A comparison of the management of blunt splenic injury in children and young people-A New South Wales, population-based, retrospective study

Retrospective review of intervention for traumatic blunt spleen injuries in adolescents by trauma center type

BACKGROUND

Management guidelines for pediatric blunt spleen injuries (BSI) include adolescent patients but few studies have compared current management of adolescents with respect to other age groups by center type.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 2017-2018 National Trauma Quality Improvement (TQIP) data of children (6-12), adolescents (13-17) and young adults (18-24) with BSI presenting to an adult, pediatric only, or adult/pediatric trauma center, comparing the rate of splenic intervention for adolescents by trauma center was performed.

RESULTS

Children had lower odds of spleen intervention than adolescents at both adult (OR 0.61 95%CI 0.39, 0.95) and adult/pediatric (OR 0.55 95%CI 0.35, 0.87) centers but did not differ at pediatric centers (OR 0.94 95%CI 0.39, 2.2) (n = 10,494). Adolescents adjusted odds of intervention was equal to adults at adult trauma centers (OR 1.2 95%CI 0.95, 1.4).

CONCLUSION

Adolescents are more likely to undergo interventions for BSI as compared to children at both adult and adult/pediatric trauma centers.

Retrospective cohort study of paediatric splenic injuries at a major adult trauma centre in South Africa identifies areas of success and improvement

This study reviews our experience with paediatric splenic trauma in a major trauma centre in South Africa. We reviewed the management and outcomes of 66 paediatric patients and concluded that selective non-operative management of paediatric splenic trauma can be undertaken successfully in a middle-income country such as South Africa. The grade of splenic injury itself is rarely the sole determinant of operative or non-operative treatment and clinical outcome.

The management and outcome of paediatric splenic injuries in the Netherlands

Background

Non-operative management (NOM) is generally accepted as a treatment method of traumatic paediatric splenic rupture. However, considerable variations in management exist. This study analyses local trends in aetiology and management of paediatric splenic injuries and evaluates the implementation of the guidelines proposed by the American Paediatric Surgical Association (APSA) in a level 1 trauma centre.

Methods

The charts of paediatric patients with blunt splenic injury (BSI) who were admitted or transferred to a level 1 trauma centre between 2003 and 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Information pertaining to demographics, mechanism of injury, injury description, associated injuries, intervention and outcomes were analysed and compared to international literature.

Results

There were 130 patients with BSI identified (63.1% male), with a mean age of 11.3 ± 4.0 and a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 21.6 ± 13.7. Bicycle accidents were the most common trauma mechanism (23.1%). Sixty-four percent were multi-trauma patients, 25% received blood transfusions, and 31% were haemodynamically unstable. Mean injury grade was 3.0, with 30% of patients having a high-grade injury. In total, 75% of patients underwent NOM with a 100% efficacy rate. Total splenectomy rate was 6.2%. Four patients died due to brain damage.

Patients with a high-grade BSI (grades IV–V) had a significantly higher ISS and longer bedrest and more often presented with an active blush on computed tomography (CT) scans than patients with a low-grade BSI (grades I–III). Non-operative management was mainly the choice of treatment in both groups (76.6% and 79.5%, respectively). Haemodynamic instability was a predictor for operative management (OM) (p = 0.001). Predictors for a longer length of stay (LOS) included concomitant injuries, haemodynamic instability and OM (all p < 0.02). Interobserver agreement in the grading of BSI is moderate, with a Cohens Kappa coefficient of 0.493.

Conclusion

Non-operative management has proven to be a realistic management approach in both low- and high-grade splenic injuries. Consideration for operative management should be based on haemodynamic instability. Compared to the anticipated length of bedrest and hospital stay outlined in the APSA guidelines, the Netherlands can reduce the length of bedrest and hospital stay through their non-operative management.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study, level III

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-021-00353-4.