Surgical treatment of radial head isolated Mason III fractures

Mason type III fractures of the radial head: ORIF, resection or prosthetic replacement?

PURPOSE

This study focused on a comparison of mid-term clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes of adults treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), radial head prosthesis (RHP) and resection (RHR).

METHODS

The retrospective evaluation concerned 47 surgically treated patients after a mean follow-up of 53 months. All patients were grouped according to the surgical procedure performed: 15 in the RHP group, 16 in the ORIF group and 16 in the RHR group. At the follow-up, outcome assessment was based on radiographs, range of motion (ROM) and functional rating scores.

RESULTS

Patients treated by RHR had significantly higher mean age and shorter operation time than other two groups. Compared to ROM, flexion, extension and pronation were significantly worse in patients treated by ORIF than those in the RHP group and the RHR group. Supination was significantly better in the RHP group. However, no statistical differences were observed in functional rating scores among the three groups. Regarding complications, instability was the only cause of revision surgery in the RHP group and the RHR group. On the other hand, the ORIF group revision rate was 50% and secondary displacement was the most frequent cause of failure.

CONCLUSION

The ORIF group did not show good results with greater elbow stiffness and higher revision rate than the other two techniques. RHR may be suitable for elderly patients with lower functional demands as it reported good clinical results and reduced operation time.

Complications, Reoperations, and Long-Term Outcomes after Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Mason Classification Type II and Type III Radial Head Fractures

Introduction  The objectives of this study were to assess long-term outcomes, complications, and reoperations after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of radial head fractures. Materials and Methods  35 adult patients, who underwent ORIF of an isolated, displaced radial head fracture without elbow instability (Mason classification type II or III) at two tertiary care referral centers from 2000 to 2017, were identified. Patient satisfaction, pain, and QuickDASH scores were assessed by telephone follow-up at median 12.9 years. Results  The mean age of the 35 patients in our study was 39 years, and 54% were women. The median length of clinical follow-up was 175 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 54% of patients, and reoperations in 23% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression identified fixation with plate and screws versus screws alone as a risk factor for complications and reoperations. The long-term telephone follow-up response rate was 54%. At 13-year median follow-up, the average patient satisfaction was 9.6/10, the average patient-reported pain was 0.7/10, and the average QuickDASH score was 10.5. Conclusion  The long-term outcomes of ORIF of Mason classification type II and III radial head fractures are favorable; however, rates of complication and reoperation are notable and may be higher with plate-and-screw fixation.

Excision Versus Replacement in Unrepairable Comminuted Fractures of the Radial Head: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications

BACKGROUND

The radial head fractures comprise approximately 4% of all fractures around the elbow. The outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation are poor in fractures with more than three fragments, and the excision of radial head is considered a viable surgical treatment option. However, it is associated with its own set of complications. The radial head prosthetic replacement has emerged as an alternative in management of these fractures with constraints of cost and related complications. Hence, the treatment for the unrepairable comminuted radial head fractures still remains controversial.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the post-operative outcomes of the radial head excision versus prosthetic replacement in comminuted Mason type-III fractures of radial head.

METHODOLOGY

Three databases of Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Embase were searched for comparative studies on the study question and relevant studies which mentioned at least one of the outcomes of interest (functional outcome scores and number of complications) were included.

RESULTS

Six studies were part of this review with 82 excisions and 99 prosthetic replacements. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of number of complications (OR 0.65; 0.08-5.07); and measures of functional outcomes; Mayo elbow performance score or MEPS (mean difference - 6.56; - 23.45 to 10.33). The incidence of elbow osteoarthritis, heterotrophic ossification, stiffness, and instability were similar in both groups. The flexion extension arc in degrees was better in excision group (mean difference 9.93; 1.31-18.55; p = .02).

CONCLUSION

Excision is a reasonable surgical option for isolated comminuted radial head fractures with similar results of function and associated rates of complications as prosthetic replacements. The arc of motion is also better with excisions. There have been reports of more osteoarthritis with excision and arthroplasty has been advised in younger patients; however, we had no quantitative proof of that in this review.