Pipkin Type-III fractures of the femoral head: Fix it or replace it?

Femoral Head Fractures: Evaluation, Management, and Outcomes

Fractures of the femoral head typically occur after high-energy trauma. Radiographs and cross-sectional imaging are used to appropriately classify and identify associated injuries or morphologic characteristics that may influence management. Identification of the radiographic and clinical hallmarks of an irreducible variant is critical to optimizing the patient's outcome. Nonsurgical treatment can be used in the setting of small, infrafoveal femoral head fractures without hip instability. When surgical treatment is indicated, an anterior (Smith-Petersen), posterior (Kocher-Langenbeck), or surgical hip dislocation approach may be used depending on injury details and surgeon preference. The purpose of this review was to summarize current evidence on femoral head fractures regarding indications, variant patterns, surgical approaches, and outcomes.

Pipkin type III femoral head fracture: which treatment strategy can be recommended?

BACKGROUND

Pipkin type III femoral head fractures are relatively rare injuries. Few studies have explored and described the treatment and outcomes of Pipkin type III femoral head fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in treating Pipkin type III femoral head fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 12 patients with Pipkin type III femoral head fractures who underwent ORIF from July 2010 and January 2018. The complications and reoperations were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Harris hip score (HHS), Thompson-Epstein criteria, and SF-12 score [including the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS)] were used for functional assessment.

RESULTS

Among the 12 patients, ten were males and two were females, with a mean age of 34.2 ± 11.9 years. The median follow-up time was 6 years (range 4-8 years). Five patients (42%) developed osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and one patient (8%) developed nonunion. These six patients (50%) underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). One patient (8%) developed heterotopic ossification and underwent ectopic bone excision; this patient also presented with post-traumatic arthritis. The mean final VAS pain score and HHS were 4.1 ± 3.1 points and 62.8 ± 24.4 points, respectively. According to the Thompson-Epstein criteria, there was one patient (8%) with excellent, four patients (33%) with good, one patient (8%) with fair, and six patients (50%) with poor outcomes. The PCS score and MCS score were 41.7 ± 34.7 points and 63.2 ± 14.5 points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Limited by the high incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, it is difficult to achieve satisfactory functional outcomes when treating Pipkin type III femoral head fractures using ORIF, and a primary THA may be considered. However, for younger patients, considering the survivorship of prosthesis, ORIF may be recommended with the proviso that the patient is fully informed of the high complication rate associated with this procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Dislocation fracture of the femoral head in adult

The smaller the head fragment, the more likely it is located at the bottom and in front of the femoral head, which then determines the most suitable approach.

A CT scan is essential after reduction and before resumption of weight-bearing to verify the size and congruence of the fragments and whether there are foreign bodies and/or a fracture of the posterior wall.

Classifications should include the size of the fragment and whether or not there is an associated fracture of the acetabulum or femoral neck (historical ‘Pipkin’, modernised ‘Chiron’).

In an emergency, the dislocation should be rectified, without completing the fracture (sciatic nerve palsy should be diagnosed before reduction). A hip prosthesis may be indicated (age or associated cervical fracture).

Delayed orthopaedic treatment is sufficient if congruence is good. A displaced fragment can be resected (foreign bodies and ¼ head), reduced and osteosynthesised (⅓ and ½ head), and a posterior wall fracture reduced and osteosynthesised. Small fragments can be resected under arthroscopy. The approach is medial (Luddloff, Ferguson, Chiron) to remove or osteosynthesise ⅓ or ¼ fragments; posterior for ½ head or a fractured posterior wall.

The results remain quite good in case of resection or an adequately reduced fragment. Long-term osteoarthritis is common (32%) but well tolerated with a low rate of prosthetisation. Avascular necrosis remains a possible complication (8.2%). Sciatic nerve palsy (4% of fracture dislocations) is more common for dislocations associated with posterior wall fractures.

Safety of surgical hip dislocation in femoral head fracture and dislocation (FHFD) and avascular necrosis risk factor analysis of FHFD: midterm results confirmed by SPECT/CT and MRI

Background

The study aim was to report the treatment outcomes of trochanteric flip osteotomy (TFO) with surgical hip dislocation (SHD) for femoral head fracture and dislocation (FHFD) and to investigate the risk factors for avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head.

Methods

The data of 34 patients (29 men, 5 women; mean age 37.9 years) diagnosed with FHFD and treated with TFO with SHD between May 2009 and February 2018 with an average follow-up period of 5.1 years (range 2.8–10.5 years) were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Merle d'Aubigné–Postel score and Thompson–Epstein Scale. Radiologic outcomes were classified according to the Matta classification. AVN was confirmed using magnetic resonance imaging or single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. The occurrence of complications was examined, and factors influencing complications, AVN.

Results

Regarding the Pipkin’s classification, there were 7 patients with type II, 2 patients with type III, and 25 patients with type IV fractures. Posterior wall fractures accompanied all associated acetabular fractures in the patients with Pipkin type IV fractures. Radiologically, the union of acetabular and femoral head fractures was observed within 6.1 months on average (range 4–10 months) in 32 patients, except two patients who developed femoral head AVN. Clinically, the average Merle d'Aubigné–Postel score was 14.4 points (range 8–17 points), and 22 patients had good or excellent results on the Thompson–Epstein Scale. Two patients developed femoral head AVN with both having displaced femoral neck fractures associated with FHFD. AVN was significantly correlated with femoral neck fractures (P = 0.000).

Conclusion

TFO with SHD is a safe and useful approach for the treatment of FHFD. Particular attention should be paid when treating femoral head fractures associated with displaced femoral neck fractures because of the high risk of AVN development.

Surgical Approaches for Managing Femoral Head Fractures (FHFs); What and How to Choose from the Different Options?

Femoral head fractures (FHFs) are considered a relatively uncommon injury; however, they carry a challenge to the trauma surgeon. Choosing the appropriate management option, either conservatively or surgically, if the latter was chosen, should it be open reduction and internal fixation or simple excision of the fragment, or acute total hip arthroplasty. Furthermore, selecting the best surgical approach through which surgical management could be performed depends on the fracture classification, the familiarity of the surgeon, and the presence of associated injuries. All approaches to the hip, including hip arthroscopy, had been proposed for the management of FHFs; however, the difference among approaches is related to the complexity of the approach, the need for special training or equipment, the effect of the approach on the functional outcomes as well as the rate of postoperative complications. This review discussed the possible surgical approaches used to manage FHFs, advantages, and disadvantages for each, and offered a guideline for selecting the most appropriate surgical approach.

Case report of a delayed iatrogenic Pipkin type III femoral head fracture-dislocation

RATIONALE

Pipkin III femoral head fracture dislocation (FHFD) is rarely observed in clinical practice, and its outcome is alarming. A considerable proportion of Pipkin III fractures result from repeated or forceful closed reduction of an irreducible FHFD. Pipkin type III fractures pose a therapeutic challenge. Most patients underwent total hip arthroplasty.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 34-year-old man experienced high-energy trauma to the left hip from a terrible traffic accident. Radiography and computed tomography (CT) at the local hospital revealed a left posterior FHFD. Emergency close reduction of the hip was performed.48 hours later, the patient was transferred to our institution. New radiography and CT examinations demonstrated an iatrogenic femoral neck fracture (FNF) associated with FHFD. In addition, a right talar fracture was observed.

DIAGNOSIS

Pipkin III fracture combined with contralateral talar fracture.

INTERVENTIONS

Considering his Pipkin fracture classification (Pipkin Type-III) and the time to surgery after his injury (>48 hours), the patient underwent left total hip arthroplasty uneventfully, followed by below-ankle plaster cast immobilization for his right ankle.

OUTCOMES

At the 6-month follow-up, the patient was able to walk pain-free, and plain radiographs were satisfactory, with no evidence of heterotopic ossification or osteonecrosis of the talus.

LESSONS

Before emergency closed reduction, early recognition of the unique characteristics of an irreducible FHFD is essential to avoid iatrogenic femoral neck fracture.

Fractures of the femoral head: a narrative review

Fractures of the femoral head are rare injuries, which typically occur after posterior hip dislocation.

The Pipkin classification, developed in 1957, is the most commonly used classification scheme to date.

The injury is mostly caused by high-energy trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents or falls from a significant height.

Emergency treatment consists of urgent closed reduction of the hip joint, followed by non-operative or operative treatment of the femoral head fracture and any associated injuries.

There is an ongoing controversy about the suitable surgical approach (anterior vs. posterior) for addressing fractures of the femoral head. Fracture location, degree of displacement, joint congruity and the presence of loose fragments, as well as concomitant injuries are crucial factors in choosing the adequate surgical approach.

Long-term complications such as osteonecrosis of the femoral head, posttraumatic osteoarthritis and heterotopic ossification can lead to a relatively poor functional outcome.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1122-1131. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210034

Complications and Functional Outcome of Femoral Head Fracture-Dislocation In Delayed and Neglected Cases

INTRODUCTION

Delayed reduction of the hip in femoral head fracture dislocation increases the risk of osteonecrosis and adversely affects the functional outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the outcome and complications of 138 patients with femoral head fracture dislocation treated by a single surgeon over a period of 22 years. Only seven patients presented within 24 h of injury and remaining all presented late. The hip joints could be reduced by closed manoeuvre in 105 patients, and 33 patients needed open reduction. The patients were managed conservatively or surgically. The mean follow-up period was 3.57 years (1-18 years).

RESULTS

There were 119 males and 19 females. The mean age was 35.71 years (range, 18-70 years). Forty-two patients were managed conservatively, and 96 patients needed surgical treatment. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach was used in 40 patients, the trochanteric flip osteotomy in 14 patients, the Smith-Peterson approach in 31 patients, and the Watson-Jones approach in one patient. The femoral head fragment was fixed in 47.82% patients and excised in 11.59% patients. Primary total hip replacement (THR) was performed in 7.24% of patients through the posterior approach. 24.63% of patients developed complications with 14.49% of hip osteonecrosis, 2.89% posttraumatic osteoarthritis and 2.17% femoral head resorption. 55% of patients who developed osteonecrosis were operated through the posterior approach. Secondary procedures were needed in 14.48% of patients. The clinical outcome, as evaluated using the modified Harris Hip Score, was good to excellent in 52.89% of patients and poor to fair in 47.11% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The incidences of osteonecrosis and secondary procedures are increased in delayed and neglected femoral head fracture dislocation. Osteonecrosis is commonly seen in Brumback 2A injuries and posterior-based approaches. All Brumback 3B fractures in such delayed cases should be treated with THR. Osteosynthesis or conservative treatment should be reserved for other types of injuries. A careful selection of treatment plan in such delayed cases can result in a comparable functional outcome as reported in the literature.

Articular Femoral Head Fracture Management: A Meta-analysis of Literature

PURPOSE

Articular fractures of the proximal femur are seldom encountered and there are few studies in literature regarding this topic. To date, only a few large series have adequate follow-up and exhaustive description of treatment and outcome, which, however, often result incomplete and do not allow a comparison. Since there are still uncertainties and debates on which the treatment gold standard should be, the goal of the present study is to carry out a meta-analysis on type I and II Pipkin fracture management to establish the best treatment according to EBM.

METHODS

Studies regarding acetabular fractures of the femur head were identified from Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Medline, ScienceDirect and PubMed; gray studies were searched from the included references' literature, and using general search engines and Social media; the query to be temporally extended from 1996 to 2020. Only comparative studies were included; we ruled out case-reports, case series, author's opinion, register databases.

RESULTS

Comparing conservative and surgical treatment, we found evidence of a better outcome choosing surgical treatment. We found a significant better outcome with open reduction internal fixation, instead of fragment excision. Comparing failure rate of surgical approaches, we found no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Our study proves that there is evidence in favor of operative treatment rather than conservative in complete or displaced Pipkin fracture Type I + II; open reduction internal fixation should be preferred rather than fragment excision, whenever possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Therapeutic.

Terrible triad of the hip: A case report

•

Pipkin-III injury is rare, and its outcome is guarded.

•

Significant number of Pipkin-III injuries are iatrogenic.

•

Recognizing irreducibility of hip dislocation is important.

•

Outcome can be improved with timely intervention.

•

Minimizing dissection might affect the outcome.

Introduction

Pipkin-III femoral head fracture dislocation is a rare injury and its outcome is guarded. Some authors believe femoral neck fracture of Pipkin-III injury is largely iatrogenic. Recent literature showed none of these injuries had excellent outcome, and most patients end up with hip replacement.

Presentation of case

A 34-year-old man sustained a traumatic hip injury with fracture-dislocation and an iatrogenic femoral neck fracture during reduction. A modified Gibson approach was performed to reduce and fix the femoral head and neck fractures in a retrograde fashion. Follow-up at 26 months assessment showed viable femoral head, and excellent functional outcome.

Discussion

Iatrogenic femoral neck fracture in the setting of femoral head dislocation is not uncommon. Clinical and radiological signs of irreducible dislocation can easily be missed which might lead to devastating complications like iatrogenic femoral neck fracture. Recognition of this unique injury, timely intervention, and meticulous dissection might positively alter the patient’s outcome.

Conclusion

This case serves to enlighten orthopedists about the risk of iatrogenic femoral neck fracture, methods to avoid such complication, and the proper management.

Surgical treatment of femoral head fractures

Background

Femoral head fractures (FHF) are uncommon and generally caused by high-energy injuries. Surgical reduction with stable fixation of large fragments is believed to have the best outcomes. This retrospective study intended to report outcomes with surgical treatment at our institution and tried to establish treatment algorithm.

Methods

Through the 6-year period (2003–2008), 35 FHF in 35 consecutive patients (average, 30 years) were surgically treated. All FHF were caused by high-energy trauma. Patients' general condition was stabilized first and hip dislocation was manually reduced immediately. Definite fracture treatment was scheduled after admission for an average of 2.9 days (0.3–11 days). Pipkin classification was used as the treatment guide and open reduction with internal fixation was performed in all 35 FHF.

Results

These FHF included 21 type I, 7 type II, 3 type III, and 4 type IV fractures. The hip joint had been approached by either an anterior or posterior route depending on the individual surgeon. Internal fixation with screws was performed for all 35 FHF. The average admission was 13.8 days (range, 2–35 days). Thirty patients (86%, 30/35) were followed for an average of 3.3 years (at lease 6 months) and all 30 FHF healed. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head was found in 23% (7/30) patients and six patients were converted to hip arthroplasty for developing advanced stages of avascular necrosis. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 43% (13/30) patients. However, only one patient had range of motion limitation. Besides, one patient had moderate hip osteoarthritis.

Conclusions

FHF are uncommon and generally caused by high-energy injuries. Fracture healing can be attained in all femoral head fractures by using open reduction and screw fixation. Our results by using conventional approaches were associated with high complication rates. Further endeavor to improve the outcome should be taken.

Case Report of a Rare Pipkin Type III Femoral Head Fracture

Introduction

Femoral head fractures are rare injury compared to other hip pathologies and often associated with posterior hip dislocation. Such fractures are often fraught with complications even after successful surgical fixation. Pipkin described a classification system for such fractures, dividing them into four types, of which Type III (31C.3) fractures are associated with femoral neck fractures. These fractures are the least common and often associated with the worst outcomes.

Case Report

We report a rare case of Pipkin Type III fracture after attempted hip relocation and review literature on this topic. A 35-year-old female sustained a right posterior hip dislocation with femoral head fracture following a fall. After attempts of manipulation and reduction, she sustained an iatrogenic right femoral neck fracture resulting in a Pipkin III femoral head fracture. Open reduction and reduction of fracture achieved through headless compression screw of femoral head and cortical screws of femoral neck. Four months after surgery, the patient under osteonecrosis of the femoral head and subsequently required conversion to a right total hip arthroplasty.

Conclusion

Femoral head fractures have serious sequelae and should be treated with caution. A high index of suspicion is required; hence, if clinically suspicious, proper imaging is paramount to prevent iatrogenic injury to the femoral neck resulting in subsequent avascular necrosis.