Development of the Italian fractures registry (RIFra): A call for action to improve quality and safety

Accuracy and reliability of the AO/OTA classification for tibial shaft fractures

Background

Available literature lacks information regarding the accuracy and reliability of the AO/OTA classification for tibial shaft fractures. This study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-observer agreement and accuracy of the AO/OTA 42 classification (4-signs) for adult patients with tibial shaft fractures.

Materials and methods

The study design is an accuracy, inter- and intra-observer agreement study. Anterior posterior (AP) and lateral X-rays of the fracture were used in the examination. The raters comprised of two junior doctors and two orthopedic trauma consultants, who underwent patient scoring twice in a blinded and randomized set-up. A committee including two consultant orthopedic trauma surgeons, one consultant orthopedic radiologist, and one associate professor was established to represent the "gold standard." The 3- and 4-signs AO/OTA 42 classification was used for classification.

Results

A total of 101 patients were included. X-rays were available for all 101 patients. Based on the gold standard classification, AO/OTA 42-A1 (56 %) was the most common fracture type, followed by AO/OTA 42-A3 (14 %). The agreement at 4-signs, when comparing the four raters and the gold standard classification was between 75 % and 86 % (Choen's kappa 0.53 to 0.79). Choen's kappa coefficient at 4-sgns for intra-and inter-observer agreement was between 0.47 and 0.74 and 0.31 and 0.60, respectively.

Conclusion

This study showed substantial to moderate accuracy of the 4-signs AO/OTA 42- classification for tibial shaft fractures. Intra-observation agreements at 4-signs showed moderate to substantial agreement with and without available CT scans. Inter-observer agreements at 4-signs showed moderate to substantial agreement with only X-rays available. Inter-observer agreements for CT scan at 4-signs showed slight to moderate agreements.

Use of the 95-degree angled blade plate with biological and mechanical augmentation to treat proximal femur non-unions: a case series

BACKGROUND

Intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric non-union are rare but challenging complications. In the present study, we investigate the use of a 95° blade, in association with biological and mechanical augmentation, in the management of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral non-unions.

METHODS

Between October 2015 and February 2021, a retrospective cohort study was conducted at our institution to investigate the use of a 95° blade, in association with biological and mechanical augmentation, in the management of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral non-unions, following the mechanical failure of the first device. All the patients underwent a clinical and radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months; at each follow-up, a plain radiograph of the femur was performed and patients were assessed using Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire.

RESULTS

From October 2015 and February 2021, 40 proximal femur non-unions were managed at our Institution. Fifteen patients out of forty (37.5%) met the inclusion criteria. The main data of the study are summarized in Table 1; patients' mean was 57 years old (range 19-83); 10 males and 5 females were included in the study. All the patients completely healed clinically and radiologically at an average of 6.1 months (range 4-13). All these patients returned to their pre-injury mobility status. During an average follow-up period of 25 months (range 8-60), the observed complications included wound dehiscence, which was treated with a superficial surgical debridement, a below-the-knee deep vein thrombosis, and a blade plate failure 3 months after the first revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the treatment of inter-and sub-trochanteric non-unions with a 95° blade plate, medial strut allograft, and bone autograft obtained with RIA system, together with a varus malalignment correction, leads to a high percentage of bone healing, with a low incidence of complications and good clinical outcome.

The Swedish Fracture Register - ten years of experience and 600,000 fractures collected in a National Quality Register

BACKGROUND

Before the creation of the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR), there was no national quality register that prospectively collects data regarding all types of fractures regardless of treatment in an emergency setting. Observational data on fractures registered in a sustainable way may provide invaluable tools for quality improvements in health care and research.

DESCRIPTION

Ten years after its implementation, the Swedish Fracture Register has 100% coverage among orthopaedic and trauma departments in Sweden. The completeness of registrations reached in 2020 69-96% for hip fractures at the different departments, with the majority reporting a completeness above 85%. The Swedish Fracture Register is a fully web-based national quality register created and run by orthopaedic professionals, with financial support from public healthcare providers and the government. All users have full access to both the registration platform and all aggregated statistics in real time. The web-based platform was created for use in health quality registers and it has easily gained acceptance among users. The register has gradually developed by the addition of more fracture types and skeletal parts. Research activity is high and 31 scientific publications have been published since 2016. The strategy from the start was to publish validation data and basic epidemiological data. However, over the past few years, publications on outcomes, such as re-operations and mortality, have been published and four register-based, randomised, controlled trials are ongoing.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to create a fracture register, to gain professional acceptance and to collect fracture data in a sustainable way on a national level if the platform is easy to use. Such a platform can also be used as a randomisation platform for prospective studies.

Femoral neck fracture: the reliability of radiologic classifications

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are one of the most common injury in the elderly. A valid radiographic classification system is mandatory to perform the correct treatment and to allow surgeons to facilitate communication. This study aims to evaluate reliability of 2018 AO/OTA Classification, AO/OTA simplified and Garden classification.

METHODS

Six Orthopaedic surgeons, divided in three groups based on trauma experience, evaluated 150 blinded antero-posterior and latero-lateral radiography of FNF using Garden classification, 2018 AO/OTA and simplified AO/OTA classification. One month later, the radiographs were renumbered and then each observer performed a second evaluation of the radiographs. The Kappa statistical analysis was used to determine the reliability of the classifications. Cohen's Kappa was calculated to determine intra and inter observer reliability. Fleiss' Kappa was used to determine multi-rater agreement.

RESULTS

The k values of interobserver reliability for Garden classification was from 0,28 to 0,73 with an average of 0,49. AO classification showed reliability from 0,2 to 0,42, with average of 0,30. Simplified AO/OTA classification showed a reliability from 0,38 to 0,58 with an average of 0,48. The values of intra observer reliability for Garden classification was from 0,48 to 0,79 with an average of 0,63. AO classification showed reliability from 0,2 to 0,64 with an average of 0,5. Simplified AO/OTA classification showed a reliability from 0,4 to 0,75 with an average of 0,61.

CONCLUSION

The revised 2018 AO/OTA classification simplified the previous classification of intracapsular fracture but remain unreliable with only fair interobserver reliability. The simplified AO/OTA classification show a reliability similar to Garden classification, with a moderate interobserver reliability. The experience of the surgeons seems not to improve reliability. No classification has been shown to be superior in terms of reliability.