Factors related to strabismus decompensation after a period of prolonged postoperative stability

An analysis of strabismus reoperations in Northern Alberta, Canada from 1995 to 2015

OBJECTIVE

To report the reoperation rate in a large group of pediatric and adult strabismus patients over a 21-year period in Northern Alberta, Canada.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 6177 strabismus surgeries from July 1995 to June 2015 on 5125 pediatric and adult patients was conducted to determine the reoperation rate at a single major referral centre. A set of guidelines was implemented in November 2014 recommending delaying reintervention for at least 12 weeks from the initial surgery, with specific exceptions.

RESULTS

The historical strabismus reoperation rate over a 21-year period was 15.7%. Of those surgeries requiring reoperation, 77.7% required only 1 reoperation, 17.1% required 2 reoperations, 3.1% required 3 reoperations, and 2.1% required 4 or more reoperations. The mean time between surgeries for patients undergoing reoperation was 2.3 years and the median time was 1.0 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides insight into the strabismus reoperation rate and the number of subsequent surgeries performed for patients over a 21-year period. Although preoperative ocular alignment, comorbidities, and the status of the operative eye modify the probability of reoperation, our results from a large cohort of patients provide an impression of the rate of reoperation and may be of benefit in the preoperative counseling of patients. Furthermore, we highlight the scarcity of guidelines for the appropriate timing of reoperation. The implementation of specific guidelines may encourage future investigation into trends in reoperation over time and promote ways to avoid unnecessary surgeries, lower health care costs to stakeholders, and ultimately improve patient care.

The Value of Fusional Convergence Amplitudes in Esodeviation Surgery Without Adjustable Sutures

PURPOSE

To explore the application of preoperative fusional convergence amplitudes in the selection of a target angle for non-adjustable suture strabismus surgery with deteriorated intermittent esotropia and diplopia.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive cases of presumed acquired non-accommodative, deteriorated intermittent esotropia managed surgically between 2005 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. For each individual, a target angle (deviation angle for which surgery was based) was selected preoperatively after analysis of fusional convergence amplitudes. Outcomes in patients selected for overcorrection at 6 meters (target angle > angle in primary position at 6 meters) were compared to those who had planned surgery based on a target angle that did not exceed their measured angle (target angle ≤ angle in primary position) at 6 meters.

RESULTS

All 31 patients achieved binocular single vision in primary position at both near and 6 meters without prisms, orthoptic therapy, or additional surgery at 4 to 6 months postoperatively. Greater mean correction in the target angle > angle in primary position group compared to the target angle ≤ angle in primary position group was observed, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .57).

CONCLUSIONS

Among this diagnostically specific cohort with intermittent esotropia with symptomatic diplopia and measurable binocular single vision preoperatively, targeted surgery based on an analysis of preexisting fusional convergence amplitudes had an outcome that compared favorably to that of documented adjustable suture strabismus surgery. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018;55(6):375-381.].