Aspirin Use in Chronic Heart Failure

The Role of Antithrombotic Therapy in Heart Failure

Heart failure is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality burden affecting approximately 1-2% of adults in developed countries, mounting to over 10% in individuals aged >70 years old. Heart failure is characterized by a prothrombotic state and increased rates of stroke and thromboembolism have been reported in heart failure patients compared with the general population. However, the impact of antithrombotic therapy on heart failure remains controversial. Administration of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is the obvious (and well-established) choice in heart failure patients with cardiovascular comorbidity that necessitates their use, such as coronary artery disease or atrial fibrillation. In contrast, antithrombotic therapy has not demonstrated any clear benefit when administered for heart failure per se, i.e. with heart failure being the sole indication. Randomized studies have reported decreased stroke rates with warfarin use in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, but at the expense of excessive bleeding. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants have shown a better safety profile in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation compared with warfarin, however, current evidence about their role in heart failure with sinus rhythm is inconclusive and further research is needed. In the present review, we discuss the role of antithrombotic therapy in heart failure (beyond coronary artery disease), aiming to summarize evidence regarding the thrombotic risk and the role of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents in patients with heart failure.

Impaired resolution of inflammation in human chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Lipoxins (LXs) are proresolving and anti-inflammatory eicosanoids whose role in chronic heart failure (CHF) pathogenesis has never been investigated. This study evaluated levels of LXs in CHF patients, its relationship with disease severity and correlation with established CHF biomarkers. The effect of low-dose aspirin [acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)] on the levels of LXs was also studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lipoxin A4 (LXA4 ), 15-epi-lipoxin A4 (15-epi-LXA4 ) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentration and activity were evaluated by immunoenzymatic and spectrophotometric assays in 34 CHF patients [New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I to IV]. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), troponin, myoglobin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and uric acid (UA) were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients were stratified into mild-to-moderate CHF (NYHA, classes I and II) and severe CHF (NYHA classes III and IV). Severe patients had lower plasma LXA4 (0·262 ± 0·034 vs. 0·362 ± 0·039 ng/mL, P < 0·05) and decreased urinary 15-epi-LXA4 levels (2·28 ± 0·44 vs. 4·88 ± 1·03 μg/day, P < 0·05) besides exhibiting increased plasma BNP (1464 ± 442 vs. 555 ± 162 pg/mL, P < 0·05) and MPO activity (45·15 ± 11·56 vs. 15·90 ± 2·80 μmol/min/mg protein, P < 0·05). Plasma LXA4 was inversely correlated with BNP, troponin, myoglobin, CRP, UA and MPO activity. ASA treatment was associated with higher urinary excretion of 15-epi-LXA4 (7·70 ± 1·48 vs. 2·06 ± 0·30 μg/day, P < 0·05) in mild-to-moderate CHF patients and lower BNP levels in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher severity of CHF is associated with reduced levels of LXs. Plasma LXA4 appears to be a valuable marker for risk stratification in CHF. Furthermore, the ASA-related increase in urinary 15-epi-LXA4 suggests enhanced renal synthesis of this eicosanoid and may represent a disregarded benefit of ASA.

Prediction of human genes and diseases targeted by xenobiotics using predictive toxicogenomic-derived models (PTDMs)

New technologies for systems-level determinants of human exposure to drugs, industrial chemicals, pesticides, and other environmental agents provide an invaluable opportunity to extend the understanding of human health and potential environmental hazards. We report here the development of a new computational-systems toxicology framework, called predictive toxicogenomics-derived models (PTDMs). PTDMs integrate three networks of chemical-gene interactions (CGIs), chemical-disease associations (CDAs) and gene-disease associations (GDAs) to infer chemical hazard profiles, identify exposure data gaps and to incorporate genes and disease networks into chemical safety evaluations. Three comprehensive networks addressing CGI, CDA and GDA extracted from the comparative toxicogenomics database (CTD) were constructed. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve ranged from 0.85 to 0.97 and were yielded using our methodology using a 10-fold cross validation by a simulation carried out 100 times. As the illustrated examples show, we predicted new potential target genes and diseases for bisphenol A and aspirin. The molecular hypothesis and experimental evidence from published literature for these predictions were provided. The results demonstrated that our method has potential applications for chemical profiling in human health exposure and environmental hazard assessment.

Gene expression profiling in peripheral blood nuclear cells in patients with refractory ischaemic end-stage heart failure

Functional analysis of up- and down-regulated genes might reveal whether peripheral blood cells may be considered as a material of diagnostic or prognostic value in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). The aim of the present study was to compare the transcriptomic profile of peripheral blood nuclear cells from 6 male patients with ischaemic end-stage HF with those of 6 male patients with asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction. The expression of genes in peripheral blood nuclear cells in both groups of patients was measured using whole-genome oligonucleotide microarrays utilizing 35 035 oligonucleotide probes. Microarray analyses revealed 130 down-regulated genes and 15 up-regulated genes in the patients with end-stage HF. Some of the down-regulated genes belonged to the pathways that other studies have shown to be down-regulated in cardiomyopathy. We also identified up-regulated genes that have been correlated with HF severity (CXCL16) and genes involved in the regulation of expression of platelet activation factor receptor (PTAFR, RBPSUH, MCC, and PSMA7). In conclusion, the identification of genes that are differentially expressed in peripheral blood nuclear cells of patients with HF supports the suggestion that this diagnostic approach may be useful in searching for the molecular predisposition for development of severe refractory HF in patients with post-infarction asymptomatic abnormalities and remodelling of the left ventricle. These results need further investigation and validation.

Does aspirin use adversely influence intermediate-term postdischarge outcomes for hospitalized patients who are treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers? Findings from Organized Program to Facilitate Life-Saving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF)

BACKGROUND

Conflicting data exist regarding a potential deleterious association between aspirin (ASA) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) when used concurrently in patients with heart failure (HF). How such an interaction may be influenced by underlying etiology of HF and whether it extends to patients treated with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), however, are not known.

METHODS

Eligible patients from the OPTIMIZE-HF registry were dichotomized into those with ischemic or nonischemic HF. Potential associations between ASA and ACEI or ARB use and 60- to 90-day postdischarge outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional and logistic regression modeling. Models were adjusted for factors known to influence the outcome of interest and by propensity score for ACEI or ARB prescription after an index HF admission.

RESULTS

Mortality was not increased (hazard ratio [95% CI]) when ASA was used in conjunction with ACEI (0.51 [0.29-0.87]) or ARB (0.29 [0.09-0.96]) in patients with ischemic or nonischemic (ACEI 0.71 [0.42-1.21], ARB 1.42 [0.74-2.74]) HF. Regression model parameter estimates trended toward harm reduction, but interaction terms for mortality and a composite of mortality or rehospitalization were nonsignificant (P for all >.05).

CONCLUSIONS

When combined with ACEI or ARB, ASA had no demonstrable adverse effect on intermediate-term postdischarge outcomes for patients with ischemic or nonischemic HF.

Adherence to guideline-recommended adjunctive heart failure therapies among outpatient cardiology practices (findings from IMPROVE HF)

Although previous studies have documented adherence with certain established heart failure (HF) quality metrics in outpatient cardiology practices, the extent to which there is conformity with other evidence-based, guideline-driven quality metrics in outpatients with HF is unknown. IMPROVE HF is a prospective cohort study designed to characterize the current management of patients with chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Aged
• Ambulatory Care/organization & administration
• Black People/statistics & numerical data
• Cardiology Service, Hospital
• Cohort Studies
• Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data
• Female
• Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data
• Heart Failure/diagnosis
• Heart Failure/ethnology
• Heart Failure/therapy
• Humans
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Practice Guidelines as Topic
• Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data
• Registries
• Retrospective Studies
• Risk Factors
• United States
• Black or African American

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Clyde W Yancy Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Gregg C Fonarow
Nancy M Albert
Anne B Curtis
Wendy Gattis Stough
Mihai Gheorghiade
J Thomas Heywood
Mark L McBride
Mandeep R Mehra
Christopher M O'Connor
Dwight Reynolds
Mary Norine Walsh

Collapse

Aspirin resistance: disparities and clinical implications

Abstract Aspirin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with vascular disease. Yet, aspirin is unable to prevent thrombosis in all patients. The term "aspirin resistance" has been used to broadly define the failure of aspirin to prevent a thrombotic event. Whether this is directly related to aspirin itself through biochemical aspirin resistance or treatment failure, or if it is because of aspirin's inability to overcome the thrombogenic aspects of the disease process itself, has not been elucidated. This can have dramatic clinical implications for a variety of vascular disease subsets and is cause for concern, considering the high prevalence of aspirin use for both primary and secondary prevention. Disparities exist in the rates of aspirin resistance among certain patient populations, such as women, patients with diabetes mellitus, and those with heart failure, and across clinical conditions, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Clinical trial data from studies observing resistance have revealed that regardless of study size, dose of aspirin, control for drug interactions and adherence, or assay used to measure platelet function, aspirin resistance is associated with an increased risk for adverse events. Although the evidence is mounting, there has yet to be a consensus on the appropriate clinical response to aspirin resistance.

Adverse drug reactions in patients with cardiovascular disease

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occur frequently in modern medical practice, increasing morbidity and mortality and inflating the cost of care. Patients with cardiovascular disease are particularly vulnerable to ADRs due to their advanced age, polypharmacy, and the influence of heart disease on drug metabolism. The ADR potential for a particular cardiovascular drug varies with the individual, the disease being treated, and the extent of exposure to other drugs. Knowledge of this complex interplay between patient, drug, and disease is a critical component of safe and effective cardiovascular disease management. The majority of significant ADRs involving cardiovascular drugs are predictable and therefore preventable. Better patient education, avoidance of polypharmacy, and clear communication between physicians, pharmacists, and patients, particularly during the transition between the inpatient to outpatient settings, can substantially reduce ADR risk.

Medication adherence in heart failure

Non-adherence with medical regimens in heart failure is a significant challenge and serves as a major reason that favorable outcomes associated with various therapies evaluated in clinical trials have not translated to the so-called real-world setting. Non-adherence has complex influences and is clearly associated with poorer outcomes. The approaches that are used or have been proposed to improve drug-taking behavior, such as in-hospital initiation of therapy, simplification of dosing regimens through adoption of combination and long-acting formulations, and improvements in provider-patient communication, are reviewed.

Clopidogrel Is Associated With a Lesser Increase in NT-proBNP When Compared to Aspirin in Patients With Ischemic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Aspirin has been associated with adverse heart failure outcomes, probably because of a blunting interaction with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Therefore, we hypothesized that clopidogrel when compared with aspirin would be associated with a slower progression of heart failure as determined by levels of amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In an open-label, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-period crossover study, 18 patients with ischemic heart failure (14 post-myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction 0.32 +/- 0.08), median age 73, New York Heart Association class II (11 patients) or III (7 patients), all taking ACE inhibitors were included. Patients were randomized to 8 weeks of aspirin 100 mg/day followed by 8 weeks of clopidogrel 75 mg/day, or the reversed sequence. Blood levels of NT-proBNP were measured using sandwich immunoassay. Patients on aspirin experienced an 8-times greater increase in log-transformed values of NT-proBNP compared with patients on clopidogrel (average change 4.757% versus 0.597%; P = .0395 for intervention, P = .4453 for period, P = .4046 for sequence). We observed no change in functional class, 6-minute walking test, creatinine levels, or electrolytes.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin is associated with a greater increase in natriuretic peptides (log-transformed NT-proBNP levels), implying that aspirin therapy is associated with a more progressive course of heart failure.

Aspirin Use and Outcomes in a Community-Based Cohort of 7352 Patients Discharged After First Hospitalization for Heart Failure

Background— The safety of aspirin in heart failure (HF) has been called into question, particularly in those patients (1) without coronary disease, (2) with renal dysfunction, or (3) treated with low-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and high-dose aspirin.

Methods and Results— We examined prescription patterns and outcomes (all-cause mortality and/or HF readmission) in patients discharged from 103 Canadian hospitals between April 1999 and March 2001 after a first hospitalization for HF. Of 7352 patients with HF (mean age, 75 years; 44% without coronary disease and 29% with renal dysfunction), 2785 (38%) died or required HF readmission within the first year. Compared with nonusers, aspirin users were no more likely to die or require HF readmission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 [0.91 to 1.16]), even in patients without coronary disease (HR, 0.98 [0.78 to 1.22]) or patients with renal dysfunction (HR, 1.13 [0.94 to 1.36]). On the other hand, users of ACE inhibitors were less likely to die or require HF readmission (HR, 0.87 [0.79 to 0.96]), even if they were using aspirin (HR, 0.86 [0.77 to 0.95]). There were no dose-dependent interactions between aspirin and ACE inhibitors.

Conclusions— In this observational study, aspirin use was not associated with an increase in mortality rates or HF readmission rates, and aspirin did not attenuate the benefits of ACE inhibitors, even in patients without coronary disease, patients with renal dysfunction, or patients treated with high-dose aspirin and low-dose ACE inhibitors.

Antiplatelet therapy: current strategies and future trends

Pharmacological management of thrombotic complications is strongly influenced by antiplatelet treatment strategies. Recent clinical trials have clearly indicated that current antiplatelet strategies may not inhibit recurrent thrombotic events in selected patients and improvement is necessary. Recently, there has been a gradual modification in the guidelines for clopidogrel dosing. In addition, newly developed P2Y12 receptor inhibitors and thrombin inhibitors are undergoing Phase II and III clinical trials. Moreover, research related to novel agents that interfere with other steps in coagulation and platelet adhesion, and platelet thromboxane and thrombin receptor blockers, show promise. An important future step will probably be the development of personalized therapy based on defining the individual patient’s propensity for thrombosis through investigation of platelet–thrombin–fibrin interactions. Such an approach will enhance the targeting of specific therapy based on the pathophysiology of the individual patient.