Delayed Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Takayasu Arteritis

Carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic assessment of disease activity in Takayasu arteritis

AIMS

To investigate the usefulness of carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in assessment of disease activity in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After screening 219 CEUS records from 124 consecutive patients followed at our clinic between October 2014 and May 2018, data were analysed from 159 carotid CEUS from 86 patients diagnosed with Type I TA. Patients were categorized based on disease activity according to National Institutes of Health criteria into two groups: active disease group (92 CEUS) and non-active disease group (67 CEUS). The enhanced intensity of carotid artery wall: (i) was higher in active disease group than in non-active disease group (3.09 ± 1.67 dB vs. 1.44 ± 1.29 dB, P < 0.0001, respectively); and (ii) had a high predictive value for TA disease activity with area under the curve (AUC) of 86.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 79.7-92.9], sensitivity of 88.0%, and specificity of 79.1%. The latter AUC was not significantly affected (P > 0.05) when erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein level, or arterial wall thickness were added to assessment of disease activity in TA.

CONCLUSION

Carotid vascularization by CEUS, as sole inflammatory marker, had a high predictive value for disease activity in Type I TA.

Evaluation of takayasu arteritis with delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging by a free-breathing 3D IR turbo FLASH

The primary aim of our case-control study was to observe delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA) in comparison with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Twenty-seven patients including 15 with active TA and 12 with stable TA who underwent both aortic MRA and DCE-MRI were included. A total of 27 sex- and age-matched healthy volunteers were enrolled as the control group. MRA were obtained with T1WI-volume-interpolated breath-hold examination sequence or fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence. DCE-MRI was acquired with a free-breathing three-dimensional inversion recovery Turbo fast low-angle shot (3D IR Turbo FLASH). Neither stenosis nor delayed enhancement of arterial wall was shown in the control group. In patients with stable TA, arterial stenosis was observed on MRA. On DCE-MR, delayed enhancement of arterial walls could be observed in the active TA group but not in the stable TA group or the control group. Stenotic arteries on MRA were comparable in the active TA and stable TA (χ = 2.70, P = .259); however, delayed enhancement of arterial walls in the active-TA group were more than those in the stable group (χ = 27.00, P < .001). Our results suggest that DCE-MRI with the free-breathing 3D IR Turbo FLASH sequence could assess TA and delayed enhancement on DCE-MRI is one characteristics of the active TA.