Non-cooperative behavior management in group decision making by a conflict resolution process and its implementation for pharmaceutical supplier selection

A Large Group Decision Making Method Considering Experts’ Non-cooperative Behavior for Investment Selection of Renewable Energy Projects

The rapid expansion of renewable energy has attracted the attention of investors, which makes the evaluation of renewable energy projects a momentous issue. As the investment selection of renewable energy projects requires the joint discussion of experts from different professional backgrounds (such as energy, transportation, construction, economy, environment, etc.), it belongs to the category of large group decision-making (LGDM). Therefore, this paper is devoted to propose a novel LGDM method considering experts’ non-cooperative behavior for investment selection of renewable energy projects. First, considering that the complexity of renewable energy projects makes it difficult for experts to express their views in a single linguistic word, the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set is used as the tool for expert evaluation in this paper. Second, since the assessment information provided by experts from different fields are often heterogeneous, a consensus-reaching process with a feedback mechanism is introduced which comprehensively considers three reliable sources: the experts’ trust relationship in the social trust network, the consensus contribution in the subgroup and the opinions’ similarity among experts. Further, to improve the efficiency and rationality of decision-making, an experts’ historical adjustment data-based non-cooperative behavior management method is proposed. Finally, the effectiveness and innovation of the proposed method are verified by a case of renewable energy power generation project investment selection in Qingdao, China and a series of comparative analysis.

Research on expert group decision-making and conflict resolution in complex engineer-ing consulting process

Expert group decision-making in the process of engineering consulting is an important part of the smooth development of engineering projects. Whether the conceptual design scheme of the project is reasonable or not will directly affect the construction quality of the project. After the preliminary selection of a river ecological governance project, four conceptual design schemes were obtained. The owner invited 20 experts in relevant fields to make decisions on the four schemes collected in the early stage. The experts gave preference information for each scheme after reading the relevant materials of the project and clarifying the actual needs of the project. Based on this background, this paper uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to construct a model for group decision-making and conflict resolution in the engineering consulting process. We use the preference relationship to reflect the degree of experts’ preference for the scheme, cluster them through similarity calculation, calculate the conflict degree of group preference and personal preference respectively, and comprehensively use the sequence difference method and personal preference correction method to resolve the conflict, so that their opinions can be quickly agreed within the specified time. The results calculated by model are consistent with the actual situation of the project, which verifies the effectiveness of the model proposed in this paper, which can provide a reference for similar project decision-making and conflict resolution process.