Equivalent union rates between intramedullary nail and locked plate fixation for distal femur periprosthetic fractures - a systematic review

Fix or Replace? Comparable Outcomes with Internal Fixation and Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures above Total Knee Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment for periprosthetic fracture (PPfx) around total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a topic of debate. Due to its low incidence, comparative studies analyzing arthroplasty and fixation are lacking in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of distal femoral replacement (DFR) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal femur PPfx.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of 99 patients who underwent DFR (n = 54) or ORIF (n = 45) for distal femur PPfx. The indications for DFR were reviewed. Fractures were classified based on their relation to the implant using the Su classification. The primary outcome was re-revision, while secondary endpoints included inpatient complications, mortality within the first year, and mechanical complications such as loosening and non-union.

RESULTS

Type 2 fractures were the most prevalent type in both groups (DFR 37 versus ORIF 48.9%), while Type 1 fractures were more commonly treated with ORIF (35.6 versus 16.7%) and Type 3 with DFR (46.3 versus 15.6%) (P = 0.003). The preferred techniques in the ORIF group were plate osteosynthesis (66.7%) and retrograde nailing (31.1%). At a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 1 to 14.1), DFR and ORIF did not demonstrate any difference in revision rates (13 versus 24.4%, P = 0.140) or mortality (3.7 versus 4.4%, P = 0.887). However, more mechanical complications were noted in the ORIF group (22.2 versus 7.4%, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Both distal femoral replacement and open reduction and internal fixation have comparable revision rates, complications, and clinical outcomes when used in supracondylar periprosthetic distal femur fractures. Longer-term studies are needed to assess DFR survivorship as well as outcomes of newer trauma techniques such as nail-plate combinations.

Total femoral spanning for distal femur "fragility" fractures utilising nail-plate fixation "short-term experience of a district general hospital"

PURPOSE

Our primary objective was to investigate the time to radiological union following linked nail-plate fixation of distal femur "fragility" fractures. Secondary objectives were to evaluate all-cause reoperations, 90-day mortality, rate of blood transfusion and the impact on quality of life.

METHODS

In this retrospective study of all adults (≥ 65 years) with native or periprosthetic distal femur fragility fractures, underwent a linked nail-plate fixation, data were retrieved on fracture classifications, clinical frailty score, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, 90-day mortality, time to radiological union, overall complication rates and EuroQoL-5D.

RESULTS

In total, 18 out of 23 patients completed sequential follow-up. Radiological union was observed in 14 patients (median 143 days; range 42-414). Three patients underwent reoperations. There were no implant failures or a subsequent periprosthetic fractures. Ninety-day mortality was 17.4%. Eighteen patients required blood transfusion. The QoL was significantly lower after index surgery (0.875 vs. 0.684; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Based on our observation, with short-term follow-up, the linked nail-plate yields optimal stability to allow immediate weight bearing, in a cohort with moderate frailty. It is reproducible, with variable radiological union rates. The concept of "total femoral spanning" reduces the risk of subsequent periprosthetic fractures. The additional intervention has increased the rates of allogenic blood transfusion. There is significant impact on overall QoL, with almost 50% being more dependent in self-care.

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury After Retrograde Nailing of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Report of 2 Cases

CASE

A 51-year-old man and 64-year-old woman with bilateral cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties (CR-TKAs) who sustained unilateral periprosthetic distal femur fractures above their CR-TKA and experienced knee instability secondary to an iatrogenic posterior-cruciate-ligament (posterior cruciate ligament [PCL]) injury from retrograde intramedullary nailing. Both patients recovered knee stability after undergoing revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Many CR-TKA designs have sufficient medial-lateral intercondylar distance to place a retrograde nail, femoral components with a relatively posterior transition from the trochlear groove to the intercondylar box will necessitate a nail starting point closer to the PCL origin. This may contribute to iatrogenic postoperative knee instability for patients with CR-TKA designs.

Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures Around a Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Meta-analysis Comparing Locking compression Plating and Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing

Purpose

The number of total knee replacements (TKRs) performed per year has been increasing annually and it is estimated that by 2030 demand would reach 3.48 million procedures per year in the United States Of America. The prevalence of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around TKRs has followed this trend with incidences ranging from 0.3% to 3.5%. Distal femoral PPFs are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. When there is sufficient bone stock in the distal femur and a fracture pattern conducive to fixation, locking compression plating (LCP) and retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) are commonly used fixation strategies. Conversely, in situations with loosening and deficient bone stock, a salvage procedure such as a distal femoral replacement is recognized as an alternative. This meta-analysis investigates the rates of non-union, re-operation, infection, and mortality for LCPs and RIMNs when performed for distal femoral PPFs fractures around TKRs.

Method

A search was conducted to identify articles relevant to the management of distal femoral PPFs around TKRs in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were then assessed for methodological quality using the methodological items for non-randomised studies (MINORS) criteria. Articles were reviewed, and data were compiled into tables for analysis.

Results

10 articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 528 PPFs. The overall incidence of complications was: non-union 9.4%, re-operation 12.9%, infection 2.4%, and mortality 5.5%. This meta-analysis found no significant differences between RIMN and LCP in rates of non-union (9.2% vs 9.6%) re-operation (15.1% vs 11.3%), infection (2.1% vs 2.6%), and mortality (6.0% vs 5.2%), respectively.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in rates of non-union, re-operation, infection, and mortality between RIMN and LCP and both remain valid surgical treatment options.

Dual Plate Fixation of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures

OBJECTIVES

Dual implants for distal femur periprosthetic fractures is a growing area of interest for these challenging fractures with dual plating (DP) emerging as a viable construct for these injuries. In the current study, an experience with DP constructs is described.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective case series with comparison group.

SETTING

Level 1 academic trauma center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Adults >50 years old sustaining comminuted OTA/AO 33-A2 or 33-A3 DFPF treated with either DP or a single distal femur locking plating (DFLP). Patients with simple 33-A1 fractures were excluded. Prior to 2018, patients underwent DFLP after which the treatment of choice became DP.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Reoperation rate, alignment, and complications.

RESULTS

34 patients treated with DFLP and 38 with DP met inclusion and follow up criteria. Average follow up was 18.2 ± 13.8 months in the DFLP group and 19.8 ± 16.1 months in the DP group ( P = 0.339). The average patient age in the DFLP group was 74.8 ± 7.3 years compared to 75.9 ± 11.3 years in the DP group. There were no statistical differences in demographics, fracture morphology, loss of reduction, or reoperation for any cause ( P >.05). DP patients were more likely to be weight bearing in the twelve-week postoperative period ( P <0.001) and return to their baseline ambulatory status ( P = 0.004) compared to DFLP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual plating of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures maintained coronal alignment with a low reoperation rate even with immediate weight bearing and these patients regained baseline level of ambulation more reliably as compared to patients treated with a single distal femoral locking plate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Biomechanical analysis of a novel screw system with a variable locking angle in mandible angle fractures

Locking plates nowadays represent an important treatment in bone trauma and bone healing due to its strong biomechanical properties. The purpose of this study was to both computationally and experimentally validate a novel screw locking system by comparing it to another locking system from state-of-the-art and to apply it in an environment of a fractured mandible. FEA was used to test both systems prior to experimental tests. The systems were locked in the plate holes at 0°, 10°, 15°, and 20°. Cyclic bending tests and push-out tests were performed in order to determine the stiffness and push-out forces of both locking systems. Finally, newly designed locking system was implemented in mandibular angle fracture. Control locking system was biomechanically superior in push-out test, but with no greater significance. In contrast, the new locking system showed greater stiffness by 17.3% at the deflection angle of 20° in cyclic tests, with lower values for other deflection angles. Similar values were displayed in fractured mandible angle environment. Greater stiffness of the new locking system in cyclic loading tests, together with polyaxiallity of the new locking screw, could lead to easier application and improved biomechanical stability of the mandible angle fractures.

Periprosthetic Fractures After a Total Knee Arthroplasty

As the number of total knee arthroplasties performed continues to increase, complications such as postoperative periprosthetic fractures are becoming increasingly more common. Femoral periprosthetic fractures are the most common type of fractures around a total knee arthroplasty, whereas tibial and patellar periprosthetic fractures are infrequent. Treatment principles depend on the bone the fracture is located, the status of the implant fixation, bone stock, and the type of implants available. The Vancouver classification allows for a standardized system to describe and manage these injuries, incorporating these factors. A systematic approach is vital in obtaining the best possible outcomes because complications and mortality rates mimic those of hip fractures.

Periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee replacement treated by ORIF. Mid to long-term follow-up study in 12 patients

Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty are a quite uncommon traumatic lesion that often are present in elderly patients with osteoporosis and comorbidities. The most common periprosthetic fracture affects the distal femur. The main internal fixation techniques are ORIF with a locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nailing. In the present study, we report the medium-long term results in 12 patients with a distal femoral periprosthetic fracture stabilized with a locking plate. We reviewed 12 patients affected by a periprosthetic distal femur fracture surgically treated between 2010 and 2016 by ORIF using a locking compression plate after an average follow-up of 5.75 years. The average age of the patients at diagnosis was 78 years. The mean interval time between knee arthroplasty and distal femoral fracture was 8.25 years. Clinical results were assessed using the WOMAC score, while radiographic results according to Beals and Tower's criteria. All fractures of our series were type II according to the Rorabeck and Taylor classification. At follow-up, the WOMAC score ranged from 40.5 to 76.5 points (average 53.92). Radiographic results, according to Beals and Tower's criteria, were excellent in 5 patients and good in 7. All patients returned to their previous daily activities. We believe that reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate is a surgical option of treatment that provides satisfactory clinical and radiological results in Rorabeck type II periprosthetic distal femoral fractures.

Optimal surgical treatment for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian-based network analysis

BACKGROUND

The surgical methods for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs) after total knee arthroplasty included locking compression plate (LCP), retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN), and distal femoral replacement (DFR). However, the optimal treatment remains controversial. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide the optimal surgical method for PDFFs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic databases, including Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed, were searched for studies that compared LCP, RIMN, and DFR for PDFFs. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Pairwise meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager version 5.4. The NMA was conducted in Aggregate Data Drug Information System software version 1.16.5. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for postoperative complications and reoperations.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies and 1198 patients were included, of whom 733 for LCP, 282 for RIMN, and 183 for DFR. Pairwise meta-analysis comparing LCP to RIMN and LCP to DFR showed no significant difference in complications and reoperations except that RIMN had a higher risk of malunion comparing to LCP (OR 3.05; 95% CI 1.46-6.34; P = 0.003). No statistically significant effects were found in the NMA of overall complications, infection, and reoperation. However, results of rank probabilities showed that DFR ranked best in overall complications and reoperation, RIMN ranked best in infection but worst in reoperation, and LCP ranked worst in infection and middle in reoperation.

DISCUSSION

We found similar complication rate and reoperation rate between LCP, RIMN, and DFR. The results of rank probabilities favored DFR, and further studies with high-level evidence are expected to verify the optimal surgical method for PDFFs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II; network meta-analysis.

Locked Lateral Plating Versus Retrograde Nailing for Distal Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

The 2 main forms of treatment for distal femur fractures are locked lateral plating and retrograde nailing. The goal of this trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment.

DESIGN

Multicenter randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Twenty academic trauma centers.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred sixty patients with distal femur fractures were enrolled. One hundred twenty-six patients were followed 12 months. Patients were randomized to plating in 62 cases and intramedullary nailing in 64 cases.

INTERVENTION

Lateral locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, bother index, EQ Health, and EQ Index. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, and number and type of adverse events.

RESULTS

Functional testing showed no difference between the groups. Both groups were still significantly affected by their fracture 12 months after injury. There was more coronal plane valgus in the plating group, which approached statistical significance. Range of motion, walking ability, and ability to manage stairs were similar between the groups. Rate and type of adverse events were not statistically different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both lateral locked plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing are reasonable surgical options for these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired 1 year postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Short-term outcomes of periprosthetic compared to native distal femur fractures, a national database study

BACKGROUND

Distal femur fractures (DFFx) are highly morbid injuries with a complication rate comparable to hip fractures. Rising rates of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have led to increasing rates of periprosthetic DFFx (pDFFx). We sought to determine how pDFFx complication rates differed from native DFFx (nDFFx).

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) was used to identify patients who sustained pDFFx or nDFFx between 2012 and 2018. Patients were further stratified by operative treatment: open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or distal femur replacement (DFR). Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare 30-day complication rates between pDFFx versus nDFFx and, among pDFFx patients, ORIF versus DFR or revision TKA (rTKA).

RESULTS

563 patients with pDFFx and 2259 patients with nDFFx were identified between 2012 and 2018. pDFFx patients had significantly lower rates of ORIF than nDFFx patients (36.4 vs 95.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, pDFFx were associated with a higher rate of surgical site complications (OR 2.48, p = 0.009) compared to nDFFx. There were no differences in mortality, reoperations, major complications, rate of blood transfusion, venous thromboembolism and disposition. In patients with pDFFx, patients undergoing DFR/rTKA were more likely to be discharged home versus a rehab facility, compared to those undergoing ORIF (OR 2.62, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this first large registry study comparing pDFFx and nDFFx, we find similar outcomes between these groups in the first 30 days after surgery. Patients with pDFFx did have higher rates of surgical site complications, including infection and dehiscence. In pDFFx patients, those undergoing DFR were more likely to return home post-operatively.

Modified fixation for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: Two case reports and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures (PSFs) present a challenge in terms of optimizing fixation in patients with poor bone quality. Surgical treatment and peri-operative management of PSFs in the elderly remain a burden for orthopedic surgeons. Among different treatment options, locking plate (LP) and retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN) have shown favorable results. However, reduced mobility and protected weight-bearing are often present in the postoperative older population. With a purpose of allowing for early weight-bearing, a modified nail plate combination (NPC) was redesigned for PSF management.

CASE SUMMARY

In our cases, two elderly osteoporotic female underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and then suffered from low energy trauma onto their knees after falling to the floor. Plain radiographs or computed tomography scans demonstrated oblique or transverse PSFs, both of which occurred at the distal femur above TKA. The modified NPC technique was performed for treatment of PSFs. The patient was made foot flat weight bearing in 1 wk. At 6-mo follow-up, the union was ultimately achieved using modified NPC with satisfactory implant outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Neither LP nor RIMN alone may provide adequate support to allow for union in circumstances where the patient has severely osteopenic bone. Therefore, developing a modified implant offer an alternative choice for treating PSFs. These two cases revealed that this technique is a viable option for the geriatric osteoporotic PSFs, offering safe, early weight bearing and favorable clinical outcomes.

Arthroscopic Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing of Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Knee Arthroplasty—Technique, Safety, and Outcomes

Background

Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty are notoriously challenging entities to manage. The 2 major fixation techniques utilized include locking compression plates and retrograde intramedullary nailing. The challenges in obtaining correct entry points in the presence of the superimposing femoral component in retrograde intramedullary nailing often warrants a full knee joint arthrotomy. Thus, the purpose of this first series is to describe the arthroscopy-assisted retrograde intramedullary nailing (ARIN) technique and evaluate clinical results and potential risks and benefits.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data obtained from 16 patients treated with the ARIN technique. Data obtained included operative time, size of incision, and intraoperative complications. In the postoperative course, patients were assessed for time to union, functional outcomes using the Knee Society Score, and the presence of complications.

Results

Nine male and 7 female patients were included with a mean age of 70.8 years. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. The mean operative time was 86.5 minutes. Union was achieved in all fractures with an average union time of 15.9 weeks. The mean Knee Society Score obtained at 2 years postoperatively was 84.6. No major complications were documented during the follow-up period. None of the cases required conversion to the conventional open technique.

Conclusions

The ARIN technique has demonstrated results comparable with those from previous resources. Although results from this series suggest that the utilized technique is safe and offers a less invasive approach, direct clinical comparisons in larger scale trials are required.

Distal femur: nail plate combination and the linked construct

Operative fixation of distal femur fractures in patients with osteoporotic bone can be challenging. Treatment with either lateral locking plate or retrograde intramedullary nail alone may not provide adequate fixation to allow for early mobilization. Rather, fixation using the nail plate combination (NPC) to treat distal femur fractures in the elderly may offer improved biomechanical stability to achieve immediate weight-bearing, especially in the setting of complex fracture patterns and osteoporosis. Here, we describe the rationale, step-by-step technique, and outcome following 2 cases: 1 patient treated with a true NPC procedure using retrograde intramedullary nail and standard locking plate, as well as a NPC procedure using a novel locking attaching washer plate.

Distal femoral replacement or internal fixation for management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The number of periprosthetic fractures above a total knee arthroplasty continues to increase. These fractures are associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Techniques for addressing these fractures include open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and revision arthroplasty, including distal femoral replacement (DFR). The primary aim of this review is to compare mortality and reoperation rates between ORIF and DFR when used to treat periprosthetic distal femur fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review including MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases was completed from inception to April 10, 2021. Studies including a comparator cohort were meta-analyzed.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified for inclusion, of which, five had sufficient homogeneity for inclusion in a meta-analysis. 30-day and 2-year mortality was 4.1% and 14.6% in the DFR group. There was no statistically significant difference between ORIF and DFR (log Odds-Ratio (OR) = -0.14, 95 %CI: -0.77 to 0.50). The reoperation rate in the DFR group was 9.3% versus 14.8% for ORIF, with no difference between groups (log OR = 0.10, 95 %CI: -0.59 to 0.79). There was no difference in rates of deep infection (log OR = 0.22, 95 %CI: -0.83 to 1.28). Direct comparison of functional outcomes was not possible, though did not appear significant.

CONCLUSION

DFR in the setting of periprosthetic distal femur fractures is equivalent to ORIF with respect to mortality and reoperation rate and thus a safe and reliable treatment strategy. DFR may be more reliable in complex fracture patterns where the ability to obtain adequate fixation is difficult.

The geriatric distal femur fracture: nail, plate or both?

Surgical fixation of distal femur fractures in geriatric patients is an evolving topic. Unlike hip fractures, treatment strategies for distal femur fractures are ill-defined and lack substantive high-quality evidence. With an increasing incidence and an association with significant morbidity and mortality, it is essential to understand existing treatment options and their supporting evidence. Current fixation methods include the use of either retrograde intramedullary nails, or plate and screw constructs. Due to the variability in fracture patterns, the unique anatomy of the distal femur, and the presence or absence or pre-existing implants, decision-making as to which method to use can be challenging. Recent literature has sought to describe the advantages and disadvantages of each, however, there is currently no consensus on a standard of care, and little randomized evidence is available that directly compares intramedullary nails with plating. Future randomized studies comparing intramedullary nails with plating constructs are necessary in order to develop a standard of care based on injury characteristics.

Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femoral Fractures Above a Total Knee Replacement: An Updated Compatibility and Technique Guide for Fixation With a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have described retrograde nailing as a treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures (OTA/AO type 33A-C) above total knee replacements (TKRs). It is often difficult to discern which TKRs will be compatible with intramedullary nailing because the femoral component design and intercondylar distance is highly variable among total knee designs. The goal of our study is 3-fold: (1) Review and update previous work of intercondylar distances of all currently available prostheses in the United States. (2) Review retrograde nails currently on the market and associated driving end to nail shaft diameter mismatch and opening reamer sizing. (3) Review technical tricks for executing a retrograde femoral nail for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures.

METHODS

Data for the intercondylar distance of the femoral components, diameter of retrograde nails and reamers, and notch compatibility were gathered.

RESULTS

The results were compiled and recorded. A "technical tricks" section was included that highlights reduction and fixation techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

This update further empowers surgeons to use all the tools available when treating periprosthetic femur fractures and allows efficient identification of the compatibility of different TKR designs with various intramedullary nails.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Interimplant femoral fractures

The number of hip or knee arthroplasties, and internal fixations of the proximal and distal femur, is increasing in proportion to the growing and ageing population, whose life expectancy is lengthening. Thus, fractures of the femur between proximal and distal implants, although rare, are becoming more frequent. Women over the age of 70, with fragile bones and whose ends of the two implants are close to each other ("kissing implants") are particularly vulnerable to them. Reliable and reproducible fracture classifications exist when it comes to 2 prostheses, but they are less well established in the presence of one, or even two, non-prosthetic implants. Their treatment is difficult and must consider the possibility of fracture consolidation while ensuring or restoring the stability and role of the implants. Whether it is the main element of treatment or a complement to prosthesis revision, locked plating forms the basis of the treatment but it must be rigorous, considering that failures are mainly the result of technical errors. Other more invasive treatments (total femoral arthroplasty, cortical sleeves) are offered more rarely if consolidation appears compromised.

Distal Femur Replacement Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare complications and functional outcomes of treatment with primary distal femoral replacement (DFR) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for English language studies up to May 19, 2020, identifying 913 studies.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that assessed complications of periprosthetic distal femur fractures with primary DFR or ORIF were included. Studies with sample size ≤5, mean age <55, nontraumatic indications for DFR, ORIF with nonlocking plates, native distal femoral fractures, or revision surgeries were excluded. Selection adhered to the PRISMA criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Study quality was assessed using previously reported criteria. There were 40 Level IV studies, 17 Level III studies, and 1 Level II study.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fifty-eight studies with 1484 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Complications assessed {incidence rate ratio [IRR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.78 [0.59-1.03]} and reoperation or revision [IRR (95% CI): 0.71 (0.49-1.04)] were similar between the DFR and ORIF cohorts. The mean knee range of motion was greater in the ORIF cohort (DFR: 90.47 vs. ORIF: 100.36, P < 0.05). The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) (DFR: 79.41 vs. ORIF: 82.07, P = 0.35) and return to preoperative ambulatory status were similar [IRR (95% CI): 0.82 (0.48-1.41)].

CONCLUSIONS

In comparing complications among patients treated for periprosthetic distal femur fracture with DFR or ORIF, there was no difference between the groups. There were also no differences in functional outcomes, although knee range of motion was greater in the ORIF group. This systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the need for future prospective trials evaluating the outcomes of these divergent treatment strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Very Distal Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures: Replacement Versus Fixation: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize all-cause reoperations and complications data as well as secondary clinical and functional outcomes, after the management of very distal femur periprosthetic fractures (vDFPFs) in a geriatric patient population with either a distal femoral locking plate (DFLP) or distal femoral replacement (DFR).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for English language articles from inception to March 16, 2020, in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting the management of vDFPFs in adults older than 65 years with either a DFLP or DFR were included. To ensure this review solely focused on very distal femoral periprosthetic fractures, only fractures of the following classifications were included: (1) Lewis and Rorabeck type II or III, (2) Su and Associates' Classification of Supracondylar Fractures of the Distal Femur type III, (3) Backstein et al type F2, and/or (4) Kim et al type II or III.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies. Study validity was assessed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS), a quality assessment tool for nonrandomized controlled studies in surgery.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-five studies with 649 vDFPFs were included for analysis. There were 440 knees in the DFLP group (mean age range: 65.9-88.3 years) and 209 knees in the DFR group (mean age range: 71.0-84.8 years). Because of the literature's heterogeneity, the data were qualitatively synthesized.

CONCLUSIONS

vDFPFs in the elderly treated with DFR underwent fewer reoperations relative to DFLP (0%-45% vs. 0%-77%, respectively). Time to weight-bearing was observably shorter in DFR studies relative to DFLP studies. Functional outcomes and postoperative range of motion indicated a trend for DFLP knees to outperform DFR knees. Future research should include prospective studies and cost-effectiveness evaluations to better understand the utility of DFR for these fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Treatment of B1 Distal Periprosthetic Femur Fractures

The burden of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures is projected to increase accordingly with the increase in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed globally in the future. Less invasive plating and intramedullary (IM) nailing techniques still seem to provide similar outcomes based on current literature. Double-plating and combination techniques may prove to be beneficial in the future pending further large-scale studies but currently have not demonstrated superiority over single plating and IM nailing based on current evidence. Distal femoral replacement may provide a useful option for future treatment, provided it is performed by a trained knee arthroplasty surgeon.

Maintaining the Neutral Axis in the Treatment of Distal Femur Fractures Via Dual Plate or Nail Plate Combination Technique: When and How?

SUMMARY

Distal femur fractures in the elderly have been historically treated with locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing with good, reliable results. However, in certain more complex fracture patterns (native or periprosthetic), increased density of fixation via dual-plate or nail plate combination can help achieve immediate weight-bearing. It can also potentially increase rates of union by shifting and maintaining the neutral axis, distributing forces more evenly across the fracture site. Here, we discuss the indications, pros and cons of both dual-plate and nail plate combination techniques in a concise case-based format.

Current Reconstruction Options in Periprosthetic Fractures Around the Knee

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic fractures are a rare complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the incidence of these fractures is growing after the increasing number of TKAs performed every year and the progressive aging of the population. In addition, the surgical treatment and peri-operative management of these complications are demanding, representing a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon.

SIGNIFICANCE

A thorough understanding of these fractures and a correct classification are necessary in order to select the most suitable surgical treatment. The aim of this review was to analyze the epidemiology, classification, diagnosis, surgical treatment, and outcomes of periprosthetic knee fractures in order to give an exhaustive overview.

RESULTS

Reduction and internal fixation with locking plates or intramedullary nails represents the preferred option in case of a stable prosthetic implant. Conversely, in case of loose tibial and/or femoral component, implant revision is mandatory. Conservative treatment is rarely indicated.

CONCLUSION

A deep understanding of the characteristics and patterns of periprosthetic knee fractures, and the determination of the stability of the prosthetic implant are necessary in order to establish the correct treatment.

Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate complication and revision rates for periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PPDFF) treated with: (1) ORIF using periarticular locking plates (ORIF), (2) retrograde intramedullary nail (IMN), and (3) distal femoral replacement (DFR).

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature was performed to identify eligible studies (N = 52). Identified treatment groups were: ORIF (N = 1205 cases), IMN (N = 272 cases), and DFR (N = 353 cases). Median follow-up was 30 months (range 6-96 months). Primary outcomes were: (1) major complication rates and (2) reoperation rates over the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes were incidence of deep infection, periprosthetic fracture, mortality over the follow-up period, 1-year mortality, non-union, malunion, delayed union, and hardware failure. Data for primary and secondary outcomes were pooled and unadjusted analysis was performed. Meta-analysis was performed on subset of individual studies comparing at least two of three treatment groups (N = 14 studies). Odds-ratios and their respective standard errors were determined for each treatment group combination. Maximum likelihood random effects meta-analysis was conducted for primary outcomes.

RESULTS

From the systematic review, major complication rates (p = 0.55) and reoperation rates (p = 0.20) were not significantly different between the three treatment groups. DFR group had a higher incidence of deep infection relative to IMN and ORIF groups (p = 0.03). Malunion rates were higher in IMN versus ORIF (p = 0.02). For the meta-analysis, odds of major complications were not significantly different between IMN versus DFR (OR 1.39 [0.23-8.52]), IMN versus ORIF (OR 0.86 [0.48-1.53]), or the ORIF versus DFR (OR 0.91 [0.52-1.59]). Additionally, odds of a reoperation were not significantly different between IMN versus DFR (OR 0.59 [0.08-4.11]), IMN versus ORIF (OR 1.26 [0.66-2.40]), or ORIF versus DFR (OR 0.91 [0.51-1.55]).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in major complications or reoperations between the three treatment groups. Deep infection rates were higher in DFR relative to internal fixation, malunion rates were higher in IMN versus ORIF, and periprosthetic fracture rates were higher in DFR and IMN versus ORIF.

Locked compression plating versus retrograde intramedullary nailing in the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar knee fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur above a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have traditionally been managed by locking compression plating (LCP). This technique is technically demanding and is associated with high rates of non-union and revision. More recently, retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) has been proposed as an acceptable alternative. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures who were treated with LCP and RIMN.

METHODS

An up-to-date literature search was carried out using the pre-defined search strategy. All studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological quality with the Cochrane's collaboration tool. Operative time, functional score, time-to-union, non-union rates and revision rates were all considered.

CONCLUSION

Ten studies with a total of 531 periprosthetic fractures were included. This meta-analysis has suggested that there is no significant difference in any of the outcome measures assessed. Further, more extensive literature is required on the subject to draw more robust conclusions.