1
|
Predictors of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Surg Res 2020; 260:506-515. [PMID: 33358194 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 09/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is not routinely performed for a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) anymore, adjuvant therapy depends on the risk factors available from SLN biopsy, including the risk of nonsentinel node metastases (NSNM). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in an attempt to identify risk factors that could be used to predict the risk of NSNM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for articles discussing predictive factors for NSNM. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and RevMan software was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) using the Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS Fifty publications were suitable for additional analysis. The clinical and primary tumor factors that were consistently identified as risk factors for NSNMs were: age >50, T stage 3 or 4, Clark level IV/V, ulceration, microsatellitosis, lymphovascular invasion, nodular histology, and extremity versus trunk primary tumor location. SLN factors that predicted NSNMs were >1 positive SLN, SLN micrometastatic tumor burden, diameter >2 mm, extracapsular extension, nonsubcapsular location (Dewar), and Rotterdam > 1 mm or ≥ 0.1 mm. CONCLUSIONS The findings in this study support that many clinical and pathologic risk factors that can be assessed with SLN biopsy alone can be used to predict the risk of NSNMs. The factors identified in this review should be evaluated in clinical prediction models to predict the risk of NSNMS, a prediction that may be used to select patients for adjuvant therapy in high-risk melanoma.
Collapse
|
2
|
Angeles CV, Kang R, Shirai K, Wong SL. Meta-analysis of completion lymph node dissection in sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma. Br J Surg 2019; 106:672-681. [PMID: 30912591 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma continues to be debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated survival and recurrence rate in these patients who underwent CLND, compared with observation. METHODS A comprehensive MEDLINE and Embase database search was performed for cohort studies and RCTs published between January 2000 and June 2017 that assessed the outcomes of CLND compared with observation in patients with SLN-positive melanoma. The primary outcome was survival and the secondary outcome was recurrence rate. Studies were assessed for quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Pooled relative risk or hazard ratio with 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated for each outcome. The extent of heterogeneity between studies was assessed with the I2 test. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017070152). RESULTS Fifteen studies (13 cohort studies with 7868 patients and 2 RCTs with 2228 patients) were identified for qualitative synthesis. Thirteen studies remained for quantitative meta-analysis. Survival was similar in patients who underwent CLND and those who were observed (risk ratio (RR) for death 0·85, 95 per cent c.i. 0·71 to 1·02). The recurrence rate was also similar (RR 0·91, 0·79 to 1·05). CONCLUSION Patients with SLN-positive melanoma do not have a significant benefit in survival or recurrence rate if they undergo CLND rather than observation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C V Angeles
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - R Kang
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - K Shirai
- Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - S L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ascierto PA, Caracò C, Gershenwald JE, Hamid O, Ross M, Sullivan RJ, Puzanov I. The Great Debate at "Melanoma Bridge", Napoli, December 2nd, 2017. J Transl Med 2018; 16:101. [PMID: 29665799 PMCID: PMC5905181 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1477-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
As part of the 2017 Melanoma Bridge congress (November 30–December 2, 2017, Napoli, Italy), the great debate session featured counterpoint views from leading experts on three contemporary controversial clinical issues in the care of the melanoma patient. These were: (1) whether complete lymph node dissection should be routinely offered to all melanoma patients with sentinel lymph node-positive disease; (2) whether first-line treatment of BRAF-mutated melanoma should consist of BRAF-targeted therapy or immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors; and (3) whether combined or sequential administration of treatments should be the preferred option in the management of patients with advanced melanoma. Discussion of these three important issues and audience responses are reported here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo A Ascierto
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapies, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, NA, Italy.
| | - Corrado Caracò
- Division of Surgery of Melanoma and Skin Cancer, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Care Foundation, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Merrick Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Center for Melanoma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ascha M, Ascha MS, Gastman B. Identification of Risk Factors in Lymphatic Surgeries for Melanoma: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Review. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79:509-515. [PMID: 28650410 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000001152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and lymphadenectomy (LAD) are commonly performed in the staging and care of patients with malignant melanoma. These procedures are accompanied by complications that may result in hospital readmission, negatively affecting patient outcomes and potentially affecting surgical procedure reimbursement. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database offers a large data set allowing physicians to evaluate 30-day readmission for surgical complications. We used this database to explore predictors of 30-day hospital readmission for SLNB and LAD in the axillary, cervical, and inguinal regions. METHODS Data from the years 2005 to 2014 of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database were used. Cohorts were constructed according to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, classification and current procedural terminology codes. The outcome of 30-day return to hospital was defined as patients who were readmitted to the hospital or the operating room within 30 days. Multiple logistic regression results are presented for a prespecified set of predictors and predictors that were significant on univariate logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated using maximum likelihood estimates, along with Wald test P values. RESULTS A total of 3006 patients were included. Of those, 151 (5.0%) returned to the hospital. Among 1235 LAD patients, 65 (5.3%) returned; among 1771 SLNB patients, 86 (4.9%) returned. Smoking was a predictor of hospital readmission for overall SLNB and for cervical SLNB on multivariate analysis. Age was a significant predictor for cervical and inguinal LAD. Hypertension was significant for cervical LAD. Diabetes, preoperative hematocrit, and male sex were predictors for inguinal SLNB. There were no significant predictors for axillary SLNB and axillary LAD, as well as overall LAD procedures. CONCLUSIONS This is the first and largest study using American College of Surgeons NSQIP to examine 30-day readmission after SLNB and LAD for melanoma in 3 commonly operated anatomical regions. We have found several significant risk factors associated with hospital readmission, which are now being used as a quality measure for hospital performance and reimbursement, that may help surgeons optimize patient selection for SLNB and LAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Ascha
- From the *Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; †Center for Clinical Investigation, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University; and ‡Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Geimer T, Sattler E, Flaig M, Ruzicka T, Berking C, Schmid-Wendtner M, Kunte C. The impact of sentinel node dissection on disease-free and overall tumour-specific survival in melanoma patients: a single centre group-matched analysis of 1192 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016; 31:629-635. [DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2015] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T. Geimer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; University Hospital of Munich (LMU); Munich Germany
| | - E.C. Sattler
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; University Hospital of Munich (LMU); Munich Germany
| | - M.J. Flaig
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; University Hospital of Munich (LMU); Munich Germany
| | - T. Ruzicka
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; University Hospital of Munich (LMU); Munich Germany
| | - C. Berking
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; University Hospital of Munich (LMU); Munich Germany
| | - M.H. Schmid-Wendtner
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; University Hospital of Munich (LMU); Munich Germany
- Interdisciplinary Oncology Center Munich; Munich Germany
| | - C. Kunte
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; University Hospital of Munich (LMU); Munich Germany
- Department for Dermatologic Surgery and Dermatology; Artemed Clinic; Munich Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Nakamura R, Fukuda K, Takahashi T, Wada N, Kitagawa Y. Clinical Significance of Sentinel Node Positivity in Patients with Superficial Esophageal Cancer. World J Surg 2016; 39:2941-7. [PMID: 26296842 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3217-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel node (SN) mapping in esophageal cancer has been reported to be technically feasible with an acceptable detection rate and accuracy. However, the clinical significance and survival analysis findings associated with the metastatic status of SNs in patients with early-stage esophageal cancer have not been clarified. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance and survival impact of SN mapping in early-stage esophageal cancer. METHODS Among patients who were diagnosed preoperatively with clinical T1N0M0 or T2N0M0 esophageal cancer and who underwent SN mapping, 70 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with pathological T1 primary thoracic esophageal cancer were enrolled in this study. Sixty-four (91 %) patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma while 5 (7 %) patients were with adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic injection of technetium-99m tin colloid was performed before surgery, and radioactive SNs were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probing. Standard esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients, and all resected nodes were evaluated by routine pathological examination. RESULTS SNs were successfully detected in 65 (92.9 %) of 70 patients with pT1 esophageal cancer. The sensitivity to predict lymph node metastasis was 91.7 %, and the diagnostic accuracy based on SN status was 96.9 %. Although there was a wide distribution of SNs from cervical to abdominal areas, 84.5 % of the patients had no lymph node metastasis or had lymph node metastasis only in SN. The disease-specific survival of the patients with metastatic non-SNs was significantly worse relative to that of the patients with no lymph node metastasis or lymph node metastasis only in SN. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that radio-guided SN mapping is useful not only as an accurate diagnostic tool for detecting lymph node metastasis but also as a tool for prognostic stratification in patients with cN0 early esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroya Takeuchi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Hirofumi Kawakubo
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Rieko Nakamura
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Fukuda
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Tsunehiro Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Norihito Wada
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bañuelos-Andrío L, Rodríguez-Caravaca G, López-Estebaranz JL, Rueda-Orgaz JA, Pinedo-Moraleda F. [Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: our experience over 8 years in a universitary hospital]. CIR CIR 2015; 83:378-85. [PMID: 26141108 DOI: 10.1016/j.circir.2015.05.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 02/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy, its use as a standard of care for patients with clinically node-negative cutaneous melanoma remains controversial. Our experience of sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma is presented and evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cohort study was conducted on 69 patients with a primary cutaneous melanoma and with no clinical evidence of metastasis, who had sentinel lymph node biopsy from October-2005 to December-2013. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was identified using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and subsequent intraoperative detection with gamma probe. RESULTS The sentinel lymph node biopsy identification rate was 98.5%. The sentinel lymph node biopsy was positive for metastases in 23 patients (33.8%). Postoperative complications after sentinel lymph node biopsy were observed in 4.4% compared to 38% of complications in patients who had complete lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSION The sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma offers useful information about the lymphatic dissemination of melanoma and allows an approximation to the regional staging, sparing the secondary effects of lymphadenectomy. More studies with larger number of patients and long term follow-up will be necessary to confirm the validity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma patients, and especially of lymphadenectomy in patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Bañuelos-Andrío
- Unidad de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, España.
| | - Gil Rodríguez-Caravaca
- Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Richtig G, Richtig E, Massone C, Hofmann-Wellenhof R. Analysis of clinical, dermoscopic and histopathological features of primary melanomas of patients with metastatic disease--a retrospective study at the Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, 2000-2010. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28:1776-81. [PMID: 24576192 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2013] [Accepted: 01/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidence rates of malignant melanoma have been increasing worldwide and metastatic melanoma is still a significant problem despite widespread prevention programmes. OBJECTIVES We made a systemic review of all metastasized melanoma patients treated at the Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz in the years 2000-2010 and looked at the kind of melanoma type, e.g. if it has been slowly growing superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) or fast growing nodular melanoma (NM). METHODS Histological slides and clinical images of patients treated at our department between 2000 and 2010, who received chemotherapy because of proven metastatic disease were analysed with regard to growth type of their primary tumours. RESULTS A total of 88 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age of all patients was 57 years (median 59 years, SD ± 15 years). Of these 88 patients 51 patients (58%) (28 male patients and 23 female patients) had SSM; mean age 58 years (median 58 years, SD ± 14 years) and 37 patients (42%) (18 male patients and 19 female patients) had NM; mean age 56 years (median 61 years, SD ± 17 years). Mean Breslow thickness in the SSM group was 2.26 mm (median: 1.6 mm, SD ± 2.11 mm). In the NM group, mean Breslow thickness was 4.59 mm (median: 3.50 mm, SD ± 4.07 mm). When separated by gender, 46 melanomas were seen in the male group (28 SSM and 18 NM) and 42 melanomas in the female group (23 SSM and 19 NM). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that more than half of the patients with metastatic disease had SSMs and not, as suspected, NMs. As SSMs are growing over a longer period to become invasive and potentially metastatic, there might be a chance to focus primary and secondary prevention programmes not only on fast growing tumours but also on slowly changes of tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Richtig
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Scolyer RA, Judge MJ, Evans A, Frishberg DP, Prieto VG, Thompson JF, Trotter MJ, Walsh MY, Walsh NMG, Ellis DW. Data set for pathology reporting of cutaneous invasive melanoma: recommendations from the international collaboration on cancer reporting (ICCR). Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37:1797-814. [PMID: 24061524 PMCID: PMC3864181 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0b013e31829d7f35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
An accurate and complete pathology report is critical for the optimal management of cutaneous melanoma patients. Protocols for the pathologic reporting of melanoma have been independently developed by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA), Royal College of Pathologists (United Kingdom) (RCPath), and College of American Pathologists (CAP). In this study, data sets, checklists, and structured reporting protocols for pathologic examination and reporting of cutaneous melanoma were analyzed by an international panel of melanoma pathologists and clinicians with the aim of developing a common, internationally agreed upon, evidence-based data set. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting cutaneous melanoma expert review panel analyzed the existing RCPA, RCPath, and CAP data sets to develop a protocol containing "required" (mandatory/core) and "recommended" (nonmandatory/noncore) elements. Required elements were defined as those that had agreed evidentiary support at National Health and Medical Research Council level III-2 level of evidence or above and that were unanimously agreed upon by the review panel to be essential for the clinical management, staging, or assessment of the prognosis of melanoma or fundamental for pathologic diagnosis. Recommended elements were those considered to be clinically important and recommended for good practice but with lesser degrees of supportive evidence. Sixteen core/required data elements for cutaneous melanoma pathology reports were defined (with an additional 4 core/required elements for specimens received with lymph nodes). Eighteen additional data elements with a lesser level of evidentiary support were included in the recommended data set. Consensus response values (permitted responses) were formulated for each data item. Development and agreement of this evidence-based protocol at an international level was accomplished in a timely and efficient manner, and the processes described herein may facilitate the development of protocols for other tumor types. Widespread utilization of an internationally agreed upon, structured pathology data set for melanoma will lead not only to improved patient management but is a prerequisite for research and for international benchmarking in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Scolyer
- *Melanoma Institute Australia Disciplines of †Pathology **Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney Departments of ‡Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology ††Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital §Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, Sydney, NSW ¶¶Royal Adelaide Hospital and Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia ∥Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland ¶Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA #Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX ‡‡Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB ∥∥Department of Pathology, Capital District Health Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada §§Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Migliano E, Bellei B, Govoni FA, Paolino G, Catricalà C, Bucher S, Donati P. SLN melanoma micrometastasis predictivity of nodal status: a long term retrospective study. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH : CR 2013; 32:47. [PMID: 23902987 PMCID: PMC3737095 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2013] [Accepted: 07/26/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is the gold standard treatment for patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Considering the morbidity associated with CLND it is important to identify histological features of the primary tumor and/or of SLN metastasis that could help to spare from CLND a subset of patients who have a very low risk of non-SLN metastasis. The objective of this study is to identify patients with a very low risk to develop non-SLNs recurrences and to limit unnecessary CLND. Methods A retrospective long-term study of 80 melanoma patients with positive SLN, undergone CLND, was assessed to define the risk of additional metastasis in the regional nodal basin, on the basis of intranodal distribution of metastatic cells, using the micro-morphometric analysis (Starz classification). Results This study demonstrates that among the demographic and pathologic features of primary melanoma and of SLN only the Starz classification shows prognostic significance for non-SLN status (p<0.0001). This parameter was also significantly associated with disease-free survival rate (p<0.0013). Conclusion The Starz classification can help to identify, among SLN positive patients, those who can have a real benefit from CLND. From the clinical point of view this easy and reliable method could lead to a significant reduction of unnecessary CLND in association with a substantial decrease in morbidity. The study results indicate that most of S1 subgroup patients might be safely spared from completion lymphatic node dissection. Furthermore, our experience demonstrated that Starz classification of SLN is a safe predictive index for patient stratification and treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Migliano
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, San Gallicano Dermatologic Institute, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for primary melanoma is accepted worldwide as a diagnostic procedure. When sentinel node positive, the invasive completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is usually performed. Approximately 20% of CLND patients have nonsentinel node (NSN) metastases. The therapeutic benefit is unknown. This review analyzed the necessity of CLND in sentinel node positive patients. RECENT FINDINGS Prognosis of sentinel node positive patients is highly heterogeneous. The Rotterdam and Dewar criteria and S-classification are important sentinel node tumor burden criteria to stratify melanoma patients for prognosis and risk of NSN metastases. Patients with less than 0.1 mm metastases seem to have similar prognosis as sentinel node negative patients, especially when located in the subcapsular area. This depends on the use of an extensive sentinel node pathology protocol identifying possibly clinically irrelevant micrometastases. SUMMARY Consensus on the sentinel node pathology work-up and analysis protocols are crucial for correct risk stratification and for clinical decision-making. Primary and sentinel node tumor burden parameters and patient comorbidities should be taken into consideration when offering CLND to an individual patient. In the future, prospective studies such as the MSLT-II and the EORTC 1208 (Minitub) will provide answers to whether CLND has a therapeutic benefit and to which patients might safely be spared CLND.
Collapse
|
12
|
Nagaraja V, Eslick GD. Is complete lymph node dissection after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma always necessary? A meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39:669-80. [PMID: 23571104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2012] [Revised: 02/04/2013] [Accepted: 02/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current recommendation for patients with cutaneous melanoma and a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a complete lymph node dissection (CLND). However, metastatic melanoma is not present in approximately 80% of CLND specimens. A meta-analysis was performed to identify the clinicopathological variables most predictive of non-sentinel node (NSN) metastases when the sentinel node is positive in patients with melanoma. METHODS A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, Cochrane library, Google scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The search identified 54 relevant articles reporting the frequency of NSN metastases in melanoma. Original data was abstracted from each study and used to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). FINDINGS The pooled estimates that were found to be significantly associated with the high likelihood of NSN metastases were: ulceration (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.53-2.31), satellitosis (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.86-5.66), neurotropism (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.39-4.53), >1 positive SLN (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.2-2.62), Starz 3 (old) (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 0.89-3.76), Angiolymphatic invasion (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.34-4.54), extensive location (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.74-2.81), macrometastases >2 mm (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.61-2.35), extranodal extension (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.79-6.40) and capsular involvement (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.37-7.27). There were 3 characteristics not associated with NSN metastases: subcapsular location (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.38-0.67), Rotterdam Criteria <0.1 mm (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.50) and Starz I (new) (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.91). Other variables including gender, Breslow thickness 2-4 mm and extremity as primary site were found to be equivocal. INTERPRETATION This meta-analysis provides evidence that patients with low SLN tumor burden could probably be spared the morbidity associated with CLND. We identified 9 factors predictive of non-SLN metastases that should be recorded and evaluated routinely in SLN databases. However, further studies are needed to confirm the standard criteria for not performing CLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Nagaraja
- The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sattler E, Geimer T, Sick I, Flaig MJ, Ruzicka T, Berking C, Kunte C. Sentinel lymph node in Merkel cell carcinoma: To biopsy or not to biopsy? J Dermatol 2013; 40:374-9. [DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.12072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2012] [Accepted: 11/21/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Sattler
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich; Munich; Germany
| | - Till Geimer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich; Munich; Germany
| | - Isabell Sick
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich; Munich; Germany
| | - Michael J. Flaig
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich; Munich; Germany
| | - Thomas Ruzicka
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich; Munich; Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich; Munich; Germany
| | - Christian Kunte
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich; Munich; Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Biver-Dalle C, Puzenat E, Puyraveau M, Delroeux D, Boulahdour H, Sheppard F, Pelletier F, Humbert P, Aubin F. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: our 8-year clinical experience in a single French institute (2002-2009). BMC DERMATOLOGY 2012; 12:21. [PMID: 23228015 PMCID: PMC3538072 DOI: 10.1186/1471-5945-12-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2012] [Accepted: 11/28/2012] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Since the introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), its use as a standard of care for patients with clinically node-negative cutaneous melanoma remains controversial. We wished to evaluate our experience of SLNB for melanoma. Methods A single center observational cohort of 203 melanoma patients with a primary cutaneous melanoma (tumour thickness > 1 mm) and without clinical evidence of metastasis was investigated from 2002 to 2009. Head and neck melanoma were excluded. SLN was identified following preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe interrogation. Results The SLN identification rate was 97%. The SLN was tumor positive in 44 patients (22%). Positive SLN was significantly associated with primary tumor thickness and microscopic ulceration. The median follow-up was 39.5 (5–97) months. Disease progression was significantly more frequent in SLN positive patients (32% vs 13%, p = 0.002). Five-year DFS and OS of the entire cohort were 79.6% and 84.6%, respectively, with a statistical significant difference between SLN positive (58.7% and 69.7%) and SLN negative (85% and 90.3%) patients (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.0096 respectively). Postoperative complications after SLNB were observed in 12% of patients. Conclusion Our data confirm previous studies and support the clinical usefulness of SLNB as a reliable and accurate staging method in patients with cutaneous melanoma. However, the benefit of additional CLND in patients with positive SLN remains to be demonstrated.
Collapse
|
15
|
Brady MS. Advances in sentinel lymph node mapping for patients with melanoma. Future Oncol 2012; 8:191-203. [PMID: 22335583 DOI: 10.2217/fon.11.139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node mapping allows accurate pathological staging for patients with cutaneous melanoma and clinically normal regional nodes. Early technical advances facilitated its widespread acceptance by surgeons. Morbidity as a result of the procedure is well established, but the potential benefit of providing powerful prognostic information outweighs these risks in most patients with intermediate-risk disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary S Brady
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill-Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Linos K, Slominski A, Ross JS, Carlson JA. Melanoma update: diagnostic and prognostic factors that can effectively shape and personalize management. Biomark Med 2011; 5:333-60. [PMID: 21657842 DOI: 10.2217/bmm.11.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Routine light microscopy remains a powerful tool to diagnose, stage and prognose melanoma. Although it is very economical and efficient, it requires a significant level of expertise and, in difficult cases the final diagnosis is affected by subjective interpretation. Fortunately, new insights into the genomic aberrations characteristic of melanoma, coupled with ancillary studies, are further refining evaluation and management allowing for more confident diagnosis, more accurate staging and the selection of targeted therapy. In this article, we review the standard of care and new updates including four probe FISH, the 2009 American Joint Commission on Cancer staging of melanoma and mutant testing of melanoma, which will be crucial for targeted therapy of metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
|