Recurrent single echo beats after cryoablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: The pediatric population

Empiric Slow Pathway Cryoablation in Symptomatic Children Without Documented Supraventricular Tachycardia

In symptomatic children without documented supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and non-inducible atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) the benefit of empiric slow pathway (SP) ablation is unknown. We evaluated 62 symptomatic patients without documented SVT that underwent electrophysiology study (EPS). The purpose of this study was to determine if symptoms improved after empiric SP ablation in children without documented SVT and without inducible AVNRT. Sixty-two symptomatic patients without previously documented SVT underwent EPS; 31 (50%) had inducible AVNRT and underwent SP ablation, 20 (32%) were non-inducible and underwent empiric SP ablation, 11 (18%) were non-inducible and had no ablation. After a mean follow-up of 23 ± 18 months there was no significant difference in freedom from symptoms within the non-inducible cohort regardless of whether empiric SP ablation was performed (p = 0.135). There was a significant improvement in symptoms at follow-up after SP ablation when comparing inducible and non-inducible patients (p = 0.020). During follow-up no patients had documented SVT. Symptomatic children without documented SVT do not benefit from empiric SP ablation when AVNRT cannot be induced.

Identifying an appropriate endpoint for cryoablation in children with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Is residual slow pathway conduction associated with recurrence?

BACKGROUND

Cryoablation is increasingly used to treat atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) due to its safety profile. However, cryoablation may have higher recurrence than radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and the optimal procedural endpoint remains undefined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify the association of cryoablation procedural endpoints with postprocedural AVNRT recurrence.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of pediatric patients following successful first-time cryoablation for AVNRT between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Preablation inducibility of AVNRT was recorded. Procedural endpoints, including slow pathway (SP) conduction (presence of jump or echo beats) with and without isoproterenol, were identified. Recurrence was established from clinical notes and/or direct patient contact.

RESULTS

Of 256 patients, 147 (57%) were assessed on isoproterenol precryoablation, and 171 (47%) were assessed on isoproterenol postcryoablation. Mean cryolesion time was 2586 ± 1434 seconds. Following ablation, 104 (41%) had some evidence of residual SP conduction. With median follow-up time of 1.9 [0.7-3.7] years, recurrence occurred in 14 patients (5%). Complete elimination of SP conduction (with and without isoproterenol) had a hazard ratio for recurrence of 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-3.8; P = .68) on univariate analysis and 1.39 (95% CI 0.36-5.4; P = .63) on multivariate analysis (including demographics, ablation time, 8-mm cryocatheter, and baseline inducibility).

CONCLUSION

The observed AVNRT recurrence rate after cryoablation was comparable to that of RFA. The presence of residual SP conduction was not associated with recurrence. This suggests that jump or single echo beat may be an acceptable endpoint in AVNRT cryoablation.