Immunogenicity of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis

Systematic Review and Principal Components Analysis of the Immunogenicity of Adalimumab

BACKGROUND

The reported immunogenicity rates of adalimumab differ significantly between studies because of a wide variety of factors related to the disease, patients, study design, and products.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to characterize this variability and identify the major factors that contribute to these fluctuations.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that reported the immunogenicity rates of adalimumab were selected, and data pertaining to publication details, study characteristics, characteristics of the cohort at baseline, and immunogenicity were extracted. Records were sorted according to the immunogenicity assay type, and mean immunogenicity values for each assay type were calculated. Normalised immunogenicity was calculated for each report by subtracting the appropriate mean immunogenicity value. Collected data were subjected to statistical analysis, namely analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis, to unveil immunogenicity rate patterns across studies from a multivariate perspective.

RESULTS

In total, 130 publications were identified, from which 165 data records were extracted and included in the analysis. The immunogenicity rates of adalimumab averaged 24.9% across studies and varied significantly over time, ranging between 0 and 87%. An increase across time in the reported immunogenicity rates was detected, and the assay used to detect anti-adalimumab antibodies was a significant (but not exclusive) contributor to this trend. Furthermore, the principal components analysis revealed that the type of study and the exposure time were associated with the assay-normalised immunogenicity rates of adalimumab. Nonetheless, neither these nor the remaining factors included in this analysis seem to contribute to the temporal increase in reported immunogenicity rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies that evaluate the patient-, product-, and disease-related factors behind the immunogenicity of adalimumab are required because the evidence published so far does not completely explain the temporal increase in immunogenicity rates detected in this analysis.

Secukinumab Demonstrates Sustained Efficacy and Safety in a Taiwanese Subpopulation With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: Four-Year Results From a Phase 3 Study, MEASURE 1

Objectives

To present the long-term (4-year) efficacy and safety of secukinumab in Taiwanese patients with active AS in the MEASURE 1 extension study.

Methods

This post hoc analysis reports data from Taiwanese patients originally randomized to subcutaneous secukinumab 150 or 75mg or placebo every 4 weeks (following intravenous loading dose) who were invited to enter the 3-year extension study. Assessments at Week 208 included ASAS20/40 responses and other clinically relevant endpoints. Efficacy data are presented as observed. Safety analyses included all patients who received ≥1 dose of secukinumab.

Results

Of the 57 Taiwanese patients in the core trial, 48 entered the extension study and 87.5% patients (42/48) completed 4 years of treatment. Thirteen Taiwanese patients (including placebo-switchers) were escalated from 75 to 150mg (approved dose) at some point starting from Week 172. ASAS20/40 responses were sustained through 4 years in the Taiwanese patients who were originally randomized to secukinumab 150mg. Clinical responses were improved in those patients who received dose-escalation from 75 to 150mg during the study. No unexpected safety signals were reported.

Conclusion

Secukinumab 150mg demonstrated sustained efficacy over 4 years in Taiwanese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. The safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with previous reports.

ClinicalTrialsgov identifier

NCT01863732.

Immunogenicity of antitumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with spondyloarthritis

Objectives To evaluate the serum dosage of the biomedicine (DBM) and the incidence of antidrug antibody (ADA) against antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) in spondyloarthritis, and to demonstrate the influence of these parameters on the clinical efficiency. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional multicentric study including patients with spondylarthritis (SpA) under antiTNF (infliximab [INF], etanercept [ETA] and adalimumab [ADL]) for at least 6 months. A dosage of the ADA and DBM were practiced by the immuno-enzymatic essay. Result Seventy one patients were recruited. Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were associated with anti-TNF in 30%. ADA was positive in 54% for INF, 33% for ADL and 0% for ETA with a significant difference(p<0.0001). Immunogenicity was correlated to a bad therapeutic response (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]≥4)(p=0.04). The DBM was inversely correlated with the rate of ADA for patients treated with INF(p<0.0001) and ADL(p<0.0001). The DBM was also inversely correlated with BASDAI of INF(p=0.03) and ADL (p=0.01). ADA was significantly associated with an anterior switch of anti TNF(p=0.04), the use of INF(p=0.002), presence of coxitis(p=0.01) and higher body mass index (BMI)(p=0.007). DMARDs associated with anti TNF were not a protective factor for positive ADA. In a multivariate study, only INF and BMI were independent factors of positive ADA. Conclusion The ADA formation lowered the DBM and favored the therapeutic failure.

Drug Levels and Antibodies Against TNF-blockers in Spondyloarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis are Associated with the Activity but they do Not Predict it

BACKGROUND

Many patients may have resistance to TNF-blockers. These drugs may induce neutralizing antibodies. The determination of the drug levels of TNF-blockers and Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) against TNF-blockers may help to make clinical decisions.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to associate and predict the drug levels of TNFblockers and ADAs in relation to disease activity in patients with Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study including patients fulfilling ASAS classification criteria for SpA and 2010 ACR-EULAR classification criteria for RA. These patients were treated with Adalimumab (ADA), Infliximab (IFX), and Etanercept (ETN). A bivariate analysis and the chi-square test were performed to evaluate the association of ADAs and drug levels with activity measures for SpA and RA. Five regression models analyzing drug levels, ADAs and disease activity measures using a multiple linear regression were performed in order to evaluate the prediction of ADAs and drug levels in relation to disease activity.

RESULTS

In SpA, IFX levels were associated with BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index) (p=0.034). In RA, total drug levels were associated with DAS28-ESR (28 joint Disease activity Score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate), (p=0.008), DAS28-CRP (p=0.042), CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) (p=0.047) and SDAI (Simple Disease activity index), (p=0.017). ADA levels had association with CDAI (p=0.002) and SDAI (p=0.002). IFX levels were associated with a DAS28-ESR (p=0.044), DAS28-CRP (p=0.022) and SDAI (p=0.022). ADAs were associated in SpA with BASDAI (p=0.027). Drug levels and ADAs did not predict disease activity in patients with SpA or RA.

CONCLUSION

ADAs and drug levels of anti-TNF are associated with disease activity measures in patients with SpA and RA. However, they cannot predict clinical activity in these conditions.

Immunoassay methods used in clinical studies for the detection of anti-drug antibodies to adalimumab and infliximab

We examined the assay formats used to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in clinical studies of the anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibodies adalimumab and infliximab in chronic inflammatory disease and their potential impact on pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes. Using findings of a recent systematic literature review of the immunogenicity of 11 biological/biosimilar agents, we conducted an ancillary qualitative review of a subset of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of the monoclonal antibodies against anti-TNF factor adalimumab and infliximab. Among studies of adalimumab and infliximab, the immunoassay method used to detect antibodies was reported in 91 of 111 (82%) and 154 of 206 (75%) adalimumab and infliximab studies, respectively. In most adalimumab and infliximab studies, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or radioimmunoassay was used [85 of 91 (93%) and 134 of 154 (87%), respectively]. ADA incidence varied widely among assays and inflammatory diseases (adalimumab, 0-87%; infliximab, 0-79%). Pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes were only reported for ADA-positive patients in 38 of 91 (42%) and 61 of 154 (40%) adalimumab and infliximab studies, respectively. Regardless of assay format or biological used, ADA formation was associated with lower serum concentrations, reduced efficacy and elevated rates of infusion-related reactions. Consistent with previous recommendations to improve interpretation of immunogenicity data for biologicals, greater consistency in reporting of assay methods and clinical consequences of ADA formation may prove useful. Additional standardization in immunogenicity testing and reporting, application of modern, robust assays that satisfy current regulatory expectations and implementation of international standards for marketed products may help to improve our understanding of the impact of immunogenicity to biologics.

Immunogenicity of Biologics in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review was conducted to explore the immunogenicity of biologic agents across inflammatory diseases and its potential impact on efficacy/safety.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted through November 2016 to identify controlled and observational studies of biologics/biosimilars administered for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA), psoriasis (Ps), Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis.

RESULTS

Of >21,000 screened publications, 443 were included. Anti-drug antibody (ADAb) rates varied widely among biologics across diseases (and are not directly comparable because of immunoassay heterogeneity); the highest overall rates were reported with infliximab (0-83%), adalimumab (0-54%), and infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 (21-52%), and the lowest with secukinumab (0-1%), ustekinumab (1-11%), etanercept (0-13%), and golimumab (0-19%). Most ADAbs were neutralizing, except those to abatacept and etanercept. ADAb+ versus ADAb- patients had lower rates of clinical response to adalimumab (RA, PsA, JIA, AS, Ps), golimumab (RA), infliximab (RA, PsA, AS, Ps), rituximab (RA), ustekinumab (Ps), and CT-P13 (RA, AS). Higher rates of infusion-related reactions were reported in infliximab- and CT-P13-treated ADAb+ patients. Background immunosuppressives/anti-proliferatives reduced biologic immunogenicity across diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on reviewed reports, biologic/biosimilar immunogenicity differs among agents, with the highest rates observed with infliximab and adalimumab. As ADAb formation in biologic-/biosimilar-treated patients may increase the risk of lost response, the immunogenicity of these agents is an important (albeit not the only) consideration in the treatment decision-making process.

The impact of immunogenicity of TNFα inhibitors in autoimmune inflammatory disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies drugs directed against TNFα, TNFα inhibitors, are immunogenic, and consequent anti-drug antibodies (ADA) formation may decrease the functional drug concentration, resulting in a loss of response. We evaluated the impact of ADA on TNFα therapeutic response.

METHODS

We considered studies enrolling adult patients affected by autoimmune inflammatory disease in therapy with TNFα inhibitors. We collected data about study and population characteristics, treatment dosage, determination of ADA and adverse events (AE). We combined data in meta-analysis, calculating risk ratios (RR) for each study. p-Values<0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Methodological quality was evaluated. Analyses were performed with the STATA 11 and RevMan 5.3 softwares.

RESULTS

We included 34 studies enrolling 4273 patients. Of these, 794 (18.6%) developed ADA. Our analysis showed a significant reduction of response (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.3-0.63) in patients with ADA respect to patients without, especially in patients treated with Infliximab (RR 0.37) or Adalimumab (RR 0.40). Furthermore, the administration of TNFα inhibitors produced a reaction at the infusion site in 17%, infection in 30% and serious AE in 5% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Detectable ADA significantly reduced TNFα inhibitors response. Drug administration can also cause injection site reaction and infections. Early detection of serum ADA levels may improve patients' management. Currently, there are many indications about the use of immunogenicity tests to guide the therapy, but information regarding how to implement it in clinical practice is needed.

An update on the use of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis

INTRODUCTION

Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic immune-mediated disease affecting the sacroiliac joints and the spine manifesting with new bone formation and osteopenia. Over the past decade, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (TNFi) have become the cornerstone for therapy in improving functional outcomes, and decreasing disease activity in patients with a marginal benefit from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) therapy. At this time, it remains to be determined whether these agents decrease new bone formation, although some studies have recently suggested that. Areas covered: In this review we discuss the factors that favour a good response to these agents both initially and during maintenance, and some of the more recent studies outlining strategies for dose reduction. Expert commentary: Finally, we discuss the importance of using more objective tools for disease activity, such as magnetic resonance imaging, as a complementary tool for clinical assessments in both predicting responses to treatment but also in selecting patients most suited for targeted therapy.

The immunogenicity of biosimilar infliximab: can we extrapolate the data across indications?

Biopharmaceuticals or 'biologics' have revolutionized the treatment of many diseases. However, some patients generate an immune response to such drugs, potentially limiting clinical efficacy and safety. Infliximab (Remicade(®)) is a monoclonal antibody used to treat several immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. A biosimilar of infliximab, CT-P13 (Remsima(®), Inflectra(®)), has recently been approved in Europe for all indications in which infliximab is approved. Approval of CT-P13 was based in part on extrapolation of clinical trial data from two indications (rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis) to all other indications, including inflammatory bowel disease. This review discusses the validity of extrapolating immunogenicity data across indications - a process adopted by the EMA as part of their biosimilar approval process - with a focus on CT-P13.

Tumor necrosis factor antagonists in the treatment of multicentric reticulohistiocytosis: Current clinical evidence

Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis (MRH) is a rare and debilitating systemic disorder characterized by cutaneous nodules and destructive polyarthritis. Due to its unknown etiology, the treatment of MRH varies with different rates of success, which causes treatment options to be rather independent and empirical. In the present study, a case of a 48‑year‑old woman with a 12‑month history of polyarthralgia and skin nodules was reported. Biopsy samples, which were obtained from her skin eruption exhibited dermal infiltration with histiocytes and multinucleated giant cells. Immunohistochemical staining indicated positivity for CD68. The patient was diagnosed with MRH and treated with a combination therapy of infliximab, prednisolone and methotrexate. Her symptoms improved markedly within 2 weeks. Following the results of this case study, a systematic review of 17 cases of MRH treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists was performed, and the efficacy of anti‑TNF treatment in MRH was analyzed.

A phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group trial comparing safety and efficacy of HD203, with innovator etanercept, in combination with methotrexate, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the HERA study

Objectives

To evaluate equivalence in efficacy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and compare the safety of the biosimilar HD203 with innovator etanercept (ETN) plus methotrexate (MTX) (ClinicalTrials.govNCT01270997).

Methods

Patients with active RA received 25 mg HD203 or ETN subcutaneously twice-weekly with MTX for 48 weeks in a phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group design. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) at week 24 for per-protocol study completer set (PPS). Secondary end points included ACR response criteria, ACRn, European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), patient-reported outcomes, safety and immunogenicity.

Results

Of the 294 randomised patients (HD203, n=147; ETN, n=147), 233 comprised the 24-week PPS (n=115 and 118, respectively). ACR20 at week 24 was achieved by 83.48% and 81.36% of PPS patients, respectively, demonstrating equivalent efficacy within predefined margins of ±20% (treatment difference 2.12%, 95% CI −7.65% to 11.89%). Outcomes for secondary end points were consistent with the primary efficacy findings. Groups were comparable for overall incidences of treatment-emergent (all-causality) adverse events (AEs) (HD203 113 (76.9%) vs ETN 114 (78.1%) (p=0.804)), adverse drug reactions, serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs. Few patients (HD203, n=8; ETN, n=3) tested positive for anti-drug antibodies.

Conclusion

The study met the primary objective of demonstrating equivalent efficacy of HD203 and ETN. HD203 was well tolerated, with safety comparable with ETN in this population of patients with RA.

Trial registration number

NCT01270997; Results.

Immunological evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with itolizumab

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease characterized by joint inflammation that affects approximately 1% of the general population. Itolizumab, a monoclonal antibody specific for the human CD6 molecule mainly expressed on T lymphocytes, has been shown to inhibit proliferation of T cells and proinflammatory cytokine production in psoriasis patients. We have now assessed the immunological effect of itolizumab in combination with methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis by analyzing clinical samples taken from 30 patients enrolled in a clinical trial. T and B cell subpopulations were measured at different time points of the study. Plasma cytokine levels and anti-idiotypic antibody response to itolizumab were also evaluated. The combined treatment of itolizumab and methotrexate led to a reduction in the frequency of T cell subpopulations, and plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines showed a significant decrease up to at least 12 weeks after treatment ended. No anti-idiotypic antibody response was detected. These results support the relevance of the CD6 molecule as a therapeutic target for the treatment of this disease.