Oral minoxidil improves background hair thickness in lichen planopilaris

Lichen Planus: What is New in Diagnosis and Treatment?

Lichen planus (LP), an idiopathic, multifaceted chronic inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous clinical presentation, affects approximately 0.5-1% of the population. The various clinical manifestations of LP fall into three broad categories, namely cutaneous, appendageal, and mucosal, with further subclassification depending on the morphology and distribution patterns of individual lesions. There is mounting evidence that LP has systemic associations, including autoimmune conditions, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disorders. Cutaneous hypertrophic and mucosal forms of LP are at a heightened risk for malignant transformation. Familiarity with these potential associations in conjunction with long-term follow-up and regular screening could lead to a timely diagnosis and management of concomitant conditions. In addition, the frequent quality of life (QoL) impairment in LP underscores the need for a comprehensive approach including psychological evaluation and support. Several treatment strategies have been attempted, though most of them have not been adopted in clinical practice because of suboptimal benefit-to-risk ratios or lack of evidence. More recent studies toward pathogenesis-driven treatments have identified Janus kinase inhibitors such as tofacitinib, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors such as apremilast, and biologics targeting the interleukin-23/interleukin-17 pathway as novel therapeutic options, resulting in a dramatic change of the treatment landscape of LP. This contemporary review focuses on the diagnosis and management of LP, and places emphasis on more recently described targeted treatment options.

Exploring Remission Dynamics and Prognostic Factors in Lichen Planopilaris: a Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a common type of primary cicatricial alopecia. Previous studies focused on the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment of LPP. A lack of knowledge regarding LPP outcomes and prognostic factors remained.

METHODS

To delineate the rate and timing of remission in LPP, as well as the prognostic factors for achieving remission, a retrospective cohort study was conducted. The study included 126 patients, from a single tertiary center, diagnosed with LPP between January 2010 and December 2022, who were followed up for a minimum of 6 months.

RESULTS

There were 89 (70.6%) women and 37 (29.4 %) men included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 47.92±14.2 years. The mean time from disease onset to diagnosis was 33.85 (±30) months, indicating significant diagnostic delays. The mean duration of follow-up was 34.13±22.7 months. Among the cohort, 43 patients achieved complete remission (CR) during the follow-up period, whereas 83 patients did not. Of the 83 patients who did not achieve CR, 35 partially improved and 48 did not improve or worsened. The median time for achieving CR was 46±18.8 months. Milder disease at presentation and comorbid lichen planus were associated with higher CR rates.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates significant diagnostic delays that should be addressed as LPP causes irreversible alopecia, suggests disease severity and comorbid lichen planus as potential prognostic factors. Further, it emphasizes the limited efficacy of current treatments and the need for prolonged treatment in patients with LPP to achieve remission.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose oral minoxidil in the management of androgenetic alopecia

INTRODUCTION

Treating alopecia can be challenging. The available treatments are topical minoxidil, low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM), and 5-α reductase inhibitors like finasteride and dutasteride. Only topical minoxidil and finasteride 1 mg daily are FDA-approved, while the rest are used off-label. Recent research has suggested that oral minoxidil may be a safe and effective treatment for both female androgenetic alopecia (female AGA) and male androgenetic alopecia (male AGA).

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we explore the pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of oral minoxidil. Additionally, we discuss its effectiveness compared to other treatments available for female AGA and male AGA.

EXPERT OPINION

LDOM has demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in several trials. Subsequently, its use for the treatment of male AGA and female AGA is increasing. However, its use remains off-label, and through increased usage, we will get a better idea of the best dosage and monitoring guidelines. LDOM has also been used with some effectiveness in other forms of hair loss.

Low-Dose Oral Minoxidil for Alopecia: A Comprehensive Review

Low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) has demonstrated a promising safety and efficacy profile in the treatment of various hair disorders, including male androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and female-pattern hair loss (FPHL); however, it lacks FDA approval. The usual LDOM starting dose for male AGA is 1-5 mg/day, depending on physician preference and the patient's condition. For FPHL, it is 0.5-1 mg/day. The maximum dose is generally 5 mg/day. If patients respond well without major side effects, the dose may be gradually increased since the LDOM's efficacy appears to be dose-dependent. Patients may use LDOM long term if the treatment outcome is satisfactory. The common side effects of LDOM are hypertrichosis and cardiovascular symptoms. Females are more prone to hypertrichosis than males. The side effects of LDOM can be categorized as (a) dose-dependent type A side effects (hypertrichosis and cardiovascular symptoms) and (b) idiosyncratic type B side effects (pericardial effusion). Minoxidil acts via multiple pathways. Although minoxidil has a relatively short half-life of around 4 h, its hypotensive effect may last approximately 72 h. Effective treatments for alopecia are limited. Therefore, LDOM could be an important addition to the available therapies for managing some hair disorders, including AGA.

Systemic minoxidil for hair disorders in pediatric patients: a safety and tolerability review

Topical minoxidil has been used for many years to treat adult alopecia, and there is growing evidence supporting the off-label use of low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM). However, there is little data on its use in pediatrics, and there are no recommended treatment guidelines. Adverse events are of particular concern in this population. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 63 patients aged between 0 and 12 years from a specialist hair clinic who were treated with LDOM or sublingual minoxidil (SM) to evaluate its safety and tolerability. LDOM and SM were generally well-tolerated, with mild hypertrichosis being the most commonly reported adverse event. Further large-scale studies are warranted to determine the efficacy and optimum dosage of systemic minoxidil for alopecia in the pediatric population.

Comprehensive review of oral minoxidil in alopecia

BACKGROUND

There have been various treatment modalities available for alopecia in the form of topical and systemic with a variable response. The compliance of the patients is important in reaping results in alopecia. Minoxidil has come a long-way finding its use from topical formulations to systemic at lower dose in different alopecia.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to discuss various conditions in alopecia where oral minoxidil has found its role.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed relating to oral minoxidil role in various alopecia. Various clinical trials, case series, and case reports were searched on PubMed and Google Scholar. The references of available studies were also reviewed to collect the additional resources. Available data from various studies and case reports were collected and consolidated to provide a concise overview of oral minoxidil indications in various alopecia.

RESULTS

Oral minoxidil has been used in various non-scarring and scarring alopecia at a lower dosage with less side effects and with promising results. Androgenetic alopecia and female pattern hair loss were the two conditions where it has been used more commonly than other alopecia, providing a ray of hope along with overcoming the issues related to topical formulations and compliance.

Frontiers in Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Research: Pathobiology Progress and Translational Horizons

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) are primary, lymphocytic cicatricial hair loss disorders. These model epithelial stem cell (SC) diseases are thought to result from a CD8⁺ T-cell‒dominated immune attack on the hair follicle (HF) SC niche (bulge) after the latter has lost its immune privilege (IP) for as yet unknown reasons. This induces both apoptosis and pathological epithelial‒mesenchymal transition in epithelial SCs, thus depletes the bulge, causes fibrosis, and ultimately abrogates the HFs' capacity to regenerate. In this paper, we synthesize recent progress in LPP and FFA pathobiology research, integrate our limited current understanding of the roles that genetic, hormonal, environmental, and other factors may play, and define major open questions. We propose that LPP and FFA share a common initial pathobiology, which then bifurcates into two distinct clinical phenotypes, with macrophages possibly playing a key role in phenotype determination. As particularly promising translational research avenues toward direly needed progress in the management of these disfiguring, deeply distressful cicatricial alopecia variants, we advocate to focus on the development of bulge IP and epithelial SC protectants such as, for example, topically effective, HF‒penetrating and immunoinhibitory preparations that contain tacrolimus, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, and/or CB1 agonists.

Lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia: review and update of diagnostic and therapeutic features

Lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia are primary scarring alopecias where diagnosis can be suggested by clinical and trichoscopy features, especially in the early stages, but scalp biopsy is the standard exam for definitive diagnosis. Frontal fibrosing alopecia is considered a variant of lichen planopilaris, as the histopathological findings are similar, with a perifollicular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, sometimes with a lichenoid pattern. A thorough clinical examination, trichoscopy and photographic documentation are essential to assess the evolution and therapeutic response. To date, there are no validated treatments or guidelines for these diseases, but there are recommendations that vary with the individual characteristics of each patient. This article presents a comprehensive review of the literature, including an update on topics related to the diagnosis, follow-up, histopathological aspects and available treatments for lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia, highlighting their similarities, differences and peculiarities.

Current controversies in trichology: a European expert consensus statement

INTRODUCTION

Hair disorders are one of the most common conditions within dermatology practice but, although new diagnostic tools and therapeutic options have arisen, the management of these patients still represents a major clinical challenge.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at gathering information and achieving consensus on relevant recommendations on the latest advances in alopecia, trichoscopy and hair dermocosmetics.

METHODS

Experts of the steering committee consulted the available evidence on trichology-related areas from the past 5 years and formulated recommendations based on the evidence and their experience. A modified two-round Delphi procedure was performed among 45 European dermatologists experts in trichology to consult their degree of agreement on twenty recommendations, using a 4-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as >80% of participants scoring either 1 (totally agree) or 2 (agree).

RESULTS

In the first round of the Delphi questionnaire, 75% of the recommendations reached consensus. Those that were not agreed upon were reformulated by the steering committee and voted again after an online meeting, where consensus was achieved in all recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

All recommendations reached consensus after the two-round Delphi questionnaire and may be useful in clinical practice for dermatologists. The participants agreed that besides this consensus, further clinical studies are needed to assess the benefits of the emerging tools and treatments and to clarify the controversies that still exist in the field, aiming at improving patients' quality of life.

A Practical Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of Classic Lichen Planopilaris

Lichen planopilaris is a primary lymphocytic cicatricial alopecia that commonly presents with hair loss at the vertex or parietal scalp. Patients may also have associated scalp itching, burning or tenderness. Due to scarring, hair loss is typically permanent. The main goals of treatment are reducing symptoms and preventing disease progression and further hair loss. Currently, the literature has limited evidence on treatments for this difficult condition, and most available evidence is from case reports and case series. Furthermore, the evidence shows a varied response to therapy, with frequent reports of poor response. This article reviews the diagnosis of this rare disease, summarize the currently available treatments, and provide insights and practices from alopecia experts.

Alopecias in humans: biology, pathomechanisms and emerging therapies

BACKGROUND

The hair follicle is a complete mini-organ with a complex biology. Recent discoveries have shed light on the pathogenesis and genetic basis of a number of hair loss conditions, offering novel treatment alternatives.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the biology and physiology of hair growth, the pathomechanism behind alopecias and emerging therapies.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Hair growth is influenced by numerous physiological moderators. Greater understanding of the biology and physiology of the hair follicle and the pathomechanisms of hair disease facilitates development of targeted treatments. Sublingual minoxidil is a promising therapy in humans where optimised drug delivery enhances efficacy and reduces systemic adverse effects. Janice kinase inhibitors, which disrupt the inflammatory cascade, help maintain the hair follicle, preserve immune privilege, and regrow hair in alopecia areata. As the pathomechanisms of other forms of alopecia become better understood, new targeted therapies with greater efficacy will emerge.

Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Review

Frontal fibrosing alopecia is a scarring alopecia, the prevalence of which is increasing worldwide since its first description in 1994. The reason for this emerging epidemic may be a higher exposure to an unknown trigger, although its aethiology and pathogenesis still remain enigmatic. Clinical, trichoscopic, sonographic, and histopathologic findings are allowing clinicians to understand more aspects about this type of cicatricial alopecia. Several treatments have been used in frontal fibrosing alopecia, although the 5-alpha reductase inhibitors seem to be the most promising. The aim of this report is to provide a compilation about the published data regarding frontal fibrosing alopecia in a narrative review.

Optimal Management of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Practical Guide

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a primary lymphocytic cicatricial alopecia that is often considered a clinical variant of lichen planopilaris (LPP) due to their shared histopathologic features. FFA is characterized by the recession of the frontal, temporal, or frontotemporal hairline; the clinical pattern is distinct and usually includes eyebrow hair loss, as well as other associated symptoms. Pruritus, facial papules, eyelash loss, body hair involvement, and trichodynia may also occur in addition to the frontotemporal recession and eyebrow loss classically seen. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are critical as FFA is a progressive disorder that can result in permanent hair loss. FFA is challenging as patients may not present or be recognized until the disease has progressed. Additionally, there is currently no consensus or standard treatment regimen for FFA. While many different therapies have been reported as beneficial, there are a limited number of published guidelines for the treatment of FFA. This article is a review of the literature on treatment modalities for FFA and the objective is to offer a practical guide for clinicians on the evidence-based management options currently available in the literature.

Oral minoxidil treatment for hair loss: A review of efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND

Although topical minoxidil is an effective treatment option for hair loss, many patients are poorly compliant because of the necessity to apply the medication twice a day, undesirable hair texture, and scalp irritation.

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, oral minoxidil at low dose has been proposed as a safe alternative. This study reviewed articles in which oral minoxidil was used to treat hair loss to determine its efficacy and safety as an alternative to topical minoxidil.

METHODS

PubMed searches were performed to identify articles discussing oral minoxidil as the primary form of treatment for hair loss published up to April 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies with 634 patients were found discussing the use of oral minoxidil as the primary treatment modality for hair loss. Androgenetic alopecia was the most studied condition, but other conditions included telogen effluvium, lichen planopilaris, loose anagen hair syndrome, monilethrix, alopecia areata, and permanent chemotherapy-induced alopecia.

LIMITATIONS

Larger randomized studies comparing the efficacy/safety of different doses with standardized objective measurements will be needed to clarify the best treatment protocol.

CONCLUSION

Oral minoxidil was found to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment alternative for healthy patients having difficulty with topical formulations.