Evaluation of pediatric ophthalmologists' perspectives of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology

A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84

BACKGROUND

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, and there is a critical need for a nuanced understanding of how AI is reshaping teaching, learning, and educational practice in medical education. This review aimed to map the literature regarding AI applications in medical education, core areas of findings, potential candidates for formal systematic review and gaps for future research.

METHODS

This rapid scoping review, conducted over 16 weeks, employed Arksey and O'Malley's framework and adhered to STORIES and BEME guidelines. A systematic and comprehensive search across PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and MedEdPublish was conducted without date or language restrictions. Publications included in the review spanned undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education, encompassing both original studies and perspective pieces. Data were charted by multiple author pairs and synthesized into various thematic maps and charts, ensuring a broad and detailed representation of the current landscape.

RESULTS

The review synthesized 278 publications, with a majority (68%) from North American and European regions. The studies covered diverse AI applications in medical education, such as AI for admissions, teaching, assessment, and clinical reasoning. The review highlighted AI's varied roles, from augmenting traditional educational methods to introducing innovative practices, and underscores the urgent need for ethical guidelines in AI's application in medical education.

CONCLUSION

The current literature has been charted. The findings underscore the need for ongoing research to explore uncharted areas and address potential risks associated with AI use in medical education. This work serves as a foundational resource for educators, policymakers, and researchers in navigating AI's evolving role in medical education. A framework to support future high utility reporting is proposed, the FACETS framework.

Unanswered Questions Pertaining to the Economic and Workforce Issues in Pediatric Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To create a survey that examines remaining unanswered questions related to the economic and workforce issues in pediatric ophthalmology.

METHODS

A 12-question survey was distributed to U.S.-based pediatric ophthalmologists on the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) discussion board and various other social media forums. Statistical analysis was performed on the basis of practice setting groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-seven pediatric ophthalmologists completed the survey. Of all respondents, 150 (52.3%) believed pediatric ophthalmology is a prestigious subspecialty, 137 (47.7%) thought that a hybrid fellowship combining pediatric ophthalmology and adult cataract surgery would increase the number of practicing pediatric ophthalmologists, 189 (65.9%) felt that early exposure during medical school would increase the number of residents who ultimately apply to pediatric ophthalmology fellowship, and 81 (28.2%) believed that the lobbyists hired by the AAPOS will be successful in preventing further Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement cuts. Medicaid patients comprised more than 25% of the total practice for 156 (54.4%) respondents. New patient, follow-up, and surgery wait times were greater than 2 months in 50.9%, 46.7%, and 38.7% of respondents, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

As the economic crisis in pediatric ophthalmology continues to worsen, questions related to increasing interest in the field through early exposure, hybrid fellowship, prestige, appointment wait times, and belief in the success of AAPOS lobbyists remain. Exceptional measures are required to revitalize the field and improve access to care. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(3):163-169.].

Artificial intelligence-based pathologic myopia identification system in the ophthalmology residency training program

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been successfully applied to the screening tasks of fundus diseases. However, few studies focused on the potential of AI to aid medical teaching in the residency training program. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the AI-based pathologic myopia (PM) identification system in the ophthalmology residency training program and assess the residents’ feedback on this system.

Materials and Methods: Ninety residents in the ophthalmology department at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University were randomly assigned to three groups. In group A, residents learned PM through an AI-based PM identification system. In group B and group C, residents learned PM through a traditional lecture given by two senior specialists independently. The improvement in resident performance was evaluated by comparing the pre-and post-lecture scores of a specifically designed test using a paired t-test. The difference among the three groups was evaluated by one-way ANOVA. Residents’ evaluations of the AI-based PM identification system were measured by a 17-item questionnaire.

Results: The post-lecture scores were significantly higher than the pre-lecture scores in group A (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference between pre-and post-lecture scores in group B (p = 0.628) and group C (p = 0.158). Overall, all participants were satisfied and agreed that the AI-based PM identification system was effective and helpful to acquire PM identification, myopic maculopathy (MM) classification, and “Plus” lesion localization.

Conclusion: It is still difficult for ophthalmic residents to promptly grasp the knowledge of identification of PM through a single traditional lecture, while the AI-based PM identification system effectively improved residents’ performance in PM identification and received satisfactory feedback from residents. The application of the AI-based PM identification system showed advantages in promoting the efficiency of the ophthalmology residency training program.

Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) needs to be accepted and understood by physicians and medical students, but few have systematically assessed their attitudes. We investigated clinical AI acceptance among physicians and medical students around the world to provide implementation guidance.

Materials and methods

We conducted a two-stage study, involving a foundational systematic review of physician and medical student acceptance of clinical AI. This enabled us to design a suitable web-based questionnaire which was then distributed among practitioners and trainees around the world.

Results

Sixty studies were included in this systematic review, and 758 respondents from 39 countries completed the online questionnaire. Five (62.50%) of eight studies reported 65% or higher awareness regarding the application of clinical AI. Although, only 10–30% had actually used AI and 26 (74.28%) of 35 studies suggested there was a lack of AI knowledge. Our questionnaire uncovered 38% awareness rate and 20% utility rate of clinical AI, although 53% lacked basic knowledge of clinical AI. Forty-five studies mentioned attitudes toward clinical AI, and over 60% from 38 (84.44%) studies were positive about AI, although they were also concerned about the potential for unpredictable, incorrect results. Seventy-seven percent were optimistic about the prospect of clinical AI. The support rate for the statement that AI could replace physicians ranged from 6 to 78% across 40 studies which mentioned this topic. Five studies recommended that efforts should be made to increase collaboration. Our questionnaire showed 68% disagreed that AI would become a surrogate physician, but believed it should assist in clinical decision-making. Participants with different identities, experience and from different countries hold similar but subtly different attitudes.

Conclusion

Most physicians and medical students appear aware of the increasing application of clinical AI, but lack practical experience and related knowledge. Overall, participants have positive but reserved attitudes about AI. In spite of the mixed opinions around clinical AI becoming a surrogate physician, there was a consensus that collaborations between the two should be strengthened. Further education should be conducted to alleviate anxieties associated with change and adopting new technologies.