Predictors for the need for fasciotomy after arterial vascular trauma of the lower extremity

More Harm Than Good: It is Time to Reconsider Prophylactic Fasciotomy in Lower-Extremity Vascular Injury

INTRODUCTION

Four-compartment calf fasciotomy (CF) can be limb-saving. Prophylactic fasciotomy (PP) is advised in high-risk situations to prevent limb loss. Calf fasciotomy can cause significant morbidity, particularly if performed unnecessarily. We hypothesized that selective use of fasciotomies (SF) after lower-extremity vascular injury would lead to a lower rate of overall fasciotomies without an increase in limb complications than prophylactic fasciotomies (PFs).

METHODS

Trauma patients who sustained lower-extremity vascular injury that required operative repair at a high-volume trauma center were retrospectively reviewed and grouped by SF or PF (2016-2022). SF were individuals who were observed and underwent CF only if signs of compartment syndrome developed, whereas PF were individuals who underwent CF without signs of compartment syndrome. The primary outcome was amputation rate. Secondary outcomes were fasciotomy rate, need for reoperative vascular surgery, and clinical characteristics predisposing use of PF.

RESULTS

Of 101 overall patients, 30 patients (29.4%) had PF. Of the remaining 71 (SF group), 43.7% (n = 31) were spared CF. The median time from injury to vascular repair in both groups was the same (7 hours, P = .15). There was no difference in rate of vascular reoperation per group (PF = 26.7% vs SF = 23.9%, P = .77). The only clinical characteristic associated with PF was need for arterial shunt (OR 4.2, P = .028).

CONCLUSIONS

In trauma patients with lower-extremity vascular injury undergoing vascular repair, selective use of fasciotomy can spare almost half of patients the need for fasciotomy without an increase in limb complications.

The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) does not predict amputation in popliteal artery injury

PURPOSE

Vascular injuries in lower extremity trauma, especially with involvement of the popliteal artery, are associated with considerably high rates of limb loss, especially with blunt trauma mechanisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of amputation in patients with traumatic popliteal artery lesions with special focus on the validity of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all patients treated for isolated lesions of the popliteal artery following trauma between January 1990 and December 2020 at a high-volume level I trauma center were included. Primary outcome was limb salvage dependent on MESS and the influence of defined parameters on limb salvage was defined as secondary outcome. The extent of trauma was assessed by the MESS.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients (age 39.2 ± 18.6 years, 76% male) with most blunt injuries (n = 47, 94%) were included. None of the patients died within 30 days and revascularization was attempted in all patients with no primary amputation and the overall limb salvage rate was 88% (44 patients). A MESS ≥ 7 was observed in 28 patients (56%) with significantly higher rates of performed fasciotomies (92.9% vs. 59.1%; p < 0.01) in those patients. MESS did not predict delayed amputation within our patient cohort (MESS 8.4 ± 4.1 in the amputation group vs. 8.1 ± 3.8 in the limb salvage group; p = 0.765).

CONCLUSION

Revascularization of limbs with isolated popliteal artery injuries should always be attempted. MESS did not predict delayed amputation in our cohort with fasciotomy being an important measure to increase limb salvage rates.

A practical nomogram for predicting amputation rates in acute compartment syndrome patients based on clinical factors and biochemical blood markers

BACKGROUND

Amputation is a serious complication of acute compartment syndrome (ACS), and predicting the risk factors associated with amputation remains a challenge for surgeons. The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors for amputation in patients with ACS and develop a nomogram to predict amputation risk more accurately.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 143 patients (32 in the amputation group and 111 in the limb preservation group) diagnosed with ACS. LASSO and multivariate logistic regression were used to screen predictors and create a nomogram. The model's accuracy was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, C-index, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The predictors included cause of injury, vascular damage, shock, and fibrinogen in the nomogram. The C-index of the model was 0.872 (95% confidence interval: 0.854-0.962), and the C-index calculated by internal validation was 0.838. The nomogram's area under the curve (AUC) was 0.849, and the calibration curve demonstrated a high degree of agreement between the nomogram's predictions and actual observations. Additionally, the DCA indicated good clinical utility for the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The risk of amputation in ACS patients is associated with the cause of injury, vascular damage, shock, and fibrinogen. Our nomogram integrating clinical factors and biochemical blood markers enables doctors to more conveniently predict the risk of amputation in patients with ACS.