Controversies in defining a surgical site infection following Mohs micrographic surgery: A literature review

Shared decision making for perioperative antibiotic use during Mohs micrographic surgery on the lower extremities

Background

While there is a higher risk of surgical site infection (SSI) on the lower extremities following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) is debated.

Objective

To determine the role of shared decision making (SDM) in guiding AP usage during MMS on the lower extremities.

Materials and methods

A prospective observational study was conducted whereby patients received a standardized SDM discussion or routine counseling. Patient satisfaction quantified by the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDMQ9) survey, rate of SSI, and rate of AP prescription were recorded.

Results

In total, 51 patients were included. While there were less antibiotics prescribed in the treatment group (20% versus 50%, P = .025), this did not affect incidence of SSI (8% in treatment group versus 7.7% in control group, P = .668). Patient satisfaction was statistically greater in SDM group (4.73 versus 2.18 in control (P < .001).

Conclusion

Patient satisfaction scores were higher among the patients who received SDM. While the usage of AP was lower in the SDM group, this did not affect incidence of SSI. This study allows the opportunity to apply SDM in the setting of MMS, which to our knowledge has not yet been attempted in the field of dermatologic surgery.

Tumeszenz-Lokalanästhesie bei geriatrischen Patienten mit Hauttumoren im Kopf-Hals-Bereich - Eine retrospektive Studie an 782 Patienten: Tumescent local anesthesia in geriatric patients with head and neck skin cancer - a retrospective study of 782 patients

Hintergrund und Zielsetzung

Aufgrund ihrer Morbidität werden dermatochirurgische Eingriffe bei älteren Patienten vorzugsweise in Tumeszenz‐Lokalanästhesie durchgeführt. Allerdings ist die Datenlage hierzu begrenzt. Ziel der Arbeit war es, die Tumeszenz‐Lokalanästhesie für Hautkrebsoperationen bei älteren Patienten mit dem Fokus auf klinische Vorteile (Behandlungsprozesse, Schmerzmanagement) und dem lokalen postoperativen Komplikationsrisiko zu evaluieren.

Patienten und Methodik

Untersuchung von Patienten ≥75 Jahren mit stationär durchgeführten Hautkrebsoperationen im Kopf‐Hals‐Bereich unter Tumeszenz‐Lokalanästhesie.

Ergebnisse

2940 Eingriffe bei 782 Patienten (Durchschnittsalter 83,3 Jahre) mit dem Ziel einer vollständigen Tumorresektion während des stationären Aufenthaltes wurden durchgeführt. 3,8 (Bereich: 1–20) Eingriffe erfolgten über einen Zeitraum von durchschnittlich 4,9 Tagen (Bereich: 1–28). 43,2% benötigten keine postoperative Analgesie. 53,5% erhielten NSAID, 3,3% Opioide. Wundinfektionen (13,6%) waren die häufigste lokale postoperative Komplikation. Chirurgische Interventionen aufgrund von Nachblutungen waren in 2,8% der Fälle erforderlich. Keine der Blutungen waren hämoglobinrelevant oder lebensbedrohlich. Nahtdehiszenzen und Nekrosen waren selten (0,6%).

Schlussfolgerungen

Die Tumeszenz‐Lokalanästhesie ist für Hautkrebsoperationen bei älteren Menschen eine effektive Anästhesiemethode. Durch den Verzicht auf eine Vollnarkose können die Behandlungsabläufe optimiert und anästhesiologische Risiken minimiert werden. Lokale postoperative Komplikationen treten eher selten auf und sind gut behandelbar. Die langanhaltende Analgesie führt zu einem geringeren Analgetikabedarf und selteneren Medikamenteninteraktionen.

Tumescent local anesthesia in geriatric patients with head and neck skin cancer - a retrospective study of 782 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Due to frailty, dermatosurgery in the elderly is preferably performed under tumescent local anesthesia, but data is limited. The aim was to evaluate tumescent local anesthesia for skin cancer surgery in the elderly with focus on clinical benefits (treatment processes, pain management) and local postoperative complication risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Investigation of patients ≥ 75 years with inpatient head and neck skin cancer surgery under tumescent local anesthesia.

RESULTS

2,940 procedures in 782 patients (mean age 83.3 years) were performed with the aim of complete tumor resection during the inpatient stay. 3.8 (range: 1-20) interventions were done over an average of 4.9 days (range: 1-28). 43.2% did not require any postoperative analgesia. 53.5% received NSAIDs, 3.3% opioids. Infection (13.6%) was the most common local postoperative complication. Surgical intervention due to bleeding was required in 2.8%. None was hemoglobin relevant or life-threatening. Suture dehiscence and necrosis were rare (0.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumescent local anesthesia is an effective method for skin cancer surgery in the elderly. By avoiding general anesthesia, treatment processes can be optimized and anesthesiologic risks minimized. Local postoperative complications are still low and well treatable. The long-lasting analgesia results in a reduced need for analgesics and drug interactions.

Postoperative Surgical Site Infection Rate in Patients with Diabetes following Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) among patients with diabetes is largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate diabetes as a potential SSI risk factor in MMS by comparing SSI incidence in a cohort of patients with and without diabetes.

METHODS

5-year retrospective review to determine SSI rate in patients with diabetes compared to patients without diabetes. SSI incidence in patients with diabetes was further compared by A1c, and the impact of antibiotics on SSI rate was also examined.

RESULTS

Overall rate of SSI was 1.47% (53/3,597 cases). SSI rate among patients with diabetes was 1.95% (14/719 cases) compared to 1.35% (39/2,878 cases) in patients without diabetes, with a non-significant odds ratio for SSI of 1.45 (95% CI = 0.78-2.68, p = 0.241). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed no difference in SSI. Stratification of diabetic patients by A1c into ≥7.0 and <7.0 compared to patients without diabetes yielded no statistically significant difference in SSI among all groups (p = 0.815). Whether an antibiotic was prescribed did not significantly impact SSI rate between groups.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in postoperative SSI was found in patients with diabetes compared to patients without diabetes following MMS regardless of degree of glycemic control.