1
|
Shen A, Arbesman M, Lodha R, Rayman P, Bungo B, Ni Y, Chan T, Gastman B, Ko J, Diaz-Montero CM, Arbesman J, Funchain P. Clinical and Immunologic Features of Germline Pathogenic Variant-Positive Patients with Melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:564-574. [PMID: 38032355 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Malignant melanoma represents the most lethal skin cancer with germline predispositions thought to comprise 10% to 15% of all melanoma cases. No studies to date examine the immunologic features that may differentiate survival differences between germline pathogenic variant (gPV)-positive patients with melanoma from gPV-negative patients with melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Adult patients with melanoma and clinical characteristics suggesting hereditary predisposition to cancer were prospectively recruited to undergo germline testing and flow cytometric analysis of peripheral immune suppressor cells. RESULTS In this cohort, gPV-positive patients (n = 72) had a significantly improved melanoma-specific survival (MSS) compared with gPV-negative patients (n = 411; HRadj, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.82; P = 0.01). These survival improvements among gPV-positive patients were most apparent among cutaneous melanoma subtypes (HRadj, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.016-0.86; P = 0.03) and numerically improved in later-stage (IIB-IV) patients (HRadj, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.10-1.11; P = 0.06). Further, gPV-positive patients had a significantly lower level of total circulating PMN-MDSC compared with gPV-negative patients (P = 0.01), which was most apparent in those diagnosed with later stages (IIB-IV) of melanoma (P = 0.009). Finally, a significant upregulation of inflammatory transcriptome signatures in later-stage gPV-positive patients (n = 21) was observed in comparison with gPV-negative patients (n = 173) in the cutaneous melanoma cohort (SKCM) of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). CONCLUSIONS gPV-positive patients with melanoma exhibit improved MSS in addition to reduced peripheral PMN-MDSC and an enhanced inflammatory microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Shen
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Roshan Lodha
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Patricia Rayman
- Cleveland Clinic Immuno-monitoring Laboratory, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Brandon Bungo
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ying Ni
- Cleveland Clinic Center for Precision Immunotherapy, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Timothy Chan
- Cleveland Clinic Center for Precision Immunotherapy, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Brian Gastman
- Cleveland Clinic Center for Precision Immunotherapy, Cleveland, Ohio
- Cleveland Clinic Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jennifer Ko
- Cleveland Clinic Immuno-monitoring Laboratory, Cleveland, Ohio
- Cleveland Clinic Center for Precision Immunotherapy, Cleveland, Ohio
- Cleveland Clinic Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - C Marcela Diaz-Montero
- Cleveland Clinic Immuno-monitoring Laboratory, Cleveland, Ohio
- Cleveland Clinic Center for Precision Immunotherapy, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Joshua Arbesman
- Cleveland Clinic Department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taibo A, Paradela S, Suanzes-Hernández J, Balboa-Barreiro V, Amado-Bouza J, Fonseca E. Prognosis of CDKN2A germline mutation in patients with familial melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Melanoma Res 2024; 34:9-15. [PMID: 37924530 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Familial melanoma is defined as melanoma occurring in two or more first-degree relatives by the WHO. Germline mutations are isolated in a subset of them. It is well known that CDKN2A is the most frequently mutated high-risk gene in familial melanoma, however, the prognosis it confers to patients who carry its mutations is still controversial. This review aims to assess whether germline mutations imply a worse prognosis in patients with familial melanoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching the electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Data from 3 independent populations were eventually included in the meta-analysis, involving 291 cases and 57 416 controls. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that there is a tendency for patients with germline mutations in the CDKN2A gene to have a worse overall survival (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.99-1.69, P = 0.05) and melanoma-specific survival (HR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.97-2.31, P = 0.07). Carrier patients would not only have more incidence of melanoma and a higher risk of a second melanoma, but they also seem to have a worse prognosis. The inclusion of gene panel testing in clinical practice and the collaboration within consortia are needed to provide further evidence on the prognosis of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Taibo
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of A Coruña
| | | | - Jorge Suanzes-Hernández
- Research Support Unit, University Hospital of A Coruña, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), A Coruña, Spain
| | - Vanesa Balboa-Barreiro
- Research Support Unit, University Hospital of A Coruña, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), A Coruña, Spain
| | - Javier Amado-Bouza
- Research Support Unit, University Hospital of A Coruña, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), A Coruña, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boşoteanu LA, Gheorghe E, Aşchie M, Cozaru GC, Deacu M, Orășanu CI, Boşoteanu M. Immunophenotypic p14 and p16 correlations with CDKN2A mutations in primary multiple and familial melanoma: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e36756. [PMID: 38134090 PMCID: PMC10735120 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000036756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma represents an aggressive malignant tumor, encapsulating frequent loss of differentiation markers, with familial melanoma constituting a relatively commonly encountered entity, in direct relationship with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A). The present study aims to identify the association between the immunohistochemical p14-p16 profile, the molecular CDKN2A findings and clinically diagnosed familial or multiple primary melanomas (MPM). We conducted a 5-year retrospective cross-sectional study, on patients diagnosed with familial or MPM. P14 and p16 immunohistochemical staining has been applied on the selected surgical specimens simultaneously with the performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) CDKN2A testing. 13 out of the 23 included cases displayed p14 and/or p16 immunohistochemical absence and the main positive relationships were encountered between CDKN2A homozygous deletion and p14 ± p16 negative immunoreactions. Cases with exclusive p16 absent reaction (n = 7) were more frequently associated with the presence of distant metastases (85.71%), while samples with exclusive p14 immunohistochemical loss exhibited more favorable histopathological prognostic markers. The average percentage of p16-stained nuclei in the superficial dermis and the deep dermis were equal (29.54% for each), therefore infirming its potential predictive and/or prognostic utility. The present study is the first of its type to approach the clinical, evolutionary and immunophenotypic correlations between p14-p16 immunohistochemical testing, CDKN2A molecular biology pattern, familial melanoma and spontaneous MPM in a cohort of Romanian patients. This analysis highlighted the value of singular p16 immunohistochemical absence as a predictor for aggressive biological behavior and unfavorable prognosis in familial melanoma and/or MPM, in comparison with the exclusive loss of p14, indifferent to the histopathological subtype. The present study emphasizes the utility of immunohistochemistry as a less expensive method of complementing the current testing arsenal and could represent the starting point for the elaboration of tailored diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, based on the discovered p14-p16-CDKN2A significant correlation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luana-Andreea Boşoteanu
- Department of Dermatovenerology, “Elias” Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Institute of Doctoral Studies, Doctoral School of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanţa, Constanţa, Romania
| | - Emma Gheorghe
- Department of Dermatology, “Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, Constanţa, Romania
- Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanţa, Constanţa, Romania
| | - Mariana Aşchie
- Clinical Service of Pathology, “Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, Constanţa, Romania
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanţa, Constanţa, Romania
- Department VIII – Medical Sciences, Academy of Romanian Scientists, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Georgeta Camelia Cozaru
- Clinical Service of Pathology, “Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, Constanţa, Romania
- Center for Research and Development of the Morphological and Genetic Studies of Malignant Pathology (CEDMOG), Constanța, Romania
| | - Mariana Deacu
- Clinical Service of Pathology, “Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, Constanţa, Romania
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanţa, Constanţa, Romania
| | - Cristian Ionuț Orășanu
- Clinical Service of Pathology, “Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, Constanţa, Romania
- Center for Research and Development of the Morphological and Genetic Studies of Malignant Pathology (CEDMOG), Constanța, Romania
| | - Mădălina Boşoteanu
- Clinical Service of Pathology, “Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, Constanţa, Romania
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanţa, Constanţa, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pissa M, Lapins J, Sköldmark C, Helgadottir H. Melanoma-specific survival before and after inclusion in a familial melanoma dermatologic surveillance program in CDKN2A mutation carriers and non-carriers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2023; 37:284-292. [PMID: 36156317 PMCID: PMC10091727 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inherited mutations in the CDKN2A gene are among the strongest known risk factors for cutaneous melanoma. Further, previous studies have reported inferior melanoma-specific survival in CDKN2A mutation carriers. OBJECTIVES Here, the melanoma-specific survival was studied, depending on CDKN2A carrier status and if the melanomas had been diagnosed before or after families were included in a surveillance program. METHODS Melanoma-prone families participating in this study were identified through a nationwide preventive program starting in 1987. Information on melanoma tumours and deaths was obtained through the Swedish Cancer Registry and Cause of Death Registry. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess melanoma-specific survival in four defined cohorts, CDKN2A mutation (MUT) carriers with first invasive melanoma before or after inclusion [MUT-pre (n = 53) and MUT-post (n = 43)] and likewise in CDKN2A wild type (WT) cases [WT-pre (n = 255) and WT-post (n = 122)]. RESULTS The MUT-pre and MUT-post cases were diagnosed with their first invasive melanoma at a significantly younger ages (38 and 42 years, respectively) than the WT-pre and WT-post cases (48 and 57 years, respectively). The melanomas in the MUT-pre had significantly higher T stage compared with MUT-post (p = 0.006), whereas no such difference was seen comparing WT-pre with WT-post (p = 0.849). MUT-pre had compared with WT-pre, significantly worse melanoma-specific survival, unadjusted (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.33-4.08, p = 0.003) adjusted (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.46-5.00, p = 0.001). However, the MUT-post cases had compared with the WT-post cases, no significant survival differences. CONCLUSION This study is the first to address the impact on survival from introducing a dermatologic surveillance program to familial melanoma cases with or without CDKN2A mutations. The CDKN2A-mut carriers appeared to have a clear benefit with less advanced melanomas diagnosed and better melanoma-specific survival after inclusion. Among the CDKN2A-wt cases, the effect of the inclusion on the studied outcomes was less evident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pissa
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Jan Lapins
- Department of Medicine, Unit of Dermatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christina Sköldmark
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Hildur Helgadottir
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Skin Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Doorn R. Surveillance, CDKN2A and survival of familial melanoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2023; 37:218-219. [PMID: 36640377 PMCID: PMC10107663 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Remco van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pauley K, Khan A, Kohlmann W, Jeter J. Considerations for Germline Testing in Melanoma: Updates in Behavioral Change and Pancreatic Surveillance for Carriers of CDKN2A Pathogenic Variants. Front Oncol 2022; 12:837057. [PMID: 35372037 PMCID: PMC8967159 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.837057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The largest proportion of hereditary melanoma cases are due to pathogenic variants (PVs) in the CDKN2A/p16 gene, which account for 20%-40% of familial melanomas and confer up to a 30%-70% lifetime risk for melanoma in individuals with these variants. In addition, PVs in the CDKN2A gene also increase risk for pancreatic cancer (~5-24% lifetime risk). Individuals with PVs in the CDKN2A gene also tend to have an earlier onset of cancer. Despite these known risks, uptake of germline testing has been limited in the past, largely due to perceptions of limited benefit for patients. Prevention recommendations have been developed for individuals with CDKN2A PVs as well the providers who care for them. On the patient level, behavioral modifications regarding melanoma prevention such as wearing sunscreen, limiting prolonged sun exposure and practicing general sun safety can help reduce risks. Germline testing can provide motivation for some individuals to adhere to these lifestyle changes. On the provider level, pancreatic cancer surveillance for individuals with CDKN2A PVs has been increasingly endorsed by expert consensus, although the efficacy of these surveillance methods remains under study. This review summarizes the updated surveillance guidelines for individuals with CDKN2A PVs and explores the impact of genetic counseling and testing in influencing behavioral changes in these individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Pauley
- Family Cancer Assessment Clinic, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Ambreen Khan
- Family Cancer Assessment Clinic, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Wendy Kohlmann
- Family Cancer Assessment Clinic, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Joanne Jeter
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dalmasso B, Pastorino L, Nathan V, Shah NN, Palmer JM, Howlie M, Johansson PA, Freedman ND, Carter BD, Beane-Freeman L, Hicks B, Molven A, Helgadottir H, Sankar A, Tsao H, Stratigos AJ, Helsing P, Van Doorn R, Gruis NA, Visser M, Wadt KAW, Mann G, Holland EA, Nagore E, Potrony M, Puig S, Menin C, Peris K, Fargnoli MC, Calista D, Soufir N, Harland M, Bishop T, Kanetsky PA, Elder DE, Andreotti V, Vanni I, Bruno W, Höiom V, Tucker MA, Yang XR, Andresen PA, Adams DJ, Landi MT, Hayward NK, Goldstein AM, Ghiorzo P. Germline ATM variants predispose to melanoma: a joint analysis across the GenoMEL and MelaNostrum consortia. Genet Med 2021; 23:2087-2095. [PMID: 34262154 PMCID: PMC8553617 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01240-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) has been implicated in the risk of several cancers, but establishing a causal relationship is often challenging. Although ATM single-nucleotide polymorphisms have been linked to melanoma, few functional alleles have been identified. Therefore, ATM impact on melanoma predisposition is unclear. METHODS From 22 American, Australian, and European sites, we collected 2,104 familial, multiple primary (MPM), and sporadic melanoma cases who underwent ATM genotyping via panel, exome, or genome sequencing, and compared the allele frequency (AF) of selected ATM variants classified as loss-of-function (LOF) and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) between this cohort and the gnomAD non-Finnish European (NFE) data set. RESULTS LOF variants were more represented in our study cohort than in gnomAD NFE, both in all (AF = 0.005 and 0.002, OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.56-4.11, p < 0.01), and familial + MPM cases (AF = 0.0054 and 0.002, OR = 2.97, p < 0.01). Similarly, VUS were enriched in all (AF = 0.046 and 0.033, OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.6-5.09, p < 0.01) and familial + MPM cases (AF = 0.053 and 0.033, OR = 1.63, p < 0.01). In a case-control comparison of two centers that provided 1,446 controls, LOF and VUS were enriched in familial + MPM cases (p = 0.027, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION This study, describing the largest multicenter melanoma cohort investigated for ATM germline variants, supports the role of ATM as a melanoma predisposition gene, with LOF variants suggesting a moderate-risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Dalmasso
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genetics of Rare Cancers, Genoa, Italy.
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
| | - L Pastorino
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genetics of Rare Cancers, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - V Nathan
- Oncogenomics Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - N N Shah
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - J M Palmer
- Oncogenomics Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - M Howlie
- Oncogenomics Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - P A Johansson
- Oncogenomics Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - N D Freedman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - B D Carter
- American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - L Beane-Freeman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - B Hicks
- Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - A Molven
- Gade Laboratory for Pathology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - H Helgadottir
- Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Sankar
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - H Tsao
- Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Department of Dermatology, MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A J Stratigos
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - P Helsing
- Department of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - R Van Doorn
- Department Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - N A Gruis
- Department Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M Visser
- Department Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K A W Wadt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - G Mann
- Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - E A Holland
- Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia
| | - E Nagore
- Department of Dermatology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Potrony
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Melanoma Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Puig
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain
- Dermatology Department, Melanoma Unit, HospitalClínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Menin
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - K Peris
- Institute of Dermatology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - M C Fargnoli
- Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - D Calista
- Dermatology Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - N Soufir
- Dépatement de Génétique Moléculaire, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - M Harland
- Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - T Bishop
- Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P A Kanetsky
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - D E Elder
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - V Andreotti
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genetics of Rare Cancers, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - I Vanni
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genetics of Rare Cancers, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - W Bruno
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genetics of Rare Cancers, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - V Höiom
- Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M A Tucker
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - X R Yang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - P A Andresen
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - D J Adams
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - M T Landi
- Divison of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - N K Hayward
- Oncogenomics Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - A M Goldstein
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - P Ghiorzo
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genetics of Rare Cancers, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ipenburg NA, El Sharouni MA, van Doorn R, van Diest PJ, van Leerdam ME, van der Rhee JI, Goeman J, Kukutsch NA. Lack of association between CDKN2A germline mutations and survival in patients with melanoma: A retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 87:479-482. [PMID: 34695526 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Remco van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jelle Goeman
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole A Kukutsch
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Revythis A, Shah S, Kutka M, Moschetta M, Ozturk MA, Pappas-Gogos G, Ioannidou E, Sheriff M, Rassy E, Boussios S. Unraveling the Wide Spectrum of Melanoma Biomarkers. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11081341. [PMID: 34441278 PMCID: PMC8391989 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of biomarkers in medicine has become essential in clinical practice in order to help with diagnosis, prognostication and prediction of treatment response. Since Alexander Breslow’s original report on “melanoma and prognostic values of thickness”, providing the first biomarker for melanoma, many promising new biomarkers have followed. These include serum markers, such as lactate dehydrogenase and S100 calcium-binding protein B. However, as our understanding of the DNA mutational profile progresses, new gene targets and proteins have been identified. These include point mutations, such as mutations of the BRAF gene and tumour suppressor gene tP53. At present, only a small number of the available biomarkers are being utilised, but this may soon change as more studies are published. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of melanoma biomarkers and their utility for current and, potentially, future clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonios Revythis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK; (A.R.); (S.S.); (M.K.)
| | - Sidrah Shah
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK; (A.R.); (S.S.); (M.K.)
| | - Mikolaj Kutka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK; (A.R.); (S.S.); (M.K.)
| | - Michele Moschetta
- CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon, 21 CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Mehmet Akif Ozturk
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul 34353, Turkey;
| | - George Pappas-Gogos
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45111 Ioannina, Greece;
| | - Evangelia Ioannidou
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, West Suffolk Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hardwick Lane, Bury St Edmunds IP33 2QZ, UK;
| | - Matin Sheriff
- Department of Urology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK;
| | - Elie Rassy
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Institut, 94805 Villejuif, France;
| | - Stergios Boussios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK; (A.R.); (S.S.); (M.K.)
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
- AELIA Organization, 9th Km Thessaloniki-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence: or or
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Efficacy of BRAF and MEK Inhibition in Patients with BRAF-Mutant Advanced Melanoma and Germline CDKN2A Pathogenic Variants. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13102440. [PMID: 34069952 PMCID: PMC8157545 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In our study, we retrospectively collected data of patients with germline CDKN2A pathogenic variants who received targeted therapy for advanced melanoma across four European centers. Since loss of CDKN2A function may intrinsically limit the activity of MAPK-directed targeted therapy, we decided to assess whether patients with germline CDKN2A pathogenic variants may achieve suboptimal results with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting on patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma and a germline CDKN2A pathogenic variant who received treatment with BRAF with or without MEK inhibitors. Despite the limitations of our study, mostly due to the rare frequency of CDKN2A pathogenic variants, a challenge for the conduction of prospective trials with proper sample size, our results support treatment with targeted therapy in this subset of patients. Abstract Inherited pathogenic variants (PVs) in the CDKN2A tumor suppressor gene are among the strongest risk factors for cutaneous melanoma. Dysregulation of the p16/RB1 pathway may intrinsically limit the activity of MAPK-directed therapy due to the interplay between the two pathways. In our study, we assessed, for the first time, whether patients with germline CDKN2A PVs achieve suboptimal results with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi)+/−MEK inhibitors (MEKi). We compared the response rate of nineteen CDKN2A PVs carriers who received first-line treatment with BRAFi+/−MEKi with an expected rate derived from phase III trials and “real-world” studies. We observed partial response in 16/19 patients (84%), and no complete responses. The overall response rate was higher than that expected from phase III trials (66%), although not statistically significant (p-value = 0.143; 95% CI = 0.60–0.97); the difference was statistically significant (p-value = 0.019; 95% CI = 0.62–0.97) in the comparison with real-world studies (57%). The clinical activity of BRAFi+/−MEKi in patients with germline CDKN2A PV was not inferior to that of clinical trials and real-world studies, which is of primary importance for clinical management and genetic counseling of this subgroup of patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Podlipnik S, Potrony M, Puig S. Genetic markers for characterization and prediction of prognosis of melanoma subtypes: a 2021 update. Ital J Dermatol Venerol 2021; 156:322-330. [PMID: 33982545 DOI: 10.23736/s2784-8671.21.06957-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
In this article we examined the most important genetic markers involved in melanoma susceptibility, initiation and progression, and their impact on the prognosis of the disease. Current knowledge in melanoma genetics identifies distinct pathways to the development of different melanoma subtypes characterized by specific clinico-pathological features and partially known genetic markers, modulated by high, low or absence of cumulative sun damage. The most prevalent somatic mutations are related to the activation of the MAPK pathway, which are classified into four major subtypes: BRAF mutant, NRAS mutant, NF1 mutant and triple wild type. Moreover, germinal mutations are also involved in the characterization and predictions of prognosis in melanoma. Currently, CDKN2A is seen as the main high-risk gene involved in melanoma susceptibility being mutated in around 20% of melanoma-prone families. Other high-risk susceptibility genes described include CDK4, POT1, BAP1, TERT promoter, ACD, and TERF2IP. Melanoma is one of the most genetically predisposed among all cancers in humans, and ultraviolet light from the sun is the main environmental factor. This genetic predisposition is starting to be understood, impacting not only on the risk of developing melanoma but also on the risk of developing other types of cancer, as well as on the prognosis of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Podlipnik
- Department of Dermatology, University of Barcelona, Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Unit of Melanoma, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miriam Potrony
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susana Puig
- Department of Dermatology, University of Barcelona, Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain - .,Unit of Melanoma, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aoude LG, Bonazzi VF, Brosda S, Patel K, Koufariotis LT, Oey H, Nones K, Wood S, Pearson JV, Lonie JM, Arneil M, Atkinson V, Smithers BM, Waddell N, Barbour AP. Pathogenic germline variants are associated with poor survival in stage III/IV melanoma patients. Sci Rep 2020; 10:17687. [PMID: 33077847 PMCID: PMC7572377 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74956-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with late stage resected cutaneous melanoma have poor overall survival (OS) and experience irreversible adverse events from systemic therapy. There is a clinical need to identify biomarkers to predict outcome. Performing germline/tumour whole-exome sequencing of 44 stage III/IV melanoma patients we identified pathogenic germline mutations in CDKN2A, CDK4, ATM, POLH, MRE11A, RECQL4 and XPC, affecting 7/44 patients. These mutations were associated with poor OS (p = 0.0082). We confirmed our findings in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) human skin cutaneous melanoma cohort where we identified pathogenic variants in 40/455 patients (p = 0.0203). Combining these cohorts (n = 499) further strengthened these findings showing germline carriers had worse OS (p = 0.0009). Additionally, we determined whether tumour mutation burden (TMB) or BRAF status were prognostic markers of survival. Low TMB rate (< 20 Mut/Mb; p = 0.0034) and BRAF p.V600 mutation (p = 0.0355) were associated with worse progression-free survival. Combining these biomarkers indicated that V600 mutant patients had significantly lower TMB (p = 0.0155). This was confirmed in the TCGA (n = 443, p = 0.0007). Integrative analysis showed germline mutation status conferred the highest risk (HR 5.2, 95% CI 1.72–15.7). Stage IV (HR 2.5, 0.74–8.6) and low TMB (HR 2.3, 0.57–9.4) were similar, whereas BRAF V600 status was the weakest prognostic biomarker (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.44–5.2).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren G Aoude
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
| | - Vanessa F Bonazzi
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Sandra Brosda
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Kalpana Patel
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | | | - Harald Oey
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Katia Nones
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Scott Wood
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - John V Pearson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - James M Lonie
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Melissa Arneil
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia
| | - B Mark Smithers
- Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia
| | - Nicola Waddell
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Andrew P Barbour
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.,Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang K, Oak AS, Slominski RM, Brożyna AA, Slominski AT. Current Molecular Markers of Melanoma and Treatment Targets. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21103535. [PMID: 32429485 PMCID: PMC7278971 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21103535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is a deadly skin cancer that becomes especially difficult to treat after it metastasizes. Timely identification of melanoma is critical for effective therapy, but histopathologic diagnosis can frequently pose a significant challenge to this goal. Therefore, auxiliary diagnostic tools are imperative to facilitating prompt recognition of malignant lesions. Melanoma develops as result of a number of genetic mutations, with UV radiation often acting as a mutagenic risk factor. Novel methods of genetic testing have improved detection of these molecular alterations, which subsequently revealed important information for diagnosis and prognosis. Rapid detection of genetic alterations is also significant for choosing appropriate treatment and developing targeted therapies for melanoma. This review will delve into the understanding of various mutations and the implications they may pose for clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Yang
- Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (K.Y.); (A.S.O.)
| | - Allen S.W. Oak
- Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (K.Y.); (A.S.O.)
| | - Radomir M. Slominski
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA;
| | - Anna A. Brożyna
- Department of Human Biology, Institute of Biology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland;
| | - Andrzej T. Slominski
- Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (K.Y.); (A.S.O.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Chemoprevention Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Veteran Administration Medical Center, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Toussi A, Mans N, Welborn J, Kiuru M. Germline mutations predisposing to melanoma. J Cutan Pathol 2020; 47:606-616. [PMID: 32249949 DOI: 10.1111/cup.13689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Nearly 15% of melanomas occur in patients with a family history and a subset of these patients have a germline mutation in a melanoma predisposing gene. CDKN2A mutations are responsible for the majority of hereditary melanoma, but many other susceptibility genes have been discovered in recent years, including CDK4, TERT, ACD, TERF2IP, POT1, MITF, MC1R, and BAP1. Additionally, melanoma risk is increased in mixed cancer syndromes caused by mutations in PTEN, BRCA2, BRCA1, RB1, and TP53. While early onset, multiple tumors, and family cancer history remain the most valuable clinical clues for hereditary melanoma, characteristic epithelioid cytology of melanocytic tumors may suggest an underlying BAP1 mutation. Herein, we review the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of melanocytic tumors associated with these germline mutations and discuss the role of genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atrin Toussi
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Nicole Mans
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Jeanna Welborn
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Maija Kiuru
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Campos C, Fragoso S, Luís R, Pinto F, Brito C, Esteves S, Pataco M, Santos S, Machado P, Vicente JB, Costa Rosa J, Cavaco BM, Moura C, Pojo M. High-Throughput Sequencing Identifies 3 Novel Susceptibility Genes for Hereditary Melanoma. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11040403. [PMID: 32276436 PMCID: PMC7230562 DOI: 10.3390/genes11040403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is one of the most aggressive human cancers due to its high invasiveness. Germline mutations in high-risk melanoma susceptibility genes have been associated with development hereditary melanoma; however, most genetic culprits remain elusive. To unravel novel susceptibility genes for hereditary melanoma, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on eight patients with multiple primary melanomas, high number of nevi, and negative for high and intermediate-risk germline mutations. Thirteen new potentially pathogenic variants were identified after bioinformatics analysis and validation. CDH23, ARHGEF40, and BRD9 were identified as the most promising susceptibility genes in hereditary melanoma. In silico analysis of CDH23 and ARHGEF40 variants provided clues for altered protein structure and function associated with the identified mutations. Then, we also evaluated the clinical value of CDH23, ARHGEF40, and BRD9 expression in sporadic melanoma by using the TCGA dataset (n = 461). No differences were observed in BRD9 expression between melanoma and normal skin samples, nor with melanoma stage, whereas ARHGEF40 was found overexpressed, and CDH23 was downregulated and its loss was associated with worse survival. Altogether, these results reveal three novel genes with clinical relevance in hereditary and sporadic melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Campos
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Sofia Fragoso
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rafael Luís
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Filipe Pinto
- i3S-Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- IPATIMUP—Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
| | - Cheila Brito
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Susana Esteves
- Unidade de Investigação Clínica (UIC) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Margarida Pataco
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Sidónia Santos
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Patrícia Machado
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - João B. Vicente
- Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Av. da República (EAN), 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Joaninha Costa Rosa
- Serviço de Anatomia Patológica do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
- NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Branca M. Cavaco
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Cecília Moura
- Clínica de Risco Familiar do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
- Serviço de Dermatologia do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Marta Pojo
- Unidade de Investigação em Patobiologia Molecular (UIPM) do Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Rua Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +351-21-722-9800 (ext. 1794)
| |
Collapse
|