"Ratio of fracture site diameter to isthmus femoral canal diameter" as a predictor of complication following treatment of infra-isthmal femoral shaft fracture with antegrade intramedullary nailing

Locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming: retrograde affords greater procedural efficiency than antegrade approach

PURPOSE

To compare the intraoperative procedural efficiency of antegrade and retrograde locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, power reaming devices and fracture tables.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted on 238 isolated diaphyseal femur fractures fixed with SIGN Standard and Fin nails within three weeks of injury. The data included baseline patient and fracture characteristics, nail type and diameter, fracture reduction methods, operative times and outcome measures.

RESULTS

There were 84 and 154 fractures in the antegrade and retrograde groups respectively. Both groups were similar vis-a-vis baseline patient and fracture characteristics. Closed reduction of the fractures was significantly easier for retrograde than an antegrade approach. The retrograde approach more readily permitted the use of Fin nails. The mean nail diameter used for retrograde was significantly larger than that for antegrade. The time taken to achieve retrograde nailing was significantly lesser than that of antegrade. There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes of the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of expensive fracture-surgery gadgets, retrograde nailing offers many procedural advantages over antegrade, such as easier closed reduction and canal reaming, the greater possibility of using the Fin nail with fewer interlocking screws and shorter operative times. However, we acknowledge the lack of randomisation and the presence of an unequal number of fractures in the two groups as limitations of this study.

Does the distance of the fixation points to the fracture affect healing in tibial shaft fractures treated with openable distal claw intramedullary nail?

Objective: A retrospective examination was made of tibia shaft fractures treated with tibia intramedullary nail (IMN) (Dunitech Nite Tibial IMN Oliga Med Ankara-Turkey), which are designed with distal retractable claws, unlike classic imtramedullar nails. It was aimed to evaluate the effect on healing of the nail diameter and the distance between the fracture line and the proximal and distal fixation points of the IMN. Material and Method: The study included 28 patients (18 males, 10 females; mean age 43.75 (18-69) years) treated with distal retractable claw tibia IMN for a diagnosis of unilateral tibia diaphyseal fracture between January 2020 and January 2022. The midpoint of the fracture line (F), the proximal fixation point of the locking screw (S), the distal fixation point of the retractable claw (T), and the isthmus mid-point (I) were determined as reference points. The FT, ST, and IT distances, the nail diameter (ND) and isthmus diameter (ID) were measured and the FT/ST ratio was calculated. Statistical evaluations were made of the relationships between the diameter and length measurements and the visual analog scale (VAS) and radiographic union score for tibia (RUST) scores at the end of one year. Results: No statistically significant correlation was determined between the RUST and VAS scores and the diameter measurements or the distance between the proximal and distal fixation points of the IMN. Conclusion: There was no effect on the fracture healing scores of the nail diameter or the distance between the proximal and distal fixation points in tibia shaft fractures treated with a tibia nail with distal retractable claws. The nail design with retractable claws provides strong fixation and stable fracture healing. The operating time is shorter resulting in less radiation exposure. Keywords: Tibia Fracture, İntramedüller Nail, Fracture Healing

"Fragment Width Ratio" as a Predictor of Nonunion for Femoral Shaft Fracture With Third Fragments

Previous studies have reported that large fracture fragment with displacement might cause nonunion of femoral shaft fractures. We therefore intended to delineate significant risk factors for developing a nonunion predisposed by a major fracture fragment. We analyzed 61 patients who were operated on using interlocking nails for femoral shaft fractures from 2009 to 2018. We classified patients with modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia fractures scores of less than 11 or needing reoperations by 1 year postoperatively as nonunion. We thereafter measured parameters of the displaced fracture fragment and fracture site to identify the significant difference between the union and non-union groups. We also applied the receiver operating characteristic curve to demonstrate a threshold value for the fragment width (FW) ratio. Among 61 patients with complete follow-up, no significant difference was found regarding length, displacement, and angulation of fragments between patients with and without union. Except for higher mean FW (P=.03) and the FW ratio (P=.01) in patients with nonunion, the logistic regression analysis demonstrated that FW ratio significantly affected union (P=.018; odds ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.001-0.522). Although a fracture fragment greater than 4 cm with displacement greater than 2 cm was reported to significantly cause nonunions, our study showed that an FW ratio greater than 0.55 instead of fragment size or displacement was predictive for the occurrence of nonunion adjoining to the fracture site. Fixation of the third fracture fragment should not be ignored for preventing a nonunion. More attention should be paid to achieve a better fixation for a major fracture fragment with an FW ratio greater than 0.55 to avoid the development of non-union following the use of interlocking nail for femoral shaft fracture. [Orthopedics. 202x;xx(x):xx-xx.].

Perioperative Radiographic Predictors of Non-Union in Infra-Isthmal Femoral Shaft Fractures after Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing: A Case-Control Study

Antegrade intramedullary (IM) nailing is the gold standard treatment for femoral shaft fractures; however, the non-union rate of infra-isthmal femoral shaft fractures is still high after antegrade IM nailing. This retrospective case−control study aimed to determine the association between perioperative radiographic factors and the non-union of infra-isthmal femoral shaft fractures after antegrade IM nailing. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the radiographic risk factors of non-union. Ninety-three patients were included, with thirty-one non-unions and sixty-two matched controls between 2007 and 2017. All were regularly followed up for 2 years. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that a ratio of the unfixed distal segment > 32.5% was strongly predictive of postoperative non-union. The risk factors for non-union were AO/OTA type B and C (odds ratio [OR]: 2.20), a smaller ratio of the distal fragment (OR: 4.05), a greater ratio of the unfixed distal segment (OR: 7.16), a higher ratio of IM canal diameter to nail size at the level of fracture (OR: 6.23), and fewer distal locking screws (OR: 2.31). The radiographic risk factors for non-union after antegrade IM nailing for infra-isthmal femoral shaft fractures were unstable fractures, shorter distal fragments, longer unfixed distal fragments, wider IM canal, and fewer distal locking screws. Surgeons must strive to avoid non-union with longer and larger nails and apply more distal locking screws, especially for unstable, wider IM canal, and shorter distal fragment fractures.

The characteristics and influence of iatrogenic fracture comminution following antegrade interlocking nailing for simple femoral shaft fractures, a retrospective cohort study

AIM

The incidence and characteristics of iatrogenic comminution (IC) are unknown, and the influence of IC on fracture union is unclear. This study was aimed to investigate the (1) incidence and characteristics of IC and (2) the outcomes of IC following antegrade interlocking nailing of simple femoral shaft fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on patients who experienced simple femoral shaft fractures and underwent antegrade interlocking nailing between February 2009 and December 2016. The incidence and characteristics of IC were examined. According to the presence of IC, patients were divided into two groups: an IC group and a non-IC (NIC) group. Demographic information and nonunion rates were compared between the two groups. Potential risk factors for IC (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), nail fit ratio, reduction technique, and greater trochanter nail entry) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The aforementioned variables, along with IC occurrence, were also assessed as potential risk factors for nonunion at 12 and 24 months after operation using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 211 total patients, IC occurred in 20.9% (n = 44) of patients. Most ICs were found at the level of the isthmus, and involved the medial cortex. Compared with the NIC group, higher nonunion rates were observed in the IC group at 12 months (31.8% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.002) and 24 months (18% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.017) after surgery. Age older than 35 years old was related with the occurrence of IC in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis found no risk factor associated with IC. Open reduction technique, IC occurrence and higher BMI were identified as the risk factors of nonunion at 12 months and 24 months after surgery in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

IC is a non-rare complication in antegrade interlocking nailing of simple femoral shaft fractures and was associated with higher nonunion rate. Age older than 35 years old showed a trend toward increasing risk of iatrogenic fracture comminution. In multivariate analysis, open reduction technique, IC occurrence and higher BMI significantly correlated with fracture nonunion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.