The association between proton pump inhibitors use and clinical outcome of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy

Proton pump inhibitors stabilize the expression of PD-L1 on cell membrane depending on the phosphorylation of GSK3β

BACKGROUND

Preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may indirectly diminish the microbiome diversity, thereby reducing the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Conversely, recent publications have shown that PPIs could potentially enhance the response to ICIs. The precise mechanism through which PPIs modulate the ICIs remains unclear. In this study, we discovered a novel molecular function of PPIs in regulating immune invasion, specifically through inducing PD-L1 translocation in various tumor cells.

METHODS

C57BL/6 mice subcutaneous transplantation model is used to verify the potential efficacy of PPIs and PD-L1 antibody. Western blotting analysis and phosphorylated chip are used to verify the alteration of PD-L1-related pathways after being treated with PPIs. The related gene expression is performed by qRT-PCR and luciferase reporter analysis. We also collected 60 clinical patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer or reflux esophagitis and then detected the expression of PD-L1 in the tissue samples by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

We observed that the IC50 of tumor cells in response to PPIs was significantly higher than that of normal epithelial cells. PPIs significantly increased the expression of PD-L1 on cell membrane at clinically relevant concentrations. Furthermore, pre-treatment with PPIs appeared to synergize the efficiency of anti-PD-L1 antibodies in mouse models. However, PPI administration did not alter the transcription or total protein level of PD-L1 in multiple tumor cells. Using a phosphorylated protein chip, we identified that PPIs enhanced the phosphorylation of GSK3β, then leading to PD-L1 protein translocation to the cell membranes. The capacity of PPIs to upregulate PD-L1 was negated following GSK3β knockout. Furthermore, our clinical data showed that the PPIs use resulted in increased PD-L1 expression in esophageal cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

We mainly address a significant and novel mechanism that the usage of PPIs could directly induce the expression of PD-L1 by inducing GSK3β phosphorylation and facilitate primary tumor progression and metastasis.

The negative effect of concomitant medications on immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: An umbrella review

BACKGROUND

Conflicting results about the effect of concomitant medications on immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were reported by many meta-analyses (MAs), and the certainty of evidence linking concomitant medications with immunotherapy efficacy has not been quantified, which may cause some evidence to be misinterpreted.

METHODS

Four databases including Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2023 in English. Based on prospective or retrospective clinical controlled trials including immunotherapy with concomitant medications or not in NSCLC, quantitative MAs reporting the efficacy of immunotherapy with binary direct comparison and enough extractable data were collected. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and risk of bias of included MAs were evaluated respectively. New meta-analyses were conducted and their evidence certainty was classified as nonsignificant, weak, suggestive, highly suggestive, or convincing.

RESULTS

Fifteen MAs with 5 medications were included. After being assessed by AMSTAR-2, PRISMA, and ROBIS, the major shortcomings were focused on the registration of protocol, literature retrieval or data extraction, implementation of sensitivity analysis or evidence certainty assessment, and incomplete reporting in the section of method and result. New pooled analyses indicated that antibiotics (HR = 1.545[1.318-1.811]), steroids (HR = 1.784[1.520-2.093]), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (HR = 1.303[1.048-1.621]) and opioids (HR = 1.910[1.213-3.006]) could shorten overall survival (OS) in patients with NSCLC receiving immunotherapy. Besides, antibiotics (HR = 1.285[1.129-1.462]) and steroids (HR = 1.613[1.315-1.979]) were harmful to progression-free survival (PFS) in these patients significantly. No negative effect was found in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the objective response rate of all medications. High-level evidence suggested that using PPIs before or after the initiation of immunotherapy and using steroids during the first-course immunotherapy could weaken the OS of patients with NSCLC. Meanwhile, the negative effects of antibiotics and opioids on OS or PFS were only supported by moderate or low-level evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The concurrent usage of PPIs or steroids adversely affects the survival of patients with NSCLC receiving immunotherapy. Future investigations are required to ascertain whether these adverse effects are primarily attributed to the comorbidities or the concurrent medications.

Associated Factors to Efficacy and Tolerance of Immunotherapy in Older Patients with Cancer Aged 70 Years and Over: Impact of Coprescriptions

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) significantly improves the prognosis for an increasing number of cancers. However, data on geriatric populations taking ICB are rare.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify factors associated with the efficacy and tolerance of ICB in an older population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study included consecutive patients aged ≥ 70 years with solid cancer who received ICB between January 2018 and December 2019. Efficacy was assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) and tolerance was defined as cessation of immunotherapy due to the occurrence of any adverse event.

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients (65.7% men) were included, mainly at the metastatic stage (95.2%); 50.5% had lung cancer. Most (80%) patients were treated with anti-PD1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), 19.1% with anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) and 0.9% with anti-CTLA4 ICB (ipilimumab). Median PFS was 3.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) (2.75-5.70)]. PFS was shorter in univariate analysis when ICB was taken concomitantly with an antiplatelet agent (AP) [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.93; 95% CI (1.22-3.04); p = 0.005]. Tolerance was lower in univariate analysis for lung cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 3.03; 95% CI (1.07-8.56), p < 0.05] and in patients taking proton pump inhibitors (PPI) [OR = 5.50; 95% CI (1.96-15.42), p < 0.001]. There was a trend toward poorer tolerance among patients living alone [OR = 2.26; 95% CI (0.76-6.72); p = 0.14].

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients taking ICB for solid cancers, concomitant AP may influence efficacy and concomitant PPI may influence tolerance. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Comedications with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Involvement of the Microbiota, Impact on Efficacy and Practical Implications

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a major breakthrough in solid oncology over the past decade. The immune system and the gut microbiota are involved in their complex mechanisms of action. However, drug interactions have been suspected of disrupting the fine equilibrium necessary for optimal ICI efficacy. Thus, clinicians are facing a great deal of sometimes contradictory information on comedications with ICIs and must at times oppose conflicting objectives between oncological response and comorbidities or complications. We compiled in this review published data on the role of the microbiota in ICI efficacy and the impact of comedications. We found mostly concordant results on detrimental action of concurrent corticosteroids, antibiotics, and proton pump inhibitors. The timeframe seems to be an important variable each time to preserve an initial immune priming at ICIs initiation. Other molecules have been associated with improved or impaired ICIs outcomes in pre-clinical models with discordant conclusions in retrospective clinical studies. We gathered the results of the main studies concerning metformin, aspirin, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, beta blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, opioids, and statins. In conclusion, one should always assess the necessity of concomitant treatment according to evidence-based recommendations and discuss the possibility of postponing ICI initiation or switching strategies to preserve the critical window.

The Impact of Concomitant Proton Pump Inhibitors Therapy on Clinical Outcome of Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with advanced cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy, there are conflict perspectives about the influence of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We are aimed at exploring the influence of concomitant PPIs exposure on clinical outcome among cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment.

METHODS

We searched relevant literatures in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library without language restrictions. We extracted the data from selected studies and calculated the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs through professional software for overall survival and progression-free survival among cancer patients undergoing ICIs therapy exposed to PPIs.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including 6716 advanced cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment were appropriate for analysis judging by pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria. The result indicated that concomitant PPIs exposure was significantly related to shorter overall survival (HR=1.388; 95% CI: 1.278-1.498, P <0.001) and progression-free survival (HR=1.285; 95% CI: 1.193-1.384, P <0.001) among multiple cancer patients receiving ICIs therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that concomitant PPIs exposure had an adverse impact on clinical outcome among patients receiving ICIs therapy. Clinical oncologists must be cautious of PPIs delivery during ICIs treatment.

Effect of Antacid Use on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Solid Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The influence of antacids use on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on ICI efficacy in advanced solid cancer patients. A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed to retrieve studies investigating the effect of antacid use on ICI efficacy. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and immune-related adverse events were measured using hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs). Thirty studies enrolling 16,147 advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment were included. The pooled analysis indicated that PPI use was associated with shorter OS (HR=1.40, 95% CI, 1.25-1.57) and PFS (HR=1.34, 95% CI, 1.19-1.52) in advanced cancer patients treated with ICIs. PPI use did not show effect on ORR or immune-related adverse event of advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment. OS, PFS, and ORR did not differ between H2RA users and non-H2RA users. In subgroup analyses, PPI use was associated with shorter OS and PFS in NSCLC and urothelial carcinoma patients and in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 monotherapy. In addition, ICI efficacy was different in the antacid exposure time frame subgroups. In conclusion, PPI use has a negative effect on OS and PFS among advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment. PPIs should be cautiously administered among advanced cancer patients treated with ICI. The safety of H2RAs and the influence of H2RAs on ICI efficacy need further investigation.

Do proton pump inhibitors alter the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients? A meta-analysis

Introduction

Gut microbiota can significantly affect the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients. Recently, antibiotics were shown to decrease survival rate of patients treated by ICIs. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can indeed modulate microbiota's diversity, therefore altering ICIs response. A meta-analysis was performed based on published data to verify this hypothesis.

Methods

In this study, over 41 publications, exploring the impact of concomitant PPI treatment on outcomes of ICI-treated patients, were analyzed. Evaluated endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported in ICIs in PPI users versus non-PPI users. Subgroup analyses were performed to minimize the impact of study heterogeneity and to investigate the influence of PPI on the different groups of interest. There was no evidence of publication bias for OS and PFS analysis in subgroup analysis.

Results

Forty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis, including a total of 20,042 patients. OS of patients receiving ICIs was negatively correlated in patients concomitantly treated with PPI (HR=1.37; 95%CI, 1.23-1.52). PFS of cancer patients receiving ICIs was also negatively correlated with PPI treatment (HR=1.28; 95%CI, 1.15-1.42). PPI and ICI use was associated with worst OS and PFS not only for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or urothelial cancer patients but also for patients treated with anti PD-1 (OS) and anti PD-L1 (OS and PFS) immunotherapies when administered in non-first line and when PPI was received as baseline treatment or in 60 days before ICI initiation. PPI and ICI use also showed the worst OS and PFS for patients from Europe and Asia.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests that PPI treatment leads to significantly worse outcomes in advanced cancer patients treated by ICIs in terms of PFS and OS.

Targeting lactate metabolism for cancer immunotherapy - a matter of precision

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive T cell therapies have been valuable additions to the toolbox in the fight against cancer. These treatments have profoundly increased the number of patients with a realistic perspective toward a return to a cancer-free life. Yet, in a number of patients and tumor entities, cancer immunotherapies have been ineffective so far. In solid tumors, immune exclusion and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment represent substantial roadblocks to successful therapeutic outcomes. A major contributing factor to the depressed anti-tumor activity of immune cells in tumors is the harsh metabolic environment. Hypoxia, nutrient competition with tumor and stromal cells, and accumulating noxious waste products, including lactic acid, pose massive constraints to anti-tumor immune cells. Numerous strategies are being developed to exploit the metabolic vulnerabilities of tumor cells in the hope that these would also alleviate metabolism-inflicted immune suppression. While promising in principle, especially in combination with immunotherapies, these strategies need to be scrutinized for their effect on tumor-fighting immune cells, which share some of their key metabolic properties with tumor cells. Here, we provide an overview of strategies that seek to tackle lactate metabolism in tumor or immune cells to unleash anti-tumor immune responses, thereby opening therapeutic options for patients whose tumors are currently not treatable.

The Association between Baseline Proton Pump Inhibitors, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, and Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis

(1) Although emerging evidence suggests that proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-induced dysbiosis negatively alters treatment response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients, no study systematically investigates the association between PPIs, ICIs, and chemotherapy; (2) Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and PubMed were searched from inception to 20 May 2022, to identify relevant studies involving patients receiving ICIs or chemotherapy and reporting survival outcome between PPI users and non-users. Survival outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. p-scores, with a value between 0 and 1, were calculated to quantify the treatment ranking, with a higher score suggesting a higher probability of greater effectiveness. We also conducted pairwise meta-analyses of observational studies to complement our network meta-analysis; (3) We identified 62 studies involving 26,484 patients (PPI = 8834; non-PPI = 17,650), including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the neck and head. Eight post-hoc analyses from 18 randomized-controlled trials were included in our network, which demonstrated that, in advanced NSCLC and UC, patients under ICI treatment with concomitant PPI (p-score: 0.2016) are associated with both poorer OS (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.37 to 1.67) and poorer PFS (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.61) than those without PPIs (p-score: 1.000). Patients under ICI treatment with concomitant PPI also had poorer OS (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.31) and poorer PFS (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.48) in comparison with those receiving chemotherapy (p-score: 0.6664), implying that PPIs may compromise ICI's effectiveness, making it less effective than chemotherapy. Our pairwise meta-analyses also supported this association. Conversely, PPI has little effect on patients with advanced melanoma, RCC, HCC, and SCC of the neck and head who were treated with ICIs; (4) "PPI-induced dysbiosis" serves as a significant modifier of treatment response in both advanced NSCLC and UC that are treated with ICIs, compromising the effectiveness of ICIs to be less than that of chemotherapy. Thus, clinicians should avoid unnecessary PPI prescription in these patients. "PPI-induced dysbiosis", on the other hand, does not alter the treatment response to ICIs in advanced melanoma, RCC, HCC, and SCC of the head and neck.

Effect of proton pump inhibitors on the clinical outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in solid cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Some concomitant drugs may affect the efficacy of programmed death protein-1/ ligand-1 (PD-1/L1) inhibitors. Among the various concomitant drugs, proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) have attracted some attention but have not reached a conclusion. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of PPIs on the survival of cancer patients treated with PD-1/L1 inhibitors.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Related databases and conferences reports were searched. Studies that reported the relationship between PPI use and clinical outcomes of PD-1/L1 inhibitors were included. Meta-analysis was conducted to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR)s with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Eight studies involving 4869 cancer patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that PPI use was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.32-1.56), worse progression free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.20-1.40), and decreased objective response (odds ratio = 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.87) in cancer patients receiving PD-1/L1 inhibitors. Neither cancer type nor therapy type affected the effect of concomitant PPIs on the OS and PFS. In the subgroup of studies with a population size <500, PPIs did not reduce the OS, but the PFS. Only 1 single-center study was conducted, showing that PPI use did not affect the OS and PFS. There was no evidence of publication bias among included studies.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant PPI use was correlated with worse clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated by PD-1/L1 inhibitors. Further prospective clinical and experimental studies are needed to confirm the effect and mechanism of PPI in worsening the clinical outcome of PD-1/L1 inhibitors.

Association of proton pump inhibitor use with survival outcomes in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been shown to regulate the gut microbiome and affect the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Contradictory results on survival have been observed in patients concomitantly treated with ICIs and PPIs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between PPI use and survival outcomes in ICI-treated cancer patients.

Methods:

EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, and major oncology conference proceedings were searched. Studies comparing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between PPI-treated and PPI-free groups of ICI-treated cancer patients were included. Data regarding study and patient characteristics, ICI and PPI treatments, and survival outcomes were extracted. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using random effects models. Subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed to explore possible factors of heterogeneity among the studies.

Results:

A total of 33 studies were included, comprising 7383 ICI- and PPI-treated patients and 8574 ICI-treated and PPI-free patients. The pooled HR was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.19–1.44; p < 0.001) for OS and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.17–1.46; p < 0.001) for PFS, indicating a significant negative association between PPI use and survival in ICI-treated patients. Subgroup meta-analyses by factors including cancer type, ICI type, and time window of PPI use revealed that ICI and PPI use impacted survival in patients with non-small cell lung or urothelial cancer, patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, and patients receiving PPI as baseline treatment or 60 days before ICI treatment initiation.

Conclusions:

PPI use in patients treated with ICIs was associated with shorter OS and PFS, especially in several specific subgroups of cancer patients. PPIs should be strictly controlled and appear to not impact survival if given temporarily after ICI initiation. These observations could provide the basis for clinical guidelines for concomitant PPI and ICI use.

The association between proton pump inhibitor use and systemic anti-tumour therapy on survival outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed to prevent or treat gastrointestinal disease. Whether the combination of systemic anti-tumour therapy and PPIs leads to poor outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. This systematic review explored the relationship between PPIs and survival outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC who are receiving systemic anti-tumour therapy.

METHODS

We searched studies reporting the overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced NSCLC patients who are receiving systemic anti-tumour therapy with or without PPIs on PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for literature published prior to 31 August 2021. The meta-analysis used a random effects model to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 to assess statistical heterogeneity. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Fourteen retrospective studies comprising 13 709 advanced NSCLC patients were identified. Subgroup analyses showed that the use of PPI was correlated with the OS or PFS of patients receiving chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy (PPI users' group vs non-users' group: HR for OS = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.21-1.51, P < .00001; HR for PFS = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.25-1.80, P < .0001). Publication bias and sensitivity analyses confirmed that the results were robust.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis demonstrated that PPI use in advanced NSCLC patients who were undergoing systemic anti-tumour therapy was correlated with increased mortality risk. Until results are further confirmed, caution should be applied when administering PPIs and systemic anti-tumour therapy to advanced NSCLC patients.

Influence of concomitant gastric acid suppressants use on the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with programmed death-1/ligand-1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Influence of concomitant use of gastric acid suppressants (GAS) on survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors has rarely been comprehensively evaluated. A meta-analysis was performed to systematically evaluate the effect of concomitant GAS in NSCLC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1inhibitors.

METHODS

Relevant observational studies were identified by search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to May 26, 2022. A random-effect model which incorporates the possible between-study heterogeneity was used to combine the results.

RESULTS

Ten retrospective and one prospective cohort studies including 5892 patients were patients were included. Influence of concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) was evaluated in ten studies, and influence of GAS, including PPIs or histamine type-2 receptor antagonists were evaluated in one study. Pooled results showed that concomitant use of GAS was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20 to 1.45, P < 0.001; I² = 0%) and overall survival (OS, adjusted HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.48, P < 0.001; I² = 0%) in NSCLC patients taking PD-1/PD-L1inhibitors. Subgroup analyses indicated that the association between concomitant use of GAS and poor survival in NSCLC patients taking PD-L1inhibitors was consistent in univariate and multivariate studies (P values for subgroup difference both > 0.05 for PFS and OS).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis by summarizing the up-to-date literatures showed that use of GAS, primarily PPIs, may be associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving PD-1/PD-L1inhibitors.

Impact of proton-pump inhibitors on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a rapidly evolving treatment modality for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use can potentially reduce the clinical efficacy of ICIs; however, the consensus in recent literature has been conflicting. This study aims to analyze overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes in patients with NSCLC on ICI and concomitant PPI therapy.

Methods

A literature search was done in 3 databases (Pubmed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central). All studies meeting the inclusion criteria assessing the impact of PPIs on the efficacy of ICI in NSCLC patients were systematically identified. A random-effects network meta-analysis evaluated OS and PFS in the two arms.

Results

Four studies with 2,940 patients are included in our analysis. ICI usage alone was associated with significantly better OS [HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.27–1.67, P < 0.00001] and PFS [HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.17–1.47, P < 0.00001] when compared to concomitant PPI and ICI therapy.

Conclusion

The concomitant use of PPIs during ICI therapy significantly worsens clinical outcomes with shorter OS and increased risk of disease progression in patients with NSCLC.

•

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a rapidly evolving treatment regime used for various cancer therapies. The role of other medications in their effectiveness remains conflicted. Proton Pump Inhibitors are one of the most commonly prescribed medications and are particularly often prescribed to cancer patients.

•

Our study finds that Proton Pump Inhibitors worsen the outcomes of overall survival and increase risk of disease progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

•

We hope that this study will enlighten providers to use proton pump inhibitors more judiciously in patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Effect of Concomitant Use of Analgesics on Prognosis in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) pose new challenges beyond traditional pharmacodynamics in the context of optimizing the treatment options with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). To alleviate cancer-related pain, analgesics are of absolute vital importance as chronic medications used by cancer patients. However, the possible outcome of ICI treatment concomitant with analgesics remains unclear.

Methods

Original articles describing the possible influence of analgesics use on ICI treatment published before December 1, 2021 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for objective response rate (ORR), hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI for progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the random-effects or fixed-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the χ²-based Q-test. Publication bias was examined by funnel plot analysis.

Results

A total of 11 studies involving 4,404 patients were included. The pooled OR showed that opioid use decreased the response of opioid users to ICIs compared to non-opioid users (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.37–0.65, p < 0.001). Compared to patients who did not receive opioids, opioid users had an increased risk of progression and mortality (HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.37–1.89, p < 0.001; HR = 1.67, 95% CI =1.30–2.14, p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was not significantly associated with differences in ORR, PFS, and OS in patients treated with ICIs (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.84–2.32, p = 0.190; HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.77–1.06, p = 0.186; HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.71–1.14, p = 0.384, respectively).

Conclusion

The concomitant use of opioids during ICI treatment has an adverse effect on patient prognosis, while the use of NSAIDs is not significantly associated with the prognosis in patients treated with ICIs.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Efficacy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

Simple Summary

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to improve survival in patients with advanced melanoma; however, a proportion of patients do not experience durable clinical benefit with these agents. Findings from a previous study suggested that the use of proton pump inhibitors while receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors may lead to worse clinical outcomes. To validate those results, we performed this retrospective analysis using data from three clinical trials involving patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We found that there is not enough evidence to conclude that proton pump inhibitors influence the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Prospective studies are needed to conclusively determine if the use of proton pump inhibitors has any meaningful impact on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma.

Abstract

The impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on clinical outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic melanoma was previously analyzed in the phase II study, CheckMate 069. This retrospective analysis utilized data from three phase II/III studies of first-line ICI therapy in untreated advanced melanoma: CheckMate 066, 067, and 069. All randomized patients with PPI use ≤ 30 days before initiating study treatment were included in the PPI-use subgroup. Possible associations between baseline PPI use and efficacy were evaluated within each treatment arm of each study using multivariable modeling. Approximately 20% of 1505 randomized patients across the studies reported baseline PPI use. The median follow-up was 52.6–58.5 months. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival analyses provided insufficient evidence of a meaningful association between PPI use and efficacy outcomes with nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab, nivolumab, or ipilimumab therapy. In five of the six ICI treatment arms, 95% confidence intervals for odds ratios or hazard ratios traversed 1. Significant associations were observed in the CheckMate 069 combination arm between PPI use and poorer ORR and PFS. This multivariable analysis found insufficient evidence to support meaningful associations between PPI use and ICI efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma.

An Up-To-Date Investigation Into the Correlation Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Clinical Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Solid Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the current anticancer therapies, a considerable proportion of patients are found to hardly benefit from these drugs. Accumulating studies have demonstrated that concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use may affect the clinical efficacy of ICIs; however, their results are inconsistent. In this study, based on updated evidence, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to clarify the prognostic significance of PPI use in advanced solid cancer patients receiving ICI therapy.

Methods

Eligible literature was searched using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and other network resources before July 2021. Clinical outcome was evaluated using overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The correlation of PPI use with OS or PFS was determined based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 17 studies enrolling 9,978 ICI-treated cancer patients were included in our meta-analysis. The global analysis demonstrated that PPI use was significantly correlated with worse OS [HR = 1.29 (1.10-1.50)] instead of PFS [HR = 1.19 (0.98-1.44)] in solid cancer patients receiving ICI therapy. In a subgroup analysis, the negative correlation of PPI use with ICI efficacy was significant in patients with non-small cell lung cancer [PFS, HR = 1.27 (1.10-1.47)] and urothelial carcinoma [OS, HR = 1.55 (1.31-1.84), PFS, HR = 1.52 (1.13-2.06)] and mixed cohorts containing multiple cancer types [OS, HR = 1.40 (1.16-1.69)], while an opposite result was observed in the PFS of patients with melanoma [HR = 0.48 (0.25-0.90)]. Moreover, the unfavorable prognostic impact of PPI use was also significant in patients over 65 years old [OS, HR = 1.28 (1.05-1.55), PFS, HR = 1.32 (1.12-1.56)] or those receiving anti-PD-1 [OS, HR = 1.37 (1.04-1.79)] or anti-PD-L1 therapies (OS, HR = 1.49 (1.30-1.69), PFS, HR = 1.34 (1.20-1.50). Finally, PPI use was significantly correlated with a worse prognosis in patients receiving PPIs 30 days before and/or after ICI initiation (OS, HR = 1.38 (1.18-1.62), PFS, HR = 1.23 (1.06-1.43)).

Conclusion

Although our global analysis revealed PPI use was not correlated with the PFS of ICI-treated patients, considering the results of our subgroup analysis, PPIs should be still cautiously used shortly before or during ICI therapy. Furthermore, more clinical validations and related mechanism investigations are of great necessity to clarify the clinical correlation of PPI use with ICI efficacy.

Systematic Review Registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], PROSPERO [No. CRD42021243707].

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cancer: Current State of Play

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most widely used drugs worldwide and are overprescribed in patients with cancer; there is increasing evidence of their effects on cancer development and survival. The objective of this narrative review is to comprehensively identify cancer medications that have clinically meaningful drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with PPIs, including loss of efficacy or adverse effects, and to explore the association between PPIs and cancer.

Methods: A PubMed search of English language studies published from 1 January 2016, to 1 June 2021 was conducted. The search terms included “proton pump inhibitors,” “cancer,” “chemotherapy,” “immunotherapy,” “hormonotherapies,” “targeted therapies,” “tyrosine kinase inhibitors,” and “gut microbiome”. Recent and relevant clinical trials, meta-analyses, and reviews were included.

Results: PPIs may have pro-tumor activity by increasing plasma gastrin levels or anti-tumor activity by inhibiting V-ATPases. However, their impact on cancer survival remains unclear. PPIs may decrease the efficacy of some antineoplastic agents through direct DDIs (e.g., some tyrosine kinase inhibitors, capecitabine, irinotecan, methotrexate). More complex DDIs seem to exist for immunotherapies with indirect interactions through the microbiome. PPIs worsen hypomagnesemia, bone loss, iron, and vitamin B12 deficiencies but may have a protective effect on the renal system.

Discussion/Conclusions: PPIs may interact with the cancer microbiome and the efficacy of various antineoplastic agents, although only a few DDIs involving PPIs are clinically significant. Further pharmaco-epidemiological studies are warranted, but physicians should be aware of the potential consequences of PPI use, which should be dose appropriate and prescribed according to guidelines.

Recent advances in primary resistance mechanisms against immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The resistance of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become an obstacle to further improve the survival of patients with advanced cancer. This review provides an overview of recent advances in primary resistance mechanisms of ICIs.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the improvement of study approach, new characteristics and trends have emerged in the classification of tumor immune subtypes. The effects of germline genetic on tumor microenvironment and the efficacy of immunotherapy have been further studied. Exosomal programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an increasing focus of research in primary resistance mechanisms of ICIs. In addition to antibiotics and steroids, the influence of other concomitant medications on the efficacy of ICIs has recently gained more attention.

SUMMARY

Exploring the resistance mechanisms of ICIs is one of the great challenges in the field of tumor immunotherapy. Continued work to understand the resistance mechanism of ICIs is ongoing.

Survival outcomes of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer concomitantly receiving proton pump inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Recent evidence suggests that gut microbiota dysbiosis adversely affects the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Our objective was to investigate the association between concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and ICIs, and poor prognosis in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a cohort study using a completely enumerated lung cancer cohort from a nationwide healthcare database in South Korea. We identified 2963 patients treated with ICIs as second-line or later therapy for stage ≥IIIB NSCLC. PPI use was ascertained within 30-days before and on the date of ICI initiation, and nonuse was defined as no prescription of PPIs during this period. Using national vital statistics in South Korea, we assessed the risk of all-cause mortality associated with concomitant PPI use through a propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazard model. Among 1646 patients included after 1:1 propensity score-matching, concomitant PPI use was associated with a 28% increased risk of all-cause mortality, compared to nonuse (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.28; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.13-1.46). We observed an increased risk when we restricted the analysis to new users of PPI (adjusted HR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.25-2.17). Subgroup analysis showed that PPI use was associated with high mortality risk among patients with viral hepatitis (adjusted HR = 2.72; 95% CI = 1.54-4.78; P_interaction  = .048). Our study indicates that PPI use is associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Further prospective studies are required to determine the risk-benefit balance of concomitant use of PPIs and ICIs.

Efficacy of first-line atezolizumab combination therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving proton pump inhibitors: post hoc analysis of IMpower150

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used concomitant to cancer treatment and they induce gut microbiota changes. It is increasingly apparent that gut dysbiosis can reduce the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, little is known about PPI effects on outcomes with ICIs, particularly in combination, ICI approaches.

METHODS

Post hoc, Cox proportional hazard analysis of phase III trial, IMpower150 was conducted to assess the association between PPI use and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in chemotherapy-naive, metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer participants randomised atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ACP), bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (BCP), or atezolizumab plus BCP (ABCP). PPI use was defined as any PPI administration between 30 days prior and 30 days after treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Of 1202 participants, 441 (37%) received a PPI. PPI use was independently associated with worse OS (n = 748; hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.53 [1.21-1.95], P < 0.001) and PFS (1.34 [1.12-1.61], P = 0.002) in the pooled atezolizumab arms (ACP plus ABCP). This association was not apparent for BCP (n = 368; OS 1.01 [0.73-1.39], P = 0.969; PFS 0.97 [0.76-1.25], P = 0.827). The observed OS treatment effect (HR 95% CI) of the atezolizumab (ACP plus ABCP) arms vs BCP was 1.03 (0.77-1.36) for PPI users compared to 0.68 (0.54-0.86) for non-users (P [interaction] = 0.028). A similar association was noted for ABCP vs BCP (PPI users 0.96 [0.68-1.35]; PPI non-users 0.66 [0.50-0.87]; P [interaction] = 0.095).

CONCLUSIONS

PPI use was a negative prognostic marker in patients treated with ACP or ABCP, but not BCP. The analysis suggests that PPIs negatively influence the magnitude of ICI efficacy.

The effect of concomitant use of statins, NSAIDs, low-dose aspirin, metformin and beta-blockers on outcomes in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Immunotherapy shows promising therapeutic efficacy against various types of cancer, but most fail to respond. Preclinical studies have suggested that concomitant medications, such as statins, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aspirin, metformin and beta-blockers, might affect clinical outcomes if used with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but their clinical roles are conflicting. This meta-analysis investigates the effect of these concomitant medications on outcomes in patients treated with ICIs. A search was conducted for all reports published until 31 March 2021 in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and conference proceedings. Studies were included if they investigated the association between the concomitant use of these medications and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) during ICI treatment. A total of 3331 patients from 13 eligible studies were included. Among them, five articles on statins, six studies evaluating NSAIDs, five studies employing low-dose aspirin, eight studies on metformin and four articles on beta-blockers were included. The concomitant use of statins during ICI treatment was correlated with improved OS and PFS. Low-dose aspirin was associated with better PFS instead of OS. No significant association was demonstrated between the concurrent use of NSAIDs, beta-blockers and metformin and OS or PFS. The concomitant use of statins and low-dose aspirin during ICI treatment showed a positive impact on treatment outcomes. The concurrent use of NSAIDs, beta-blockers and metformin is not significantly associated with clinical benefits. The effect of these medications in different cancer patients treated with ICI is needed to be further validated.

Controversial link between proton pump inhibitors and anticancer agents: review of the literature

Drug-drug interactions represent a topic of great interest, not only due to the risk of unexpected adverse events but also due to the possibility of altering the effectiveness of a specific treatment. Inappropriate or concomitant use of drugs can often lead to changes in the bioavailability of various compounds, resulting in pharmacokinetic alterations. A recent example is the concomitant administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and anticancer agents. PPIs are overused beyond their classic indications, resulting in a high risk of interactions with other drugs, such as anticancer agents, both PO and intravenous. However, the real clinical impact of concomitant acid suppression therapy and anticancer therapies remains controversial and is not yet fully understood. Certainly, the gut microbiota plays a key role in regulating the response of the immune system, and PPIs can significantly alter the gut microbiome, resulting in gut dysbiosis. Indeed, while the link sometimes appears to lead to negative outcomes, as in the case of immunotherapy, oral capecitabine, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in other cases, it seems to enhance the effectiveness of intravenous chemotherapy. In this review, I analyse the possible drug interactions between PPIs and the main classes of anticancer drugs.