1
|
Vogel C, Grimm B, Marmor MT, Sivananthan S, Richter PH, Yarboro S, Hanflik AM, Histing T, Braun BJ. Wearable Sensors in Other Medical Domains with Application Potential for Orthopedic Trauma Surgery-A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3134. [PMID: 38892844 PMCID: PMC11172495 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of wearable technology is steadily increasing. In orthopedic trauma surgery, where the musculoskeletal system is directly affected, focus has been directed towards assessing aspects of physical functioning, activity behavior, and mobility/disability. This includes sensors and algorithms to monitor real-world walking speed, daily step counts, ground reaction forces, or range of motion. Several specific reviews have focused on this domain. In other medical fields, wearable sensors and algorithms to monitor digital biometrics have been used with a focus on domain-specific health aspects such as heart rate, sleep, blood oxygen saturation, or fall risk. This review explores the most common clinical and research use cases of wearable sensors in other medical domains and, from it, derives suggestions for the meaningful transfer and application in an orthopedic trauma context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Vogel
- University Hospital Tuebingen on Behalf of the Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, BG Unfallklinik, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (C.V.); (T.H.)
| | - Bernd Grimm
- Luxembourg Institute of Health, Department of Precision Health, Human Motion, Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Digital Methods Group, 1445 Strassen, Luxembourg;
| | - Meir T. Marmor
- Orthopaedic Trauma Institute (OTI), San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA;
| | | | - Peter H. Richter
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Esslingen Hospotal, 73730 Esslingen, Germany;
| | - Seth Yarboro
- Deptartment Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA;
| | - Andrew M. Hanflik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Downey Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente, Downey, CA 90027, USA;
| | - Tina Histing
- University Hospital Tuebingen on Behalf of the Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, BG Unfallklinik, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (C.V.); (T.H.)
| | - Benedikt J. Braun
- University Hospital Tuebingen on Behalf of the Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, BG Unfallklinik, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (C.V.); (T.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olsen RJ, Hasan SS, Woo JJ, Nawabi DH, Ramkumar PN. The Fundamentals and Applications of Wearable Sensor Devices in Sports Medicine: A Scoping Review. Arthroscopy 2024:S0749-8063(24)00098-7. [PMID: 38331364 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To (1) characterize the various forms of wearable sensor devices (WSDs) and (2) review the peer-reviewed literature of applied wearable technology within sports medicine. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE databases, from inception through 2023, was conducted to identify eligible studies using WSDs within sports medicine. Data extraction was performed of study demographics and sensor specifications. Included studies were categorized by application: athletic training, rehabilitation, and research. RESULTS In total, 43 studies met criteria for inclusion in this review. Forms of WSDs include pedometers, accelerometers, encoders (consisting of magnetometers and gyroscopes), force sensors, global positioning system trackers, and inertial measurement units. Outcome metrics include step counts; gait, limb motion, and angular positioning; foot and skin pressure; change of direction and inclination, including analysis of both body parts and athletes on a field; displacement and velocity of body segments and joints; heart rate; plethysmography; sport-specific kinematics; range of motion, symmetry, and alignment; head impact; sleep; throwing biomechanics; and kinetic and spatiotemporal running metrics. WSDs are used in athletic training to assess sport-specific biomechanics and workload with a goal of injury prevention and training optimization, as well as for rehabilitation monitoring and research such as for risk predicting and aiding diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS WSDs enable real-time monitoring of human performance across a variety of implementations and settings, allowing collection of metrics otherwise not achievable. WSDs are powerful tools with multiple applications within athletic training, patient rehabilitation, and orthopaedic and sports medicine research. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Wearable technology may represent the missing link to quantitatively addressing return to play and previous performance. WSDs are commercially available and portable adjuncts that allow clinicians, trainers, and individual athletes to monitor biomechanical parameters, workload, and recovery status to better contextualize personalized training, injury risk, and rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena J Olsen
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | | | - Joshua J Woo
- Brown University/The Warren Alpert School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A
| | - Danyal H Nawabi
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Prem N Ramkumar
- Long Beach Orthopedic Institute, Long Beach, California, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Youssef Y, De Wet D, Back DA, Scherer J. Digitalization in orthopaedics: a narrative review. Front Surg 2024; 10:1325423. [PMID: 38274350 PMCID: PMC10808497 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1325423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in technology and digital tools like the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and sensors are shaping the field of orthopaedic surgery on all levels, from patient care to research and facilitation of logistic processes. Especially the COVID-19 pandemic, with the associated contact restrictions was an accelerator for the development and introduction of telemedical applications and digital alternatives to classical in-person patient care. Digital applications already used in orthopaedic surgery include telemedical support, online video consultations, monitoring of patients using wearables, smart devices, surgical navigation, robotic-assisted surgery, and applications of artificial intelligence in forms of medical image processing, three-dimensional (3D)-modelling, and simulations. In addition to that immersive technologies like virtual, augmented, and mixed reality are increasingly used in training but also rehabilitative and surgical settings. Digital advances can therefore increase the accessibility, efficiency and capabilities of orthopaedic services and facilitate more data-driven, personalized patient care, strengthening the self-responsibility of patients and supporting interdisciplinary healthcare providers to offer for the optimal care for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin Youssef
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Deana De Wet
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - David A. Back
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian Scherer
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Traumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
"Bring Your Own Device"-A New Approach to Wearable Outcome Assessment in Trauma. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59020403. [PMID: 36837604 PMCID: PMC9966638 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Outcome data from wearable devices are increasingly used in both research and clinics. Traditionally, a dedicated device is chosen for a given study or clinical application to collect outcome data as soon as the patient is included in a study or undergoes a procedure. The current study introduces a new measurement strategy, whereby patients' own devices are utilized, allowing for both a pre-injury baseline measure and ability to show achievable results. Materials and Methods: Patients with a pre-existing musculoskeletal injury of the upper and lower extremity were included in this exploratory, proof-of-concept study. They were followed up for a minimum of 6 weeks after injury, and their wearable outcome data (from a smartphone and/or a body-worn sensor) were continuously acquired during this period. A descriptive analysis of the screening characteristics and the observed and achievable outcome patterns was performed. Results: A total of 432 patients was continuously screened for the study, and their screening was analyzed. The highest success rate for successful inclusion was in younger patients. Forty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The most prevalent outcome was step count. Three distinctive activity data patterns were observed: patients recovering, patients with slow or no recovery, and patients needing additional measures to determine treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Measuring outcomes in trauma patients with the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) strategy is feasible. With this approach, patients were able to provide continuous activity data without any dedicated equipment given to them. The measurement technique is especially suited to particular patient groups. Our study's screening log and inclusion characteristics can help inform future studies wishing to employ the BYOD design.
Collapse
|
5
|
Continuous Shoulder Activity Tracking after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:bioengineering10020128. [PMID: 36829622 PMCID: PMC9952737 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Postoperative shoulder activity after proximal humerus fracture treatment could influence the outcomes of osteosynthesis and may depend on the rehabilitation protocol. This multi-centric prospective study aimed at evaluating the feasibility of continuous shoulder activity monitoring over the first six postoperative weeks, investigating potential differences between two different rehabilitation protocols. Shoulder activity was assessed with pairs of accelerometer-based trackers during the first six postoperative weeks in thirteen elderly patients having a complex proximal humerus fracture treated with a locking plate. Shoulder angles and elevation events were evaluated over time and compared between the two centers utilizing different standard rehabilitation protocols. The overall mean shoulder angle ranged from 11° to 23°, and the number of daily elevation events was between 547 and 5756. Average angles showed longitudinal change <5° over 31 ± 10 days. The number of events increased by 300% on average. Results of the two clinics exhibited no characteristic differences for shoulder angle, but the number of events increased only for the site utilizing immediate mobilization. In addition to considerable inter-patient variation, not the mean shoulder angle but the number of elevations events increased markedly over time. Differences between the two sites in number of daily events may be associated with the different rehabilitation protocols.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghosh A, Nag S, Gomes A, Gosavi A, Ghule G, Kundu A, Purohit B, Srivastava R. Applications of Smart Material Sensors and Soft Electronics in Healthcare Wearables for Better User Compliance. MICROMACHINES 2022; 14:121. [PMID: 36677182 PMCID: PMC9862021 DOI: 10.3390/mi14010121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The need for innovation in the healthcare sector is essential to meet the demand of a rapidly growing population and the advent of progressive chronic ailments. Over the last decade, real-time monitoring of health conditions has been prioritized for accurate clinical diagnosis and access to accelerated treatment options. Therefore, the demand for wearable biosensing modules for preventive and monitoring purposes has been increasing over the last decade. Application of machine learning, big data analysis, neural networks, and artificial intelligence for precision and various power-saving approaches are used to increase the reliability and acceptance of smart wearables. However, user compliance and ergonomics are key areas that need focus to make the wearables mainstream. Much can be achieved through the incorporation of smart materials and soft electronics. Though skin-friendly wearable devices have been highlighted recently for their multifunctional abilities, a detailed discussion on the integration of smart materials for higher user compliance is still missing. In this review, we have discussed the principles and applications of sustainable smart material sensors and soft electronics for better ergonomics and increased user compliance in various healthcare devices. Moreover, the importance of nanomaterials and nanotechnology is discussed in the development of smart wearables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnab Ghosh
- Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India
| | - Sagnik Nag
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences & Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Tiruvalam Road, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Alyssa Gomes
- Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India
| | - Apurva Gosavi
- Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India
| | - Gauri Ghule
- Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India
| | - Aniket Kundu
- Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India
| | - Buddhadev Purohit
- DTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads 221, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Rohit Srivastava
- Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India
| |
Collapse
|