Practical approach to the native distal femur fractures in the elderly: A rapid review over the recent trends

Clinical differences between periprosthetic and native distal femur fractures: a comparative observational study

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFF) is increasing as the number of total knee replacements becomes more common. This study compared the demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of periprosthetic versus native distal femur fractures (NDFF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients ≥ 18 who underwent surgical fixation of NDFF or PDFF from 2012 to 2020 at a level-1 trauma center. The main variables collected included demographics, AO/OTA fracture classification, fixation construct, concomitant fractures, polytrauma rates, bone density, and reduction quality. Primary outcomes were unexpected return to the operating room (UROR), hospital length of stay, and quality of reduction. T-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

209 patients were identified, including 70 PDFF and 139 NDFF. PDFF patients were elderly females (81%) with isolated (80%) and comminuted (85%) 33 A.3 (71%) fractures. NDFF patients included 53% females, were commonly middle-aged, and displayed comminuted (92%) 33 C.2 fractures. 48% of NDFF patients had concomitant fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the primary fixation for both groups, followed by nail-plate combination (37%) for PDFF and lateral locking plates (21%) for NDFF. NDFF patients experienced significantly longer hospital stays, higher UROR rates, and worse quality of reduction (p < 0.05). PDFF patients had a significantly greater prevalence of low bone density (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PDFF occur as isolated injuries with significant metaphyseal comminution in elderly females with low bone quality. NDFF commonly occurs in younger patients with less metaphyseal comminution and concomitant fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the most common treatment for both groups, although preference for nail-plate combination fixation is increasing. NDFF type 33 C fractures are at greater risk of UROR.

Comparison of radiological and functional results in osteoporotic distal femur fractures operated with single plating, lateral incision, and double plating, anterior paramedial incision: A retrospective study

Treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures is often complicated by a high rate of nonunion and varus collapse. For such fractures, lateral plating with lateral incision and double plating with anterior paramedial incision have shown promising results in the recent literature. The hypothesis of this study was that bilateral plating of comminuted distal femur fractures in osteoporotic patients would result in higher union rates and lower revision rates compared to an isolated lateral locking plate. The study included 56 patients (23 males, 33 females) with supracondylar femur fracture. According to the OA/OTA classification, 9 were type A3, 8 were A2, 13 were C1, 16 were C2, and 10 were C3. The mean follow-up period was 12 months, with 29 patients treated using lateral mini-incision, lateral locking plate, and 27 patients treated with anterior paramedial incision, dual plating. The clinical and radiological results were evaluated. The mean duration of radiological union in the studied population was 15 ± 2.1 months (range, 11-21 months) in the single plate group (Group A), and 13.5 ± 2.6 months (range, 9-19 months) in the double plate group (Group B). Mean ROM was 112.3° and flexion contracture 4° in Group A, and ROM 108.3° and flexion contracture 6.7° in Group B. (P = .15). The average Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score was 85.6 points in Group A and 83.5 points in Group B (P = .2278). The postoperative anteversion measurement in the operated extremity ranged from -15 to 19 in Group A, and from 5 to 18 in Group B. When the anteversion degrees were compared between the injured and uninjured extremities in the postoperative period, a significant difference was observed within Group A (P = .0018), but no significant difference was observed in Group B (P = .2492). Dual plate fixation using the anterior paramedial approach is an effective operative method for osteoporotic distal femur fractures. This has many advantages such as precise exposure, easy manipulation, anatomic reduction, and stable fixation. However, for surgical indications and medial bone defects > 1 cm, grafting should be performed.

Combined nail-plate constructs in the management of osteoporotic native distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the available evidence

PURPOSE

Distal femoral fractures account for 4-6% of fragility fractures. These may be managed using a combined nail-plate construct (NPC). The use of NPCs is gaining traction. Whilst several theoretical advantages exist, there is little evidence reporting on binary or patient-reported outcomes. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review of the available literature pertaining to NPCs and their treatment of native distal femoral fractures, appraising the outcomes and focusing on the rationale for their increasing uptake in recent literature.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Clinical Key, PubMed and Cochrane library was performed from date of inception up to in August 9, 2022. All study languages were included initially. A further Google Scholar search review was performed to identify any other studies not identified in the database interrogation. Studies were eligible if they reported on the use of nail-plate constructs in managing distal femoral fractures. Any outcome metric was permitted. The study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for non-randomised Studies tool. Quantitative analysis was performed using a log odds ratio random effects model. The Knapp-Hartung adjustment was utilised if the total number of included studies was < 5. Study effect sizes and appropriate plots were constructed to illustrate the outcomes data.

RESULTS

A total of four studies were eligible for inclusion. Study data was extracted and summarised with their relevant outcomes presented. The literature review demonstrated that the use of NPCs led to significantly earlier full weight bearing (p < 0.001) and had reduced non-union rates over a single construct, without affecting infection rates (12.5% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.289) and significantly lower implant failure rates (10.5% vs. 0%; p = 0.011). A meta-analysis is performed of available studies and Forrest plots presented.

CONCLUSION

The use of NPC in the management of native osteoporotic DFFs is gaining traction but the available evidence is of low grade with significant heterogeneity in small cohorts of patients. We suggest that a large-scale, multicentre prospective study should be performed, with agreed functional and radiological outcome metrics, to provide a more robust evidence base.

Current standard of care for distal femur fractures in Germany and Switzerland

BACKGROUND

Distal femur fractures occur with an incidence of 4.5/100,000 and show a prevalence of 0.4%. Causes include low-impact trauma in older patients and high-impact trauma in younger patients without pre-existing medical conditions. The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of trauma mechanisms, trauma-promoting factors, comorbidities, medication history and type of surgical care to provide an overview of the causes of injury and the most appropriate therapeutic approach.

METHODS

In this multicenter cohort study a retrospective analysis of 229 patients who sustained a distal femur fracture between January 2011 and December 2020 was performed. Individual fracture patterns, fracture predisposing factors, concomitant disease profiles, medication history, treatment strategy and associated complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

229 patients were included in the retrospective analysis. A total of 113-type 33 A, 50-type 33 B and 66-type 33 C fractures were diagnosed, of whom 92% received a lateral locking plate osteosynthesis. There was a complication in 14.4% of all cases, of which 6.1% were attributable to infection. Significant risk factors for developing a complication were an increased BMI (29.9 ± 8.5 kg/m2; p = 0.04), fracture displacement of over half a shaft width (p < 0.001) and AOC fractures (p < 0,016), specifically C2 fractures (p < 0,008).

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, lateral locking plate osteosynthesis was the method of choice and was selected in over 90% of cases, regardless of the fracture classification and risk factors. A complication rate of 14.4% emphasizes the necessary analysis of patient- and care-specific risk factors and a resulting adjustment of the therapy strategy. An increased BMI (29.9 ± 8.5 kg/m2; p = 0.04), fracture displacement of over half a shaft width (p < 0.001) and AOC fractures (p < 0,016), specifically C2 fractures (p < 0,008) increase the risk of developing a complication and should prompt an early switch to a treatment strategy that provides more stability.