Clinical neuroscience and neurotechnology: An amazing symbiosis

Brain and grammar: revealing electrophysiological basic structures with competing statistical models

Acoustic, lexical, and syntactic information are simultaneously processed in the brain requiring complex strategies to distinguish their electrophysiological activity. Capitalizing on previous works that factor out acoustic information, we could concentrate on the lexical and syntactic contribution to language processing by testing competing statistical models. We exploited electroencephalographic recordings and compared different surprisal models selectively involving lexical information, part of speech, or syntactic structures in various combinations. Electroencephalographic responses were recorded in 32 participants during listening to affirmative active declarative sentences. We compared the activation corresponding to basic syntactic structures, such as noun phrases vs. verb phrases. Lexical and syntactic processing activates different frequency bands, partially different time windows, and different networks. Moreover, surprisal models based on part of speech inventory only do not explain well the electrophysiological data, while those including syntactic information do. By disentangling acoustic, lexical, and syntactic information, we demonstrated differential brain sensitivity to syntactic information. These results confirm and extend previous measures obtained with intracranial recordings, supporting our hypothesis that syntactic structures are crucial in neural language processing. This study provides a detailed understanding of how the brain processes syntactic information, highlighting the importance of syntactic surprisal in shaping neural responses during language comprehension.

Advancements in brain-machine interfaces for application in the metaverse

In recent years, with the shift of focus in metaverse research toward content exchange and social interaction, breaking through the current bottleneck of audio-visual media interaction has become an urgent issue. The use of brain-machine interfaces for sensory simulation is one of the proposed solutions. Currently, brain-machine interfaces have demonstrated irreplaceable potential as physiological signal acquisition tools in various fields within the metaverse. This study explores three application scenarios: generative art in the metaverse, serious gaming for healthcare in metaverse medicine, and brain-machine interface applications for facial expression synthesis in the virtual society of the metaverse. It investigates existing commercial products and patents (such as MindWave Mobile, GVS, and Galea), draws analogies with the development processes of network security and neurosecurity, bioethics and neuroethics, and discusses the challenges and potential issues that may arise when brain-machine interfaces mature and are widely applied. Furthermore, it looks ahead to the diverse possibilities of deep and varied applications of brain-machine interfaces in the metaverse in the future.

Considerations for implanting speech brain computer interfaces based on functional magnetic resonance imaging

Objective.Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have the potential to reinstate lost communication faculties. Results from speech decoding studies indicate that a usable speech BCI based on activity in the sensorimotor cortex (SMC) can be achieved using subdurally implanted electrodes. However, the optimal characteristics for a successful speech implant are largely unknown. We address this topic in a high field blood oxygenation level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, by assessing the decodability of spoken words as a function of hemisphere, gyrus, sulcal depth, and position along the ventral/dorsal-axis.Approach.Twelve subjects conducted a 7T fMRI experiment in which they pronounced 6 different pseudo-words over 6 runs. We divided the SMC by hemisphere, gyrus, sulcal depth, and position along the ventral/dorsal axis. Classification was performed on in these SMC areas using multiclass support vector machine (SVM).Main results.Significant classification was possible from the SMC, but no preference for the left or right hemisphere, nor for the precentral or postcentral gyrus for optimal word classification was detected. Classification while using information from the cortical surface was slightly better than when using information from deep in the central sulcus and was highest within the ventral 50% of SMC. Confusion matrices where highly similar across the entire SMC. An SVM-searchlight analysis revealed significant classification in the superior temporal gyrus and left planum temporale in addition to the SMC.Significance.The current results support a unilateral implant using surface electrodes, covering the ventral 50% of the SMC. The added value of depth electrodes is unclear. We did not observe evidence for variations in the qualitative nature of information across SMC. The current results need to be confirmed in paralyzed patients performing attempted speech.