National study: Most elderly patients benefit from earlier hip fracture surgery despite co-morbidity

Poor prognosis and risk factors of nonoperative treatment hip fracture patients with end-stage renal disease

This study aims to summarize the prognosis and risk factors of nonoperative treatment patients of hip fracture with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A total of 113 individuals of hip fracture with nonoperative treatment were retrospectively enrolled, 38 patients with ESRD were defined as the observation group, and the other 75 patients without ESRD were served as the control group. The difference in 30-day and 1-year mortality rate between the 2 groups was compared. The effects of risk factors on survival were estimated by the Cox proportional-hazards model. The survival difference was estimated by the method of Kaplan-Meier. In the subsequent subgroup analysis of the observation group, as before, the Cox proportional-hazards model and the Kaplan-Meier method were used. The 1-year mortality rate of the observation group was considerably higher than that of the control group, which was 86.84% and 32.0%, respectively (P < .005). For nonoperative treatment hip fracture subjects, ESRD, age ≥ 82, BMI (BMI) < 20, high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and low Barthel Index (BI) were associated with a low survival curve (P < .05). In the subsequent multivariable subgroup analyses, for nonoperative treatment hip fracture subjects with ESRD, high CCI and low BI were also the independent risk factors of mortality. For nonoperative treatment hip fracture subjects, ESRD, old age, low BMI, high CCI and low BI were the independent risk factors of mortality. For hip fracture subjects with ESRD, nonoperative treatment was associated with excess high 1-year mortality rate, especially for patients with high CCI and low BI.

Mortality Trends in Geriatric Proximal Femoral Fracture Treatments After National Payor Policy Changes: A National Study

INTRODUCTION

Proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) are a major medical event in an elderly's life. The extent of conservative treatment is poorly evaluated in Western health systems. This study retrospectively examines a national cohort of patients older than 65 years with PFFs treated by early surgery (ES) (<48h), delayed surgery (DS) (>48h), and conservative treatment (COT) over the past decade (2010 to 2019).

RESULTS

The study cohort included 38,841 patients; 18.4% were 65 to 74 years, 41.1% were 75 to 84 years, and 40.5% were older than 85 years; 68.5% were female. ES rose from 68.4% in 2013 to 85% in 2017 (P < 0.0001). COT dropped from 8.2% in 2010 to 5.2% in 2019 (P < 0.0001). Level I trauma centers chose 2.3 times less COT (7.75% in 2010 decreased to 3.37% in 2019) while regional hospitals chose COT only 1.4 times less over the years (P < 0.001). Hospitalization periods differed: 6.3 ± 0.6d for COT, 8.6 ± 0.3d for ES, and 12 ± 0.4d for DS (P < 0.001), and the in-hospital mortality rates were 10.5%, 2%, and 3.6%, respectively (P < 0.0001). One-year mortality rates decreased for ES only (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

ES rose from 58.1% in 2010 to 84.9% in 2019 (P = 0.00002). COT is diminishing throughout the Israeli health system, from 8.2% in 2010 to 5.2% in 2019. Tertiary hospitals consistently practice less COT than regional hospitals (P < 0.001), probably related to surgeons' and anesthetists' appraisal of the patient's medical status and demand. COT had the shortest hospitalization period but carried the highest in-hospital mortality rates (10.5%). The mild difference in out-of-hospital mortality between the COT and DS groups suggests similar patient characteristics that require additional investigation. In conclusion, more PFFs are treated within 48h with a reduced mortality rate, and the 1-year mortality has improved for ES only. Treatment preferences vary between tertiary and regional hospitals.

Risk factors for prolonged preoperative waiting time of intertrochanteric fracture patients undergoing operative treatment

Purpose

Intertrochanteric fracture is a common fracture in older adults. We observed the case characteristics of intertrochanteric fracture and analyzed the risk factors for prolonged preoperative waiting time based on patient data from a 6 year period. Investigate the post-admission treatment of intertrochanteric fracture.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records from July 2015 to July 2021 of patients hospitalized for intertrochanteric fracture who had undergone internal fixation surgery in the orthopedic ward of the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Data regarding gender, age, AO/OTA classification, preoperative waiting time, preoperative medical comorbidities, and complicated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of lower limbs were collected. Statistical tests were used to evaluate the factors influencing preoperative preparation time and DVT.

Results

A total of 1812 cases were retrospectively analyzed, 1258 patients (69.43%) had three or more medical comorbidities. The average preoperative waiting time was 5.09 ± 3.27 days. Advanced age, more preoperative medical comorbidities and DVT led to longer preoperative waiting times, and preoperative medical comorbidities were an independent risk factor. Patients with advanced age and preoperative medical comorbidities were more likely to have DVT.

Conclusion

Age and preoperative medical comorbidities are risk factors for DVT and prolonged preoperative preparation time in intertrochanteric fracture patients. Preoperative medical comorbidities are an independent risk factors affecting the preoperative waiting time, and a combination of multiple comorbidities almost predicts the delay of the operation time.

DOES PERICAPSULAR ANESTHETIC BLOCK IMPROVE THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD IN TRANSTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES?

Objective:

To evaluate pain and mobility in patients with transtrochanteric fractures subjected to osteosynthesis with pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and compare with patients who did not receive the block.

Methods:

The medical records of 49 patients were analyzed and data were collected regarding: age, gender, anesthetic evaluation, cause of trauma, locomotion, fracture classification, type of anesthesia used, anesthetic technique, pain, opioid administration and mobility with partial load.

Results:

Out of 49 patients, 17 (34.7 %) received PENG block. After surgery, most patients complained of pain and opioids were administered (67.3 %), with greatest frequency in the group without PENG block (93.3 %). Most patients who received PENG block walked within 6 h after surgery (52.9 %) and all recovered the ability to walk until hospital discharge (48 h), different from the group that did not receive PENG block (p = 0.012). The groups showed a significant difference between them regarding the frequency of reports of moderate to severe pain (p = 0.003).

Conclusion:

The use of PENG block in patients with transtrochanteric fractures subjected to osteosynthesis can help to reduce postoperative pain, early mobility with partial load and less use of opioids. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Block and Spinal Anesthesia in Terms of Postoperative Mortality and Walking Ability in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients - A Retrospective, Propensity-Score Matched Study

Purpose

To compare the effects of peripheral nerve block (PNB) and spinal anesthesia (SA) on one-year mortality and walking ability of elderly hip fracture patients after hip arthroplasty.

Methods

Patients ≥65 years who underwent unilateral hip arthroplasty due to femoral neck fracture, using either PNB or SA from 2014 to 2019, were included. Demographic data, comorbidities, and results of preoperative screening were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a ratio of 1:1 for PNB and SA groups. The primary outcomes were 30-day, 90-day, and one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included walking ability in the first postoperative year, major complications, length of stay, and the cost of hospitalization. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Three hundred and sixteen patients were included, of whom 200 received SA and 116 received PNB. Eighty-nine patients in each group were matched after PSM. Patients in the PNB group showed significantly lower risks of death in 30 days (2.2% vs 10.1%, P=0.029) and 90 days (3.4% vs 12.4%, P=0.026) after hip arthroplasty, when compared to the SA group. There was no significant difference in one-year mortality, walking ability, major complications, and length of stay. Higher hospitalization cost was found in the PNB group (53,828.21 CNY vs 59,278.83 CNY, P=0.024). One-year accumulated survival rate was higher in the PNB group without reaching a significant level.

Conclusion

PNB was related to lower 30- and 90-day mortality but higher hospitalization cost in elderly hip fracture patients after hip arthroplasty. However, the anesthesia types were not associated with one-year mortality, one-year walking ability, major complications, and length of stay.