Surgical strategies in polytraumatized patients with femoral shaft fractures - comparing a German and an Australian level I trauma centre

Efficacy of damage control orthopedics strategy in the management of lower limb trauma

Background

Little is known about the efficacy of damage control (DC) surgery in the management of lower limb trauma. Here we compared the clinical parameters and complication rates of such patients received either DC or emergency comprehensive (EC) surgery treatment.

Methods

This study is a retrospective study on patients with lower limb trauma that received surgical treatment. Data of 120 patients were divided into DC and EC surgery groups. Clinical parameters obtained at hospital admission and complications during follow-up were analyzed. Injury Severity Score (ISS), Gustilo classification and Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) were used to assess trauma severity, open fractures and viability of injured limb, respectively.

Results

Age, sex, ISS, fracture type, injury site, MESS, operation time, blood loss, pulmonary and cranial injuries were compared. We found that patients in the DC group had more severe injury as reflected by the higher injury severity score (ISS) (28.1 ± 10.9 vs 21.3 ± 7.4, P < 0.001). ISS was also identified as a significant influencer for the treatment selection (P < 0.001). In addition, patients treated with DC surgery demonstrated less complications (7 cases vs 27 cases), which was supported by the propensity score logistic regression analysis (Odd ratio 4.667).

Conclusions

DC surgery is more often selected to treat patients with more severe lower limb injuries, which leads to lower complication rates.

Guidelines for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients

GOAL

To provide healthcare professionals with comprehensive multidisciplinary expert recommendations for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients, both during the prehospital phase and after admission to a Trauma Centre.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 21 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e., pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of the quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. Few recommendations remained non-graded.

METHODS

The committee addressed eleven questions relevant to the patient suffering severe limb trauma: 1) What are the key findings derived from medical history and clinical examination which lead to the patient's prompt referral to a Level 1 or Level 2 Trauma Centre? 2) What are the medical devices that must be implemented in the prehospital setting to reduce blood loss? 3) Which are the clinical findings prompting the performance of injected X-ray examinations? 4) What are the ideal timing and modalities for performing fracture fixation? 5) What are the clinical and operative findings which steer the surgical approach in case of vascular compromise and/or major musculoskeletal attrition? 6) How to best prevent infection? 7) How to best prevent thromboembolic complications? 8) What is the best strategy to precociously detect and treat limb compartment syndrome? 9) How to best and precociously detect post-traumatic rhabdomyolysis and prevent rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury? 10) What is the best strategy to reduce the incidence of fat emboli syndrome and post-traumatic systemic inflammatory response? 11) What is the best therapeutic strategy to treat acute trauma-induced pain? Every question was formulated in a PICO (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 19 recommendations. Among the formalised recommendations, 4 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 3 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert advice. After two rounds of scoring and one amendment, strong agreement was reached on all the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant agreement among experts on strong recommendations to improve practices for severe limb trauma patients.

Surgical strategy for femoral shaft fractures in severely injured patients: A 13-year experience from a tertiary trauma centre

BACKGROUND

The treatment strategy of femoral shaft fractures in polytraumatised patients has evolved over the years and led to improved outcomes for these patients. However, there is still controversy regarding the optimal treatment strategy and surgical care can differ markedly from one country to another. We investigate the surgical treatment strategy (Early Definitive Care (EDC) or Damage Control Orthopaedics (DCO)) implemented in the care of severely injured patients with femoral shaft fractures treated at a single tertiary trauma centre in southern Finland and factors affecting decision making.

METHODS

The Helsinki Trauma Registry (HTR) was used retrospectively to identify severely injured patients (New Injury Severity Score [NISS] ≥ 16) treated from 2006 through to 2018 with concomitant femoral shaft fractures. Patients <16 years old, with isolated head injuries, dead on arrival and those admitted >24 h following the injury were excluded. Based on their initial surgical management strategy, femoral fracture patients were divided into EDC and DCO groups and compared.

RESULTS

Compared to other trauma-registry patients, those with femoral shaft fractures are younger (30.9 ± 15.9 vs. 47.0 ± 19.7, p<0.001) and more often injured in road traffic accidents (64.1% vs. 34.4%, p<0.001). The majority (78%) of included patients underwent EDC. Patients who underwent DCO were significantly more severely injured (NISS: 40.1 ± 11.5 vs. 27.8 ± 10.1, p<0.001) with longer lengths of stay in ICU (15.4 ± 9.8 vs. 7.5 ± 6.1 days, p<0.001) and in hospital (29.9 ± 29.6 vs. 13.7 ± 11.4 days, p<0.001) than patients treated with EDC. Decision making was based primarily on injury related factors, while non-injury related factors may have contributed to choosing a DCO approach in a small number of cases.

CONCLUSION

Early definitive care is the prevailing treatment strategy in severely injured femoral shaft fracture patients treated at a tertiary trauma centre. Patients treated with DCO strategy are more severely injured particularly having sustained worse intracranial and thoracic injuries. In addition to injury related factors, treatment strategy decision making was influenced by non-injury related factors in only a minority of cases.

Orthopedic injuries in patients with multiple injuries: Results of the 11th trauma update international consensus conference Milan, December 11, 2017

BACKGROUND

In blunt trauma, orthopedic injuries are often associated with cerebral and torso injuries. The optimal timing for definitive care is a concern. The aim of the study was to develop evidence-based guidelines for damage-control orthopedic (DCO) and early total care (ETC) of pelvic and long-bone fractures, closed or open, and mangled extremities in adult trauma patients with and without associated injuries.

METHODS

The literature since 2000 to 2016 was systematically screened according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-analyses protocol. One hundred twenty-four articles were reviewed by a panel of experts to assign grade of recommendation and level of evidence using the Grading of recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, and an International Consensus Conference, endorsed by several scientific societies was held.

RESULTS

The choice between DCO and ETC depends on the patient's physiology, as well as associated injuries. In hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture patient, extraperitoneal pelvic packing, angioembolization, external fixation, C-clamp, and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta are not mutually exclusive. Definitive reconstruction should be deferred until recovery of physiological stability. In long bone fractures, DCO is performed by external fixation, while ETC should be preferred in fully resuscitated patients because of better outcomes. In open fractures early debridement within 24 hours should be recommended and early closure of most grade I, II, IIIa performed. In mangled extremities, limb salvage should be considered for non-life-threatening injuries, mostly of upper limb.

CONCLUSION

Orthopedic priorities may be: to save a life: control hemorrhage by stabilizing the pelvis and femur fractures; to save a limb: treat soft tissue and vascular injuries associated with fractures, stabilize fractures, recognize, and prevent compartmental syndrome; to save functionality: treat dislocations, articular fractures, distal fractures. While DCO is the best initial treatment to reduce surgical load, ETC should be applied in stable or stabilized patients to accelerate the recovery of normal functions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of predominantly level II studies, level II.

What are the differences in outcomes between simple and complicated FSF managed by early IMN?

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of simple versus complicated femoral shaft fracture (FSF) treated by early intramedullary nail.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study in level 1 trauma center including patients with FSF. Management consisted of intramedullary nailing (IMN) after adequate resuscitation within 24 h. Data were prospectively collected on admission (trauma base) consisted of demographics, biological parameters, associated injuries and injury severity score (ISS). Complicated fractures consisted of type C fracture or any type associated with bilateral femur fracture, floating knee, associated femoral neck fracture, dislocated hip, concomitant neurovascular injury. Simple fractures were Isolated type A and B fracture. Simple and complicated fracture groups were compared using stratification by ISS (ISS < 16; 16 ≤ ISS < 25; ISS ≥ 25).

RESULTS

Inclusion of 191 consecutive patients: simple FSF (N = 109) versus complicated FSF (N = 82) (type 32C, n = 36; bilateral, n = 44; associated neck of femur fracture, n = 15; floating knee, n = 36; concomitant femoral artery injury, n = 3 or sciatic nerve injury, n = 7). Complicated fractures were associated with higher rate of associated injuries (thoracic, 56.1 vs. 40.4%, p = 0.04; head 25.6 vs 10.1%, p = 0.005) and ARDS (12.2% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.046); longer ICU stay (12.8 vs. 7.3 days, p = 0.019) and hospital stay (24.3 vs. 15.7 days, p < 0.001). After stratification, differences in morbidity between simple and complicated FSF were significant solely in range 16≤ISS < 25. Complicated fractures had longer operation duration (297 vs. 151 min, p < 0.001) due to additional IMN (tibial, humeral) requirements (24% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001) and longer femoral IMN duration (133 vs. 104 min, p < 0.05). Pseudarthrosis was higher in complicated fracture group (9.6 vs. 3.7%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Complicated femoral fractures are associated with higher morbidity, especially in less severely injured polytrauma, which eventually results in longer hospital stay. Patients with moderate ISS and complicated fracture may have an increased risk of ARDS.

[Effectiveness of minimally invasive osteotomy Ilizarov technique combined with intramedullary nail for femoral lengthening]

Objective

To explore the effectiveness of minimally invasive osteotomy Ilizarov technique combined with intramedullary nail for femoral lengthening.

Methods

Seventy-one patients with femoral shortening deformity who met the selection criteria between January 2013 and June 2016 were randomly divided into trial group (36 cases were treated with minimally invasive osteotomy Ilizarov technique combined with intramedullary nail for femoral lengthening) and control group (35 cases were treated with simple Ilizarov technique for femoral lengthening). There was no significant difference in age, gender, causes of femoral shortening, length of femoral shortening, rate of femoral deformity between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, lengthening rate, external fixation duration, frequency of pin tract infection, osteotomy healing time, and range of motion (ROM) of knee at 1 year after operation were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

The patients of two groups were followed up 12-60 months (mean, 31 months). Pin tract infection occured in 8 cases (10 pins), including 1 case (1 pin) in the trial group and 7 cases (9 pins) in the control group. There was significant difference in the incidence of pin tract infection between the two groups ( χ2=5.265, P=0.022). All patients were cured by replacing the fixation pins, changing dressing actively, application of antibiotics, and adequate postoperative care. The operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, external fixation duration, osteotomy healing time, and ROM of knee at 1 year after operation of the trial group were superior to those of the control group, showing significant differences ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the lengthening rate between the two groups ( t=-1.581, P=0.153).

Conclusion

The minimally invasive osteotomy Ilizarov technique combined with intramedullary nail in femoral lengthening increases the operation time, but the external fixation duration and incidence of pin tract infection are significantly reduced and the function of knee is significantly improved.

Damage control surgery - experiences from a level I trauma center

Background

There is still no evidence in literature for damage control orthopaedics (DCO), early total care (ETC) or using external fixation solely in fractures of the long bones in multi-system-trauma. The aim of this study was to determine parameters influencing the choice of treatment in clinical routine (DCO, ETC, or EF) in femoral or tibial shaft fractures in combination with multi-system-trauma, severe soft tissue damage or both.

Methods

Data of 236 patients with 280 fractures of long bones of the lower extremities treated at a level I trauma center were analysed. Clinical parameters on arrival (age, sex [m/f], ISS, fracture site [femur/tibia], soft tissue damage [closed or open fractures according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification], pulmonary injury [yes/no]) were collected and analysed whether they influence the choice of upcoming treatment (DCO/ETC/EF).

Results

Our findings showed that high ISS and severe soft tissue damage (grade III) significantly correlated with DCO. High ISS, old age, female sex and fracture site (tibia) correlated with EF. This group of sole use of external fixation had highest rate of complications, 69% were associated with at least one complication.

Conclusion

Severely injured patients are treated significantly more often with DCO or EF. The presence of higher ISS (≥16) and of type III open fractures increased the use of DCO. However, ISS, fracture-site, patient’s age, type III open fractures or sex (female) increased the use of EF compared to ETC.

The Impact of Intramedullary Nailing of Tibia Fractures on the Innate Immune System

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation after trauma is thought to be aggravated by intramedullary nailing (IMN) and predisposes to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Polymorphonuclear granulocytes (PMNs) are the main effector cells in this process. However, in patients with a femur fracture, the injury severity was the decisive factor for the PMN phenotype. A tibia fracture is often caused by a more moderate injury and might allow for a window to assess the innate immune response caused by IMN.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients with a tibia fracture were included. The innate immune response was measured before and after IMN by plasma interleukin 6, PMN Mac1, and active FcγRII (FcγRII*) expression both before and after fMLF (N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine) stimulation. Furthermore, HLA-DR on monocytes was analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five consecutive patients were included. Polymorphonuclear granulocyte fMLF-induced Mac1 and FcγRII* were decreased. In concordance, HLA-DR expression on monocytes was decreased in patients compared with control subjects. Intramedullary nailing was associated with a further decrease of HLA-DR-positive monocytes, whereas no changes in PMN phenotype or plasma interleukin 6 levels were observed.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary nailing of a tibial fracture did not affect the PMN phenotype. The impact from injury determined the PMN phenotype. In contrast, the monocyte phenotype changed after the additional insult by IMN in patients with an isolated tibial fracture.

Current Concepts in Orthopedic Management of Multiple Trauma

Multiple trauma patients frequently present challenging clinical scenarios with musculoskeletal injuries being the most common indications for surgical procedures in these patients. Despite our substantial knowledge, a universally approved objective definition for “multiple trauma” is yet to be delineated. Several controversial aspects of economics, pathophysiology, animal models, diagnosis, management and outcome of patients with multiple trauma have recently been explored and although some progress has been made, it seems that the available evidence is still inconclusive in some occasions. This manuscript revisits several current concepts of multiple trauma that have been the focus of recent investigation. We aim to provide the reader with an updated perspective based on the most recently published literature in the field of multiple trauma.