Valproic acid enhances pamidronate-sensitized cytotoxicity of Vδ2+ T cells against EBV-related lymphoproliferative cells

CD277 agonist enhances the immunogenicity of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia towards Vδ2+ T cell cytotoxicity

Relapse and refractoriness remain the major obstacles in clinical treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Efficacy of current therapeutic strategies for relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML is generally unsatisfying. Vδ2⁺ T cells have become an attractive candidate for immunotherapy of various types of tumors. However, the results were not exciting in some pilot studies utilizing Vδ2 cell-based protocols to treat R/R AML. Functional receptors on Vδ2 cells and immunogenic ligands on leukemia cells are both critical to the anti-AML effect of Vδ2 cells, which have not been characterized in the context of R/R AML. CD277 can bind to phosphoantigens and promote the activation of Vδ2 cells. Anti-CD277 (clone 20.1) monoclonal antibody (20.1 mAb) has been identified as an agonist of CD277. Whether 20.1 mAb sensitizes R/R AML cells awaits investigation. Herein, we showed that the expressions of activating receptors on Vδ2 cells and CD277 on leukemia cells were deficient in patients with R/R AML. While agonists for NKG2D and TRAIL ligands did not increase the immunogenicity of R/R AML cells, 20.1 mAb significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of Vδ2 cells on the drug-resistant human AML cell line and different types of primary AML cells from R/R patients. The sensitizing effect of 20.1 mAb was dependent on inducing degranulation of Vδ2 cells. These findings suggest a decisive role of CD277 in mediating the recognition of R/R AML cells by Vδ2⁺ T cells. CD277 agonist combining adoptive transfer of Vδ2⁺ T cells may improve the efficacy in the treatment of R/R AML.

Exposure to valproic acid is associated with less pulmonary infiltrates and improvements in diverse clinical outcomes and laboratory parameters in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Valproic acid (VPA) has shown beneficial effects in vitro against SARS-CoV-2 infection, but no study has analyzed its efficacy in the clinical setting.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included 165 adult patients receiving VPA at the time of admission to hospital, and 330 controls matched for sex, age and date of admission. A number of clinical, outcome and laboratory parameters were recorded to evaluate differences between the two groups. Four major clinical endpoints were considered: development of lung infiltrates, in-hospital respiratory worsening, ICU admissions and death.

RESULTS

VPA-treated patients had higher lymphocyte (P<0.0001) and monocyte (P = 0.0002) counts, and lower levels of diverse inflammatory parameters, including a composite biochemical severity score (P = 0.016). VPA patients had shorter duration of symptoms (P<0.0001), were more commonly asymptomatic (P = 0.016), and developed less commonly lung infiltrates (65.8%/88.2%, P<0.0001), respiratory worsening (20.6%/30.6%, P = 0.019) and ICU admissions (6.1%/13.0%, P = 0.018). There was no difference in survival (84.8%/88.8%, P = 0.2), although death was more commonly related to non-COVID-19 causes in the VPA group (36.0%/10.8%, P = 0.017). The cumulative hazard for developing adverse clinical endpoints was higher in controls than in the VPA group for infiltrates (P<0.0001), respiratory worsening (P<0.0001), and ICU admissions (P = 0.001), but not for death (0.6). Multivariate analysis revealed that VPA treatment was independently protective for the development of the first three clinical endpoints (P = 0.0002, P = 0.03, and P = 0.025, respectively), but not for death (P = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

VPA-treated patients seem to develop less serious COVID-19 than control patients, according to diverse clinical endpoints and laboratory markers.