulder abduction, contralateral C7 nerve onto the lower trunk via the modified prespinal route with direct coaptation to restore lower trunk function and onto the musculocutaneous nerve with interpositional bridging by medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve arising from lower trunk to restore elbow flexion, and the phrenic nerve onto the posterior division of lower trunk to recover elbow and finger extension. At least three years after surgery, the patients who had a meaningful recovery were selected to perform secondary reconstruction to restore active pick-up function. Active pick-up function was successfully restored in ten patients after they underwent multiple nerve transfers combined with additional secondary functional hand reconstructions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Biomechanical analysis of brachial plexus injury: Availability of three-dimensional finite element model of the brachial plexus

Adult brachial plexus injuries frequently lead to significant and permanent physical disabilities. Investigating the mechanism of the injury using biomechanical approaches may lead to further knowledge with regard to preventing brachial plexus injuries. However, there are no reports of biomechanical studies of brachial plexus injuries till date. Therefore, the present study used a complex three-dimensional finite element model (3D-FEM) of the brachial plexus to analyze the mechanism of brachial plexus injury and to assess the validity of the model. A complex 3D-FEM of the spinal column, dura mater, spinal nerve root, brachial plexus, rib bone and cartilage, clavicle, scapula, and humerus were conducted. Stress was applied to the model based on the mechanisms of clinically reported brachial plexus injuries: Retroflexion of the cervical, lateroflexion of the cervical, rotation of the cervical, and abduction of the upper limb. The present study analyzed the distribution and strength of strain applied to the brachial plexus during each motion. When the cervical was retroflexed or lateroflexed, the strain was focused on the C5 nerve root and the upper trunk of the brachial plexus. When the upper limb was abducted, strain was focused on the C7 and C8 nerve roots and the lower trunk of the brachial plexus. The results of brachial plexus injury mechanism corresponded with clinical findings that demonstrated the validity of this model. The results of the present study hypothesized that the model has a future potential for analyzing pathological conditions of brachial plexus injuries and other injuries or diseases, including that of spine and spinal nerve root.

Algorithm for bionic hand reconstruction in patients with global brachial plexopathies

OBJECTIVE Global brachial plexus lesions with multiple root avulsions are among the most severe nerve injuries, leading to lifelong disability. Fortunately, in most cases primary and secondary reconstructions provide a stable shoulder and restore sufficient arm function. Restoration of biological hand function, however, remains a reconstructive goal that is difficult to reach. The recently introduced concept of bionic reconstruction overcomes biological limitations of classic reconstructive surgery to restore hand function by combining selective nerve and muscle transfers with elective amputation of the functionless hand and its replacement with a prosthetic device. The authors present their treatment algorithm for bionic hand reconstruction and report on the management and long-term functional outcomes of patients with global brachial plexopathies who have undergone this innovative treatment. METHODS Thirty-four patients with posttraumatic global brachial plexopathies leading to loss of hand function consulted the Center for Advanced Restoration of Extremity Function between 2011 and 2015. Of these patients, 16 (47%) qualified for bionic reconstruction due to lack of treatment alternatives. The treatment algorithm included progressive steps with the intent of improving the biotechnological interface to allow optimal prosthetic hand replacement. In 5 patients, final functional outcome measurements were obtained with the Action Arm Research Test (ARAT), the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. RESULTS In all 5 patients who completed functional assessments, partial hand function was restored with bionic reconstruction. ARAT scores improved from 3.4 ± 4.3 to 25.4 ± 12.7 (p = 0.043; mean ± SD) and SHAP scores improved from 10.0 ± 1.6 to 55 ± 19.7 (p = 0.042). DASH scores decreased from 57.9 ± 20.6 to 32 ± 28.6 (p = 0.042), indicating decreased disability. CONCLUSIONS The authors present an algorithm for bionic reconstruction leading to useful hand function in patients who lack biological treatment alternatives for a stiff, functionless, and insensate hand resulting from global brachial plexopathies.

Predictors of Disability and Quality of Life With an Upper-Extremity Peripheral Nerve Disorder

OBJECTIVE

We sought to understand the wide range of problems that patients with upper-extremity peripheral nerve disorders experience and to identify predictors of disability and quality of life (QOL).

METHOD

Data from standardized assessments of disability and QOL, physical examination results, and intake surveys from 627 patients were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. We compared results between groups and built multivariate models measuring disability, work disability, and physical and mental QOL.

RESULTS

The sample demonstrated substantial disability and even greater work disability, which both closely correlated with poorer QOL. Work status was integral in predicting disability. Common predictors across models included problems with sleep and intimate relationships, deficits in work and household performance, and higher pain.

CONCLUSION

To decrease disability and improve QOL, occupational therapy practitioners should help patients with upper-extremity peripheral nerve disorders identify strategies to maintain meaningful work and household roles, intimate relationships, and sleep, while continuing to address pain.

Self-Report Measures of Hand Pain Intensity: Current Evidence and Recommendations

Successful management of problems related to the hands and upper extremities begins with a comprehensive assessment of the pain experience and related factors. Pain intensity is the domain most commonly assessed, and pain relief is often the primary goal of treatment. Because pain is a private and subjective experience, self-report is considered the gold standard of pain measurement. This article describes and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the most commonly used self-report scales used to measure hand pain intensity, and gives recommendations to help clinicians select from among the various options for measuring the intensity of hand pain.

A scoping review of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores for hand and wrist conditions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the variability of reported baseline Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores for non-acute hand and wrist conditions. We hypothesized that DASH scores for evaluation of hand and wrist pathology would provide a map of scores that would correspond to severity. In addition to providing a catalog of DASH scores for various upper extremity pathologies, we hypothesized that this review would support the validity of the DASH instrument.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using 3 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from the earliest available date through January 1, 2013. Search terms included "DASH" and "hand" and combinations of conditions found in the initial search. The search was restricted to studies with baseline DASH scores and DASH scores for isolated conditions, and written in the English language.

RESULTS

Our search identified 1,770 citations; 136 full-text articles were reviewed and 85 studies were included in the scoping review. This provided 100 DASH scores mapped for 24 different diagnoses. Most articles (67%) included chronic conditions for inflammatory or degenerative pathologies rather than posttraumatic disorders. Posttraumatic DASH score reporting ranged from 4 months to 11 years after injury, and final outcome scores varied among studies assessing the same pathology. The greatest variation and highest scores were for de Quervain tendinitis (range, 29-93) and scapholunate advance collapse (range, 17-89). These scores indicated higher disability in de Quervain tendinitis and wrist osteoarthritis compared with conditions such as thumb amputation and upper extremity replantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial variation in the DASH scores and methodology was found and indicates a need for further study of the DASH to allow for standardized interpretation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

How to measure outcomes of peripheral nerve surgery

Evaluation of outcomes after peripheral nerve surgeries include several assessment methods that reflect different aspects of recovery, including reinnervation, tactile gnosis, integrated sensory and motor function, pain and discomfort, and neurophysiologic and patient-reported outcomes. This review lists measurements addressing these aspects as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each tool. Because of complexities of neurophysiology, assessment remains a difficult process, which requires researchers to focus on measurements best relevant to specific conditions and research questions.