Un-LINQed: Spontaneous extrusion of newer generation implantable loop recorders

Novel Technique for Cardiac Monitor Implantation in Pediatrics

Implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) allow for symptom-rhythm correlation. Current manufacturer recommendations call for implantation of ICMs diagonally in the left anterior chest. Complications such as skin tenting and device erosion have occurred using this technique in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of implanting ICMs via new vertical-parasternal technique (VP) compared to manufacturer-recommended diagonal technique (D) in pediatric patients. Single-center, IRB-approved retrospective study of pediatric patients that underwent ICM implantation from 01/01/2017 to 12/01/2021. All implants were performed after informed consent, under sterile conditions in the electrophysiology laboratory. Data collected included demographics, implant orientation (VP or D), complications, device type, presence of P-wave, and measurement of R-wave amplitude at implantation and follow-up. ICMs were implanted in 34 patients without congenital heart disease. Initial R-wave amplitude average for VP 1.00, D 0.99 (p = NS). Follow-up R-wave amplitude was 0.97 VP and 0.93 for D (p = NS). Median follow-up period for VP was 11 and for D was 20 months (p = NS). D cohort had only post-procedural complication due to skin tenting of the ICM in child < 2.5 years of age. No skin tenting, erosions, or complications occurred in the vertical-parasternal implant technique. Vertical-Parasternal ICM implantation is as safe and effective as the manufacturer-recommended diagonal implant. Short- and long-term data demonstrate an equivalent R-wave detection and no significant signal deterioration, even in very young children. No skin tenting, erosions, or complications occurred in the vertical parasternal implant technique.

Insertable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector: Impact of obesity on sensing quality and safety

Background

Fat layers in obese patients can impair R-wave detection and diagnostic performance of a subcutaneous insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). We compared safety and ICM sensing quality between obese patients [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m²] and normal-weight controls (BMI <30 kg/m²) in terms of R-wave amplitude and time in noise mode (noise burden) detected by a long-sensing-vector ICM.

Materials and methods

Patients from two multicentre, non-randomized clinical registries are included in the present analysis on January 31, 2022 (data freeze), if the follow-up period was at least 90 days after ICM insertion, including daily remote monitoring. The R-wave amplitudes and daily noise burden averaged intraindividually for days 61-90 and days 1-90, respectively, were compared between obese patients (n = 104) and unmatched (n = 268) and a nearest-neighbour propensity score (PS) matched (n = 69) normal-weight controls.

Results

The average R-wave amplitude was significantly lower in obese (median 0.46 mV) than in normal-weight unmatched (0.70 mV, P < 0.0001) or PS-matched (0.60 mV, P = 0.003) patients. The median noise burden was 1.0% in obese patients, which was not significantly higher than in unmatched (0.7%; P = 0.056) or PS-matched (0.8%; P = 0.133) controls. The rate of adverse device effects during the first 90 days did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion

Although increased BMI was associated with reduced signal amplitude, also in obese patients the median R-wave amplitude was >0.3 mV, a value which is generally accepted as the minimum level for adequate R-wave detection. The noise burden and adverse event rates did not differ significantly between obese and normal-weight patients.Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04075084 and NCT04198220.

Augmented Transcutaneous Stimulation Using an Injectable Electrode: A Computational Study

Minimally invasive neuromodulation technologies seek to marry the neural selectivity of implantable devices with the low-cost and non-invasive nature of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES). The Injectrode® is a needle-delivered electrode that is injected onto neural structures under image guidance. Power is then transcutaneously delivered to the Injectrode using surface electrodes. The Injectrode serves as a low-impedance conduit to guide current to the deep on-target nerve, reducing activation thresholds by an order of magnitude compared to using only surface stimulation electrodes. To minimize off-target recruitment of cutaneous fibers, the energy transfer efficiency from the surface electrodes to the Injectrode must be optimized. TES energy is transferred to the Injectrode through both capacitive and resistive mechanisms. Electrostatic finite element models generally used in TES research consider only the resistive means of energy transfer by defining tissue conductivities. Here, we present an electroquasistatic model, taking into consideration both the conductivity and permittivity of tissue, to understand transcutaneous power delivery to the Injectrode. The model was validated with measurements taken from (n = 4) swine cadavers. We used the validated model to investigate system and anatomic parameters that influence the coupling efficiency of the Injectrode energy delivery system. Our work suggests the relevance of electroquasistatic models to account for capacitive charge transfer mechanisms when studying TES, particularly when high-frequency voltage components are present, such as those used for voltage-controlled pulses and sinusoidal nerve blocks.

Outcomes of Implantable Loop Monitoring in Patients <21 Years of Age

Rhythm-symptom correlation in pediatric patients with syncope/palpitations or at risk cohorts can be difficult, but important given potential associations with treatable or malignant arrhythmia. We sought to evaluate the use, efficacy and outcomes of implantable loop recorders (ILR) in pediatrics. We conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients (<21 years) with implanted ILR. Patient/historical characteristics and ILR indication were obtained. Outcomes including symptom documentation, arrhythmia detection and ILR based changes in medical care were identified. Comparison of outcomes were performed based on implant indication. Additional sub-analyses were performed in syncope-indication patients comparing those with and without changes in clinical management. A total of 116 patients with ILR implant were identified (79 syncope/37 other). Symptoms were documented 58% of patients (syncope 68% vs nonsyncope 35%; p = 0.002). A total of 37% of patients had a documented clinically significant arrhythmia and 25% of patients had a resultant change in clinical management independent of implant indication. Arrhythmia type was dependent on implant indication with nonsyncope patients having more ventricular arrhythmias. Pacemaker/defibrillator implantation and mediation management were the majority of the clinical changes. In conclusion, IRL utilization in selected pediatric populations is associated with high efficacy and supports clinical management. ILR efficacy is similar regardless of indication although patients with nonsyncope indications had a higher frequency of ventricular arrhythmias as opposed to asystole and heart block in syncope indications. The majority of arrhythmic findings occurred in the first 12 months, and new technology that would allow for less invasive monitoring for 6 to 12 months may be of value.