"Close-open-close free-flap technique" for the cover of severely injured limbs

A simple free flap strategy using end-to-side anastomosis to the main vessels in injured extremity

Background

During free flap surgery, the surgeon sometimes encounters problems with anastomosis such as intractable arterial spasms or vessel size discrepancy in venous anastomoses. End-to-side (ETS) anastomosis has the advantages of limited chance of vessel spasm and easy handling by adjusting for vessel size discrepancy. We introduced the arterial and venous end-to-side anastomosis (AV-ETS) strategy, which is based on the ETS anastomosis to the main artery and accompanying veins, to avoid intraoperative anastomotic problems when creating a free flap. The aim of this study was to compare flap outcomes and intraoperative anastomotic problems before and after introduction of the AV-ETS strategy in extremity free flap surgery.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively examined 72 consecutive extremity free flaps. Before introducing the AV-ETS strategy, we used the conventional strategy in which the recipient artery was selected according to the number of the remaining main artery and the anastomosis technique was flexibly changed, although the end-to-end (ETE) technique was used in most cases.

Results

The conventional group had 18 flaps and the AV-ETS group had 54 flaps. The rate of flap survival did not differ between these groups, and there were no cases of flap failure after the introduction of the AV-ETS strategy. The AV-ETS group had significantly fewer flaps that required a change in preoperative planning for the recipient artery or anastomotic site of the artery.

Conclusions

The AV-ETS strategy may facilitate reliable preoperative planning and the performance of stable free flap surgery without requiring a flexible response during surgery.

Mangled extremity- Modern concepts in treatment

A mangled extremity is the most devastating limb injury and presents a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. There are two main treatment options, reconstruction or amputation, but sometimes indications for either are not clear. There are many pro and contra arguments for both options. To make the decision easier numerous score systems have been introduced, but the final decision is based on the judgment and experience of the treating surgeon. Early extremity reconstruction appears to give better results than delayed or late reconstruction and should be the treatment of choice where possible. The goal in reconstruction of a lower extremity is to restore and maintain balance and ambulation, while restoration of an upper extremity's numerous functions is more demanding. In this paper the authors describe and suggest treatment approaches in patients with a severely mangled extremity, including assessment and treatment of all injured tissues, using defined protocols, with special attention to bone stabilization, revascularization, soft-tissue coverage and nerve reconstruction. These have a great impact on the outcome and function of the injured extremity. Rehabilitation and return to the preinjury level is slow and sometimes uncertain.