Foot salvage using microsurgical free muscle flaps in severely crushed foot with soft tissue defects

Reconstruction of foot and ankle defects using the vaccum sealing drainage versus the induced-membrane the elderly: A retrospective comparative study

The purpose of this study was to compare the reconstructive outcomes of soft-tissue defects around foot and ankle with vaccum sealing drainage (VSD) or induction membrane (IM) of cement formation and attempt to provide an optimal strategy for elderly patients. A retrospective review of all continuous patients with foot and ankle reconstruction using different flaps from October of 2016 and October of 2020 was performed. Based on the different way, the patients were divided into two groups: VSD group (n = 26) and IM group (n = 27). Outcomes were assessed according to the size of the defect, frequency of debridement procedures, hospitalization time, duration of healing, the healing rate, major amputation rate, functional outcomes and complications. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) detection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was also be completed. We found that there was no difference in demographic characteristics, size of the defect, debridement times and functional outcomes between the two groups (p > 0.05); however, a significant difference in the wound healing time, hospitalization time and complications were noted between them(p < 0.05). The fresh granulation tissue of both groups showed abundant positive expression of VEGF. Thus, the VSD and IM are both available for foot and ankle reconstruction in elderly patients. However, the IM group offers short hospitalization time, duration of healing and lower frequency of postoperative complications. Thus, we advocate the IM for reconstruction of defects of the foot and ankle region in the elderly patients.

Patient-reported outcomes following free flap lower extremity reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity has shown success for the management of large and complex defects, restoration of function, and favorable aesthetic outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have not been well explored in previous literature. This meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of PROs after free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to 2021 for studies reporting on PROs following free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

RESULTS

Overall, 53 studies were included, and 11 studies reported validated PRO measures for meta-analysis. A total of 1953 patients underwent reconstruction with 1958 free flaps for lower limb defects with a mean follow-up of 3.26 (0.25-7.83) months. The mean postoperative Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores were 60.3 (±12) out of 80 points (4 studies, 85 patients). The mean postoperative AOFAS scores were 75.1 (±15) out of 100 points (4 studies, 68 patients). The mean postoperative SF-36 scores were 88.1 (±8.0) out of 100 points; mental health component was 48.7 (±8.9), and physical component was 38.4 (±8.2), out of 50 points (4 studies, 88 patients).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that patients report improved physical health, mental health, and function following lower extremity reconstruction with free flaps. Patients reported similar improvements in functional scores following lower extremity reconstruction regardless of their free flap type. Furthermore, patients with myocutaneous flaps may have improved mental health and worse physical health scores when compared to perforator flaps. The evidence profiles presented in this review indicate that additional research is needed to help guide future decision-making.

Comparison of "complications" and functional outcome of anterolateral thigh flap and sural neurofasciocutaneus flap for foot and ankle reconstruction: A single center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Skin and soft-tissue defects around the foot and ankle remain a challenge for orthopedic and plastic surgeons. Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap and sural neurofasciocutaneous (NFC) flap are both used to reconstruct lower-extremity soft-tissue defects. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of the two flaps and attempt to provide an optimal strategy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted, reviewing data from 93 patients who underwent reconstruction of wounds around the foot and ankle with ALT flap (42 cases) or NFC flap (51 cases) from January 2014 to January 2020. Patients' demographics, characteristics of the defect, complications, cosmetic appearance, and functional outcome were analyzed, and statistical analysis was performed.

RESULT

There was no difference in gender and etiology; however, NFC flaps were more frequently used in elderly patients. Mean size of the flap in the ALT group was significantly larger in comparison with the NFC group. The ALT group had longer operation and hospitalization time than the NFC group (P < 0.05). The incidence of partial necrosis in ALT group was significantly lower than that in NFC group, while its general complications rate was higher. In long-term follow-up, esthetic appearance of the reconstructed site was comparable in both groups, the ALT group had a higher ratio of revision surgery. Moreover, the ALT group showed better overall esthetic outcomes in the donor site.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that anterolateral thigh flaps in wound coverage of foot and ankle achieved better outcomes than neurofasciocutaneous flaps in terms of recipient benefits and donor-site compromise with a special indication for larger and more distally located defects.

Different surgical procedures for reconstruction of soft-tissue defects around the ankle

INTRODUCTION

Management of soft tissue defects around the ankle is a difficult and challenging situation for all reconstructive surgeons. A microsurgical free flaps coverage can solve this problematic situation especially with large defects that is not available in all trauma centers. Moreover, long operating time and suitable operative demands are considered obstacles.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Eighty five patients having soft tissue defects around ankle were included in this study. They underwent various reconstructions in our specialized hand and reconstructive microsurgery unit from 2015 to 2019. Fifty two were males and thirty three patients were females. Road traffic accident was the main cause of injury in 66 patients followed by implant exposure in 15 patients and chronic osteomyelitis in 4 patients. Distally based superficial sural artery flap was used to reconstruct the defects in 21 cases, free flap was used in 32 cases, Rotational local flap was used in 8 cases, contralateral distally based superficial sural artery flap was used in 2 cases, full or partial skin flaps were used in 10 cases and Propeller flap was used in 12cases.

RESULTS

All flaps survived except for one modified sural flap with 98% success rate and average follow up of 48 months. All patients were satisfied with the functional capacity of operated limbs. Average time of bone healing postoperative was 3 months with gradual return to original work with acceptable degrees for cosmotic appearance of the limbs.

CONCLUSION

Many treatment options are available to cover defects around the ankle. Propeller and rotational flaps are fast and easy but cover small defects, distally-based modified sural artery flap is an excellent reliable flap. Microsurgical free flaps provide good contour, color, texture and cover large defects but require microsurgery facilities to execute.

Foot and ankle reconstruction using the lateral supramalleolar flap versus the anterolateral thigh flap in the elderly: A comparative study

The purpose of this study was to compare the reconstructive outcomes of soft‐tissue defects around the foot and ankle with anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap or lateral supramalleolar (LSM) flap and attempt to provide an optimal strategy for elderly patients. A retrospective review of all continuous patients with foot and ankle reconstruction using different flaps from October of 2010 and October of 2020 was performed. Based on the flap types, the patients were divided into two groups: ALT flap group (n = 50) and LSM flap group (n = 46). Outcomes were assessed according to the flap survival rate, early complications, general complications, late complications, cosmetic appearance, functional outcomes and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). We found that there was no difference in average age, gender, aetiology, size of the defect, debridement times between the two groups; however, a significant difference in operation time, hospitalisation time and cost were noted between them. What's more, the early flap complications between them were not significantly different. The LSM flap group showed less general complications, less flap bulky and lower cosmetic appearance. Moreover, the functional evaluation and VSS seem similar (P > .05). Thus, The ALT flap and LSM flap are both flaps available for foot and ankle reconstruction in elderly patients. However, the LSM flap offers short operation time, short hospitalisation time, and less cost with a lower frequency of postoperative complications. Thus, we advocate the LSM flap for the reconstruction of moderate‐size defects of the foot and ankle region in elderly patients.

Orthoplastic Management of Open Midfoot Injuries: Is Functional Limb Salvage Possible?

High energy open midfoot injuries are uncommon but devastating injuries. A combination of complex fracture dislocations and soft tissue injury patterns render reconstruction challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical and patient reported outcomes following orthoplastic management of open midfoot injuries in a Major Trauma Center. A retrospective review of all open midfoot fractures admitted to our unit between January 2015 and December 2016 was undertaken. Demographics, operative details, complications, additional surgeries, and patient reported outcomes in the form of EQ-5D and Enneking scores were collected. Fifteen patients were identified (13 male, mean age 39.2 years). One patient underwent amputation at initial debridement and 8 required additional debridement. Of these 8 patients, 3 had an amputation during their index admission. In the limb salvage group (11 patients), definitive soft tissue cover involved free flaps in 6 patients, split skin graft in 3 patients, and delayed primary closure in 2 patients. Definitive orthopedic treatment was internal fixation in 8 and external fixation in 3 patients. Two patients required a Masquelet procedure for bone loss. One patient had a toe amputation and 1 had a below knee amputation for deep infection. The median EQ-5D score was 66 (interquartile range 43), and the median Enneking score was 20.5 (interquartile range 9). Limb salvage following open midfoot fractures is technically possible in most cases, however this often involves multiple procedures and the outcomes are variable and difficult to predict. Patients should be carefully counseled, and amputation considered in all such cases.