Biologics for pityriasis rubra pilaris treatment: A review of the literature

Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: A Multicentric Case Series of 65 Spanish Patients

INTRODUCTION

PRP is a rare entity of unknown etiopathogenesis. Lack of management guidelines makes it a challenge for clinicians.

OBJECTIVE

To add our experience to increase evidence about PRP.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, descriptive and multicentric study of 65 patients with PRP, being the largest European case series of patients with PRP.

RESULTS

PRP was more frequent in male patients with an average age of 51 years, but erythrodermic forms presented in older patients (average age 61 years). Six (75%) paediatric patients and ten (60%) non-erythrodermic adults controlled their disease with topical corticosteroids. On the contrary, 26 (68%) erythrodermic patients required biologic therapy as last and effective therapy line requiring an average of 6.5 months to achieve complete response.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a statistical difference in terms of outcome and response to treatment between children or patients with limited disease and patients who develop erythroderma.

Biologics for Treatment of Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: A Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

To describe the published efficacy and adverse event rates associated with existing biologics for the treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP).

DATA SOURCES

A literature review using the PubMed database (January 1990-July 2023) was conducted. Multiple search combinations were conducted using "pityriasis rubra pilaris" and various biologics as keywords to identify relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Inclusion criteria included all study types that were published within the past 30 years in English and mentioned at least one biologic and PRP. A preliminary search yielded a total of 499 results. After screening using inclusion and exclusion criteria, 77 relevant articles (69 case reports, 5 case series, 2 clinical trials, and 1 retrospective analysis) were analyzed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

TNF-α inhibitors have been evaluated and are effective in treating PRP. However, recent treatment with anti-interleukin (IL)-17 and anti-IL-23 therapies such as ustekinumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab are emerging as new treatment options with a mean improvement in PRP Area and Severity Index scores, change in severity of erythema, scaling, and thickness of PRP lesions. From initial clinical trials, secukinumab and ixekizumab are promising treatment options for achieving remission.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review compares the efficacy for numerous biologics and a discussion to guide clinicians on benefits and risks in choosing a biologic for PRP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologics may be a favourable treatment option leading to greater patient adherence due to reduced dosing frequencies, improvement in quality of life, and reduction in frequency and severity of flares.

Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: An Updated Review of Clinical Presentation, Etiopathogenesis, and Treatment Options

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare papulosquamous reaction pattern with a significant impact on quality of life. Type I PRP is the most common PRP variant, presenting as erythematous papules emerging in a follicular distribution and later coalescing into plaques with characteristic islands of sparing; histologically, an alternating pattern of orthokeratosis and parakeratosis is considered the hallmark of PRP (checkerboard hyperkeratosis). Other PRP variants (types II-V) differ in their age of onset and clinical presentation. Type VI PRP is a rare PRP subtype associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection and is occasionally associated with diseases of the follicular occlusion tetrad. Caspase recruitment domain family, member 14 (CARD14)-associated papulosquamous eruption and facial discoid dermatitis are newly described disease states that have an important clinical overlap with PRP, creating shared conundrums with respect to diagnosis and treatment. The etiology inciting PRP often remains uncertain; PRP has been suggested to be associated with infection, malignancy, or drug/vaccine administration in some cases, although these are based on case reports and causality has not been established. Type V PRP is often due to inborn CARD14 mutations. Furthermore, recent literature has identified interleukin-23/T-helper-17 cell axis dysregulation to be a major mediator of PRP pathogenesis, paving the way for mechanism-directed therapy. At present, high-dose isotretinoin, ixekizumab, and secukinumab are systemic agents supported by single-arm prospective studies; numerous other agents have also been trialed for PRP, with variable success rates. Here, we discuss updates on clinical manifestations, present new insights into etiopathogenesis, and offer a survey of recently described therapeutic options.

Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris: A Multicentric Case Series of 65 Spanish Patients

INTRODUCTION

PRP is a rare entity of unknown etiopathogenesis. Lack of management guidelines makes it a challenge for clinicians.

OBJECTIVE

To add our experience to increase evidence about PRP.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, descriptive and multicentric study of 65 patients with PRP, being the largest European case series of patients with PRP.

RESULTS

PRP was more frequent in male patients with an average age of 51 years, but erythrodermic forms presented in older patients (average age 61 years). Six (75%) paediatric patients and ten (60%) non-erythrodermic adults controlled their disease with topical corticosteroids. On the contrary, 26 (68%) erythrodermic patients required biologic therapy as last and effective therapy line requiring an average of 6.5 months to achieve complete response.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a statistical difference in terms of outcome and response to treatment between children or patients with limited disease and patients who develop erythroderma.

Rapid response of erythrodermic pityriasis rubra pilaris to tildrakizumab

The cases of two patients with erythrodermic pityriasis rubra pilaris that showed a rapid and virtually complete response to tildrakizumab are presented. Treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris remains challenging and there is very little evidence about use of interleukin-23 blockers in this condition. These cases may contribute to extending the available therapeutic options, especially when a fast clearance of the lesions is needed.

Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris - a difficult path to optimal treatment. Case report

Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris is a rare, chronic inflammatory dermatosis of unknown etiology, presenting with erythema and papular eruptions. Treatment is difficult due to the lack of causal therapy, guidelines and requires an individualized approach. The most common treatments are systemic retinoids, immunosuppressants, phototherapy and biological therapy. This article presents the case of a 73-year-old man suffering from type 1 pityriasis rubra pilaris. The patient was initially treated with acitretin, which was discontinued due to hypogammaglobulinemia. This rare side effect of acitretin has not been previously published. As a second-line treatment, the patient received methotrexate, but with no clinical improvement after 3 months and an increase in skin pruritus. Finally, the use of isotretinoin resulted in significant clinical improvement and was well tolerated.

Successful Treatment of Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris with Risankizumab in Children

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory skin disease that affects men and women of all ages, including children. PRP is characterized by follicular and palmoplantar hyperkeratosis and salmon-colored scaling plaques. The exact pathogenesis of PRP is still unknown; most PRP cases are acquired, but some cases may show a familial occurrence, often associated with a mutation in the CARD14 gene. Due to the rarity of PRP, treatment recommendations are based mainly on case reports, small case series and expert opinions and still represent a major therapeutic challenge, especially in children. A growing number of reports on treatment with biologicals, particularly anti-TNFα, has been published. However, an involvement of the IL-23/Th17 axis in both psoriasis and PRP pathogenesis may suggest that this pathway may be a potential therapeutic target. Here, we present three pediatric patients with PRP successfully treated with risankizumab. All patients exhibited a severe course of PRP and lack of response to conventional therapy, including acitretin, cyclosporine and phototherapy. A single dose of 75 mg risankizumab resulted in almost complete clearance of skin lesions in case 1 and 2 at week 4. In patient 3, clear skin was achieved after the second administration of risankizumab (150 mg). All patients continue the treatment with risankizumab, and no adverse effects have been reported up to the present time. Our study demonstrates that risankizumab, an IL-23 blocker, shows good efficacy and safety among pediatric patients with PRP.

Treatment Options for Juvenile Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris

Pityriasis rubra pilaris represents a group of familial and acquired disorders of cornification that affect both adult and pediatric patients. Treatment options are difficult to assess through clinical trials, given the rarity of the disorder and its tendency for spontaneous remission. Case reports and case series are therefore the primary means of assessment. Because of the heterogeneity of the disease, there is no universal approach to treatment, and multiple agents may need to be trialed to achieve disease control. At present, topicals are used for most pediatric patients, though monotherapy with topicals is only effective for less severe disease. Despite concerns over their side-effect profiles, oral retinoids are generally accepted as a first-line systemic therapy. However, interleukin-17 inhibitors and ustekinumab, an interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 inhibitor, may soon become first-line systemic treatment as well, given their efficacy and relative safety in trials thus far. Ustekinumab, in particular, is emerging as a first-line agent for patients with pityriasis rubra pilaris with CARD14 gene variations. When these therapies fail, second-line and adjunctive therapies to consider include tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, methotrexate, and phototherapy. However, further investigation is necessary to assess the safety and efficacy of many of these agents in juvenile pityriasis rubra pilaris.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris partially responsive to treatment with upadacitinib: A case report

Pityriasis rubra pilaris is a rare inflammatory dermatosis characterized by orange-red confluent plaques, hyperkeratotic follicular papules, palmoplantar keratoderma, and, in some cases, erythroderma. The etiology of pityriasis rubra pilaris is unclear. This condition is often treated with oral retinoids and topical corticosteroids, and more recently, biological agents have become the mainstay of treatment. However, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence on the safety and effectiveness of these agents, and the disease often remains refractory to therapy. Herein, we present a case of pityriasis rubra pilaris with a favorable response to treatment with upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, which has not been previously reported in the literature for the management of this condition.

Biologic Therapies for the Management of Cutaneous Findings in Genodermatoses: A Review

Genodermatoses are genetically inherited dermatologic conditions. The management of cutaneous findings in genodermatoses is challenging, and first-line therapies, such as steroids and/or retinoids, are often inadequate. In recent years, research on the molecular basis of genodermatoses has led to the use of biologic therapies for intractable disease. Here, we review the evidence regarding the use of available biologic therapies for the management of dermatologic findings in genodermatoses. Biologic therapies appear to be promising therapeutic options for several recalcitrant genodermatoses, especially those with underlying immune dysregulation. However, not all genodermatoses are amenable to biologic therapies, and some have been shown to paradoxically worsen under treatment. Biologic therapies offer a novel avenue to target refractory genodermatoses. However, evidence supporting the use of biologic therapies in the management of genodermatoses is mostly limited to case reports and case series. Further studies are warranted to determine the safety and efficacy of biologic therapies for the management of cutaneous findings in genodermatoses.

A case of classic adult pityriasis rubra pilaris successfully treated with a combination of acitretin and ustekinumab: A case report

Classic adult pityriasis rubra pilaris is a severe papulosquamous disease that tends to resolve in 3-5 years but can have a devastating impact on patients while active. It shares features with psoriasis, but treatment remains largely empiric, based on case reports and series. The condition is often refractory to treatment, especially initially, with topical corticosteroids and oral acitretin the more commonly employed agents. Relatively high doses of acitretin are needed for adequate response, and adverse events often limit adherence. Given the similarity to psoriasis, biologic agents approved for psoriasis have been used with good effect in classic adult pityriasis rubra pilaris and show better tolerance than other agents. In this report, we describe the successful use of a combination of acitretin and ustekinumab in a case of classic adult pityriasis rubra pilaris.

Cutaneous sarcoidosis due to immune‐checkpoint inhibition and exacerbated by a novel BRAF dimerization inhibitor

Sarcoidosis is a non‐infective granulomatous disorder of unknown aetiology, with cutaneous involvement affecting up to 30% of patients. Drug‐induced sarcoidosis has been reported secondary to modern melanoma therapies including immune‐checkpoint inhibitors and first generation BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib and dabrafenib. Herein, we report a case of cutaneous micropapular sarcoidosis that first developed on immune‐checkpoint inhibition with ipilimumab and nivolumab for metastatic melanoma, which was exacerbated and further complicated by pityriasis rubra pilaris‐like palmar plaques upon transition to a next‐generation BRAF‐dimerisation inhibitor. Both the micropapular eruption and palmar plaques rapidly resolved after cessation of the novel BRAF‐inhibitor and concurrent commencement of hydroxychloroquine. It is unclear how inhibition of BRAF‐dimerisation results in granuloma formation, though upregulation of T_H1/T_H17 T‐cells and impairment of T‐reg cells may be responsible. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for exacerbation of sarcoidosis when transitioning from immune‐checkpoint inhibitors to these novel BRAF‐dimerisation inhibitors, particularly as their uptake in treating cancers increases beyond clinical trials. Further studies are required to assess whether these next‐generation agents can trigger sarcoidosis de‐novo, or simply exacerbate pre‐existing sarcoidosis.

Phospholipase A2 enzymes represent a shared pathogenic pathway in psoriasis and pityriasis rubra pilaris

Altered epidermal differentiation along with increased keratinocyte proliferation is a characteristic feature of psoriasis and pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP). However, despite this large degree of overlapping clinical and histologic features, the molecular signatures these skin disorders share are unknown. Using global transcriptomic profiling, we demonstrate that plaque psoriasis and PRP skin lesions have high overlap, with all differentially expressed genes in PRP relative to normal skin having complete overlap with those in psoriasis. The major common pathway shared between psoriasis and PRP involves the phospholipases PLA2G2F, PLA2G4D, and PLA2G4E, which were found to be primarily expressed in the epidermis. Gene silencing each of the 3 PLA2s led to reduction in immune responses and epidermal thickness both in vitro and in vivo in a mouse model of psoriasis, establishing their proinflammatory roles. Lipidomic analyses demonstrated that PLA2s affect mobilization of a phospholipid-eicosanoid pool, which is altered in psoriatic lesions and functions to promote immune responses in keratinocytes. Taken together, our results highlight the important role of PLA2s as regulators of epidermal barrier homeostasis and inflammation, identify PLA2s as a shared pathogenic mechanism between PRP and psoriasis, and as potential therapeutic targets for both diseases.

The IL-23/IL-17 Pathway in Inflammatory Skin Diseases: From Bench to Bedside

Interleukin-17 (IL-17) is an essential proinflammatory cytokine, which is mainly secreted by the CD4⁺ helper T cells (Th17 cells) and subsets of innate lymphoid cells. IL-17A is associated with the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, alopecia areata, pityriasis rubra pilaris, pemphigus, and systemic sclerosis. Interleukin-23 (IL-23) plays a pivotal role in stimulating the production of IL-17 by activating the Th17 cells. The IL-23/IL-17 axis is an important pathway for targeted therapy for inflammatory diseases. Emerging evidence from clinical trials has shown that monoclonal antibodies against IL-23, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor are effective in the treatment of patients with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, pityriasis rubra pilaris, pemphigus, and systemic sclerosis. Here, we summarize the latest knowledge about the biology, signaling, and pathophysiological functions of the IL-23/IL-17 axis in inflammatory skin diseases. The currently available biologics targeting the axis is also discussed.

Erythrodermic pityriasis rubra pilaris treatment: Two case reports and literature review

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory dermatosis characterized by hyperkeratotic follicular papules and erythematous-desquamative plaques that tend to progressively evolve into erythroderma. Treatment is challenging given that international guidelines are not available and large-scale trials do not exist. Traditionally, many topical and systemic drugs had been used as consolidated agents; recently, biologicals are gaining increasing importance, promisingly dominating the therapeutic scenario ahead. Herein, we present a case series showing the "past" and the "future" therapeutic approaches to erythrodermic PRP, one case treated with acitretin and nb-UVB phototherapy combination, while the other with ustekinumab, performing also a throughout literature review.

Use of Biologics in Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris Refractory to First-Line Systemic Therapy: A Systematic Review [Formula: see text]

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is an uncommon, inflammatory, papulosquamous skin disease. Treatment of PRP is challenging as the disease is often refractory to conventional therapies, such as retinoids and methotrexate. There has been an increasing number of studies reporting the successful use of biologic therapy in patients with PRP; however, the data on the efficacy and safety are limited. Our objective was to evaluate the existing evidence for utilizing biologics, whether alone or in combination with established systemic therapies, in patients with treatment-resistant PRP. We systematically reviewed evidence within Medline and Pubmed databases between January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2019. Articles consisted of patients diagnosed with PRP who have failed to respond sufficiently to first-line systemic therapies, or who had comorbidities that precluded their use. In total, 363 unique articles were identified, 56 of which were considered relevant to the clinical question. Of the 56 articles highlighted, 35 met the inclusion criteria and were limited to case series and case studies. Therapy with biologics was found to be successful for both monotherapy (81.1% [27/33]) and when used in combination with existing systemic therapies (87.5% [14/16]). The existing evidence suggests that biologics may be regarded as a tool for PRP treatment alone or in combination therapy with existing treatments, although large-scale randomized clinical trials are necessary to better assess their efficacy and safety.

Learning From Success and Failure: Biologics for Non-approved Skin Diseases

The impressive potential of biologics has been demonstrated in psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and urticaria. Numerous biologicals are entering the field for a restricted number of skin disorders. Off-label use of biologics in other recalcitrant skin diseases has increased. Mounting data point to the potential of already existing biologics acting on the IL-17/IL-23 pathway in skin disorders with epidermal hyperkeratosis (e.g., pityriasis rubra pilaris), acneiform inflammation (e.g., hidradenitis suppurativa), and loss of mucosal integrity (e.g., aphthosis). TNF-α blockers are also effective in the latter conditions but seem of particular value in granulomatous (e.g., granuloma annulare) and neutrophilic disorders (e.g., pyoderma gangrenosum). Failure of IL-17 blockade in skin diseases resulting from immune-mediated cell destruction (e.g., alopecia areata and vitiligo) illustrates its limited involvement in Th1-dependent skin immunology. Overall, disappointing results of TNF-α blockers in alopecia areata and vitiligo point to the same conclusion although promising results in toxic epidermal necrolysis suggest TNF-α exerts at least some in vivo Th1-related activities. Acting on both the Th1 and Th17 pathway, ustekinumab has a rather broad potential with interesting results in lupus and alopecia areata. The efficacy of omalizumab in bullous pemphigoid has revealed an IgE-mediated recruitment of eosinophils leading to bullae formation. Reconsidering reimbursement criteria for less common but severe diseases seems appropriate if substantial evidence is available (e.g., pityriasis rubra pilaris). For other disorders, investigator- and industry-initiated randomized clinical trials should be stimulated. They are likely to improve patient outcome and advance our understanding of challenging skin disorders.

Pityriasis rubra pilaris as a systemic disease

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory skin disorder of unknown etiology, initially described in 1835. It is characterized by keratotic follicular papules, well-demarcated salmon-colored erythematous scaly plaques interspersed with distinct islands of uninvolved skin, and palmoplantar keratoderma. Is PRP a systemic disease? Skin is mainly affected in PRP. Despite its clinical heterogeneity, PRP could be associated with a variety of rheumatologic, infectious, neoplastic, and other extracutaneous manifestations. We accept the hypothesis of not only an association but also a causative relation between skin and systemic manifestations with possible common underlying pathomechanisms such as systemic immunologic processes and superantigen mimicry.