The effect of in situ augmentation on implant anchorage in proximal humeral head fractures

Biomechanical analysis of push-pull principle versus traditional approach in locking plates for proximal humeral fracture treatment

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humerus fractures are usually treated with locking plates, which could present recurrence, screw penetration, joint varization. The push-pull principle was introduced to prevent these risks and showed promising results; a dedicated design was then developed and this feasibility study aims to compare the biomechanical performances of such dedicated push-pull plate with the traditional locking plate using finite elements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The humerus geometry was obtained from Sawbone CT-scans; the geometries of a traditional locking plate and of the dedicated push-pull one were used. A fracture was added below the humeral head and the plates were virtually implanted. The wire pulling mechanism was simulated connecting the plate to the humeral head apex, considering two levels of tension. Three testing set-ups (axial, torsion and compression bending) were simulated. Stress distributions on bone, plate and screws were measured.

RESULTS

Stress distribution on the distal humerus was similar for both plates. Stress distribution on the proximal humerus was more homogeneous for the push-pull model, showing less unloaded sections (up to 78%). The different levels of tension applied to the wire returned slight differences in terms of stress values, but the comparison with the traditional approach gave similar outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

More homogeneous stress distribution is found with the push-pull plate in all three testing set-ups, showing lower unloaded areas (and thus lower stress-shielding) compared to the traditional plate; the screws implemented returned to be all loaded in at least one of the set-ups, thus showing that they all contribute to plate stability.

[Augmentation techniques for the treatment of osteoporosis-associated fractures of the extremities]

The current demographic development is leading to an increasing number of cases of osteoporosis-related fractures. Affected individuals are typically part of a vulnerable, predominantly geriatric patient group with limited physical resources. Additionally, the pathophysiological characteristics of osteoporotic bones with reduced bone quality and quantity, pose a significant challenge to the osteosynthesis techniques used. Achieving rapid postoperative mobilization and stable weight-bearing osteosynthesis to prevent postoperative medical complications are the main goals of the surgical management. In recent years augmentation techniques have gained in importance in the treatment of osteoporosis-related fractures by significantly enhancing the stability of osteosyntheses and reducing mechanical complication rates. The main options available are polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) augmentation and various bioresorbable bone substitute materials with different properties. Implant augmentations can be applied at various locations in the extremity bones and standardized procedures are now available, such as for the proximal humerus and femur. When used correctly, low complication rates and promising clinical outcomes are observed. This article aims to provide an overview of available techniques and applications based on the current literature. Guidelines and substantial scientific evidence are still limited.

Fibula allograft in complex three-part and four-part proximal humeral fractures in active patients, a matched case-control study

Background

About 20% of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are unstable and/or markedly displaced and therefore require surgery. Locking plate fixation after anatomical reduction has become the current treatment of choice for these fractures in the active population. However, studies have shown complication rates up to 36%, such as loss of reduction and avascular necrosis. To date, data from literature are inconclusive on outcomes following the use of an intramedullary fibula allograft in PHFs, possibly due to the case mix. It is hypothesized that the use of a fibula allograft is beneficial to prevent secondary displacement of the fracture in cases where the medial hinge is markedly displaced and unstable, resulting in better clinical and patient reported outcomes.

Methods

In this multicenter matched cohort study, patients with an unstable, displaced PHF, including anatomic neck fractures and significantly displaced surgical neck fractures, were included. Patients that were treated with a locking plate augmented with a fibula allograft were matched to patients who had undergone locking plate reconstruction without the allograft. The matches were made based on fracture characteristics, age, and performance status. Functional outcomes, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, complications, and radiographic results were compared.

Results

Twelve patients with fibula allograft augmented osteosyntheses were included and matched to 12 control patients. The mean age was 58 years in the fibula allograft group compared to 62 years in the control group. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score, Constant Shoulder score, abduction, and external rotation were significantly better in the fibula allograft group (17.4 ± 8.6 vs. 26.1 ± 19.2, P = .048; 16.5 ± 11.5 vs. 19.8 ± 16.5 P = .040; mean 127° ± 38° vs. mean 92° ± 49° P = -.045; 50° ± 21° vs. mean 26° ± 23°, P = .004). There was no statistically significant difference in the Oxford Shoulder score between groups (P = .105). The Visual Analog Scale was not significantly different between groups (3.1 ± 1.8 vs. 1.6 ± 1.9, P = .439). Radiographic union was reached in 11 patients of the fibula allograft group compared to 8 in the control group (P = .317). The complication rate was twice as high in the control group (3 vs. 7).

Conclusion

Additional support of the medial hinge in unstable PHFs with a locking plate in combination with a fibula allograft appears to create a more stable construct without compromising the viability of the articular surface of the head. The use of a fibula allograft in selected complex cases could therefore result in better clinical outcomes with lower complication rates.

Cement-Augmented Screw Fixation with PHILOS Plating for Osteoporotic Proximal Humeral Fractures: An Observation of Mid- and Long-Term Curative Efficacy

OBJECTIVES

The mid- and long-term clinical outcomes of cement-augmented screws in the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures have rarely been reported. The aim of this study was to observe the mid- and long-term efficacy of combined cement-augmented screw fixation and PHILOS plating in the treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed data from 19 patients with osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus who had undergone internal fixation at the Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital from February 2017 to May 2021. The cohort was comprised of six males and 13 females, aged 75-87 (mean age: 82.52 ± 1.24) years. According to the Neer classification, three, 12, and four patients had two-part, three-part, and four-part fractures, respectively. All patients were treated with open reduction internal fixation with cement-augmented screws and PHILOS plating. Time until fracture healing was recorded postoperatively. Patients were observed for postoperative complications, including humeral head necrosis, loosening or breaking of the augmented screws, screw perforation of the humeral head, and varus fracture displacement. Visual analog scale and Constant scores of the shoulder joint were compared 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Scores at the most recent follow-up were used to evaluate shoulder joint function. Measured data conforming to a normal distribution were expressed as mean ± SD. Analysis of variance or rank sum tests were used for intergroup comparisons. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

All 19 patients followed up for 1-4 (average: 2.13 ± 0.61) years. Fractures united in all cases, with a healing time of 8-14 (average: 10.25 ± 1.72) weeks. There were no cases of humeral head necrosis, screw loosening, fractures, or perforation of the humeral head. One patient had mild varus fracture displacement with a reduced neck-shaft angle. There were significant differences in visual analog scale and Constant scores 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery (p < 0.05). The visual analog scale score was 0 at final follow-up in all cases. The Constant score of the shoulder joint was excellent, good, fair, and poor in two, 12, four, and one case, respectively, yielding an excellent and good rate of 73.68%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cement-augmented screw fixation combined with PHILOS plating of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures had good mid- and long-term clinical efficacy. It should be considered a new option for fracture treatment in such patients.

Experimental magnesium phosphate cement paste increases torque of trochanteric fixation nail advanced™ blades in human femoral heads

BACKGROUND

The use of polymethylmethacrylate cement for in-situ implant augmentation has considerable disadvantages: it is potentially cytotoxic, exothermic and non-degradable. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to develop a magnesium phosphate cement which meets the requirements for in-situ implant augmentation as an alternative. Secondly, this experimental cement was compared to commercial bone cements in a biomechanical test set-up using augmented femoral head blades.

METHODS

A total of 40 human femoral heads were obtained from patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. After bone mineral density was quantified, specimens were assigned to four treatment groups. A blade of the Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced™ was inserted into each specimen and augmented with either Traumacem™ V+, Paste-CPC, the experimental magnesium phosphate cement or no cement. A rotational load-to-failure-test (0° to 90°) was performed.

FINDINGS

A conventional two-component magnesium phosphate cement failed in-situ implant augmentation consistently due to filter pressing. Only a glycerol-based magnesium phosphate paste was suitable for the augmentation of femoral head blades. While the blades augmented with Traumacem™ V+ yielded the highest maximum torque overall (22.1 Nm), the blades augmented with Paste-CPC and the magnesium phosphate paste also showed higher maximum torque values (15.8 and 12.8 Nm) than the control group (10.8 Nm).

INTERPRETATION

This study shows for the first time the development of a degradable magnesium phosphate cement paste which fulfills the requirements for in-situ implant augmentation. Simultaneously, a 48% increase in stability is demonstrated for a scenario where implant anchorage is difficult in osteoporotic bone.

Treatment of Metaphyseal Defects in Plated Proximal Humerus Fractures with a New Augmentation Technique-A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

Background and Objectives: Unstable proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with metaphyseal defects-weakening the osteosynthesis construct-are challenging to treat. A new augmentation technique of plated complex PHFs with metaphyseal defects was recently introduced in the clinical practice. This biomechanical study aimed to analyze the stability of plated unstable PHFs augmented via implementation of this technique versus no augmentation. Materials and Methods: Three-part AO/OTA 11-B1.1 unstable PHFs with metaphyseal defects were created in sixteen paired human cadaveric humeri (average donor age 76 years, range 66-92 years), pairwise assigned to two groups for locked plate fixation with identical implant configuration. In one of the groups, six-milliliter polymethylmethacrylate bone cement with medium viscosity (seven minutes after mixing) was placed manually through the lateral window in the defect of the humerus head after its anatomical reduction to the shaft and prior to the anatomical reduction of the greater tuberosity fragment. All specimens were tested biomechanically in a 25° adduction, applying progressively increasing cyclic loading at 2 Hz until failure. Interfragmentary movements were monitored by motion tracking and X-ray imaging. Results: Initial stiffness was not significantly different between the groups, p = 0.467. Varus deformation of the humerus head fragment, fracture displacement at the medial humerus head aspect, and proximal screw migration and cut-out were significantly smaller in the augmented group after 2000, 4000, 6000, 8000 and 10,000 cycles, p ≤ 0.019. Cycles to 5° varus deformation of the humerus head fragment-set as a clinically relevant failure criterion-and failure load were significantly higher in the augmented group, p = 0.018. Conclusions: From a biomechanical standpoint, augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement placed in the metaphyseal humerus head defect of plated unstable PHFs considerably enhances fixation stability and can reduce the risk of postoperative complications.

[Translated article] Comparative biomechanical study of two configurations of cemented screws in a simulated proximal humerus fracture fixed with locking plate

INTRODUCTION

Screw tip augmentation with bone cement for fixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures seems to improve stability and to decrease the rate of complications related to implant failure. However, the optimal augmentation combinations are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the relative stability of two augmentations combinations under axial compression load in a simulated proximal humerus fractures fixed with locking plate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A surgical neck osteotomy was created in five pairs of embalmed humeri with a mean age of 74 years (range 46-93 years), secured with a stainless-steel locking-compression plate. In each pair of humeri, on the right humerus were cemented the screws A and E, and in the contralateral side were cemented screws B and D of the locking plate. The specimens were first tested cyclically in axial compression for 6000 cycles to evaluate interfragmentary motion (dynamic study). At the end of the cycling test, the specimens were loaded in compression force simulating varus bending with increasing load magnitude until failure of the construct (static study).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in interfragmentary motion between the two configurations of cemented screws in the dynamic study (p=0.463). When tested to failure, the configuration of cemented screws in lines B and D demonstrated higher compression load to failure (2218N vs. 2105, p=0.901) and higher stiffness (125N/mm vs. 106N/mm, p=0.672). However, no statistically significant differences were reported in any of these variables.

CONCLUSIONS

In simulated proximal humerus fractures, the configuration of the cemented screws does not influence the implant stability when a low-energy cyclical load is applied. Cementing the screws in rows B and D provides similar strength to the previously proposed cemented screws configuration and could avoid complications observed in clinical studies.

Reversed windshield-wiper effect leads to failure of cement-augmented pedicle screw: Biomechanical mechanism analysis by finite element experiment

The failure mode of cement-augmented pedicle screw (CAPS) was different from common pedicle screw. No biomechanical study of this failure mode named as "reversed windshield-wiper effect" was reported. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this failure mode, a series of finite element models of CAPS and PS were modified on L4 osseous model. Nine models were created according to the cement volume at 0.5 mL interval (range: 1-5 mL). Pullout load and cranio-caudal loads were applied on the screws. Stress and instantaneous rotation center (IRC) of the vertebra were observed. Under cranio-caudal load, the stress concentrated on the screw tip and pedicle region. The maximal stress (MS) at the screw tip region was +2.143 MPa higher than pedicle region. With cement volume increasing, the maximal stress (MS) at the screw tip region decreased dramatically, while MS at pedicle region was not obviously affected. As dose increased to 1.5 mL, the MS at pedicle region became higher than screw tip region and the maximal stress difference was observed at 3.5 mL. IRC of the vertebra located at the facet joint region in PS model. While IRC in CAPS models shifted anteriorly closer to the vertebral body with the increasing of cement volume. Under axial pull-out load, the maximal stress (MS) of cancellous bone in CAPS models was 29.53-50.04% lower than that 2.228 MPa in PS model. MS in the screw-bone interface did not change significantly with cement volume increasing. Therefore, the possible mechanism is that anterior shift of IRC and the negative difference value of MS between screw tip and pedicle region due to cement augmentation, leading to the screw rotate around the cement-screw complex as the fulcrum point.

Comparative biomechanical study of two configurations of cemented screws in a simulated proximal humerus fracture fixed with locking plate

INTRODUCTION

Screw tip augmentation with bone cement for fixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures seems to improve stability and to decrease the rate of complications related to implant failure. However, the optimal augmentation combinations are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the relative stability of two augmentations combinations under axial compression load in a simulated proximal humerus fractures fixed with locking plate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A surgical neck osteotomy was created in five pairs of embalmed humeri with a mean age of 74 years (range 46-93 years), secured with a stainless-steel locking-compression plate. In each pair of humeri, on the right humerus were cemented the screws A and E, and in the contralateral side were cemented screws B and D of the locking plate. The specimens were first tested cyclically in axial compression for 6,000 cycles to evaluate interfragmentary motion (dynamic study). At the end of the cycling test, the specimens were loaded in compression force simulating varus bending with increasing load magnitude until failure of the construct (static study).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in interfragmentary motion between the two configurations of cemented screws in the dynamic study (p=0.463). When tested to failure, the configuration of cemented screws in lines B and D demonstrated higher compression load to failure (2218N vs. 2105, p=0.901) and higher stiffness (125N/mm vs. 106N/mm, p=0.672). However, no statistically significant differences were reported in any of these variables.

CONCLUSIONS

In simulated proximal humerus fractures, the configuration of the cemented screws does not influence the implant stability when a low-energy cyclical load is applied. Cementing the screws in rows B and D provides similar strength to the previously proposed cemented screws configuration and could avoid complications observed in clinical studies.

Augmentation in fragility fractures, bone of contention: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a complex multifactorial disease characterized by reduced bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue linked to an increase of fracture risk. Fragility fractures occur in osteoporotic subjects due to low-energy trauma. Osteoporotic patients are a challenge regarding the correct surgical planning, as it can include fixation augmentation techniques to reach a more stable anchorage of the implant, possibly lowering re-intervention rate and in-hospital stay.

METHODS

The PubMed database and the Google Scholar search engine were used to identify articles on all augmentation techniques and their association with fragility fractures until January 2022. In total, we selected 40 articles that included studies focusing on humerus, hip, spine, and tibia.

RESULTS

Literature review showed a quantity of materials that can be used for reconstruction of bone defects in fragility fractures in different anatomic locations, with good results over the stability and strength of the implant anchorage, when compared to non-augmented fractures.

CONCLUSION

Nowadays there are no recommendations and no consensus about the use of augmentation techniques in osteoporotic fractures. Our literature review points at implementing the use of bone augmentation techniques with a specific indication for elderly patients with comminuted fractures and poor bone quality.

Feasibility and Radiological Outcome of Minimally Invasive Locked Plating of Proximal Humeral Fractures in Geriatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures are common injuries in the elderly. Locked plating showed high complication and reoperation rates at first. However, with second-generation implants and augmentation, minimally invasive locked plating might be a viable alternative to arthroplasty or conservative treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients with proximal humerus fractures treated between 2014 and 2020 with locked plating. All patients over 60 years of age who underwent surgery for a proximal humerus fracture with plate osteosynthesis (NCB, Philos, or Philos with cement) during the specified period were included. Pathological fractures, intramedullary nailing, or arthroplasty were excluded. Primary outcome measurements included secondary displacement and surgical complications. Secondary outcomes comprised function and mortality within one year.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients (mean age 75.6 +/- 8.9 years; 194 women and 55 men) were included in the study. No significant difference in the AO fracture classification could be found. Ninety-two patients were surgically treated with first-generation locked plating (NCB, Zimmer Biomet, Wayne Township, IN, USA), 113 patients with second-generation locked plating (Philos, Depuy Synthes, Wayne Township, IN, USA), and 44 patients with cement-augmented second-generation locked plating (Philos, Traumacem V+, Depuy Synthes). A 6-week radiological follow-up was completed for 189 patients. In all groups, X-rays were performed one day after surgery, and these showed no differences concerning the head shaft angle between the groups. The mean secondary varus dislocation (decrease of the head shaft angle) after six weeks for first-generation locked plating was 6.6 ± 12° (n = 72), for second-generation locked plating 4.4 ± 6.5 (n = 83), and for second-generation with augmentation 1.9 ± 3.7 (n = 35) with a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.012). Logistic regression showed a significant dependency for secondary dislocation for the type of treatment (p = 0.038), age (p = 0.01), and preoperative varus fracture displacement (p = 0.033). Significantly fewer surgical complications have been observed in the augmented second-generation locked plating group (NCB: 26.3%; Philos 21.5%; Philos-augmented 8.6%; p = 0.015). Range of motion was documented in 122 out of 209 patients after 3 months. In the Philos-augmented group, 50% of the patients achieved at least 90° anteversion and abduction, which was only about a third of the patients in the other 2 groups (NCB 34.8%, n = 46; Philos 35.8%, n = 56; augmented-Philos 50.0%, n = 20; p = 0.429).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive locked plating is still a valuable treatment option for geriatric patients. With augmentation and modern implants, the complication rate is low and comparable to those of reverse shoulder arthroplasty reported in the literature, even in the challenging group of elderly patients.

[Augmentation in the treatment of proximal humeral and femoral fractures]

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral and trochanteric femoral fractures in older patients are typically caused by low-energy trauma and are therefore often associated with osteoporosis. The treatment of such fragility fractures can be difficult as implant purchase is reduced in osteoporotic bone. By augmenting the fixation with cement the contact surface between implant and bone can be increased, which improves the stability of the osteosynthesis.

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the operative technique for the augmentation of trochanteric femoral fractures treated with the Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA, DePuy Synthes, Oberdorf BL, Switzerland) and proximal humeral fractures stabilized with a PHILOS plate (DePuy Synthes). Furthermore, the evidence for the augmentation of these two fracture types is elucidated.

RESULTS

Biomechanical studies could show an improved stability of the osteosynthesis after successful augmentation for both fracture types. The current evidence also indicates a clinical reduction of fixation failure. Whether the augmentation has an influence on the functional result could so far not yet clearly be proven.

CONCLUSION

Augmentation seems to be a safe and valuable addition to available treatment options especially for patients with fragility fractures.

Age-Independent Clinical Outcome in Proximal Humeral Fractures: 2-Year Results Using the Example of a Precontoured Locking Plate

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment strategy for the proximal humeral fracture (PHF) remains controversial. The debate is centered around the correct treatment strategy in the elderly patient population. The present study investigated whether age predicts the functional outcome of locking plate osteosynthesis for this fracture entity.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients with surgically treated displaced PHF between 01/2017 and 01/2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were treated by locking plate osteosynthesis. The cohort was divided into two groups: Group 1 (≥65 years) and Group 2 (<65 years). At the follow-up examination, the SSV, CMS, ASES, and Oxford Shoulder Score (OS), as well as a radiological follow-up, was obtained. The quality of fracture reduction is evaluated according to Schnetzke et al. Results: Of the 95 patients, 79 were followed up (83.1%). Group 1 consists of 42 patients (age range: 65-89 years, FU: 25 months) and Group 2 of 37 patients (28-64 years, FU: 24 months). The clinical results showed no significant differences between both groups: SSV 73.4 ± 23.4% (Group 1) vs. 80.5 ± 189% (Group 2). CMS: 79.4 ± 21 vs. 81.9 ± 16, ASES: 77.2 ± 20.4 vs. 77.5 ± 23.1, OS: 39.5 ± 9.1 vs. 40.8 ± 8.2; OS: 39.5 ± 9.1 vs. 40.8 ± 8.2. In the radiological follow-up, fractures healed in all cases. Furthermore, the quality of fracture reduction in both groups is comparable without significant differences. The revision rate was 9.5% in Group 1 vs. 16.2% in Group 2.

DISCUSSION

Both age groups show comparable functional outcomes and complication rates. Thus, the locking plate osteosynthesis can be used irrespective of patient age; the treatment decision should instead be based on fracture morphology and individual patient factors.

Primary stability of cement augmentation in locking plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures: A comparison of absorbable versus non-absorbable cement

BACKGROUND

Cement augmentation has been suggested to increase the stability of screw anchoring in osteoporotic humeral fractures. Initial results are promising but may be jeopardized by cement leakage into the joint and difficult implant removal. Absorbable cement might have advantages in this regard, but it is unclear if the primary stability of both techniques is equivalent to each other. Therefore, this study aimed to compare its primary stability with that of non-absorbable cement augmentation.

METHODS

Nineteen cadaveric humeri with two-part fracture models were treated with locking plate osteosynthesis and cement augmentation using either absorbable calcium phosphate cement (group 1) or polymethylmethacrylate (group 2). Fracture movement, stiffness, failure mode, and ultimate load under cyclic compressive loading were examined and compared between the groups.

FINDINGS

The absolute and relative stiffness values in group 1 were significantly smaller than those in group 2 after 50 cycles (group 1: 114 ± 38 N/mm and 94 ± 8% vs. group 2: 188 ± 71 N/mm and 106 ± 9%; p₅₀ = 0.022), 2000 cycles (group 1: 97 ± 34 N/mm and 81 ± 15% vs. group 2: 153 ± 47 N/mm and 88 ± 15%; p₂₀₀₀ = 0.028), and 5000 cycles (group 1: 98 ± 40 N/mm and 81 ± 22% vs. group 2: 158 ± 40 N/mm and 92 ± 16%; p₅₀₀₀ = 0.028). The failure load was not statistically significantly different between the groups.

INTERPRETATION

Although the PMAA group showed higher values for absolute and relative stiffness, no statistically significant difference was found in the primary stability between absorbable and non-absorbable cement augmentation supporting plate osteosynthesis in proximal humeral fractures. In view of the potential advantages of bio-absorbable cement during the healing process, its use should be considered for the augmentation and stabilization of osteoporotic fractures.

Evaluation of mushroom-shaped allograft for unstable proximal humerus fractures

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humerus fractures are common injuries of the elderly. Different treatment options, depending on fracture complexity and stability, have been recommended in the literature. Particularly for varus displaced fractures with a lack of medial support, and patients suffering from osteoporosis, structural allografts can be used to enhance the stability of the construct. An individually shaped allograft has been suggested in the literature and investigated in a clinical setting. However, biomechanical properties have yet to be evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four fresh-frozen humeri and 12 femoral heads were obtained, and an unstable three-part fracture of the humeral head was simulated. Fracture fixation was achieved by using a locking plate in both groups. In the test group, a mushroom-shaped allograft was tailored out of a femoral head to individually fit the void inside the humeral head. Specimens were fitted with a 3D motion analysis system and cyclically loaded with a stepwise increasing load magnitude in a varus-valgus bending test until failure or up to a maximum of 10,000 load cycles.

RESULTS

The mushroom group reached a significantly higher number of load cycles (8342; SD 1,902; CI 7133-9550) compared to the control group (3475; SD 1488; CI 2530-4420; p < 0.001). Additionally, the test group showed significantly higher stiffness values concerning all observational points (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This mushroom-shaped allograft in combination with a locking plate significantly increased load to failure as well as stiffness of the construct when exposed to varus-valgus bending forces. Therefore, it might be a viable option for surgical treatment of unstable and varus displaced proximal humerus fractures to superiorly prevent loss of reduction and varus collapse.

Evaluation of screw placement in proximal humerus fractures regarding drilling manoeuvre and surgeon's experience

INTRODUCTION

Following proximal humeral plate osteosynthesis, mechanical complication rates ranging up to 40% have been reported. The study aims to determine the influence of surgeons' experience and the technique of drilling on the complication rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample involved 45 cadaveric humeri. Six orthopaedic surgeons were divided into two groups with regard to their level of experience (novice versus expert group). On each humerus two different proximal humerus plates were applied. Drillings were performed either with a sharp or worn drill bit (to simulate either sharp or blunt drilling). The respective holes were drilled until the respective participant thought to have placed the drill bit subchondrally, followed by perforation of the cartilage of the humeral head. Both these values and cases of unintended penetration of the articular cavity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fourteen holes (3.6%) were primary penetrated in the joint cavity in the worn-drill-bit-subgroup and 19 holes (5%) in the sharp-drill-bit-group. The latter had an average distance between the chosen subchondral position and the humeral articular surface of 8.3 mm and the worn-drill-bit-subgroup was at 10.6 mm. In the novice group 20 perforations (5.2%) of the joint space occurred and the mean interval between the chosen subchondral point and the humeral articular surface was 4.0 mm. The experienced surgeons showed a perforation rate of 3.4% and were at a mean of 14.9 mm. There were no significant differences regarding drilling manoeuvres and experience.

CONCLUSION

Although our results are satisfactory, they can be traced back to the relatively high interval between the respective chosen position of the drill bit and the humeral articular surface which may not guarantee screw stability during ORIF of all fracture patterns.

Principles of Locking Plate Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures

Proximal humerus fractures are common, particularly in elderly patients and those with osteopenia or osteoporosis. Although nonsurgical management results in satisfactory outcomes for most patients, surgical treatment is indicated in select cases. Despite an increasing trend toward arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures can still provide excellent clinical outcomes. Proper technique for internal fixation of the proximal humerus requires an understanding of osseous and neurovascular anatomy. In particular, understanding reliable regions of biomechanically superior bone can help prevent failure of fixation. Biomechanical studies have shown that locked plating of proximal humerus fractures provides stable fixation. Cadaveric and finite element models underscore the importance of screw placement in the posteromedial metaphysis. When medial column support is challenging to obtain, or when bone quality is poor, augmentation with bone autograft, allograft, and/or synthetic composites can improve the biomechanics of internal fixation constructs. The purpose of this review is to outline the anatomic, biologic, and biomechanical principles of plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing fixation and preventing fixation failure.

Latest Trends in the Current Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures - an Analysis of 1162 Cases at a Level-1 Trauma Centre with a Special Focus on Shoulder Surgery

BACKGROUND

The management of proximal humeral fracture (PHF) is not only complex but ever changing. Published epidemiological data are often dated and do not factor in demographic changes or the latest developments in implant material and surgical techniques.

AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the epidemiology and actual treatment of PHF at a level-1 trauma centre, with a special focus on shoulder surgery.

HYPOTHESES

1. Between 2009 to 2012 and 2014 to 2017, an increase in complex PHF entities can be observed. 2. In correlation with fracture complexity, an increasing number of comorbidities, especially osteoporosis, can be observed.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2017, a total of 589 patients (73% female; mean age: 68.96 ± 14.9 years) with 593 PHFs were treated. Patient records and imaging (XRs and CTs) of all patients were analysed. Fractures with ad latus displacement of a maximum of 0,5 cm and/or humeral head angulation of less than 20° were classified as non-displaced. Patients with displaced fractures were included in the analysis of the therapeutic algorithm. These results were compared to those of a cohort 2009 to 2012 (566 patients, 569 PHFs), which used the same inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The two cohorts showed comparable patient numbers, as well as gender and age distributions. Between 2009 to 2012 and 2014 to 2017, a decrease in 2-part fractures (13.9 to 8.6%) and a simultaneous increase in 4-part fractures (20.4 to 30%), and thus fracture complexity was observed. Further decreases were observed in conservative therapy (27.8 to 20.6%), nail osteosynthesis (10.7 to 2.7%) and anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (5,4 to 1%). Furthermore, there was an increase in the use of locking plate osteosynthesis (43.2 to 56.7%) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (9 to 18.4%). The general trend shows an increase in surgical therapy between the years (72.2 to 79.4%), as well as an increase in osteoporosis incidence (13 to 20.6%). The greatest numbers of comorbidities were found in 3- and 4-part fractures.

CONCLUSION

There is an increase in both the complexity of fractures and the number of surgically treated fractures between 2009 and 2012. Furthermore, an increase in osteoporosis numbers can be observed. New implants (PEEK, fenestrated screws for cement augmentation) and new surgical techniques (double plating osteosynthesis) were used as a result of increasing fracture complexity. Moreover, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was used more commonly.

Dynamic locking screws in proximal humeral plate osteosynthesis demonstrate superior fixation properties: a biomechanical study

Purpose

Angular stable implants reduced the complication rate in the treatment of humeral head fractures. But the failure rate is still high. To further reduce the risk of cut-out, cement augmentation of screws was introduced. A reason for failure of plate osteosynthesis might be the extremely high stiffness of the screw-plate interface leading to a loss of reduction and cut-out of screws. A more homogeneous distribution of the forces on all screws may avoid secondary dislocation. We hypothesize that dynamic osteosynthesis minimizes screw loosening and results in a higher load to failure than standard locking screws.

Methods

Twelve paired human humerus specimens were analysed. A standardized three-part fracture model with a metaphyseal defect was simulated. Within each pair of humeri, one was fixed with a Philos plate and standard locking screws (LS), whereas the other humerus was fixed with a Philos plate and dynamic locking screws (DLS). A cyclic varus-bending test or a rotation test with increasing loading force was performed until failure of the screw-bone-fixation.

Results

In the varus bending test, pairs failed by screw loosening in the humeral head. The LS-group reached 2901 (601–5201) load cycles until failure, while the DLS-group failed after 3731 (2001–5601) cycles. This corresponds to a median loading of 195 N for the LS-group and 235 N for the DLS-group (p = 0.028). In the rotation test the LS-group reached a median of 1101 (501–1501) load cycles until failure of fixation occurred, while the DLS-group failed after 1401 (401–2201) cycles (p = 0.225).

Conclusions

Plate fixation using dynamic locking screws for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures demonstrated more load cycles until failure compared to standard locking plate osteosynthesis.

Operative treatment of 2-part surgical neck type fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: Cement augmented locking plate PHILOS™ vs. proximal humerus nail multiloc®

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare locked plating with intramedullary nailing in the treatment of displaced 2-part surgical neck type proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients ≥60 years of age with a displaced 2-part surgical neck type fracture of the proximal humerus were surgically treated and randomized for either augmented locking plate fixation Group LP or multiplanar intramedullary nailing Group IN. The primary outcome parameter was the Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm and Hand (DASH) Score after 24 months. Secondary outcome parameters were the age- and gender adjusted Constant Murley Score (CS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES), the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) after 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 and 24 months. Further parameters included the quality of fracture reduction as well as complications and revision surgeries. 60 patients with a mean age of 75±9.8 were included and longitudinally followed over 24 months (follow-up rate: 83.3%).

RESULTS

The mean DASH-Scores at 24 months was 32.6 ± 9.7 points in Group LP versus 37.8 ± 8.3 points in Group IN (p = 0.04). The mean Constant Murley Score at 24 months follow-up was 76.2 ± 7.7 points in Group LP compared to 72 ± 9.1 points in Group IN (p = 0.08). The ASES at 24 months follow-up was 75.1 ± 9 points in Group LP versus to 73.5 ± 8.9 in Group IN (p = 0.51). The OSS at 24 months was 43.7 ± 8.1 in Group LP compared to 38.2 ± 10 in Group IN (p = 0.03). The SF-36 at 24 months was 74.7 ± 12.5 in Group LP versus to 70.9 ± 12.8 in Group IN (p = 0.29). Screw cutting out was observed in n = 2 (6,7%) cases of Group LP, and in none of Group IN (p = 0.49). Revision surgery was necessary in n = 2 (6.7%) cases of Group LP and in two cases of Group IN (6.7%, p = 1).

CONCLUSION

Functional outcomes are similar at 2-years follow-up in locked plating with screw tip augmentation compared to intramedullary nailing. Both implants reached low complication- and revision rates for two-part surgical neck types fractures of the proximal humerus in patients ≥60 years, if anatomic fracture reduction and accurate implant position was obtained.

Trends in the Characterization of the Proximal Humerus in Biomechanical Studies: A Review

Proximal humerus fractures are becoming more common due to the aging of the population, and more related scientific research is also emerging. Biomechanical studies attempt to optimize treatments, taking into consideration the factors involved, to obtain the best possible treatment scenario. To achieve this, the use of finite element analysis (FEA) is necessary, to experiment with situations that are difficult to replicate, and which are sometimes unethical. Furthermore, low costs and time requirements make FEA the perfect choice for biomechanical studies. Part of the complete process of an FEA involves three-dimensional (3D) bone modeling, mechanical properties assignment, and meshing the bone model to be analyzed. Due to the lack of standardization for bone modeling, properties assignment, and the meshing processes, this article aims to review the most widely used techniques to model the proximal humerus bone, according to its anatomy, for FEA. This study also seeks to understand the knowledge and bias behind mechanical properties assignment for bone, and the similarities/differences in mesh properties used in previous FEA studies of the proximal humerus. The best ways to achieve these processes, according to the evidence, will be analyzed and discussed, seeking to obtain the most accurate results for FEA simulations.

Cement augmentation of calcar screws may provide the greatest reduction in predicted screw cut-out risk for proximal humerus plating based on validated parametric computational modelling: Augmenting proximal humerus fracture plating

Aims

Fixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures remains challenging even with state-of-the-art locking plates. Despite the demonstrated biomechanical benefit of screw tip augmentation with bone cement, the clinical findings have remained unclear, potentially as the optimal augmentation combinations are unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the biomechanical benefits of the augmentation options in a humeral locking plate using finite element analysis (FEA).

Methods

A total of 64 cement augmentation configurations were analyzed using six screws of a locking plate to virtually fix unstable three-part fractures in 24 low-density proximal humerus models under three physiological loading cases (4,608 simulations). The biomechanical benefit of augmentation was evaluated through an established FEA methodology using the average peri-screw bone strain as a validated predictor of cyclic cut-out failure.

Results

The biomechanical benefit was already significant with a single cemented screw and increased with the number of augmented screws, but the configuration was highly influential. The best two-screw (mean 23%, SD 3% reduction) and the worst four-screw (mean 22%, SD 5%) combinations performed similarly. The largest benefits were achieved with augmenting screws purchasing into the calcar and having posteriorly located tips. Local bone mineral density was not directly related to the improvement.

Conclusion

The number and configuration of cemented screws strongly determined how augmentation can alleviate the predicted risk of cut-out failure. Screws purchasing in the calcar and posterior humeral head regions may be prioritized. Although requiring clinical corroborations, these findings may explain the controversial results of previous clinical studies not controlling the choices of screw augmentation.

Does cement augmentation of the screws in angular stable plating for proximal humerus fractures influence the radiological outcome: a retrospective assessment

BACKGROUND

Screw-tip augmentation in angular stable plating offers new possibilities for the treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures. This retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the radiological outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated with angular stable plates and additional screw-tip cement augmentation in patients over the age of 60.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective single centre analysis was conducted from June 2013 to December 2016. The minimum follow-up time was set to 6 months after surgery. Anatomical reduction and fixation were evaluated in respect to reattached tuberosities to the head fragment and the adequate restoration of the calcar area not showing any valgus or varus malalignment. Complete fracture healing was determined 3 months after surgery. Any failures such as secondary displacement, primary screw perforation, intraarticular cement leakage and avascular necrosis of the humeral head with concomitant screw cut-out were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 24 patients (21 females; 3 males) at a median age of 77.5 (62-96) years were included. Five 2-part, twelve 3-part and seven 4-part fractures were detected. The measured median BMD value of 23 patients was 78.4 mg/cm³ (38.8-136.9 mg/cm³). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 50% of the patients. In most cases, the A level screws and the B1 screw were augmented with bone cement by a median of 7 (5-9) head screws used. Postoperative varus displacement was not detected in any of the patients. One patient (4.2%) sustained an early secondary displacement. Intraarticular cement leakage was detected in 3 patients (2 head-split fractures). Avascular necrosis of the humeral head was observed in 4 patients (16.7%). Revision surgery was necessary in four cases, using hemiarthroplasty twice and reverse shoulder arthroplasty the other two times.

CONCLUSION

Screw-tip augmentation in angular stable plating for proximal humerus fracture treatment showed a low secondary displacement rate of 4.2% in patients suffering from poor bone quality. Nevertheless, the occurrence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head with mainly severe fracture patterns observed in this study was higher compared to previously reported results in the literature. Cement augmentation in head-split fractures is not recommended, considering the high risk of an intraarticular cement leakage.

Secondary Perforation Risk in Plate Osteosynthesis of Unstable Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Biomechanical Investigation of the Effect of Screw Length

Secondary perforation of screws into the joint surface is a commonly reported mechanical fixation failure mode in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures (PHF). This study investigated the influence that screws tip to joint distance (TJD) has on the biomechanical risk of secondary screw perforation and the stability of PHF. Ten pairs of cadaveric proximal humeri with a wide range of bone mineral density were used. Each specimen was osteotomized and instrumented with the PHILOS plate, simulating a highly unstable 3-part fracture. Bones were randomized into a long screw group (LSG) with 4 mm TJD, or a short screw group (SSG) with 8 mm TJD. A custom biomechanical setup was used to test the samples to failure cyclically with a constant valley load and an increasing ramp. The number of cycles to the initial screw loosening event was significantly higher for the LSG (mean ± standard deviation: 17,532 ± 6,458) compared with the SSG (11,102 ± 5,440) (p < 0.01). The mode of failure during testing was lateral-inferior displacement combined with varus collapse, with calcar screws perforating first. The number of cycles to failure event for LSG (27,849 ± 5,648) was not significantly different compared with SSG (28,782 ± 7,307) (p = 0.50). Screws that purchase closer to the joint had better initial stability and resistance against loosening. Placing longer screws, within limits dictated by the surgical guide, is expected to decrease the risk of secondary perforation failures in unstable PHF. These findings require clinical corroboration. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2625-2633, 2019.

Osteoporotic Bone: When and How to Use Augmentation?

The number of fragility fractures is rising, and treatment is a challenge for orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Various augmentation options have been developed to prevent mechanical failure. Different composites can be used based on the fracture type, patient needs, and biomechanical needs. Indications for augmentation are not limited to osteoporotic fractures but can also be performed as a salvage procedure or in pathologic fractures. Biomechanical studies have shown advantages for augmented implants in the spine, proximal femur, and humerus. Clinical studies are preliminary but promising, showing good clinical results after augmentation with reduced mechanical failure and minimal complications.

Augmented Fixation for Fractures of the Appendicular Skeleton

Despite advances in technology such as locked plating, osteoporotic bone and bone defects remain challenging complications for orthopaedic surgeons. The concept of augmented fixation is useful in these settings. Augmented fixation can be described as improving construct strength and stability by enhancing the surrounding environment. By understanding and using the techniques of alternative fixation strategies, endosteal or medullary support, structural grafting, or the use of bone graft substitutes in combination with standard or integrated fixation, surgeons can improve the chances of success when treating difficult fractures. The purpose of this article is to introduce the reader to the concept of augmented fixation, review strategies for its application, and review applicable published results.

Augmentation of plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of current biomechanical and clinical studies

INTRODUCTION

Secondary dislocation due to loss of fixation is the most common complication after plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. A wide range of different techniques for augmentation has been described to improve the primary and secondary stability. Nevertheless, comparative analyses on the specific advantages and limitations are missing. Therefore, the aim of the present article was to systematically review and evaluate the current biomechanical and clinical studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The databases of PubMed and EMBASE were comprehensively searched for studies on augmentation techniques for proximal humeral fractures using defined search terms. Subsequently, all articles identified were screened for eligibility and subdivided in either clinical or biomechanical studies. Furthermore, the level of evidence and study quality were assessed according the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and the Coleman Methodology Score, respectively.

RESULTS

Out of 2788, 15 biomechanical and 30 clinical studies were included. The most common techniques were structural allogenic or autologous bone grafting to enhance the medial support, metaphyseal void filling utilizing synthetic bone substitutes or bone grafts, and screw-tip augmentation with bone cement. Biomechanical data were available for structural bone grafting to enhance the medial support, void filling with synthetic bone substitutes, as well as for screw-tip augmentation. Clinical evidence ranged from level II-IV and study quality was 26-70/100 points. Only one clinical study was found investigating screw-tip augmentation. All studies included revealed that any kind of augmentation positively enhances mechanical stability, reduces the rate of secondary dislocation, and improves patients' clinical outcome. None of the studies showed relevant augmentation-associated complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation of plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures seems to be a reliable and safe procedure. All common techniques mechanically increase the constructs' stability. Clinically evaluated procedures show reduced complication rates and improved patient outcomes. Augmentation techniques seem to have the highest significance in situations of reduced bone mineral density and in high-risk fractures, such as 4-part fractures. However, more high-quality and comparative clinical trials are needed to give evidence-based treatment recommendations.

Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of a ready-to-use calcium phosphate cement implanted to augment intramedullary nail fixation of a three-part humeral head fracture model

The aim of this study was the dynamic biomechanical evaluation of a ready-to-use oil-based calcium phosphate cement paste implanted to augment intramedullary nail fixation of a three-part humeral head fracture model. Fractures in the osteoporotic bone are often fractures of the proximal humerus. Secondary fracture displacements due to cut-out in osteoporotic bone have been observed in up to 13% of cases. Procedures have been developed to augment fracture fixation with polymethylmethacrylate to increase stability, but there are still unsolved challenges relating to its material-specific properties. Calcium phosphate cement could be a biological alternative in the augmentation of osteoporotic fractures because of its more favourable material properties. Fracture fixation was performed on eight pairs of human cadaveric bones to stabilize a standardized three-part humeral head fracture model by implantation of the Targon^® PH (Braun-Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) intramedullary nail and insertion of three head screws and two bicortical shaft screws. The procedure was randomized, and one bone of each pair received calcium phosphate cement augmentation. Custom-made cannulated screws with an open lateral slot facilitated augmentation, making it possible to cement the threaded portion of the screw (1-mL calcium phosphate cement/screw). After the calcium phosphate cement had hardened, the humeri were subjected to dynamic axial loading. Load was progressively increased, monitored by ultrasound-based motion analysis, and total deformation was recorded. Load testing continued until implant failure. The augmented group withstood significantly more cycles before implant failure. The average initial stiffness showed a significant difference between the two study groups. Ultrasonic sensor technology was used to measure angular displacement during testing and a significant difference was found. Calcium phosphate cement offers a potential alternative to implant augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic humeral head fractures. Future studies are required to confirm these observations clinically in vivo.

Cement augmentation of glenoid baseplate screws does not improve primary stability in reversed shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

Cuff tear arthritis and complex proximal humeral fractures are common pathologies that are frequently addressed by the implantation of a reversed shoulder prosthesis. The present cadaveric study aimed to analyze the effect of cement augmentation of the glenoid component on the primary stability in geriatric patients.

HYPOTHESIS

Cement augmentation of glenoid baseplate screws has an influence on primary stability in reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Glenoid base plates (Delta Xtend, DePuy Synthes, Westchester, USA) were implanted in 6 pairs of formalin-fixated scapulae of 4 female and 2 male donors (average age 83 years). Two angle stable screws were placed at the superior and inferior position. Cement augmentation was performed with 2ml bone cement (Kyphon, Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) per screw in right specimens. Afterwards, biomechanical testing with 600 to 1000N (100 cycles) at a 65° abduction angle was performed. Finally, a load-to-failure analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

No implant loosening was observed during cyclic tests from 600N to 1000N. In addition no difference in the plastic deformation was detected at 600N (p=0.301), 700N (p=0.522), 800N (p=0.480), 900N (p=0.521) and 1000N (p=0.748). Load-to-failure analyses revealed implant loosening at 3314N (SD 823N) in the cement-augmented implants and at 3059N (SD 974N) in scapulae with non-cemented screws (p=0.522).

DISCUSSION

Cement-augmented fixation of the glenoid component did not result in an increased primary stability in this study. Thus, the application of cement should be critically assessed considering associated risks and increased costs.

LEVEL OF PROOF

Basic science study, controlled laboratory study.

Screws with larger core diameter and lower thread pitch increase the stability of locked plating in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the screw design as a factor for stability of the bone-implant interface in locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Aim of the present study was to analyze if locking screws with a large core diameter and a low thread pitch provide increased stability when compared to conventional locking screws.

METHODS

3-Part proximal humeral fractures were created in ten pairs of osteoporotic human cadaveric humeri and fixed with a locking plate. Head fixation was performed with screws with a large core diameter (soft bone screws) in one humerus and with conventional cancellous locking screws in the other humerus of each donor. Specimens were loaded in the varus bending position. Stiffness, failure loads, plate bending and motion at the bone-implant interface were evaluated using mechanical sensors and an optical motion capture system.

FINDINGS

The stiffness of the construct for the soft bone screws was 299.8 N/mm (IR, 72.1 N/mm) and 203.9 N/mm (IR, 37.3 N/mm) for the conventional locking screws (p = 0.005). Plate bending did not differ between the two groups. Motion at the bone-implant interface was significantly reduced in the soft bone screw group (p < 0.05). The median load-to-failure was significantly higher in the soft bone screw group (358 N vs. 313 N; p = 0.012).

INTERPRETATION

The use of soft bone screws is associated with less motion at the bone-implant interface and therefore greater fixation strength when compared to fixation with conventional locking screws. Clinical studies are needed to prove these biomechanical findings in the in vivo situation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Controlled laboratory study.

Cement augmentation of the proximal humerus internal locking system in elderly patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Cement augmentation of the proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS) screws might reduce complication rates in osteoporotic bones. This study compared the risk of mechanical failure during the first year after PHILOS™ treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) without (control group) and with (augmented group) screw augmentation. Secondary objectives were to report shoulder functions, quality of life (QoL), adverse events (AEs), and reoperation rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter randomized trial enrolled patients aged ≥ 65 years with displaced/unstable PHF from eight European centers. Randomization was performed during surgery through sealed opaque envelopes. Mechanical failures were assessed by two independent reviewers via radiographs, shoulder function by Quick DASH, SPADI, and Constant Murley scores, and QoL by EQ-5D. Follow-ups were planned at postoperative 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The preliminary analysis of 6-week radiographs of the first 59 enrolled patients suggested a mechanical failure rate lower than expected and the difference between groups was too small to be detected by the planned sample size of 144. The trial was prematurely terminated after 67 patients had been enrolled: 34 (27 eligible) in the control group and 33 (29 eligible) in the augmented group. Follow-ups were performed as planned. Nine patients had mechanical failures and the failure rates (95% CI) were: augmented group, 16.1% (5.5; 33.7); control group, 14.8% (4.2; 33.7); the relative risk (95% CI) for the augmented group was 1.09 (0.32; 3.65) compared to the control group (p = 1.000). No statistically significant differences in shoulder function, QoL, and AEs were observed between study groups at 1 year. Nine patients (15.8%) underwent a revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to premature termination, the study was underpowered. A larger study will be necessary to determine if cement augmentation lowers the risk of mechanical failure rate.

Effect of pedicle screw augmentation with a self-curing elastomeric material under cranio-caudal cyclic loading-a cadaveric biomechanical study

Background

Pedicle screws can be augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement through cannulated and fenestrated pedicle screws to improve screw anchorage. To overcome the drawbacks of PMMA, a modified augmentation technique applying a self-curing elastomeric material into a balloon-created cavity prior to screw insertion was developed and evaluated. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of the established and novel augmentation technique on pedicle screw anchorage in a biomechanical in vitro experiment.

Methods

In ten lumbar vertebral bodies, the right pedicles were instrumented with monoaxial cannulated and fenestrated pedicle screws and augmented in situ with 2 ml PMMA. The left pedicles were instrumented with monoaxial cannulated pedicle screws. Prior to left screw insertion, a balloon cavity was created and filled with 3 ml of self-curing elastomer (silicone). Each screw was subjected to a cranio-caudal cyclic load starting from − 50 to 50 N while the upper load was increased by 5 N every 100 load cycles until loosening or 11,000 cycles (600 N). After cyclic loading, a pullout test of the screws was conducted.

Results

The mean cycles to screw loosening were 9824 ± 1982 and 7401 ± 1644 for the elastomer and PMMA group, respectively (P = 0.012). The post-cycling pullout test of the loosened screws showed differences in the failure mode and failure load, with predominantly pedicle/vertebrae fractures in the PMMA group (1188.6 N ± 288.1) and screw pullout through the pedicle (671.3 N ± 332.1) in the elastomer group.

Conclusion

The modified pedicle screw augmentation technique involving a balloon cavity creation and a self-curing elastomeric silicone resulted in a significantly improved pedicle screw anchorage under cyclic cranio-caudal loading when compared to conventional in situ PMMA augmentation.

Augmentation of a Locking Plate System Using Bioactive Bone Cement-Experiment in a Proximal Humeral Fracture Model

Introduction:

The purpose of this study was to test whether local filling of a novel strontium-containing hydroxyapatite (Sr-HA) bone cement can augment the fixation of a locking plate system in a cadaveric proximal humeral facture model.

Materials and Methods:

Twelve pairs of formalin-treated cadaveric humeri were used. One side in each pair was for cemented group, while the other side was for the control group. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the samples was tested. A 3-part facture model was created and then reduced and fixed by a locking plate system. In the cemented group, the most proximal 4 screw holes were filled with 0.5 mL bone cement. In the control group, the screw holes were not filled by cement. Locking screws were inserted in a standard manner before the cement hardened. X-ray was taken before all the specimens being subjected to mechanical study, in which 6 pairs were used for axial loading (varus bending) test, while other 6 pairs were used for axial rotational test.

Results:

There is no difference in BMD between the cemented side and the control side. The X-ray shows that the implant is in position. Cement filling was noted in the most proximal 4 screws in the cemented group. Better mechanical outcome was seen in the cemented groups, in terms of less maximal displacement per cycle and higher failure point and stiffness in varus bending test. However, no difference was found between the cemented group and the control group in the axial rotation test.

Discussion:

In similarity with the previous studies, our results showed better mechanical results in the cemented group. However, due to the limitations (e.g. sample size, fracture model, testing protocol, etc), we still cannot directly extrapolate current mechanical results to clinical practice at the present moment. Furthermore, it is still unknown whether better primary outcome may lead to better long-term results, even though the local release of strontium may enhance the local bone formation.

Conclusion:

The local filling of Sr-HA bone cement augments the fixation of the locking plate system in current proximal humeral fracture model.

Biomechanical comparison of screw-based zoning of PHILOS and Fx proximal humerus plates

Background

Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates is associated with complications. We aimed to compare the biomechanical effects of removing screws and blade of a fixed angle locking plate and hybrid blade plate, on a two-part fracture model.

Methods

Forty-five synthetic humeri were divided into nine groups where four were implanted with a hybrid blade plate and the remaining with locking plate, to treat a two-part surgical neck fracture. Plates’ head screws and blades were divided into zones based on their distance from fracture site. Two groups acted as a control for each plate and the remaining seven had either a vacant zone or blade swapped with screws. For elastic cantilever bending, humeral head was fixed and the shaft was displaced 5 mm in extension, flexion, valgus and varus direction. Specimens were further loaded in varus direction to investigate their plastic behaviour.

Results

In both plates, removal of inferomedial screws or blade led to a significantly larger drop in varus construct stiffness than other zones. In blade plate, insertion of screws in place of blade significantly increased the mean extension, flexion valgus and varus bending stiffness (24.458%/16.623%/19.493%/14.137%). In locking plate, removal of screw zones proximal to the inferomedial screws reduced extension and flexion bending stiffness by 26–33%.

Conclusions

Although medial support improved varus stability, two inferomedial screws were more effective than blade. Proximal screws are important for extension and flexion. Mechanical consequences of screw removal should be considered when deciding the number and choice of screws and blade in clinic.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2185-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new gliding screw concept for the fixation of proximal humeral fractures

Aims

Plating displaced proximal humeral fractures is associated with a high rate of screw perforation. Dynamization of the proximal screws might prevent these complications. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new gliding screw concept for plating proximal humeral fractures biomechanically.

Methods

Eight pairs of three-part humeral fractures were randomly assigned for pairwise instrumentation using either a prototype gliding plate or a standard PHILOS plate, and four pairs were fixed using the gliding plate with bone cement augmentation of its proximal screws. The specimens were cyclically tested under progressively increasing loading until perforation of a screw. Telescoping of a screw, varus tilting and screw migration were recorded using optical motion tracking.

Results

Mean initial stiffness (N/mm) was 581.3 (sd 239.7) for the gliding plate, 631.5 (sd 160.0) for the PHILOS and 440.2 (sd 97.6) for the gliding augmented plate without significant differences between the groups (p = 0.11). Mean varus tilting (°) after 7500 cycles was comparable between the gliding plate (2.6; sd 1.9), PHILOS (1.2; sd 0.6) and gliding augmented plate (1.7; sd 0.9) (p = 0.10). Similarly, mean screw migration(mm) after 7500 cycles was similar between the gliding plate (3.02; sd 2.85), PHILOS (1.30; sd 0.44) and gliding augmented plate (2.83; sd 1.18) (p = 0.13). Mean number of cycles until failure with 5° varus tilting were 12702 (sd 3687) for the gliding plate, 13948 (sd 1295) for PHILOS and 13189 (sd 2647) for the gliding augmented plate without significant differences between the groups (p = 0.66).

Conclusion

Biomechanically, plate fixation using a new gliding screw technology did not show considerable advantages in comparison with fixation using a standard PHILOS plate. Based on the finding of telescoping of screws, however, it may represent a valid approach for further investigations into how to avoid the cut-out of screws.

Cite this article: Y. P. Acklin, I. Zderic, J. A. Inzana, S. Grechenig, R. Schwyn, R. G. Richards, B. Gueorguiev. Biomechanical evaluation of a new gliding screw concept for the fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:422–429. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.76.BJR-2017-0356.R1.

Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Inferiorly Directed Versus 3 Superiorly Directed Locking Screws on Stability in a 3-Part Proximal Humerus Fracture Model

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the stability of 3 points of inferiorly directed versus 3 points of superiorly directed locking screw fixation compared with the full contingent of 6 points of locked screw fixation in the treatment of a 3-part proximal humerus fracture.

METHODS

A standardized 3-part fracture was created in 10 matched pairs (experimental groups) and 10 nonmatched humeri (control group). Osteosynthesis was performed using 3 locking screws in the superior hemisphere of the humeral head (suspension), 3 locking screws in the inferior hemisphere (buttress), or the full complement of 6 locking screws (control). Specimens were tested in varus cantilever bending (7.5 Nm) to 10,000 cycles or failure. Construct survival (%) and the cycles to failure were compared.

RESULTS

Seven of 10 controls survived the 10,000-cycle runout (70%: 8193 average cycles to failure). No experimental constructs survived the 10,000-cycle runout. Suspension and buttress screw groups failed an average of 331 and 516 cycles, respectively (P = 1.00). The average number of cycles to failure and the number of humeri surviving the 10,000-cycle runout were greater in the control group than in the experimental groups (P ≤ 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Data support the use of a full contingent of 6 points of locking screw fixation over 3 superior or 3 inferior points of fixation in the treatment of a 3-part proximal humerus fracture with a locking construct. No biomechanical advantage to the 3 buttress or 3 suspension screws used in isolation was observed.

Validated computational framework for efficient systematic evaluation of osteoporotic fracture fixation in the proximal humerus

The high rate of fixation failure in osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures indicate the need for improved solutions. Computer simulations may help to overcome the limitations of the gold standard biomechanical testing in evaluating the performance of new implants and enhance the effectivity and outcome of the design process. This study presents a framework for automated computational analysis that facilitates efficient and systematic evaluation of proximal humerus fracture plating under a variety of conditions including bone quality, fracture pattern, implant configuration and loading regime. The underlying finite element methodology was previously validated. The capabilities of the software tool are demonstrated by virtually reproducing a previously published biomechanical study on the effect of screw augmentation and showing that the models capture the essence of the experimental results. Due to the modular design of the framework, the currently available set of angle-stable plate implants can be readily expanded to include other fixations such as intramedullary nails. Besides the capability to compare already existing solutions, the tool can provide rapid feedback on novel ideas. Therefore, it is expected to efficiently complement and partially replace expensive experimental tests and aid development and optimization of implant designs for improved fixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures.

Biomechanical analysis of plate systems for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common in the human body but their management remains controversial. Open reduction and internal fixation with plates is one of the leading modes of operative treatment for these fractures. The development of technologies and techniques for these plates, during the recent decades, promise a bright future for their clinical use. A comprehensive review of in vitro biomechanical studies is needed for the comparison of plates' mechanical performance and the testing methodologies. This will not only guide clinicians with plate selection but also with the design of future in vitro biomechanical studies. This review was aimed to systematically categorise and review the in vitro biomechanical studies of these plates based on their protocols and discuss their results. The technologies and techniques investigated in these studies were categorised and compared to reach a census where possible.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Web of Science and Scopus database search yielded 62 studies. Out of these, 51 performed axial loading, torsion, bending and/or combined bending and axial loading while 11 simulated complex glenohumeral movements by using tendons. Loading conditions and set-up, failure criteria and performance parameters, as well as results for each study, were reviewed. Only two studies tested four-part fracture model while the rest investigated two- and three-part fractures. In ten studies, synthetic humeri were tested instead of cadaveric ones. In addition to load-displacement data, three-dimensional motion analysis systems, digital image correlation and acoustic emission testing have been used for measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, PHILOS was the most tested plate and locking plates demonstrated better mechanical performance than non-locking ones. Conflicting results have been published for their comparison with non-locking blade plates and polyaxial locking screws. Augmentation with cement [calcium phosphate or poly(methyl methacrylate)] or allografts (fibular and femoral head) was found to improve bone-plate constructs' mechanical performance. Controversy still lies over the use of rigid and semi-rigid implants and the insertion of inferomedial screws for calcar region support. This review will guide the design of in vitro and in silico biomechanical tests and also supplement the study of clinical literature.

The prediction of cyclic proximal humerus fracture fixation failure by various bone density measures

Fixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures has remained challenging, but may be improved by careful pre-operative planning. The aim of this study was to investigate how well the failure of locking plate fixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures can be predicted by bone density measures assessed with currently available clinical imaging (realistic case) and a higher resolution and quality modality (theoretical best-case). Various density measures were correlated to experimentally assessed number of cycles to construct failure of plated unstable low-density proximal humerus fractures (N = 18). The influence of density evaluation technique was investigated by comparing local (peri-implant) versus global evaluation regions; HR-pQCT-based versus clinical QCT-based image data; ipsilateral versus contralateral side; and bone mineral content (BMC) versus bone mineral density (BMD). All investigated density measures were significantly correlated with the experimental cycles to failure. The best performing clinically feasible parameter was the QCT-based BMC of the contralateral articular cap region, providing significantly better correlation (R2  = 0.53) compared to a previously proposed clinical density measure (R2  = 0.30). BMC had consistently, but not significantly stronger correlations with failure than BMD. The overall best results were obtained with the ipsilateral HR-pQCT-based local BMC (R2  = 0.74) that may be used for implant optimization. Strong correlations were found between the corresponding density measures of the two CT image sources, as well as between the two sides. Future studies should investigate if BMC of the contralateral articular cap region could provide improved prediction of clinical fixation failure compared to previously proposed measures. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.

Cement augmentation of humeral head screws reduces early implant-related complications after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures

Background

Cement augmentation (CA) of humeral head screws in locked plating of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) was found to be biomechanically beneficial. However, clinical outcomes of this treatment have not been well evaluated to date.

Objectives

To assess outcomes of locked plating of PHF with additional CA and to compare them with outcomes of conventional locked plating without CA.

Methods

24 patients (mean age, 74.2 ± 10.1 years; 22 female) with displaced PHF were prospectively enrolled and treated with locked plating and additional CA. The Constant score (CS), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and the Simple Shoulder Value (SSV) were assessed 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Fracture healing and potential complications were evaluated on postoperative radiographs. The CS and complications were compared with the outcomes of a matched group of 24 patients (mean age, 73.9 ± 9.4 years; 22 female) with locked plating of displaced PHF without CA.

Results

At the 3‑month follow-up, the mean CS was 59.9 ± 15.6 points, the mean SST was 7.5 ± 2.7 points, and the mean SSV was 63.9 ± 21.7%. All scores significantly improved by the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.05; CS, 72.9 ± 17.7; SST, 9.2 ± 3.2; SSV, 77.2 ± 17.3%). There were two cases (8%) of biological complications (n = 1 varus malunion and n = 1 humeral head necrosis). Compared with locked plating without CA, no significant differences were observed between the CS at the 3‑ (57.8 ± 13.4 points; p = 0.62) and 12-month (73.0 ± 12.8 points; p = 0.99) follow-up. However, patients without CA had a significantly increased risk of early loss of reduction and articular screw perforation (p = 0.037).

Conclusion

Locked plating of proximal humeral fractures with trauma cement augmentation of humeral head screws could be translated from the ex-vivo lab setting into the clinical situation without additional complications. Locked plating of displaced PHF with additional cement augmentation showed similar clinical outcomes but reduced the rate of early implant-related complications compared to locked plating without additional CA.

Surgical treatment of osteoporotic fractures: An update on the principles of management

The treatment of osteoporotic fractures continues to challenge orthopedic surgeon. The fragility of the underlying bone in conjunction with the need for specific implants led to the development of explicit surgical techniques in order to minimize implant failure related complications, morbidity and mortality. From the patient's perspective, the existence of frailty, dementia and other medical related co-morbidities induce a complex situation necessitating high vigilance during the perioperative and post-operative period. This update reviews current principles and techniques essential to successful surgical treatment of these injuries.

The Applications of Finite Element Analysis in Proximal Humeral Fractures

Proximal humeral fractures are common and most challenging, due to the complexity of the glenohumeral joint, especially in the geriatric population with impacted fractures, that the development of implants continues because currently the problems with their fixation are not solved. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative assessments are crucial in management of those patients. Finite element analysis, as one of the valuable tools, has been implemented as an effective and noninvasive method to analyze proximal humeral fractures, providing solid evidence for management of troublesome patients. However, no review article about the applications and effects of finite element analysis in assessing proximal humeral fractures has been reported yet. This review article summarized the applications, contribution, and clinical significance of finite element analysis in assessing proximal humeral fractures. Furthermore, the limitations of finite element analysis, the difficulties of more realistic simulation, and the validation and also the creation of validated FE models were discussed. We concluded that although some advancements in proximal humeral fractures researches have been made by using finite element analysis, utility of this powerful tool for routine clinical management and adequate simulation requires more state-of-the-art studies to provide evidence and bases.

Biomechanical analysis of stiffness and fracture displacement after using PMMA-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation for sacrum fractures

Cement augmentation of pedicle screws is the gold standard for the stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the spine. In-screw cement augmentation, in which cement is injected through the cannula, is another option for fracture stabilization of fragility fractures of the sacrum. However, biomechanical superiority of this technique compared to conventional sacroiliac screw fixation has not been tested. The present study compares the stability of cement-augmented and non-cement-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation in osteoporotic sacrum fractures under cyclic loading. Eight human donor pelvises with intact ligaments and 5

Humeral Tip-apex-distance as a Prognostic Marker for Proximal Humeral Fractures in 203 Patients

BACKGROUND

Humeral head fractures and their postoperative outcome remain a challenging problem in surgical daily routine. Predictive factors for loss of fixation are rare.

OBJECTIVE

Determination of predictive factors for the failure of osteosynthesis with the loss of fixation or migration of screws in humeral head fractures.

METHOD

From 1995 to 2011, 408 patients with proximal humeral fractures [mean age 66.6 years, 50.9-82.3 years] and osteosynthesis were analyzed. Two hundred and three received open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with the PHILOS^® plate. The non-locking plate was used in 80, the locking plate in 16 and humeral head prosthesis in 26 patients, in addition to 23 patients undergoing other procedures. Intraoperative reduction that achieved an anatomical alignment of the medial aspect of the humerus (humeral calcar) was assessed in 94 patients by postoperative X-ray analysis. The loss of fixation was evaluated by a follow-up of three to five X-rays and measurement of the humeral tip-apex-distance (HTAD).

RESULTS

For stable fixed fractures with an intact calcar, percentual HTAD was significantly higher than for unstable fixed fractures (p=0.04). Morbidity, such as hypertension, orthopedic operations or diabetes, strongly influenced the HTAD, while postoperative passive motion treatment modestly affected the HTAD over time.

CONCLUSION

The anatomic reconstruction of the calcar, leading to stable fixation of humeral head fractures, can significantly prevent an overproportioned decrease in the HTAD in postoperative X-rays and seems to be vital in multimorbid patients. Measurement of the HTAD over time delivers a tool for early detection of secondary loss of fixation.

Biomechanical evaluation of straight antegrade nailing in proximal humeral fractures: the rationale of the "proximal anchoring point"

PURPOSE

Varus failure is one of the most common failure modes following surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Straight antegrade nails (SAN) theoretically provide increased stability by anchoring to the densest zone of the proximal humerus (subchondral zone) with the end of the nail. The aim of this study was to biomechanically investigate the characteristics of this "proximal anchoring point" (PAP). We hypothesized that the PAP would improve stability compared to the same construct without the PAP.

METHODS

Straight antegrade humeral nailing was performed in 20 matched pairs of human cadaveric humeri for a simulated unstable two-part fracture.

RESULTS

Biomechanical testing, with stepwise increasing cyclic axial loading (50-N increments each 100 cycles) at an angle of 20° abduction revealed significantly higher median loads to failure for SAN constructs with the PAP (median, 450 N; range, 200-1.000 N) compared to those without the PAP (median, 325 N; range, 100-500 N; p = 0.009). SAN constructs with press-fit proximal extensions (endcaps) showed similar median loads to failure (median, 400 N; range, 200-650 N), when compared to the undersized, commercially available SAN endcaps (median, 450 N; range, 200-600 N; p = 0.240).

CONCLUSIONS

The PAP provided significantly increased stability in SAN constructs compared to the same setup without this additional proximal anchoring point. Varus-displacing forces to the humeral head were superiorly reduced in this setting. This study provides biomechanical evidence for the "proximal anchoring point's" rationale. Straight antegrade humeral nailing may be beneficial for patients undergoing surgical treatment for unstable proximal humeral fractures to decrease secondary varus displacement and thus potentially reduce revision rates.

Computed tomography-based prediction of the straight antegrade humeral nail's entry point and exposure of "critical types": truth or fiction?

BACKGROUND

Straight antegrade intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus fractures has shown promising clinical results. However, up to 36% of all humeri seem to be "critical types" in terms of the potential violation of the supraspinatus (SSP) tendon footprint by the nail's insertion zone. The aims of this study were to evaluate if a computed tomography (CT) scan could reliably predict the nail's entry point on the humeral head and if it would be possible to preoperatively estimate the individual risk of iatrogenic violation of the SSP tendon footprint by evaluating the uninjured contralateral humerus.

METHODS

Twenty matched pairs of human cadaveric shoulders underwent CT scans, and the entry point for an antegrade nail as well as measurements regarding critical distances between the entry point and the rotator cuff were determined. Next, gross anatomic measurements of the same data were performed and compared. Furthermore, specimens were reviewed for critical types.

RESULTS

Overall, 42.5% of all specimens were found to be critical types. The CT measurements exhibited excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.90). Similarly, excellent agreement between the CT scan and gross anatomic measurements in contralateral shoulders (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.88) was found.

CONCLUSION

Assessing the uninjured contralateral side, CT can reliably predict the entry point in antegrade humeral nailing and preoperatively identify critical types of humeral heads at risk of iatrogenic implantation damage to the SSP tendon footprint. This study may help surgeons in the decision-making processon which surgical technique should be used without putting the patient at risk for iatrogenic, implant-related damage to the rotator cuff.

Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage

INTRODUCTION

Cement augmentation is an established method to increase the pedicle screw (PS) anchorage in osteoporotic vertebral bodies. The ideal timing for augmentation when a reposition maneuver is necessary is controversial. While augmentation of the PS before reposition maneuver may increase the force applied it on the vertebrae, it bears the risk to impair PS anchorage, whereas augmenting the PS after the maneuver may restore this anchorage and prevent early screw loosening. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of cement application timing on PS anchorage in the osteoporotic vertebral body.

METHODS

Ten lumbar vertebrae (L1-L5) were used for testing. The left and right pedicles of each vertebra were instrumented with the same PS size and used for pairwise comparison of the two timing points for augmentation. For the reposition maneuver, the left PS was loaded axially under displacement control (2 × ±2 mm, 3 × ±6 mm, 3 × ±10 mm) to simulate a reposition maneuver. Subsequently, both PS were augmented with 2 ml PMMA cement. The same force as measured during the left PS maneuver was applied to the previously augmented right hand side PS [2 × F (±2 mm), 3 × F (±6 mm), 3 × F (±10 mm)]. Both PS were cyclically loaded with initial forces of +50 and -50 N, while the lower force was increased by 5 N every 100 cycles until total failure of the PS. The PS motion was measured with a 3D motion analysis system. After cyclic loading stress, X-rays were taken to identify the PS loosening mechanism.

RESULTS

In comparison with PS augmented prior to the reposition maneuver, PS augmented after the reposition maneuver showed a significant higher number of load cycles until failure (5930 ± 1899 vs 3830 ± 1706, p = 0.015). The predominant loosening mechanism for PS augmented after the reposition maneuver was PS toggling with the attached cement cloud within the trabecular bone. While PS augmented prior to the reposition, maneuver showed a motion of the screw within the cement cloud.

CONCLUSION

The time of cement application has an effect on PS anchorage in the osteoporotic vertebral body if a reposition maneuver of the instrumented vertebrae is carried out. PS augmented after the reposition maneuver showed a significant higher number of load cycles until screw loosening.