Clinical and ocular motor complications of extraocular muscle extirpation for infantile nystagmus syndrome

A New Clinical Method for Visual Function Evaluation Including Estimation and Measurement of Therapeutic Effectiveness: Lessons From Infantile Nystagmus Research

PURPOSE

To translate infantile nystagmus system (INS) research into easily understood, clinically relevant terminology and suggest modifications to research and clinical testing, data and clinical interpretation, and therapeutic choices and evaluation.

METHODS

A clinical method is presented using only three best-corrected visual acuity measurements of patients with INS, whereby (1) a measure of the quality of visual acuity across the visual field is possible; (2) pre-therapy estimates of post-therapy improvements in peak acuity and the high-acuity range of gaze angles are possible; and (3) more realistic visual function outcome measures of therapy are available to the practitioner.

RESULTS

The application of the high-acuity field quality spreadsheet to the analyses of patients with INS (before and after therapy) results in a quantitative measure of visual function based on three visual acuity measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinician can now duplicate adequate functional visual acuity descriptions in patients with INS along with their pre-therapy estimates and outcome measures. Previously, these have only been available to researchers or the rare clinicians who have access to both eye movement data and the expanded nystagmus acuity function analysis of INS waveforms. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2021;58(3):188-195.].

Surgical interventions for infantile nystagmus syndrome

BACKGROUND

Infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) is a type of eye movement disorder that can negatively impact vision. Currently, INS cannot be cured, but its effects can potentially be treated pharmacologically, optically, or surgically. This review focuses on the surgical interventions for INS. Despite the range of surgical interventions available, and currently applied in practice for the management of INS, there is no clear consensus, and no accepted clinical guidelines regarding the relative efficacy and safety of the various treatment options. A better understanding of these surgical options, along with their associated side effects, will assist clinicians in evidence-based decision-making in relation to the management of INS.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of surgical interventions for INS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) to 3 July 2020, with no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) studying the efficacy and safety of surgical options for treating INS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our prespecified outcome measures were the change from baseline in: binocular best-corrected distance visual acuity; head posture; amplitude, frequency, intensity, and foveation period durations of the nystagmus waveform; visual recognition times; quality of life and self-reported outcome measures; incidence of adverse effects with a probable causal link to treatment; and permanent adverse effects after surgery. Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts and full-text articles, extracted data from eligible RCTs, and judged the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. We reached consensus on any disagreements by discussion. We summarised the overall certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We only identified one eligible RCT (N = 10 participants), undertaken in India. This trial randomised participants to receive either a large retro-equatorial recession of the horizontal rectus muscle of 9 mm on the medial rectus and 12 mm on the lateral rectus, or a simple tenotomy and resuturing of the four horizontal rectus muscles. We did not identify any RCTs comparing a surgical intervention for INS relative to no treatment. In the single eligible RCT, both eyes of each participant received the same intervention. The participants' age and gender were not reported, nor was information on whether participants were idiopathic or had sensory disorders. The study only included participants with null in primary position and did not explicitly exclude those with congenital periodic alternating nystagmus. The study did not report funding source(s) or author declaration of interests. The evaluation period was six months. We judged this study at low risk for sequence generation and other sources of bias, but at high risk of bias for performance and detection bias. The risk of bias was unclear for selection bias, attrition bias, and reporting bias. There is very uncertain evidence about the effect of the interventions on visual acuity and change in amplitude, frequency, and intensity of the nystagmus waveform. We were unable to calculate relative effects due to lack of data. None of the participants in either intervention group reported adverse effects at six-month follow-up (very low-certainty evidence). There was no quantitative data reported for quality of life, although the study reported an improvement in quality of life after surgery in both intervention groups (very low-certainty evidence). Change in head posture, foveation period durations of the nystagmus waveform, visual recognition times, and permanent adverse effects after surgery were not reported in the included study. We judged the certainty of the evidence, for both the primary and secondary efficacy outcomes, to be very low. Due to a lack of comprehensive reporting of adverse events, there was also very low-certainty of the safety profile of the evaluated surgical interventions in this population. As such, we are very uncertain about the relative efficacy and safety of these interventions for the surgical management of INS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review identified minimal high-quality evidence relating to the efficacy and safety of surgical interventions for INS. The limited availability of evidence must be considered by clinicians when treating INS, particularly given these procedures are irreversible and often performed on children. More high-quality RCTs are needed to better understand the efficacy and safety profile of surgical interventions for INS. This will assist clinicians, people with INS, and their parents or caregivers to make evidence-based treatment decisions.

Longitudinal Studies and Eye-Movement-Based Treatments of Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome: Estimated and Measured Therapeutic Improvements in Three Complex Cases

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

To demonstrate the utility of using eye-movement data to reveal the diagnostic characteristics of infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS), determine treatment, and both estimate and document therapeutic improvements in three patients with well-developed foveation periods, fairly broad, lateral gaze "nulls," head turns, strabismus, and complex, multiplanar nystagmus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Infrared reflection, magnetic search coil, and high-speed digital video systems were used to record the eye movements of INS patients, pre- and post-Kestenbaum null-point correction surgery (horizontal or vertical). Data were analyzed and estimations made, using the eXpanded Nystagmus Acuity Function (NAFX) that is part of the OMtools toolbox for MATLAB.

RESULTS

In all three subjects (S1-S3), both peak NAFX and longest foveation domain (LFD) improved from their pre-Kestenbaum values. S1: 0.700-0.745 (6.4%) and 25-34° (36%), respectively. S2: 0.445-0.633 (42.4%) and >40° to >50° (10%), respectively. S3: 0.250-0.300 (20%) and 13° to ≫18° (see text), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

S1: Even at the high ends of the pre-therapy NAFX and LFD spectra, INS foveation (and therefore, visual-function) improvements may be adequate to justify nystagmus surgery and provide clinical improvements beneficial to the patient. S2: INS foveation improvements in the vertical plane are equal to those originally estimated using the horizontal data in prior patients. S3: Two apparent NAFX peaks can be converted into a very broad peak by surgery based on the preferred lower peak.