Psychological outcomes affect functional outcomes in patients with severe pelvic ring fractures

Sleep quality and psychological health in patients with pelvic and acetabulum fractures: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is known that difficulty sleeping after a fracture can have negative effects on both mental and physical health and may prolong the recovery process. The objective of this study is to explore how sleep quality and psychological health are linked in patients with pelvic and acetabulum fractures.

METHODS

A study was conducted on 265 patients between 2018 and 2022 who had suffered pelvic and acetabulum fractures. The study examined various factors, including age, gender, cause of injury, post-operative complications, and injury severity. The study employed ordinal logistic regression to examine the relationship between various pelvic fractures and seven subscales of the Majeed Pelvic Score (MPS), as well as the Sleep Disorder Questionnaire (SDQ) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The study focused on the postoperative outcome one year after surgery, and each patient was assessed at the one-year mark after surgical intervention. Additionally, the study evaluated the functional outcome, sleep quality, and psychological disorders of the patients.

RESULTS

From 2018 to 2022, a total of 216 patients suffered from pelvic and acetabulum fractures. Among them, 6.6% experienced borderline clinical depression, and 45.2% reported mild mood disturbances. Anxiety was found to be mild to moderate in 46% of Tile C and posterior acetabulum wall fracture patients. About 24.8% of patients reported insomnia, while 23.1% reported sleep movement disorders. However, no significant correlation was found between fracture types and sleep disorders. The mean Majeed pelvic score (MPS) was 89.68.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures typically experience functional improvement, but may also be at increased risk for insomnia and sleep movement disorders, particularly for certain types of fractures. Psychological well-being varies between fracture groups, with signs of borderline clinical depression observed in some cases. However, anxiety levels do not appear to be significantly correlated with pelvic and acetabular fractures.

Reconsidering injury severity: Looking beyond the maximum abbreviated injury score

BACKGROUND

Injury severity is often determined by anatomical measures such as the Maximum Abbreviated Injury Score (MAIS). Yet, it is suggested that MAIS provides a limited view on injury severity as the overall burden of trauma is multidimensional, including psychological problems and health care costs for example. It is unclear if MAIS as a single criterion can serve as a proper indicator for overall injury severity, since it has not been compared with other severity measures for different types of injuries. Consequently, scientists and policymakers using MAIS as primary measure for injury severity may have insufficient information for prioritizing prevention policy and research. This study explores the relation between MAIS and other injury severity measures for ten different injury types to determine if MAIS is indicative for the overall burden of trauma.

METHODS

Trauma patients filled in a questionnaire six months after they visited an emergency department in the Netherlands. In total, 3.698 patients registered in the Dutch Injury Surveillance System responded. The following injury types are included: injuries to the head-brain, face, spinal cord, internal organs, upper and lower extremities, and hips. The questionnaire consisted of questions about the impact of patients' injury regarding quality of life (EQ-5D+), perceived severity, subjective distress (IES-R), anxiety and depression (HADS) and healthcare use.

RESULTS

Logistic regression showed that MAIS was significantly related to hospital stay, quality of life and cognitive complaints. A lack of association was found between MAIS and perceived severity, distress, anxiety and depression. Furthermore, Z-score analysis showed that the relation between severity measures differs between injury types.

CONCLUSIONS

MAIS is an anatomical-based discriminative measure for injury severity that correlates with several other severity measures including hospital stay and healthcare costs. However, MAIS is not always a proper indicator for severity when severity involves the patient's psychological burden or perceived health status. In sum, the accuracy of MAIS as an indicator for injury severity depends on the definition of severity and the injury type. Therefore, caution is needed when using and interpreting MAIS as an indicator for injury severity in research or policymaking.

Clustering of trauma patients based on longitudinal data and the application of machine learning to predict recovery

Predicting recovery after trauma is important to provide patients a perspective on their estimated future health, to engage in shared decision making and target interventions to relevant patient groups. In the present study, several unsupervised techniques are employed to cluster patients based on longitudinal recovery profiles. Subsequently, these data-driven clusters were assessed on clinical validity by experts and used as targets in supervised machine learning models. We present a formalised analysis of the obtained clusters that incorporates evaluation of (i) statistical and machine learning metrics, (ii) clusters clinical validity with descriptive statistics and medical expertise. Clusters quality assessment revealed that clusters obtained through a Bayesian method (High Dimensional Supervised Classification and Clustering) and a Deep Gaussian Mixture model, in combination with oversampling and a Random Forest for supervised learning of the cluster assignments provided among the most clinically sensible partitioning of patients. Other methods that obtained higher classification accuracy suffered from cluster solutions with large majority classes or clinically less sensible classes. Models that used just physical or a mix of physical and psychological outcomes proved to be among the most sensible, suggesting that clustering on psychological outcomes alone yields recovery profiles that do not conform to known risk factors.

Analysis of Postoperative Gait, Hip Strength, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After OTA/AO 61-B and 61-C Pelvic Ring Injuries

OBJECTIVES

To examine clinical gait parameters, hip muscle strength, pelvic functional outcomes, and psychological outcomes after surgical fixation of OTA/AO 61-B and 61-C pelvic ring injuries.

DESIGN

Retrospective review identified 10 OTA/AO 61-B patients and 9 OTA/AO 61-C patients for recruitment who were between 1 and 5 years after pelvic fixation. Gait and strength assessments, and patient-reported outcome scores were performed/collected and analyzed.

SETTING

Outpatient clinical motion performance laboratory.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients with OTA/AO 61-B and OTA/AO 61-C fractures who were between 1 and 5 years after pelvic fixation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Hip strength, kinetics, and spatial-temporal outcomes; Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score; Short Form 36; Hamilton Anxiety/Depression Rating Scales.

RESULTS

There were no differences in age, body mass index, or time since definitive fixation between OTA/AO 61-B and 61-C groups. The OTA/AO 61-C group had higher median injury severity scores, longer length of stay, and greater postoperative pelvic fracture displacement. There was no difference in bilateral hip strength, bilateral peak hip moments, peak hip power, and walking speed between groups. Patients with OTA/AO 61-C fractures had lower scores on Short Form 36 General Health and Majeed Work, with a trend toward a lower Total Majeed score. There were no differences in self-reported total anxiety and depression symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not identify any gait, strength, or psychological differences between OTA/AO 61-B and 61-C injuries at 1-5 years of follow-up. However, increased injury severity in OTA/AO 61-C patients may have residual consequences on perceived general health and ability to work. This pilot study establishes a template for future research into functional recovery of patients with severe pelvic ring trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Postoperative Falls Following Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

No study has examined the incidence of risk factors for postoperative falls following foot and ankle surgery. We investigated the incidence and risk factors for postoperative falls in foot and ankle surgery using inpatient and outpatient population.

METHODS

A single fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeon instituted collection of a postoperative fall questionnaire at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. A retrospective review of 135 patients with complete prospectively collected fall questionnaire data was performed. Patient demographic information, injury characteristics, comorbidities, baseline medications, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were collected. After univariable analysis, a multivariable binary logistic regression was conducted to assess independent risk factors for postoperative falls.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) age was 52 (21) and body mass index was 32.7 (11.1). A total of 108 patients (80%) underwent outpatient procedures. Thirty-nine of the 135 patients (28.9%) reported experiencing a fall in the first 6 weeks after surgery. In multivariable analysis, antidepressant use (adjusted odds ratio 3.41, 95% CI 1.19-9.81) and higher VAS pain scores at 2 weeks postoperatively (adjusted odds ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.08-1.50) were found to be independent risk factors for postoperative falls.

CONCLUSION

This study found a high incidence of postoperative falls in the first 6 weeks after foot and ankle surgery. Baseline antidepressant use and higher 2-week VAS pain scores were associated with postoperative falls. Foot and ankle surgeons should discuss the risk of falling with patients especially those with risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study at a single institution.

Effect of Psychological Intervention on Pelvic Floor Function and Psychological Outcomes After Hysterectomy

Background

Hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations worldwide. However, postoperative complications and body image changes may induce psychological distress after hysterectomy. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of psychological intervention on pelvic floor function and psychological outcomes following hysterectomy among patients with benign indications.

Methods

Ninety-nine patients underwent hysterectomy were randomly divided into intervention group (n = 50) and control group (n = 49). Patients in the control group received routine postoperative nursing care, while extra psychological intervention was provided to patients in the intervention group, including psychological support, regular lectures and family support. After 6 months, patient's psychological statuses were assessed by Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The pelvic floor function of patients was evaluated using Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative complications, including uracratia, pelvic organ prolapses, sexual dysfunction and chronic pelvic pain, was evaluated.

Results

After 6-month intervention, the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were significantly decreased in the intervention group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018 respectively). Both scored were significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Compared with control group, the incidence of uracratia, pelvic organ prolapse, sexual dysfunction and chronic pelvic pain for intervention group was significantly lower (p = 0.003, p = 0.027, p = 0.001, p = 0.002 respectively) and the pelvic floor muscle strength was significantly stronger (p = 0.001). Besides, the postoperative Urinary Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ-7), and Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7) scores were significantly lower (p = 0.025, p = 0.04, p < 0.001) and PISQ-12 score was significantly higher in intervention group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Psychological intervention could effectively improve the psychological condition of patients with hysterectomy, which may facilitate patients' postoperative recovery in pelvic floor function. These findings emphasized the necessity of psychological intervention in routine postoperative nursing care.

Outcomes following pelvic ring fractures in the paediatric population: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pelvic fractures represent a small proportion of all paediatric fractures, but are likely to be associated with a high-energy mechanism, multiple injuries, and significant morbidity and mortality. Operative fixation of unstable pelvic fractures is accepted. However, there remains a paucity of data on functional outcomes and complications following pelvic fractures in the skeletally immature.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was performed, searching Medline, Embase, and Cochrane central review. The primary outcome was functional outcome after pelvic fractures in the paediatric population following operative or non-operative treatment. Secondary outcomes included mechanism of injury, associated injuries, mortality rate, and method of surgical fixation if required. Where possible, weighted totals of the data set were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 23 studies were included in this review. Only eight studies reported functional outcomes, with limb length discrepancy and limp being the most common complication. Only 8.8% of all pelvic fractures underwent surgical fixation. Motor vehicle collision was the most common cause of injury, and extremity fracture was the most common associated injury.

CONCLUSION

Paediatric pelvic fractures are caused by high-energy mechanisms and have significant morbidity and mortality. There remains a paucity of information on functional outcomes after these injuries.