Predicting the Effect of Chemical Factors on the pH of Crystallization Trials

Macromolecular protein crystallisation with biotemplate of live cells

Macromolecular protein crystallisation was one of the potential tools to accelerate the biomanufacturing of biopharmaceuticals. In this work, it was the first time to investigate the roles of biotemplates, Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells, in the crystallisation processes of lysozyme, with different concentrations from 20 to 2.5 mg/mL lysozyme and different concentrations from 0 to 5.0 × 10⁷ (cfu/mL) Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells, during a period of 96 h. During the crystallisation period, the nucleation possibility in droplets, crystal numbers, and cell growth and cell density were observed and analysed. The results indicated the strong interaction between the lysozyme molecules and the cell wall of the S. cerevisiae, proved by the crystallization of lysozyme with fluorescent labels. The biotemplates demonstrated positive influence or negative influence on the nucleation, i.e. shorter or longer induction time, dependent on the concentrations of the lysozyme and the S. cerevisiae cells, and ratios between them. In the biomanufacturing process, target proteins were various cells were commonly mixed with various cells, and this work provides novel insights of new design and application of live cells as biotemplates for purification of macromolecules.

Data- and diversity-driven development of a Shotgun crystallization screen using the Protein Data Bank

Protein crystallization has for decades been a critical and restrictive step in macromolecular structure determination via X-ray diffraction. Crystallization typically involves a multi-stage exploration of the available chemical space, beginning with an initial sampling (screening) followed by iterative refinement (optimization). Effective screening is important for reducing the number of optimization rounds required, reducing the cost and time required to determine a structure. Here, an initial screen (Shotgun II) derived from analysis of the up-to-date Protein Data Bank (PDB) is proposed and compared with the previously derived (2014) Shotgun I screen. In an update to that analysis, it is clarified that the Shotgun approach entails finding the crystallization conditions that cover the most diverse space of proteins by sequence found in the PDB, which can be mapped to the well known maximum coverage problem in computer science. With this realization, it was possible to apply a more effective algorithm for selecting conditions. In-house data demonstrate that compared with alternatives, the Shotgun I screen has been remarkably successful over the seven years that it has been in use, indicating that Shotgun II is also likely to be a highly effective screen.