Sex Differences in the Combined Ablation and Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Results From LAACablation Registry

Prognostic Impact of Left Atrial Appendage Patency After Device Closure

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of left atrial appendage (LAA) patency, including those with and without visible peri-device leak (PDL), post-LAA closure in patients with atrial fibrillation, remains elusive.

METHODS

Patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with the WATCHMAN 2.5 device were prospectively enrolled. The device surveillance by cardiac computed tomography angiography was performed at 3 months post-procedure. Adverse events, including stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and the combined major adverse events (MAEs), were compared between patients with complete closure and LAA patency.

RESULTS

Among 519 patients with cardiac computed tomography angiography surveillance at 3 months post-LAA closure, 271 (52.2%) showed complete closure, and LAA patency was detected in 248 (47.8%) patients, including 196 (37.8%) with visible PDL and 52 (10.0%) without visible PDL. During a median of 1193 (787-1543) days follow-up, the presence of LAA patency was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (adjusted hazard ratio for baseline differences, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.17-8.83]; P=0.023) and MAEs (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.17]; P=0.003). Specifically, LAA patency with visible PDL was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (hazard ratio, 3.66 [95% CI, 1.29-10.42]; P=0.015) and MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.71 [95% CI, 1.71-8.07]; P=0.001), although LAA patency without visible PDL showed higher risks of MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.59 [95% CI, 1.28-10.09]; P=0.015). Incidences of stroke/TIA (2.8% versus 3.0% versus 6.7% versus 22.2%; P=0.010), cardiovascular death (0.9% versus 0% versus 1.7% versus 11.1%; P=0.005), and MAEs (4.6% versus 9.0% versus 11.7% versus 22.2%; P=0.017) increased with larger PDL (0, >0 to ≤3, >3 to ≤5, or >5 mm). Older age and discontinuing antiplatelet therapy at 6 months were independent predictors of stroke/TIA and MAEs in patients with LAA patency.

CONCLUSIONS

LAA patency detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography at 3 months post-LAA closure is associated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with WATCHMAN 2.5 device.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03788941.

Incidence, impact and predictors of residual device patency after left atrial appendage closure with the LACbes device

BACKGROUND

The residual device patency (RDP) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the LACbes device has not been specifically explored in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. This study aims to explore the incidence, impact and predictors of RDP detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) post LAAC.

METHODS

AF patients implanted with the LACbes device were prospectively enrolled. CCTA device surveillance was performed at 3 months post-procedure. Major adverse events (MAEs), including stroke/transient ischemic attack, major bleeding and all-cause death, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 141 patients with CCTA surveillance, 56 (39.7%) showed no visible leak and 85 (60.3%) showed RDP. During the median follow-up of 443 [232, 706] days, the presence of RDP was not associated with an increased risk of MAEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-34.24, p = 0.196), while peri-device leak (PDL) at the lobe was associated with heightened risks of MAEs (adjusted HR: 6.85, 95% CI: 1.62-28.89, p = 0.009). In patients with PDL at the lobe, antiplatelet after 6 months (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.91, p = 0.038) was independent protective predictor of MAEs. Besides, current smoking (odds ratio [OR]: 7.52, 95% CI: 2.68-21.08, p < 0.001) and maximum diameter of LAA orifice (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.00-1.34, p = 0.048) were independent predictors of PDL at the lobe.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of PDL at the device lobe detected by CCTA at 3-month post LAAC with LACbes is associated with unfavorable prognosis in AF patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03788941.

Combined Radiofrequency Ablation and Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and comorbid heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFrEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is of clinical importance but a great challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of the combined radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedure in AF patients complicated with systolic HF.

METHODS

AF patients with HFrEF or HFmrEF who underwent the combined RFCA and LAAC procedure were prospectively enrolled in the LAACablation registry. The procedural complications and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Another cohort of AF patients with systolic HF who did not undergo either RFCA or LAAC were used for prognosis comparison.

RESULTS

Among 802 AF patients who underwent the combined procedure, 65 patients were comorbid with systolic HF (25 with HFrEF and 40 with HFmrEF). The overall procedural complication rate was 9.2%, which was mainly attributed to acute decompensated HF (6.2%). Accompanied with markedly reduced AF burden (from median [25th, 75th percentile]: 100 [100, 100] to 0 [0, 1.2]%, p < 0.001), upward trajectories of cardiac function were observed in 51 (78.4%) patients, showing improvement in New York Heart Classification (p < 0.01), natriuretic peptide levels (from 1492 [809, 3259] to 413 [163, 880] pg/mL, p < 0.001) and left ventricular EF (from 42.6 ± 5.3 to 53.8 ± 8.2%, p < 0.001). During the 27-month follow-up period, death, thromboembolism, major bleeding, and HF rehospitalization were observed in three, one, one, and four patients, respectively. The observed event rates showed a significant reduction compared with the non-procedure AF-HF cohort (n = 138; for composite endpoint: hazard ratio: 2.509, 95% confidence interval: 1.415-4.449, p = 0.002) and with the respective rates predicted by risk scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining RFCA and LAAC achieves acceptable safety and credible long-term efficacy in AF patients with systolic HF. Further randomized studies are warranted in a larger patient cohort.