Context-sensitive gender inference of named entities in text

Using Dynamic Pruned N-Gram Model for Identifying the Gender of the User

Organizations analyze customers’ personal data to understand and model their behavior. Identifying customers’ gender is a significant factor in analyzing markets that help plan the promotional campaigns, determine target customers and provide relevant offers. Several techniques were developed to analyze different types of data, including text, image, speech, and biometrics, to identify the gender of the user. The method of synthesis of the profile name differs from one customer to another. Using numerical substitutions of specific letters, known as Leet language, impedes the gender identification task. Moreover, using acronyms, misspellings, and adjacent names impose additional challenges. Towards this goal, this work uses the customers’ profile names associated with submitted reviews to recognize the customers’ gender. First, we create datasets of profile names extracted from the customers’ reviews. Secondly, we introduce a dynamic pruned n-gram model for identifying the gender of the user. It starts with data segmentation to handle adjacent parts, followed by data conversion and cleaning to fix the use of Leet language. Feature selection through a dynamic pruned n-gram model is the next step with the recurrent misspelling correction using fuzzy matching. We evaluate the proposed approach on the real data collected from active web resources. The obtained results demonstrate its validity and reliability.

Further Divided Gender Gaps in Research Productivity and Collaboration during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Coronavirus-related Literature

Based on publication data on coronavirus-related fields, this study applies a difference in differences approach to explore the evolution of gender inequalities before and during the COVID-19 pandemic by comparing the differences in the numbers and shares of authorships, leadership in publications, gender composition of collaboration, and scientific impacts. We find that, during the pandemic: (1) females’ leadership in publications as the first author was negatively affected; (2) although both females and males published more papers relative to the pre-pandemic period, the gender gaps in the share of authorships have been strengthened due to the larger increase in males’ authorships; (3) the share of publications by mixed-gender collaboration declined; (4) papers by teams in which females play a key role were less cited in the pre-pandemic period, and this citation disadvantage was exacerbated during the pandemic; and (5) gender inequalities regarding authorships and collaboration were enhanced in the initial stage of COVID-19, widened with the increasing severity of COVID-19, and returned to the pre-pandemic level in September 2020. This study shows that females’ lower participation in teams as major contributors and less collaboration with their male colleagues also reflect their underrepresentation in science in the pandemic period. This investigation significantly deepens our understanding of how the pandemic influenced academia, based on which science policies and gender policy changes are proposed to mitigate the gender gaps.