Lacking evidence for performance of implants used for proximal femoral fractures - A systematic review

Treatment Outcomes of Dynamic Hip Screws Versus Short Intramedullary Nails for Extra-capsular Fragility Hip Fractures and Their Coding Audit

Introduction In the UK, hip fractures are a common reason for presentations to the emergency departments, which places significant pressure on NHS hospitals, appropriate choice of an implant to treat the hip fracture is one among many other factors that affect patients' outcomes. This audit aims to identify and compare the outcome difference between the dynamic hip screws (DHS) and short cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of extracapsular hip fractures. Methods In a retrospective study of 52 patients admitted as a result of hip fractures in one NHS trust, data collection was done from the patients' records using the trust's online system, we studied different variables to compare the outcome difference between DHS and short intramedullary (IM) nails, two senior authors interpreted the patients' X-rays and verified the coding and classification of the neck of femur fractures. Results This retrospective study examined 52 extracapsular hip fracture cases, including 37 females and 15 males. Forty-six (88%) of the included patients were ASA 3 and 4 (American Society of Anesthesiologists), and the average days to discharge from therapies were 8.4 (SD-+ 4) days compared to 11 (SD-+ 5.2) days for short IM nails and DHS, respectively (P= 0.03), the 30-day mortality rate for short nails was 7% (n= 4/52) patients and 6% (n= 3/52) for DHS (P =0.69). The mean operating times for the different implants were 58.11 (SD-+ 15.1) minutes for DHS and 58.03 (SD-+ 23.2) minutes for the short nail (P =0.98). Compliance with the national guidelines for providing an appropriate operation to treat hip fractures initially went from 63% (n=33/52) initially to 73% (n=38/52). This means that more patients who are appropriate for nailing are being treated with IM nails. Conclusion Short IM nails are associated with faster hospital discharge; this fact may be reflecting the lower postoperative pain as a result of avoiding soft tissue dissection associated with extramedullary devices. keeping in mind that IM devices have mechanical advantages over sliding hip screws; hence, they are more commonly used for more complex fracture patterns, leading to nearly similar outcomes when compared to extramedullary devices, this can be a source of bias in retrospective studies, larger randomized trials may lead to different outcomes.

Defining Cephalomedullary Nail Breakage Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To establish the background rate of breakage of cephalomedullary nails.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched on April 3, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

All English-language studies that examined trochanteric with or without subtrochanteric fractures and identified cephalomedullary nail breakage as an outcome measure and a breakage rate could be derived were included. Implants captured were predominantly the TFNA, TFN, and PFN by DePuy Synthes, various versions of the Gamma nail by Stryker, the Zimmer Natural Nail by Zimmer Biomet, and the Intertan by Smith and Nephew.

DATA EXTRACTION

The author, year of publication, dates of implant insertion, study design, method of detection of breakages, implant used, number of implant breakages, number of implants inserted, breakage rate, and follow-up were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Meta-analysis of included studies used descriptive nonparametric statistics and a noncomparative proportion for the pooled result. Differences in results between study design types were compared using the mean breakage rate per study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Cephalomedullary nail breakage is a rare complication with a median reported rate of 0.6% and a pooled result rate of 0.4%. Ninety-five percent of studies had a breakage rate of 1.3% or less, which sets a benchmark from the reported literature for future studies. There is wide variability in rates of breakage reported between different types of study designs with single-center review studies reporting breakage rates nearly 4-fold greater than large-scale administrative database reviews. The rate of implant breakage should not be used in isolation to judge an implant's performance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of Intramedullary Nails in the Treatment of Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures: An Observational Study of 13,232 Fractures in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary nails are commonly used in the treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. We aimed to compare intramedullary nails in widespread use in Norway on the basis of reoperation risk.

METHODS

We assessed data from 13,232 trochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures treated with an intramedullary nail and registered in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register between 2007 and 2019. The primary outcome measure was the risk of reoperation for various types of short and long intramedullary nails. Secondly, we compared risk of reoperation for the selected nails with respect to fracture type (AO/OTA type A1, A2, A3, and subtrochanteric fractures). Cox regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class was used to estimate hazard rate ratios (HRRs) for reoperation.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 82.9 years, and 72.8% of the nails were used in the treatment of female patients. We included 8,283 short and 4,949 long nails. A1 fractures accounted for 29.8%, A2 for 40.6%, A3 for 7.2%, and subtrochanteric fractures for 22.4%. When comparing short nails regardless of fracture type, the TRIGEN INTERTAN had an increased risk of reoperation at 1 year (HRR, 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03 to 1.66]; p = 0.028) and 3 years (HRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.61]; p = 0.011) postoperatively compared with the Gamma3. For individual fracture types, we found no significant differences in reoperation risk between the various types of short nails. When comparing long nails, the TRIGEN TAN/FAN had an increased risk of reoperation at 1 year (HRR, 3.05 [95% CI, 2.10 to 4.42]; p < 0.001) and 3 years (HRR, 2.54 [95% CI, 1.82 to 3.54]; p < 0.001) postoperatively compared with the long Gamma3.

CONCLUSIONS

This study may indicate a slightly increased risk of reoperation for the short TRIGEN INTERTAN compared with other short nails in widespread use in Norway. In analyses of long nails, the TRIGEN TAN/FAN nail was associated with a higher risk of reoperation in the treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Peri-implant fracture: a rare complication after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fracture

INTRODUCTION

Trochanteric femoral fractures are among the most common operatively treated fractures. Intramedullary fixation has become the treatment of choice in many centers around the world. Nevertheless, the knowledge of rare complications of these fractures is limited. In this study, the incidence and treatment strategies for peri-implant fractures (PIF) were assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was done on 987 consecutive operatively treated trochanteric fractures. PFNA cephalomedullary nail was used as a fixation method. All patients were followed up from patient records for peri-implant fractures. Plain radiographs as well as different salvage methods were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The total rate of peri-implant fractures was 1.4% (n = 14). The rate of PIF for patients treated with short (200 mm) nails, intermediate-length (240 mm) nails, and long nails was 2.7% (n = 2), 1.5% (n = 11), and 0.7% (n = 1), respectively (ns, p > 0.05 for difference). Treatment of choice for PIF was either ORIF with locking plate (57%, n = 8) or exchange nailing (43%, n = 6). None of the PIF patients needed additional surgeries for non-union, malunion, or delayed union.

CONCLUSIONS

A PIF is a rare complication of intramedullary fixation of trochanteric fractures. It can be treated with either locking plates or exchange nailing with sufficient results. There are no grounds for favoring long nails to avoid PIFs.

Clinical and radiological results of using proximal femoral locking compression plate and proximal femoral nail antirotation for subtrochanteric fractures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fracture in the use of proximal femoral locking compression plate (PFLCP) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). This retrospective study was performed on patients who referred to Firoozgar Hospital in 2017 with subtrochanteric fracture. During follow-up, control radiographs were obtained from patients and the Harris Hip Score questionnaire was completed. Finally, the data were entered into Spss version 22 and then analyzed. A total of 56 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two treatment groups of 28: including groups with locking plate and nailing treatment. The results showed that the treatment was not significantly different in patients with subtrochanteric fractures who were treated with either intramedullary nailing or plate placement. There is no difference between the two groups in any of the parameters. The two groups were similar in terms of fracture classification, and finally no significant difference was found in terms of union findings. This study showed that clinical and imaging findings are not significantly different between the two groups of patients with subtrochanteric fracture who are treated with nailing or plate placement.

Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures : 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate if there are differences in outcome between sliding hip screws (SHSs) and intramedullary nails (IMNs) with regard to fracture stability.

METHODS

We assessed data from 17,341 patients with trochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures treated with SHS or IMN in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from 2013 to 2019. Primary outcome measures were reoperations for stable fractures (AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type A1) and unstable fractures (AO/OTA type A2, A3, and subtrochanteric fractures). Secondary outcome measures were reoperations for A2, A3, and subtrochanteric fractures individually, one-year mortality, quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension three-level index score), pain (visual analogue scale (VAS)), and satisfaction (VAS) for stable and unstable fractures. Hazard rate ratios (HRRs) for reoperation were calculated using Cox regression analysis with adjustments for age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score.

RESULTS

Reoperation rate was lower after surgery with IMN for unstable fractures one year (HRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 0.97; p = 0.022) and three years postoperatively (HRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.99; p = 0.036), compared with SHS. For individual fracture types, no clinically significant differences were found. Lower one-year mortality was found for IMN compared with SHS for stable fractures (HRR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96; p = 0.007), and unstable fractures (HRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.98; p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

This national register-based study indicates a lower reoperation rate for IMN than SHS for unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, but not for stable fractures or individual fracture types. The choice of implant may not be decisive to the outcome of treatment for stable trochanteric fractures in terms of reoperation rate. One-year mortality rate for unstable and stable fractures was lower in patients treated with IMN. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):274-282.

Biodegradable cement augmentation of gamma nail osteosynthesis reduces migration in pertrochanteric fractures, a biomechanical in vitro study

BACKGROUND

Cut-out of gamma nail often results from poor primary bone stability, suboptimal reduction (varus) and excentric placement of the head element which may lead to "instability" and frequently requires revision. Various studies have shown that augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate cement increases the primary stability of osteosynthesis. However, it has not yet been widely used in fracture treatment due to certain disadvantages, e.g., the lack of osteointegration, the formation of an interface membrane or the presence of toxic monomers. Few studies show that biodegradable bone cements increase the stability of osteosynthesis in different anatomical regions and therefore could be an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate cement in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

Two biomechanical situations were simulated using 24 Sawbones (simple and multifragmentary pertrochanteric fractures; AO-classification 31-A1 and 31-A2. Both groups were stabilized using the Gamma3® nailing system with and without biodegradable bone cement. Sawbones underwent the same cyclic loading test, simulating 10.000 gait cycles loading the bones with three times body weight. Migration was determined by comparing computed tomography scans recorded before and after the mechanical testing. The three-dimensional migration of the lag screw was calculated, and the rotation of the head around the longitudinal axis was determined.

FINDINGS

Biodegradable cement reduced migration by approximately 35% in 31-A1 fractures (25.4% in 31-A2 fractures) and the rotation of the head around the lag screw by approximately 37% in 31-A1 fractures (17.8%, 31-A2).

INTERPRETATION

Use of biodegradable bone cement improved the primary stability of gamma nail osteosynthesis in the biomechanical model.

Decision making in the management of malunion and nonunion of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip

AIM

Intertrochanteric fractures account for almost 50% of hip fractures.Nonunion and malunion of these fractures are relatively uncommon. This study reviews the outcome of 31 cases of intertrochanteric fracture failures. An algorithm for the management of these injuries is also proposed.

METHODS

19 patients with intertrochanteric malunion and 12 patients with non-union were included in this study. Treatment of these injuries was initiated according to the algorithm proposed in this study. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by assessing union, pre and postoperative shortening and HSA (head-shaft angle). Functional outcomes were assessed by the Parker mobility scale and presence or absence of pain.

RESULTS

All the patients with intertrochanteric malunion with follow-up had united. The postoperative shortening in all patients were ⩽2.5 cms. Patients having intertrochanteric nonunion with follow-up, who underwent internal fixation had united with an acceptable Parker mobility scale score, except in 1 patient who sustained an ipsilateral distal femur fracture. The average HSA correction obtained was 21° (range 3-60°).

CONCLUSION

The algorithm proposed in this study helps streamline the treatment according to each case scenario.It helps in planning and managing patients with intertrochanteric fracture failures.

Distal interlocking for short trochanteric nails: static, dynamic or no locking? Review of the literature and decision algorithm

Pertrochanteric hip fractures are among the most common and the use of short cephalomedullary nails as the treatment of choice is increasing.

A systematic review regarding distal locking options for short cephalomedullary nails was undertaken using Medline/PubMed®, Embase® and Cochrane Library® in order to evaluate current indications, associated complications and to provide treatment recommendations.

The results seem to support the use of distal static locking for unstable fractures, dynamic locking for length stable/rotational unstable fractures and no locking for stable fractures.

Complications associated with distal locking include iatrogenic fractures, thigh pain, delayed union and nonunion, implant failure, screw loosening and breaking, drill bit breaking, soft tissue irritation, femoral artery branch injury, intramuscular haematoma and compartment syndrome. It is also associated with longer operative time and radiation exposure.

In unlocked constructs, dorsomedial comminution and nail/medullary canal mismatch contribute to peri-implant fractures. Anterior cortical impingement is associated with cut-out and nonunion.

Most studies comparing distally locked and unlocked nails report a short follow-up.

Distal locking mode should be based on the fracture’s stability.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:421-429. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190045

An alternative method to tighten the helical blade with impaired locking mechanism during operation of cephalomedullary nailing

During the operation of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA), surgeons may run across a rare problem that the helical blade fails to be tightened and locked by clockwise turning of the impactor handle. At this moment, three options can be taken: first, replace the unlocked helical blade and re-insert another new one; second, keep the unlocked helical blade in place, proceed and finish the operation as usual; and third, as we described, keep the first helical blade in situ and tighten and lock it by other instruments, such as the SW4.0 mm hexagonal screwdriver for the distal interlocking screw, which is already in the instrument box. The third option is the best, as it keeps the operation going and remains the fixation quality as usual.

Effectiveness of distally slotted proximal femoral nails on prevention of femur fractures during and after intertrochanteric femur fracture surgery

INTRODUCTION

Intra- and post-operative femoral shaft fractures related with nailing remain of concern. Although manufacturers have sought to solve the problem by providing distally slotted nails, it is not clear that these implants reduce fractures. We compare two distally slotted proximal femoral nails [trochanteric nail (TRON) and proximal femur intramedullary nail (PROFIN)].

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of 195 hips treated with TRONs (distally slotted in four places in the sagittal and coronal planes) and 583 hips treated with PROFINs (distally slotted in two places in the coronal plane) in two institutes were retrospectively evaluated. The inclusion criteria were follow-up for at least 6 months; pertrochanteric fractures and age over 55 years.

RESULTS

In total, 161 hips in the TRON group and 512 hips in the PROFIN group were included. The mean follow-up time was 28.5 (range: 6-84) months in whole group. The demographic characteristics of the groups were similar. Only 2 intraoperative shaft and 3 proximal lateral cortex fracture was detected in PROFIN group, there wasn't any postoperative fracture. Four proximal lateral cortex and 2 femur shaft fractures were detected in TRON group (one during operation and one at postoperative 8th month after a fall at pedestrian way).

CONCLUSIONS

Distal cephalomedullary nail slotting prevented intra- and post-operative femoral fractures. A distal slot 50 mm in length may increase nail elasticity and reduce nail tip stress to a greater extent than a 30-mm slot. Distal slotting in both the sagittal and coronal planes afforded no advantage compared to coronal slotting only.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective study.

Increased therapy demand and impending loss of previous residence status after proximal femur fractures can be determined by continuous gait analysis - A clinical feasibility study

Proximal femur fractures account for increased healthcare costs whenever patients are unable to return to their previous state of residence. Studies suggest that patients benefit from early weight-bearing, yet compliance to weight-bearing regimes is poorly investigated. Aim of the study was thus to show the clinical feasibility of a new measurement tool able to determine continuous weight-bearing behavior after intramedullary nail osteosynthesis of intertrochanteric femur fractures, assess the influence of weight-bearing on clinical outcome and determine rehabilitation demand based on early postoperative gait performance. In an observational study, gait data of 22 patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures were evaluated. During the inpatient stay patients were continuously monitored with a gait analysis insole. Primary outcome was the amount of weight-bearing reached. Short-term functional outcome, as well as return to the previous state of living were evaluated in relation to weight-bearing and activity during the inpatient stay. With the presented technique continuous gait data of all patients during postoperative mobilization could be obtained. Only 13 patients reached full weight-bearing. The technique was feasible to determine correlations between weight-bearing and outcome, as well as between gait activity and outcome. Significant gait differences between patients able to return to their previous state of living and those who could not were seen. Dynamic insole measurements are feasible to continuously determine the postoperative gait performance. Their postoperative use showed, that the continuous compliance to permissive weight-bearing after intertrochanteric fractures is low. The presented measurement technique has the potential to identify patients at risk for reduced outcome and impending loss of previous residence status. Further studies will have to investigate the effects of technology assisted "patient at risk" identification and adapted therapy on clinical outcome.

Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis

Objectives

To compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of InterTAN nail (IT) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for managing primary AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric hip fractures (IHFs) in older osteoporotic patients.

Methods

Patients aged 60 years or older who received surgical treatment for IHFs (AO/OTA 3.1A2.1-A2.3) with IT or PFNA were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the postoperative treatment failure rate. The secondary outcome was the Harris Hip Score (HHS).

Results

A total of 326 osteoporotic cases (326 hips: IT, n = 162; PFNA, n = 164) were assessed with a mean follow-up of 43.5 months (range, 38–48 months). For the entire cohort, the incidence of postoperative treatment failure (periprosthetic fracture and reoperation) was 29/326 (8.9%); the IT-treated cohort (7/162, 4.3%) had a significantly lower rate compared with the PFNA-treated cohort (22/165, 13.3%). The incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures was significantly lower in the IT-treated cohort than in the PFNA-treated cohort (2.5% vs 7.9%). The postoperative HHS at the final follow-up was not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusion

IT might show a better outcome in managing osteoporotic AO/OTA 31-A2 IHFs in terms of periprosthetic fracture and reoperation compared with PFNA.

Unstable trochanteric fractures: Issues and avoiding pitfalls

The incidence of trochanteric fractures is rising because of increasing number of senior citizens with osteoporosis. There are various modalities for reduction and internal fixation. However, the incidence of complications remains high. In the herein article we discuss issues that influence the fixation and outcomes of unstable trochanteric fractures. Moreover, the results of a prospective, randomised, cohort, time bound, hospital based, comparative study is presented.