Racial disparities in clinical trials of biologic treatments for psoriatic arthritis

Disparities in Care for Psoriasis

Race, ethnicity, language, sex, age, income, insurance status, location, and other socioeconomic and demographic factors influence access to and quality of care for patients with psoriasis, which can potentially lead to inequitable outcomes.

Differential risks of psoriatic arthritis development in patients with varied psoriasis manifestations: a sex- and ethnicity-specific analysis

Objectives

This study investigated psoriatic arthritis (PsA) risk across varied psoriasis manifestations, considering sex and ethnicity.

Methods

Using TriNetX, a federated database encompassing over 120 million electronic health records (EHRs), we performed global retrospective cohort studies. Psoriasis vulgaris (Pso), pustulosis palmoplantaris (PPP), and generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) cohorts were retrieved using ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching, incorporating age, sex, and ethnicity, was employed. An alternative propensity matching model additionally included established PsA risk factors.

Results

We retrieved data from 486 (Black or African American-stratified, GPP) to 35,281 (Pso) EHRs from the US Collaborative Network. Significant PsA risk variations emerged: Pso carried the highest risk [hazard ratio (HR) 87.7, confidence interval (CI) 63.4-121.1, p < 0.001], followed by GPP (HR 26.8, CI 6.5-110.1, p < 0.0001), and PPP (HR 15.3, CI 7.9-29.5, p < 0.0001). Moreover, we identified significant sex- and ethnicity-specific disparities in PsA development. For instance, compared to male Pso patients, female Pso patients had an elevated PsA risk (HR 1.1, CI 1.1-1.2, p = 0.002). Furthermore, White Pso patients had a higher likelihood of developing PsA compared to their Black or African American counterparts (HR 1.3, CI 1.04-1.7, p = 0.0244). We validated key findings using alternative propensity matching strategies and independent databases.

Conclusion

This study delineates nuanced PsA risk profiles across psoriasis forms, highlighting the pivotal roles of sex and ethnicity. Integrating these factors into PsA risk assessments enables tailored monitoring and interventions, potentially impacting psoriasis patient care quality.

Characteristics of race/ethnicity in trials leading to anti-rheumatic drug approval for inflammatory arthritis by the US Food and Drug Administration

OBJECTIVE

Presenting the racial/ethnic representation in clinical trials leading to new approvals of inflammatory arthritis (IA) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to determine the extent of racial/ethnic disparities.

METHODS

Pivotal trials supporting the approval of new indications from July 2012 to June 2022 were collected from Drugs@FDA, the FDA-approved drugs database. More details were then identified by searching Pubmed and the National Institutes of Health trials registry. General characteristics of the approved drugs and demographic data for each pivotal trial, especially the race/ethnicity data, were collected. The enrollment profiles of each race/ethnicity were analyzed and then compared with the 2020 US census data.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2022, 34 new approvals were identified based on 59 clinical trials. The Black was consistently underrepresented in all subtypes of IA and drugs, while the White was overrepresented compared to the 2020 US census data. For Asian and Hispanic participants, these pivotal trials presented relatively heterogeneities in enrollments. As for the trends over time, increased involvements of White were still observed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, and spondyloarthritis, while increased involvements of Black and decreased enrollments of Asian and Hispanic were only observed in RA.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite many efforts to eliminate racial/ethnic disparities, the Black was consistently underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials compared to the 2020 US national race/ethnicity distribution data. The White was consistently overrepresented, and the Hispanic presented heterogeneous results. No evident time trend was observed.