Particularities of hand and wrist complex injuries in polytrauma management

On arrival continuous brachial plexus block provides superior analgesia with reduced persistent postsurgical pain in complex hand injuries: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with complex hand injuries experience extreme pain and frequently witness prolonged preoperative waiting period, which intensifies their agony, especially during wound dressing and debridement, further intensifying pain of acute trauma. Hence, there is a need to study utility of continuous peripheral nerve block in settings of acute trauma emergencies. We hypothesized that, as compared with intravenous systemic analgesics, continuous brachial plexus block would provide superior analgesia in these patients.

METHODS

Eighty adults of either sex, with complex unilateral hand injuries (significant soft-tissue loss, crushed hand injury, and metacarpal bone fractures), having moderate-to-severe pain were randomized into two groups of 40 patients each. We excluded patients with sensory deficits, coagulopathy, or vascular injuries of the forearm. In the intervention group (group brachial plexus block [BPB]), patients received continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. In control group (group C) patients were administered intravenous analgesics (injection paracetamol [500 mg] 6 hourly with injection diclofenac [50 mg] 8 hourly). We recorded pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale) at regular intervals and total rescue analgesic used. Patients were followed-up on days 15 and 30 following surgery to note persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP). Groups were compared using Student's t test/χ2 test as applicable. Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis of skewed continuous variables or ordered categorical data.

RESULTS

Significantly more patients in group BPB reported Numeric Rating Scale score of <4, 1 hour following intervention (100% in group BPB vs. 57.5% in group C; p = 0.00). No patients in group BPB reported pain/discomfort during any interventions, like wound assessment/dressings. On the contrary, 55% (n = 22/40) of patients in group C experienced moderate-to-severe pain (p = 0.00) and required rescue analgesic. The median preoperative waiting time was significantly less in group BPB (18 [16-18] vs. 48 [24-48] hours; p = 0.00). Significantly more patients in group C reported PPSP on days 15 and 30 (19/40 in group C vs. 6/40 in group BPB; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

On-arrival blocks with catheter technique provide consistent pain relief, with lower PPSP, and hence should be integrated in pain management protocols.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level I.

Impact of single versus dual arterial supply on perfusion and function in finger replantation after complex hand injuries

Finger amputations following complex hand injuries (CHI) pose a significant challenge in hand surgery due to severe tissue trauma and neurovascular damage, necessitating precise arterial repair. While restoring arterial perfusion is critical, it remains unclear whether reconstructing both proper palmar digital arteries is required for optimal outcomes. This study evaluates whether restoring one or both arteries in finger replantation after complex injuries impacts perfusion and overall outcomes. In this retrospective, cross-sectional, follow-up study, we investigated patients with finger amputations following CHI admitted to the high-volume regional hand trauma center between January 2013 and December 2020. Perfusion has been assessed using FLIR thermal imaging and laser speckle contrast analysis. Functional outcomes and quality of life scores were measured using standardized questionnaires. Sensory assessments, along with pain and grip strength measurements were also conducted. A total of 31 patients were included in the study. Thermal imaging showed a significantly higher finger surface temperature in patients with two-artery reconstruction. Laser speckle contrast analysis confirmed better perfusion, though not statistically significant. Functional and quality-of-life scores were similar across groups, except for significantly improved temperature sensation in the two-artery group. In conclusion, reconstructing both arteries in finger replantation following CHI isn't essential for good outcomes if one artery provides adequate perfusion, but dual reconstruction may improve perfusion and temperature sensation.

Improving hand therapy delivery during care transitions in multisystem trauma patients

High-quality hand therapy is critical to maximising functional capacity and optimising overall outcomes following hand injuries. Therapy delivery requires clear communication between surgeons and occupational therapists. At Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC), Canada's largest tertiary care centre, suboptimal communication is a significant barrier to efficient hand therapy delivery in acute multisystem trauma patients. A baseline audit at SHSC found that 41% of hand therapy orders required clarification and 35% of patients waited over 24 hours before their order was fulfilled. In many cases, communication errors created unacceptably long delays that were suspected by surgeon stakeholders to impede patient outcomes. This highlighted an opportunity for investigation and system improvement.Using process mapping methodology, we outlined standard process involved in patient care and identified barriers to successful communication. We collaborated with key stakeholders to codesign a standardised template for care orders. We aimed to improve order clarity and consistency with the goal of reducing the incidence of clarification and delays.Postimplementation, the percentage of hand therapy orders requiring clarification was decreased to 24%. The number of patients waiting over 24 hours for therapy was also reduced; however, further investigation is required to verify this finding. In addition, essential order components were more consistently and comprehensively included. Next steps of this work include expanding the use of the order template outside of the multisystem trauma population and improving the communication of hand therapy at discharge from hospital.

Traumatized Hand - Update at the First Visit

The hand is the segment most exposed to trauma, with a large volume of care in urgent and emergency services. Therefore, it is necessary that physicians on duty have the essential knowledge to effectively manage these injuries. In the present article, we will review the main conditions and conduct guidelines.

Incidence and underreporting of osseous wrist and hand injuries on whole-body computed tomographies at a level 1 trauma center

BACKGROUND

To investigate the incidence of osseous wrist and hand injuries on whole-body computed tomographies (WBCT) at an urban maximum-care trauma center, to report the number of missed cases in primary radiology reports, and to develop an algorithm for improved detection of these injuries.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis reviewing all WBCT for a period of 8 months for osseous wrist and hand injuries. (1) Reconstruction of hands/wrists in three planes (thickness 1-2 mm) and analysis by a blinded musculoskeletal radiologist. (2) Scanning of primary radiology reports and comparison to the re-evaluation. (3) Calculation of the diagnostic accuracy of WBCT during primary reporting. (4) Search for factors potentially influencing the incidence (trauma mechanism, associated injuries, Glasgow Coma Scale, artifacts). (5) Development of an algorithm to improve the detection rate.

RESULTS

Five hundred six WBCT were included between 01/2020 and 08/2020. 59 (11.7%) WBCT showed 92 osseous wrist or hand injuries. Distal intra-articular radius fractures occurred most frequently (n = 24, 26.1%); 22 patients (37.3%) showed multiple injuries. The sensitivity of WBCT in the detection of wrist and hand fractures during primary evaluation was low with 4 positive cases identified correctly (6.8%; 95% CI 1.9 to 16.5), while the specificity was 100% (95% CI 99.2 to 100.0). Forty-three cases (72.9%) were detected on additional imaging after clinical reassessment. Twelve injuries remained undetected (20.3%). Motorcycle accidents were more common in positive cases (22.0% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.006). 98% of positive cases showed additional fractures of the upper and/or lower extremities, whereas 37% of the patients without osseous wrist and hand injuries suffered such fractures (p < 0.001). The remaining investigated factors did not seem to influence the occurrence.

CONCLUSION

Osseous wrist and hand injuries are present in 11.7% on WBCT after polytrauma. 93.2% of injuries were missed primarily, resulting in a very low sensitivity of WBCT during primary reporting. Motorcycle accidents might predispose for these injuries, and they often cause additional fractures of the extremities. Clinical re-evaluation of patients and secondary re-evaluation of WBCT with preparation of dedicated multiplanar reformations are essential in polytrauma cases to detect osseous injuries of wrist and hand reliably.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered prospectively on November 17th, 2020, at the German register for clinical trials (DRKS-ID: DRKS00023589 ).

The association of hand and wrist injuries with other injuries in multiple trauma patients. A retrospective study in a UK Major Trauma Centre

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20,000 major trauma cases occur in England every year. However, the association with concomitant upper limb injuries is unknown. This study aims to determine the incidence, injury pattern and association of hand and wrist injuries with other body injuries and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) in multiply injured trauma patients.

METHODS

Single centre retrospective study was performed at a level-one UK Major Trauma Centre (MTC). Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) eligible multiply injured trauma patients that were admitted to the hospital between January 2014 and December 2018 were analysed. TARN is the national trauma registry. Eligible patients were: a trauma patient of any age who was admitted for 72 h or more, or was admitted to intensive care, or died at the hospital, was transferred into the hospital for specialist care, was transferred to another hospital for specialist care or for an intensive care bed and whose isolated injuries met a set of criteria. Data extracted included: age, gender, mode of arrival, location of injuries including: hand and/or wrist and mechanism of injury. We performed a logistic regression analysis to assess the association between hand/wrist injury to ISS score of 15 points or above/below and to the presentation of other injuries.

RESULTS

107 patients were analysed. Hand and wrist injuries were the second most common injury (26.2%), after thoracic injuries. Distal radial injuries were found in 5.6%, carpal/carpometacarpal in 6.5%, concurrent distal radius and carpometacarpal in 0.9%, phalangeal injuries in 4.7%, tendon injuries in 0.9% and concurrent hand and wrist injuries in 7.5% cases. There was a significant association between hand or wrist injuries and lower limb injuries (Odds Ratio (OR): 3.84; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.09 to 13.50; p = 0.04) and pelvic injuries (OR: 4.78; 95% CI: 1.31 to 17.44; p = 0.02). There was no statistical association between hand and wrist injuries and ISS score (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.11 to 5.79; p = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Hand and wrist injuries are prevalent in trauma patients admitted to MTCs. They should not be under-estimated but routinely screened for in multiply injured patients particularly those with a pelvic or lower limb injury.

Detection of missed fractures of hand and forearm in whole-body CT in a blinded reassessment

BACKGROUND

We examined the visibility of fractures of hand and forearm in whole-body CT and its influence on delayed diagnosis. This study is based on a prior study on delayed diagnosis of fractures of hand and forearm in patients with suspected polytrauma.

METHODS

Two blinded radiologists examined CT-scans of patients with fractures of hand or forearm that were diagnosed later than 24 h after admission and control cases with unremarkable imaging of those areas. They were provided with clinical information that was documented in the admission report and were asked to examine forearm and hands. After unblinding, the visibility of fractures was determined. We examined if time of admission or slice thickness was a factor for late or missed diagnoses.

RESULTS

We included 72 known fractures in 36 cases. Of those 65 were visible. Sixteen visible fractures were diagnosed late during hospital stay. Eight more fractures were detected on revision by the radiologists. Both radiologists missed known fractures and found new fractures that were not reported by the other. Missed and late diagnoses of fractures occurred more often around 5 pm and 1 am. Slice thickness was not significantly different between fractures and cases with fractures found within 24 h and those found later.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of late diagnosis or completely missed fractures of the hand and forearm may be reduced by a repeated survey of WBCT with focus on the extremities in patients with suspected polytrauma who are not conscious.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Missed hand and forearm injuries in multiple trauma patients: An analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®

PURPOSE

Multiple trauma patients have a high risk of missed injuries. The main point of our study was to provide new epidemiological data on hand and forearm injuries in multiple trauma with a focus on those that were missed. Therefore, we used the database of the TraumaRegister DGU®.

METHODS

In this study, we evaluated anonymous data from 139931 patients aged 1-100 years with multiple trauma in the TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Society for Trauma Surgery from 2007 to 2017. Patients with hand and forearm injuries documented during hospital stay were identified and analyzed. We included fractures, dislocations, tendon injuries, nerve injuries and vessel injuries. Patients with missed hand and forearm injuries were compared with patients with primary diagnosed injuries in view of gender, age, ISS, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), trauma mechanism type of injury, hospital stay, RISC II and mortality rate. Missed injuries were defined as injuries that were recently diagnosed and documented in the intensive care unit (ICU).

RESULTS

A total of 50459 multiple trauma patients (36.1%) had hand or forearm injuries, and 89472 patients (63.9%) had neither. Patients with hand injuries were younger and were more often involved in car and motorcycle accidents. Severe head trauma was evaluated less frequently, and severe thorax trauma was evaluated more often in patients with hand injuries. The times of diagnosis of hand injuries were documented in 10971 cases. A total of 727 patients (6.6%) with missed hand injuries were registered. The most commonly missed injuries in multiple trauma were 104 carpal fractures/dislocations (11.2%), 195 nerve injuries (25.4%) and 54 tendon injuries (11.4%). Predisposing factors for missing injuries were multiple diagnoses, primary care in the first hospital and direct from emergency room transfer to the ICU.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to previous findings, severely injured patients, especially those with head injuries and GCS of ≤8, were not predisposed to have missed hand injuries compared to patients without severe head trauma. Special attention should be paid to younger patients after traffic accidents with multiple diagnoses and direct transfer to the ICU.

Detection of fractures of hand and forearm in whole-body CT for suspected polytrauma in intubated patients

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of whole-body CT for diagnosis of hand and forearm fractures in intubated patients with suspected polytrauma.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis on data collected from two trauma centres in Germany, including demographics, ISS, clinical symptoms, depiction in whole-body CT, and time to diagnosis.

Results

Out of 426 patients included in the study, 66 (15.5%) suffered a hand or forearm fracture. The total number of fractures was 132, the whole-body CT report mentioned 98 (74.2%). 16 (12,1%) fractures of 12 patients were diagnosed later than 24 h after admission. Late diagnoses of fractures of the hand occurred more often if the hand was not fully included in the CT scan field. The sensitivity of whole-body CT for cases with fractures of hand and/or forearm with full inclusion of the corresponding area in the scan field was 80.2%.

Conclusions

This study shows that whole-body CT is a valuable diagnostic tool for hand fractures in polytrauma patients. Hands should be evaluated regardless of clinical presentation in intubated patients after suspected polytrauma if they are included in the whole-body CT.

[Strategies for complex injuries of the hand]

The quality of the reconstruction, follow-up treatment and care determine the treatment outcome of complex hand injuries. The initial estimation and therapy are decisive. Optimal results necessitate a structured approach with strategic planning, including thorough débridement, precise analysis of the resulting defect and loss of function and if possible unilateral reconstruction and well-founded planning of secondary interventions. Within the framework of the detailed patient clarification the perspectives, possibilities and alternatives must be realistically presented. Taking these fundamental strategic steps into consideration, the primary aims of reconstruction and preservation of function, rapid occupational and social reintegration and avoidance of delayed complications can best be realized. There is no standard approach for these extremely variable injuries. Decisive is that even in cases of apparently harmless injuries, the involvement of functional structures must be considered early in the initial stages.

Management of complications relating to complex traumatic hand injuries

Complex hand injuries result in local trauma to osseous, neurovascular, and soft tissue structures. The large amount of energy imparted to these tissues may result in complex regional pain syndrome, stiffness, or infection. Unfortunately, a good outcome may not only depend on the technical aspects of the procedure but on the expectations, occupation, age, and other factors that are out of the surgeon's control. The best treatment for these complications is prevention; however, this review offers strategies to combat the complications once they arise.