1
|
Chu X, Sun B, Mo X, Liu J, Zhang Y, Weng H, Chen D. Time-series dynamic three-way group decision-making model and its application in TCM efficacy evaluation. Artif Intell Rev 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s10462-023-10445-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
|
2
|
Zhan J, Wang W, R. Alcantud JC, Zhan J. A three-way decision approach with prospect-regret theory via fuzzy set pair dominance degrees for incomplete information systems. Inf Sci (N Y) 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
3
|
Esteves LG, Izbicki R, Stern JM, Stern RB. Logical coherence in Bayesian simultaneous three-way hypothesis tests. Int J Approx Reason 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2022.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
4
|
An optimization viewpoint on evaluation-based interval-valued multi-attribute three-way decision model. Inf Sci (N Y) 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
5
|
Wu M, Wang X, Fan J. A multiple attribute decision-making three-way model at four-branch fuzzy environment. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS 2022. [DOI: 10.3233/jifs-212097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Three-way decisions (TWDs) theory is one of the core ideas of decision-theoretic rough sets (DTRSs). Reviewing the existing research results, we find that TWDs provides us with more flexible decision choices. And the traditional fuzzy number does not take into account the absence of information (indifference) in the evaluation process. In order to construct a new model which can get flexible decision results in complex decision environment, we introduce four-branch fuzzy numbers (FBFNs) to describe the evaluation information, so that the decision-makers can express the evaluation information more comprehensively. In this paper, a novel TWDs model in four-branch fuzzy environment is proposed to solve multiple-attribute decision-making (MADM) problem. The first challenge is to construct a TWDs model based on FBFNs and to develop a new linguistic interpretation of the loss functions. Then, we extend a method for aggregating the loss functions obtained from the attribute evaluation values. Finally, we use the nonlinear solution to solve the threshold, and apply TOPSIS method to solve the conditional probability of FBFNs. The effectiveness of this method is illustrated by an example, and the decision results are compared with a MADM method based on OWGA operator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meiqin Wu
- School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xinsheng Wang
- School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jianping Fan
- School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen W, Zhang Q, Dai Y. Sequential multi-class three-way decisions based on cost-sensitive learning. Int J Approx Reason 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
7
|
On three perspectives for deriving three-way decision with linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inf Sci (N Y) 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.12.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
8
|
Liang D, Fu Y, Xu Z. Novel AQM analysis approach based on similarity and dissimilarity measures of interval set for multi-expert multi-criterion decision making. Int J Approx Reason 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
9
|
|
10
|
Zhu J, Ma X, Zhan J. A regret theory-based three-way decision approach with three strategies. Inf Sci (N Y) 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
11
|
Liang D, Wang M, Xu Z. A novel approach of three-way decisions with information interaction strategy for intelligent decision making under uncertainty. Inf Sci (N Y) 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
12
|
|
13
|
Incremental sequential three-way decision based on continual learning network. INT J MACH LEARN CYB 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s13042-021-01472-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
14
|
Campagner A, Cabitza F, Berjano P, Ciucci D. Three-way decision and conformal prediction: Isomorphisms, differences and theoretical properties of cautious learning approaches. Inf Sci (N Y) 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
15
|
Li X, Yang Y, Yi H, Yu Q. Conflict analysis based on three-way decision for trapezoidal fuzzy information systems. INT J MACH LEARN CYB 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s13042-021-01427-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
16
|
Yang J, Yao Y. A three-way decision based construction of shadowed sets from Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inf Sci (N Y) 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
17
|
Liu J, Li H, Huang B, Liu Y, Liu D. Convex combination-based consensus analysis for intuitionistic fuzzy three-way group decision. Inf Sci (N Y) 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
18
|
A novel intuitionistic fuzzy three-way decision model based on an intuitionistic fuzzy incomplete information system. INT J MACH LEARN CYB 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s13042-021-01426-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
19
|
Jiang H, Hu BQ. A novel three-way group investment decision model under intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making environment. Inf Sci (N Y) 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
20
|
Kusunoki Y, Błaszczyński J, Inuiguchi M, Słowiński R. Empirical risk minimization for dominance-based rough set approaches. Inf Sci (N Y) 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
21
|
|
22
|
Approaches to Three-Way Decisions Based on the Evaluation of Probabilistic Linguistic Terms Sets. Symmetry (Basel) 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/sym13050764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The method of determining probability thresholds of three-way decisions (3WDs) has always been the key of research, especially in the current environment with a large number of data and uncertainties. Among these problems, there will be correlation and similarity between them. In the light of these problems, the loss function with Probabilistic Linguistic Terms Sets (PLTSs) is introduced in the paper, and then we propose a PLTS evaluation-based approach to determine the thresholds and derive 3WDs. According to the definition and characters of PLTSs, the PLTSs loss function matrix is constructed firstly. Then using the equivalent model of Decision-theoretic rough sets (DTRSs), we construct the equivalent model (i.e., the αopt-model and the βopt-model, which are symmtrical) and try to find the optimal solution to determine the thresholds. Based on that, we propose a novel three-way decision approach under PLTSs evaluations. Finally, the validity of the method is verified by an example.
Collapse
|
23
|
Risk evaluation model for failure mode and effect analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy rough number approach. Soft comput 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00500-020-05497-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
24
|
|
25
|
|
26
|
Fuzzy entropies for class-specific and classification-based attribute reducts in three-way probabilistic rough set models. INT J MACH LEARN CYB 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s13042-020-01179-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
27
|
Shen W, Wei Z, Li Q, Zhang H, Miao D. Three-way decisions based blocking reduction models in hierarchical classification. Inf Sci (N Y) 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
28
|
Wang T, Li H, Zhang L, Zhou X, Huang B. A three-way decision model based on cumulative prospect theory. Inf Sci (N Y) 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
29
|
Zhang Q, Pang G, Wang G. A novel sequential three-way decisions model based on penalty function. Knowl Based Syst 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
30
|
Dai D, Li H, Jia X, Zhou X, Huang B, Liang S. A co-training approach for sequential three-way decisions. INT J MACH LEARN CYB 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s13042-020-01086-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
31
|
|
32
|
Three-Way Decision for Handling Uncertainty in Machine Learning: A Narrative Review. ROUGH SETS 2020. [PMCID: PMC7338178 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-52705-1_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
In this work we introduce a framework, based on three-way decision (TWD) and the trisecting-acting-outcome model, to handle uncertainty in Machine Learning (ML). We distinguish between handling uncertainty affecting the input of ML models, when TWD is used to identify and properly take into account the uncertain instances; and handling the uncertainty lying in the output, where TWD is used to allow the ML model to abstain. We then present a narrative review of the state of the art of applications of TWD in regard to the different areas of concern identified by the framework, and in so doing, we will highlight both the points of strength of the three-way methodology, and the opportunities for further research.
Collapse
|