Intratumoral DNA stem-line heterogeneity in superficial spreading melanoma

Intratumor and Intertumor Heterogeneity in Melanoma

Melanoma is a cancer that exhibits one of the most aggressive and heterogeneous features. The incidence rate escalates. A high number of clones harboring various mutations contribute to an exceptional level of intratumor heterogeneity of melanoma. It also refers to metastases which may originate from different subclones of primary lesion. Such component of the neoplasm biology is termed intertumor and intratumor heterogeneity. These levels of tumor heterogeneity hinder accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. The increasing number of research on the topic reflects the need for understanding limitation or failure of contemporary therapies. Majority of analyses concentrate on mutations in cancer-related genes. Novel high-throughput techniques reveal even higher degree of variations within a lesion. Consolidation of theories and researches indicates new routes for treatment options such as targets for immunotherapy. The demand for personalized approach in melanoma treatment requires extensive knowledge on intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity on the level of genome, transcriptome/proteome, and epigenome. Thus, achievements in exploration of melanoma variety are described in details. Particularly, the issue of tumor heterogeneity or homogeneity given BRAF mutations is discussed.

High WT1 expression is associated with very poor survival of patients with osteogenic sarcoma metastasis

PURPOSE

Although metastasis is the primary determinant of poor survival of patients with osteogenic sarcoma, some patients live much longer than others, indicating metastatic heterogeneity underlying survival outcome. The purpose of the investigation was to identify genes underlying survival outcome of patients with osteogenic sarcoma metastasis.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We have used microarray to first compare mRNA expression between normal bone and osteogenic sarcoma specimens, identified genes overexpressed in osteogenic sarcoma, and compared expression of the selected gene between a poorly metastatic (SAOS) and two highly metastatic cell lines (LM8 and 143B). Finally, expression of the selected gene was assessed by immunostaining of osteogenic sarcoma samples with known survival outcome.

RESULTS

Microarray analysis revealed 5.3-fold more expression of WT1 mRNA in osteogenic sarcoma compared with normal bone and >2-fold overexpression in 143B and LM8 cells compared with SAOS. Furthermore, WT1 mRNA was absent in normal bone (10 of 10) by reverse transcription-PCR but present in osteogenic sarcoma-derived cell lines (5 of 8). One hundred percent (42 of 42) of low-grade osteogenic sarcoma specimens expressed no WT1 as determined by immunostaining; however, 24% (12 of 49) of the high-grade specimens showed intense staining. Mean survival of patients with high-grade metastatic osteogenic sarcoma but low WT1 staining (27 of 37) was 96.5 +/- 129.3 months, whereas mean survival of patients with high-grade metastatic osteogenic sarcoma having intense staining (10 of 37) was 18.3 +/- 12.3 months (P > 0.0143). All splice variants of WT1 mRNA, including a hitherto unknown variant (lacking exons 4 and 5), were found to be expressed in osteogenic sarcoma.

CONCLUSION

WT1 seems to be associated with very poor survival of patients with osteogenic sarcoma metastasis.