Esotropia with an accommodative component after surgery for infantile esotropia compared to primary accommodative esotropia

Long-term Motor and Sensory Outcomes After Unilateral Medial Rectus Recession-Lateral Rectus Resection for Infantile Esotropia

PURPOSE

To report long-term motor and sensory outcomes after unilateral medial rectus recession-lateral rectus resection for infantile esotropia.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who had undergone unilateral medial rectus recession-lateral rectus resection for infantile esotropia and were followed up postoperatively for a minimum of 10 years were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included. The mean age at surgery was 2.9 ± 2.2 years (range: 2.5 months to 9.0 years). The mean postoperative follow-up was 15.7 ± 4.4 years (range:10.0 to 27.5 years). Overall, 54 patients (54%) had surgical success at their last follow-up visit. Age at first surgery, strabismus duration, degree of hyperopia, preoperative size of deviation, presence of dissociated vertical deviation, inferior oblique overaction, or both dissociated vertical deviation and inferior oblique overaction, and the number of esotropia surgeries did not predict motor outcome after surgery. Consecutive exotropia developed in 43% of patients (constant in 18% and intermittent in 25%). Residual and recurrent esotropia occurred in 20% and 21% of patients, respectively. Refractive accommodative esotropia developed in 17% of patients and there was a high accommodation convergence/accommodation ratio esotropia in 2%. Peripheral binocular single vision was achieved in 54% of patients and stereopsis in 1%. Patients with 1.5 years or less of strabismus duration had better chances of achieving peripheral binocular single vision.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of the patients with infantile esotropia achieved a successful long-term motor outcome and peripheral binocular single vision. Consecutive exotropia occurred frequently. Recurrent esotropia and refractive accommodative esotropia developed in some patients, and a high accommodation convergence/accommodation ratio esotropia in a few. Stereopsis outcome was extremely poor. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(2):106-113.].

Surgical outcomes for esotropia in children with high accommodative convergence/accommodation ratio

Purpose

To assess if high accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio impacts surgical outcomes in children with esotropia (ET), and evaluate the appropriate target angle in surgical dosing in the presence of high AC/A ratio.

Methods

A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent primary bilateral medial rectus (BMR) recessions for ET. Patients were excluded if follow-up was ≤2 months. Basic demographic information, visual acuity, stereopsis, alignment, and target angle for surgery were collected. High AC/A was defined as ≥10 prism diopter (Δ) deviation at near compared to distance. Outcome parameters were near and distance deviations ≤10Δ within orthophoria, and/or stereopsis postoperatively. Yates' continuity correction, unpaired t-test, regression analysis, and one-way ANOVA were used.

Results

We identified 103 patients, 23 with high AC/A and 80 with normal AC/A, preoperatively. Mean age was 4.0 ± 2.5 years. Surgical success measured by postoperative alignment was 48% and 45% in the high AC/A and normal AC/A groups, respectively (P = 1.0). There was a statistically significant difference in preoperative near deviation between high AC/A and normal AC/A groups (P = 0.0015); however, there was no significant difference in preoperative distance deviation (P = 0.061). In addition, there was not a significant difference in preoperative or postoperative stereopsis between high AC/A and normal AC/A groups (P = 0.88 and P = 0.44, respectively). There was a significant difference in the normal AC/A and high AC/A groups when target angle was directed toward preoperative near deviation as determined by one-way ANOVA (F = 170.88, P < 0.0001 and F = 14.61, P = 0.0010, respectively).

Conclusion

In the setting of ET treated with BMR recession, the presence of high AC/A does not affect surgical success as measured by alignment and stereopsis. In addition, when high AC/A is present, surgical dosing with a target angle toward near deviation was found to yield the best surgical outcomes in our patient population.

Accommodative esotropia: the state of the art

PURPOSE

To review the state of the art of Accommodative Esotropia (AE) through careful study of what has been reported up to the point in literature.

METHODS

A literature search was done on PubMed using key words including "Accommodative esotropia", "Infantile esotropia", "Strabismus" and "Accommodation". We systematically reviewed and critically appraised what has been written about AE and we tried to analyze that according to the current management of AE.

RESULTS

Accommodative Esotropia (AE) is a form of strabismus characterized by convergent misalignment of the visual axes that can be associated with hyperopia and abnormal fusional divergence. Also abnormal accommodative convergence/accommodation ratio could be found. In lots of cases, AE initially presents as an intermittent esodeviation at age 1.5 to 4 years. The prevalence of AE has been estimated near 1-2% in the United States. The only treatment with an optical correction usually is successful in re-establishing alignment, but surgical correction is necessary in approximately 30% of cases.