Failure of stem cell therapy to improve visual acuity in children with optic nerve hypoplasia

Advanced Therapy and Clinical Trials to Treat Patients with Optic Nerve Diseases

Optic nerve diseases include a wide variety of pathogenic conditions triggering injury or dysfunction of the optic nerves that lead to visual impairment or blindness in one or both eyes. Despite their pathogenic variety, most of them proceed through common mechanisms that allow them to investigate together. Nevertheless, roles of the cells, tissues, genes, growth factors, and proteins, and all underlying pathophysiological mechanisms need to be studied fully for better management of each optic nerve disease. This review presents a collection of information regarding ongoing and completed clinical trials (CT) of advanced therapies that deliver stem cell and gene therapy treatments as drugs to patients with optic nerve diseases as well as successes and failures achieved in treating these patients in the last few years. These drugs seem safe from creating neurotoxicity. It describes outcomes of a bibliographic search for stem cell therapy, gene therapy, and neuroprotection-based CT registered in the International ClinicalTrials.gov, the European EudraCT, and the Spanish REEC database, and related papers published in the PUBMED database by applying different search terminologies. This review overall informs the patients of optic neurodiseases that advanced therapies are progressing successfully in search of effective and safe treatments for them.

Selected Ophthalmological Features in Children with Septo-Optic Dysplasia and Optic Nerve Hypoplasia

Septo-optic dysplasia (SOD) and optic nerve hypoplasia (ONH) cause congenital visual impairment. Their aetiology is mostly unknown. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of selected ophthalmological features in patients with these disorders. A chart review was performed on patients with SOD/ONH. Ophthalmological data were extracted. There were 102 patients (56 males). The median age at the end of the study was 12.7 years. Best-corrected visual acuity ranged from normal to no light perception. Bilateral ONH was more common than unilateral ONH. Strabismus (85%) and to a lesser extent nystagmus (52%) were both very common in our cohort. Patients with esotropia had worse visual acuity than those who had exotropia. The presence of nystagmus was more likely in cases with bilateral ONH. Therefore, patients with SOD/ONH may have normal visual acuity. Many have strabismus, which may cause amblyopia thereby further decreasing visual acuity. Nystagmus occurs commonly and its presence typically indicates bilateral ONH.

Using umbilical cord blood for regenerative therapy: Proof or promise?

The identification of nonhematopoietic progenitor cells in cord blood has spawned great interest in using cord blood cells for new indications in regenerative therapy. Many preclinical studies demonstrated improvement in reperfusion and markers of organ recovery using cord blood-derived cells in a range of animal models. Initial results heralded increasing clinical interest regarding the use of cord blood for regenerative therapy. Initial clinical studies were largely uncontrolled feasibility studies that were case series and reported on small numbers of patients. The emergence of controlled studies has been slower, although multiple controlled studies have been conducted in patients with cerebral palsy and type I diabetes. Heterogeneity in the cellular product, patients, study design, and the timing of outcome measurements remains barriers to meta-analysis and a clearer understanding of efficacy. Controlled studies of modest size have been reported for a range of additional conditions. The conduct of controlled clinical trials to evaluate potential new uses of cord blood for regenerative therapy remains essential. None of the indications studied to date can be regarded as proven. Moreover, consistency in outcome reporting in terms of the instruments used and the time points for assessment after therapy are needed, including longer follow-up of study participants. Frequent and careful evaluation of the evidence will allow cord blood banks, health care providers, and patients to assess potential new options in the use of cord blood for regenerative therapy.

Systematic review of controlled clinical studies using umbilical cord blood for regenerative therapy: Identifying barriers to assessing efficacy

Clinical use of umbilical cord blood (UCB) for novel indications in regenerative therapy continues to rise, however, whether new indications are proven is less clear. An updated systematic search of the literature, focusing only on controlled clinical studies, is needed to properly assess potential efficacy. After updating our systematic search to April 1, 2018 (PROSPERO protocol CRD42016040157), a total of 16 studies were identified that addressed the treatment of cerebral palsy (four studies), type 1 diabetes (three studies), and nine other novel potential indications where only a single controlled study was identified. In the four controlled studies of patients with cerebral palsy, three used allogeneic cells and reported greater improvement in motor-related scores at 1, 3 and 6 months compared with controls. The results were mixed for other scores at other time points, including additional measures of mental and motor function. One study of autologous UCB treatment reported an improvement in motor function scores at 12 months compared with controls. In the three controlled studies of type 1 diabetes, two studies used autologous cells whereas one used allogeneic cord blood cells to "educate" autologous lymphocytes. Taken together, there was no clear difference in HbA1c levels or daily insulin requirements between treated patients and controls. For the nine published reports with a single controlled study, eight used allogeneic UCB cells and seven infused mesenchymal stromal cells derived from UCB. All but one study reported benefit. Many other published reports that lack a control group were not included in our analysis. More controlled studies are needed that use similar approaches regarding cell source and outcome measures at similar time points. Pooled estimates of results from multiple studies will be essential as published studies remain modest in size. Patients should continue to be enrolled in clinical trials because there are no novel potential indications remain unproven.

Cell-Based Therapy Using Umbilical Cord Blood for Novel Indications in Regenerative Therapy and Immune Modulation: An Updated Systematic Scoping Review of the Literature

Cell-based therapy using umbilical cord blood (UCB) is being used increasingly in novel applications. To balance heightened public expectations and ensure appropriateness of emerging cell-based treatment choices, regular evidence-based assessment of novel UCB-derived therapies is needed. We performed a systematic search of the literature and identified 57 studies (814 patients) for analysis. Sixteen of these studies (353 patients) included a control group for comparison. The most commonly reported novel indication for therapy was neurologic diseases (25 studies, 476 patients), including studies of cerebral palsy (12 studies, 276 patients). Other indications included diabetes mellitus (9 studies, 149 patients), cardiac and vascular diseases (7 studies, 24 patients), and hepatic diseases (4 studies, 106 patients). Most studies administered total nucleated cells, mononuclear cells, or CD34-selected cells (31 studies, 513 patients), whereas 20 studies described the use of UCB-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. The majority of reports (46 studies, 627 patients) described cellular products obtained from allogeneic sources, whereas 11 studies (187 patients) used autologous products. We identified 3 indications where multiple prospective controlled studies have been published: 4 of 4 studies reported clinical benefit in cerebral palsy, 1 of 3 studies reported benefit for cirrhosis, and 1 of 3 studies reported biochemical response in type 1 diabetes), although heterogeneity among the studies precluded meaningful pooled analysis of results. We anticipate a more clear understanding of the clinical benefit for specific indications once more controlled studies are reported. Patients should continue to be enrolled on registered clinical trials for novel therapies. Blood establishments, transplantation centers, and regulatory bodies need to prepare for greater clinical demand.