Current research on the relevance of electrocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Tighter is better: Can a simple and cost-free parameter predict response to cardiac synchronization therapy?

BACKGROUND

Several studies have evaluated the role of QRS duration (QRSd) or QRS narrowing as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) to reduce nonresponders.

AIM

Our study aimed to determine the correlation between the relative change in QRS index (QI) compared to clinical outcome and prognosis in patients who underwent CRT implantation.

METHODS

A three-centers study involving 398 patients with a CRT device was conducted. Clinical, echocardiographic and pharmacological variables, QRSd before and after CRT implantation and QI were measured.

RESULTS

In a 6-month follow-up, a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic volumes (LVEDV and LVESV) were observed. QI was related to reverse remodeling (multiple r-squared: 0.48, adjusted r-squared: 0.43, p = .001), and the cut-off value that best predicted LV reverse remodeling after 6 months of CRT was 12.25% (AUC 0.7, p = .001). At 24 months, a statistically significant difference was found between patients with a QI ≤ 12.25% and those with a QI > 12.25% regarding NYHA class worsening (p = .04). The mean of the QI of patients who died from cardiovascular causes was lower than patients who died of other causes (p = .0179). A correlation between pre-CRT QRSd/LVEDV and QI was observed (r = + 0.20; p = .0003). A higher QRSd/LVEDV ratio was associated with an improved LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV (p < .0001) at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

QI narrowing after CRT was related to greater echocardiographic reverse remodeling and a lower rate of adverse events (death or cardiovascular hospitalizations). The QI can improve the prediction of adverse events in a population with CRT regardless of comorbidities according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index. QI could be used to predict CRT response.

Non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Insights from multimodality imaging and electrocardiography. A brief review

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a successful strategy for heart failure (HF) patients. The pre-requisite for the response is the evidence of electrical dyssynchrony on the surface electrocardiogram usually as left bundle branch block (LBBB). Non-response to CRT is a significant problem in clinical practice. Patient selection, inadequate delivery and sub-optimal left ventricle lead position may be important causes.

OBJECTIVES

In an effort to improve CRT response multimodality imaging (especially echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance) could play a decisive role and extensive literature has been published on the matter. However, we are so far from routinary use in clinical practice. Electrocardiography (with respect to left ventricle capture and QRS narrowing) may represent a simple and low cost approach for early prediction of potential non-responder, with immediate practical implications.

CONCLUSION

This brief review covers the current recommendations for CRT in HF patients with particular attention to the potential benefits of multimodality imaging and electrocardiography in improving response rate.